The N-terminal domains of SOCS proteins: A conserved region in the disordered N-termini of SOCS4 and 5

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 946-957

  Feng, Zhi Ping ^a,b   Chandrashekaran, Indu R ^c   Low, Andrew ^a,b   Speed, Terence P ^a,b   Nicholson, Sandra E ^a,b   Norton, Raymond S ^c  

^a WALTER AND ELIZA HALL INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

CD; Cytokine signaling; Disordered protein; Eukaryotic linear motifs; NMR; SOCS proteins

Indexed keywords

SUPPRESSOR OF CYTOKINE SIGNALING; SUPPRESSOR OF CYTOKINE SIGNALING 4; SUPPRESSOR OF CYTOKINE SIGNALING 5; SUPPRESSOR OF CYTOKINE SIGNALING 6; SUPPRESSOR OF CYTOKINE SIGNALING 7; TRIFLUOROETHANOL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CIRCULAR DICHROISM; CONTROLLED STUDY; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; VERTEBRATE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; MICE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SUPPRESSOR OF CYTOKINE SIGNALING PROTEINS;

EUKARYOTA; MAMMALIA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 84856777596     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.23252     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Ihle JN, Kerr IM. Jaks and Stats in signaling by the cytokine receptor superfamily. Trends Genet 1995; 11: 69-74.
2. Starr R, Willson TA, Viney EM, Murray LJ, Rayner JR, Jenkins BJ, Gonda TJ, Alexander WS, Metcalf D, Nicola NA, Hilton DJ. A family of cytokine-inducible inhibitors of signalling. Nature 1997; 387: 917-921.
3. Endo TA, Masuhara M, Yokouchi M, Suzuki R, Sakamoto H, Mitsui K, Matsumoto A, Tanimura S, Ohtsubo M, Misawa H, Miyazaki T, Leonor N, Taniguchi T, Fujita T, Kanakura Y, Komiya S, Yoshimura A. A new protein containing an SH2 domain that inhibits JAK kinases. Nature 1997; 387: 921-924.
4. Ilangumaran S, Ramanathan S, Rottapel R. Regulation of the immune system by SOCS family adaptor proteins. Semin Immunol 2004; 16: 351-365.
5. Nicholson SE, Hilton DJ. The SOCS proteins: a new family of negative regulators of signal transduction. J Leukoc Biol 1998; 63: 665-668.
6. Alexander WS, Hilton DJ. The role of suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins in regulation of the immune response. Annu Rev Immunol 2004; 22: 503-529.
7. Alexander WS, Starr R, Fenner JE, Scott CL, Handman E, Sprigg NS, Corbin JE, Cornish AL, Darwiche R, Owczarek CM, Kay TW, Nicola NA, Hertzog PJ, Metcalf D, Hilton DJ. SOCS1 is a critical inhibitor of interferon-γ signaling and prevents the potentially fatal neonatal actions of this cytokine. Cell 1999; 98: 597-608.
8. Croker BA, Krebs DL, Zhang JG, Wormald S, Willson TA, Stanley EG, Robb L, Greenhalgh CJ, Forster I, Clausen BE, Nicola NA, Metcalf D, Hilton DJ, Roberts AW, Alexander WS. SOCS3 negatively regulates IL-6 signaling in vivo. Nat Immunol 2003; 4: 540-545.
9. Hilton DJ, Richardson RT, Alexander WS, Viney EM, Willson TA, Sprigg NS, Starr R, Nicholson SE, Metcalf D, Nicola NA. Twenty proteins containing a C-terminal SOCS box form five structural classes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 114-119.
10. Babon JJ, McManus EJ, Yao S, DeSouza DP, Mielke LA, Sprigg NS, Willson TA, Hilton DJ, Nicola NA, Baca M, Nicholson SE, Norton RS. The structure of SOCS3 reveals the basis of the extended SH2 domain function and identifies an unstructured insertion that regulates stability. Mol Cell 2006; 22: 205-216.
11. Elliott J, Johnston JA. SOCS: role in inflammation, allergy and homeostasis. Trends Immunol 2004; 25: 434-440.
12. Babon JJ, Sabo JK, Zhang JG, Nicola NA, Norton RS. The SOCS box encodes a hierarchy of affinities for Cullin5: implications for ubiquitin ligase formation and cytokine signalling suppression. J Mol Biol 2009; 387: 162-174.
13. Bergamin E, Wu J, Hubbard SR. Structural basis for phosphotyrosine recognition by suppressor of cytokine signaling-3. Structure 2006; 14: 1285-1292.
14. Nicholson SE, Willson TA, Farley A, Starr R, Zhang JG, Baca M, Alexander WS, Metcalf D, Hilton DJ, Nicola NA. Mutational analyses of the SOCS proteins suggest a dual domain requirement but distinct mechanisms for inhibition of LIF and IL-6 signal transduction. EMBO J 1999; 18: 375-385.
15. Bullock AN, Debreczeni JE, Edwards AM, Sundstrom M, Knapp S. Crystal structure of the SOCS2-elongin C-elongin B complex defines a prototypical SOCS box ubiquitin ligase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 7637-7642.
16. Bullock AN, Rodriguez MC, Debreczeni JE, Songyang Z, Knapp S. Structure of the SOCS4-ElonginB/C complex reveals a distinct SOCS box interface and the molecular basis for SOCS-dependent EGFR degradation. Structure 2007; 15: 1493-1504.
17. Babon JJ, Sabo JK, Soetopo A, Yao S, Bailey MF, Zhang JG, Nicola NA, Norton RS. The SOCS box domain of SOCS3: structure and interaction with the elonginBC-cullin5 ubiquitin ligase. J Mol Biol 2008; 381: 928-940.
18. Yoshimura A, Naka T, Kubo M. SOCS proteins, cytokine signalling and immune regulation. Nat Rev Immunol 2007; 7: 454-465.
19. Nicholson SE, Metcalf D, Sprigg NS, Columbus R, Walker F, Silva A, Cary D, Willson TA, Zhang JG, Hilton DJ, Alexander WS, Nicola NA. Suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS)-5 is a potential negative regulator of epidermal growth factor signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 2328-2333.
20. Segatto O, Anastasi S, Alema S. Regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor signalling by inducible feedback inhibitors. J Cell Sci 2011; 124: 1785-1793.
21. Seki Y, Hayashi K, Matsumoto A, Seki N, Tsukada J, Ransom J, Naka T, Kishimoto T, Yoshimura A, Kubo M. Expression of the suppressor of cytokine signaling-5 (SOCS5) negatively regulates IL-4-dependent STAT6 activation and Th2 differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 13003-13008.
22. Dunker AK, Cortese MS, Romero P, Iakoucheva LM, Uversky VN. Flexible nets. The roles of intrinsic disorder in protein interaction networks. FEBS J 2005; 272: 5129-5148.
23. Dyson H, Wright PE. Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005; 6: 197-208.
24. Tompa P, Szasz C, Buday L. Structural disorder throws new light on moonlighting. Trends Biochem Sci 2005; 30: 484-489.
25. Uversky VN, Oldfield CJ, Dunker AK. Showing your ID: intrinsic disorder as an ID for recognition, regulation and cell signaling. J Mol Recognit 2005; 18: 343-384.
26. Feng ZP, Zhang X, Han P, Arora N, Anders RF, Norton RS. Abundance of intrinsically unstructured proteins in P. falciparum and other apicomplexan parasite proteomes. Mol Biochem Parasitol 2006; 150: 256-267.
27. Linding R, Jensen LJ, Diella F, Bork P, Gibson TJ, Russell RB. Protein disorder prediction: implications for structural proteomics. Structure 2003; 11: 1453-1459.
28. Liu J, Tan H, Rost B. Loopy proteins appear conserved in evolution. J Mol Biol 2002; 322: 53-64.
29. Mohan A, Sullivan WJ, Jr, Radivojac P, Dunker AK, Uversky VN. Intrinsic disorder in pathogenic and non-pathogenic microbes: discovering and analyzing the unfoldomes of early-branching eukaryotes. Mol Biosyst 2008; 4: 328-340.
30. Schreiber G, Keating AE. Protein binding specificity versus promiscuity. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2011; 21: 50-61.
31. Iakoucheva LM, Brown CJ, Lawson JD, Obradovic Z, Dunker AK. Intrinsic disorder in cell-signaling and cancer-associated proteins. J Mol Biol 2002; 323: 573-584.
32. Das S, Mukhopadhyay D. Intrinsically unstructured proteins and neurodegenerative diseases: conformational promiscuity at its best. IUBMB Life 2011; 63: 478-488.
33. Sugase K, Dyson HJ, Wright PE. Mechanism of coupled folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered protein. Nature 2007; 447: 1021-1025.
34. Uversky VN, Dunker AK. Controlled chaos. Science 2008; 322: 1340-1341.
35. Dosztanyi Z, Sandor M, Tompa P, Simon I. Prediction of protein disorder at the domain level. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2007; 8: 161-171.
36. Fuxreiter M, Tompa P, Simon I. Local structural disorder imparts plasticity on linear motifs. Bioinformatics 2007; 23: 950-956.
37. Vacic V, Oldfield CJ, Mohan A, Radivojac P, Cortese MS, Uversky VN, Dunker AK. Characterization of molecular recognition features, MoRFs, and their binding partners. J Proteome Res 2007; 6: 2351-2366.
38. Oldfield CJ, Cheng Y, Cortese MS, Romero P, Uversky VN, Dunker AK. Coupled folding and binding with α-helix-forming molecular recognition elements. Biochemistry 2005; 44: 12454-12470.
39. Puntervoll P, Linding R, Gemund C, Chabanis-Davidson S, Mattingsdal M, Cameron S, Martin DM, Ausiello G, Brannetti B, Costantini A, Ferre F, Maselli V, Via A, Cesareni G, Diella F, Superti-Furga G, Wyrwicz L, Ramu C, McGuigan C, Gudavalli R, Letunic I, Bork P, Rychlewski L, Kuster B, Helmer-Citterich M, Hunter WN, Aasland R, Gibson TJ. ELM server: a new resource for investigating short functional sites in modular eukaryotic proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31: 3625-3630.
40. Meszaros B, Simon I, Dosztanyi Z. Prediction of protein binding regions in disordered proteins. PLoS Comput Biol 2009; 5: e1000376.
41. Boeckmann B, Bairoch A, Apweiler R, Blatter MC, Estreicher A, Gasteiger E, Martin MJ, Michoud K, O'Donovan C, Phan I, Pilbout S, Schneider M. The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31: 365-370.
42. Suzek BE, Huang H, McGarvey P, Mazumder R, Wu CH. UniRef: comprehensive and non-redundant UniProt reference clusters. Bioinformatics 2007; 23: 1282-1288.
43. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007; 23: 2947-2948.
44. Di Tommaso P, Moretti S, Xenarios I, Orobitg M, Montanyola A, Chang JM, Taly JF, Notredame C. T-Coffee: a web server for the multiple sequence alignment of protein and RNA sequences using structural information and homology extension. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39: W13-W17.
45. Bailey TL, Gribskov M. Methods and statistics for combining motif match scores. J Comput Biol 1998; 5: 211-221.
46. Eddy SR. Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics 1998; 14: 755-763.
47. Gouy M, Guindon S, Gascuel O. SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol Biol Evol 2010; 27: 221-224.
48. Obradovic Z, Peng K, Vucetic S, Radivojac P, Dunker AK. Exploiting heterogeneous sequence properties improves prediction of protein disorder. Proteins 2005; 61 Suppl 7: 176-182.
49. Obradovic Z, Peng K, Vucetic S, Radivojac P, Brown C, Dunker AK. Predicting intrinsic disorder from amino acid sequence. Proteins 2003; 53: 566-572.
50. Rogers S, Wells R, Rechsteiner M. Amino acid sequences common to rapidly degraded proteins: the PEST hypothesis. Science 1986; 234: 364-368.
51. Vacic V, Uversky VN, Dunker AK, Lonardi S. Composition Profiler: a tool for discovery and visualization of amino acid composition differences. BMC Bioinformatics 2007; 8: 211.
52. von Mering C, Jensen LJ, Kuhn M, Chaffron S, Doerks T, Kruger B, Snel B, Bork P. STRING 7-recent developments in the integration and prediction of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35: D358-D362.
53. Ofran Y, Rost B. ISIS: interaction sites identified from sequence. Bioinformatics 2007; 23: e13-e16.
54. Dosztanyi Z, Meszaros B, Simon I. ANCHOR: web server for predicting protein binding regions in disordered proteins. Bioinformatics 2009; 25: 2745-2746.
55. Sreerama N, Woody RW. Estimation of protein secondary structure from circular dichroism spectra: comparison of CONTIN, SELCON, and CDSSTR methods with an expanded reference set. Anal Biochem 2000; 287: 252-260.
56. Goddard TD, Kneller DG. SPARKY 3. San Francisco: University of California.
57. Gentles AJ, Wakefield MJ, Kohany O, Gu W, Batzer MA, Pollock DD, Jurka J. Evolutionary dynamics of transposable elements in the short-tailed opossum Monodelphis domestica. Genome Res 2007; 17: 992-1004.
58. Jin HJ, Shao JZ, Xiang LX, Wang H, Sun LL. Global identification and comparative analysis of SOCS genes in fish: insights into the molecular evolution of SOCS family. Mol Immunol 2008; 45: 1258-1268.
59. Vihinen M, Torkkila E, Riikonen P. Accuracy of protein flexibility predictions. Proteins 1994; 19: 141-149.
60. Cuff JA, Barton GJ. Application of multiple sequence alignment profiles to improve protein secondary structure prediction. Proteins 2000; 40: 502-511.
61. Cortese MS, Uversky VN, Keith Dunker A. Intrinsic disorder in scaffold proteins: getting more from less. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2008; 98: 85-106.
62. Hofmann K, Bucher P. The FHA domain: a putative nuclear signalling domain found in protein kinases and transcription factors. Trends Biochem Sci 1995; 20: 347-349.
63. Stahl N, Farruggella TJ, Boulton TG, Zhong Z, Darnell JE, Jr, Yancopoulos GD. Choice of STATs and other substrates specified by modular tyrosine-based motifs in cytokine receptors. Science 1995; 267: 1349-1353.
64. Meszaros B, Tompa P, Simon I, Dosztanyi Z. Molecular principles of the interactions of disordered proteins. J Mol Biol 2007; 372: 549-561.
65. Takeda DY, Wohlschlegel JA, Dutta A. A bipartite substrate recognition motif for cyclin-dependent kinases. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 1993-1997.
66. Devos D, Russell RB. A more complete, complexed and structured interactome. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2007; 17: 370-377.
67. Hegyi H, Schad E, Tompa P. Structural disorder promotes assembly of protein complexes. BMC Struct Biol 2007; 7: 65.
68. Lee KH, Moon KJ, Kim HS, Yoo BC, Park S, Lee H, Kwon S, Lee ES, Yoon S. Increased cytoplasmic levels of CIS, SOCS1, SOCS2, or SOCS3 are required for nuclear translocation. FEBS Lett 2008; 582: 2319-2324.
69. Hwang MN, Min CH, Kim HS, Lee H, Yoon KA, Park SY, Lee ES, Yoon S. The nuclear localization of SOCS6 requires the N-terminal region and negatively regulates Stat3 protein levels. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2007; 360: 333-338.
70. Martens N, Wery M, Wang P, Braet F, Gertler A, Hooghe R, Vandenhaute J, Hooghe-Peters EL. The suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS)-7 interacts with the actin cytoskeleton through vinexin. Exp Cell Res 2004; 298: 239-248.
71. Craig HM, Pandori MW, Guatelli JC. Interaction of HIV-1 Nef with the cellular dileucine-based sorting pathway is required for CD4 down-regulation and optimal viral infectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 11229-11234.
72. Kremer BE, Adang LA, Macara IG. Septins regulate actin organization and cell-cycle arrest through nuclear accumulation of NCK mediated by SOCS7. Cell 2007; 130: 837-850.
73. Cheng Y, LeGall T, Oldfield CJ, Dunker AK, Uversky VN. Abundance of intrinsic disorder in protein associated with cardiovascular disease. Biochemistry 2006; 45: 10448-10460.
74. Csizmok V, Dosztanyi Z, Simon I, Tompa P. Towards proteomic approaches for the identification of structural disorder. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2007; 8: 173-179.