Femoral fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 93, Issue 24, 2011, Pages 2310-2322

  Hartman, Curtis W ^a   Garvin, Kevin L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ALLOGRAFT; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE REMODELING; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMORAL FIXATION; FEMUR; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE; FRACTURE FIXATION; OSTEOLYSIS; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOGRAPHY; REVIEW; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; AGED; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; INFECTION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; PROGNOSIS; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES; PROGNOSIS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REOPERATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84855391382     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: 15351386     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.9324icl     Document Type: Review

References (87)

1. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780-5. (Pubitemid 46564282)
2. Agarwal S, Freiberg AA, Rubash HE. Preoperative planning for revision hip arthroplasty. In: Callaghan JJ, Rosenberg AG, Rubash HE, editors. The adult hip. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p 1313.
3. Harris WH, McCarthy JC Jr, O'Neill DA. Femoral component loosening using contemporary techniques of femoral cement fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1063-7. (Pubitemid 12031930)
4. O'Neill DA, Harris WH. Failed total hip replacement: assessment by plain radiographs, arthrograms, and aspiration of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:540-6. (Pubitemid 14136827)
5. Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH. Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987;69:45-55. (Pubitemid 17098507)
6. Della Valle CJ, Paprosky WG. The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:55-62. (Pubitemid 38436559)
7. D'Antonio J, McCarthy JC, Bargar WL, Borden LS, Cappelo WN, Collis DK, Steinberg ME, Wedge JH. Classification of femoral abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;296:133-9. (Pubitemid 23332131)
8. Mallory TH. Preparation of the proximal femur in cementless total hip revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;235:47-60.
9. Saleh KJ, Holtzman J, Gafni A, Saleh L, Davis A, Resig S, Gross AE. Reliability and intraoperative validity of preoperative assessment of standardized plain radiographs in predicting bone loss at revision hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1040-6. (Pubitemid 32662106)
10. Weeden SH, Paprosky WG. Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(4 Suppl 1):134-7. (Pubitemid 34663244)
11. Saleh KJ, Holtzman J, Gafni A, Saleh L, Jaroszynski G, Wong P, Woodgate I, Davis A, Gross AE. Development, test reliability and validation of a classification for revision hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2001;19:50-6. (Pubitemid 32288635)
12. Krishnamurthy AB, MacDonald SJ, Paprosky WG. 5- to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:839-47. (Pubitemid 28037651)
13. Lawrence JM, Engh CA, Macalino GE. Revision total hip arthroplasty. Long-term results without cement. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993;24:635-44. (Pubitemid 23321287)
14. Della Valle CJ, Paprosky WG. Classification and an algorithmic approach to the reconstruction of femoral deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone and Joint Surg Am. 2003;85 Suppl 4:1-6. (Pubitemid 37377422)
15. Richards CJ, Duncan CP, Masri BA, Garbuz DS. Femoral revision hip arthroplasty: a comparison of two stem designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:491-6.
16. Iorio R, Healy WL, Presutti AH. A prospective outcomes analysis of femoral component fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:662-9. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
17. Barrack RL, Folgueras AJ. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the femoral component. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1995;3:79-85.
18. Pellicci PM, Wilson PD Jr, Sledge CB, Salvati EA, Ranawat CS, Poss R, Callaghan JJ. Long-term results of revision total hip replacement. A follow-up report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:513-6. (Pubitemid 15077716)
19. Kavanagh BF, Ilstrup DM, Fitzgerald RH Jr. Revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:517-26. (Pubitemid 15077717)
20. Callaghan JJ, Salvati EA, Pellicci PM, Wilson PD Jr, Ranawat CS. Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two to five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:1074-85. (Pubitemid 15248198)
21. Rubash HE, Harris WH. Revision of nonseptic, loose, cemented femoral components using modern cementing techniques. J Arthroplasty. 1988;3:241-8.
22. Estok DM 2nd, Harris WH. Long-term results of cemented femoral revision surgery using secondgeneration techniques. An average 11.7-year followup evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;299:190-202. (Pubitemid 24051719)
23. Mulroy WF, Harris WH. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques for aseptic loosening of the femoral component. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:325-30.
24. Eisler T, Svensson O, Iyer V, Wejkner B, Schmalholz A, Larsson H, Elmstedt E. Revision total hip arthroplasty using third-generation cementing technique. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:974-81.
25. Dohmae Y, Bechtold JE, Sherman RE, Puno RM, Gustilo RB. Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;236:214-20. (Pubitemid 18264720)
26. Simon JP, Fowler JL, Gie GA, Ling RS, Timperley AJ. Impaction cancellous grafting of the femur in cemented total hip revision arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73(Suppl 1):73.
27. Ornstein E, Atroshi I, Franzén H, Johnsson R, Sandquist P, Sundberg M. Early complications after one hundred and forty-four consecutive hip revisions with impacted morselized allograft bone and cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1323-8. (Pubitemid 35407575)
28. Oakes DA, Cabanela ME. Impaction bone grafting for revision hip arthroplasty: biology and clinical applications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:620-8. (Pubitemid 44916626)
29. Eldridge JD, Smith EJ, Hubble MJ, Whitehouse SL, Learmonth ID. Massive early subsidence following femoral impaction grafting. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:535-40. (Pubitemid 29021308)
30. Jazrawi LM, Della Valle CJ, Kummer FJ, Adler EM, Di Cesare PE. Catastrophic failure of a cemented, collarless, polished, tapered cobalt-chromium femoral stem used with impaction bone-grafting. A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:844-7. (Pubitemid 29297562)
31. Masterson EL, Masri BA, Duncan CP. The cement mantle in the Exeter impaction allografting technique. A cause for concern. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:759-64. (Pubitemid 27452608)
32. Meding JB, Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM. Impaction bone-grafting before insertion of a femoral stem with cement in revision total hip arthroplasty. A minimum two-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1834-41. (Pubitemid 28016588)
33. Pekkarinen J, Alho A, Lepistö J, Ylikoski M, Ylinen P, Paavilainen T. Impaction bone grafting in revision hip surgery. A high incidence of complications. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:103-7. (Pubitemid 30060136)
34. Ornstein E, Linder L, Ranstam J, Lewold S, Eisler T, Torper M. Femoral impaction bone grafting with the Exeter stem - the Swedish experience: survivorship analysis of 1305 revisions performed between 1989 and 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:441-6.
35. Edwards SA, Pandit HG, Grover ML, Clarke HJ. Impaction bone grafting in revision hip surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:852-9. (Pubitemid 37259686)
36. Halliday BR, English HW, Timperley AJ, Gie GA, Ling RS. Femoral impaction grafting with cement in revision total hip replacement. Evolution of the technique and results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:809-17. (Pubitemid 36992157)
37. Mahoney CR, Fehringer EV, Kopjar B, Garvin KL. Femoral revision with impaction grafting and a collarless, polished, tapered stem. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;432:181-7. (Pubitemid 40316179)
38. Wraighte PJ, Howard PW. Femoral impaction bone allografting with an Exeter cemented collarless, polished, tapered stem in revision hip replacement: a mean follow-up of 10.5 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1000-4.
39. Sierra RJ, Charity J, Tsiridis E, Timperley JA, Gie GA. The use of long cemented stems for femoral impaction grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1330-6. (Pubitemid 351780485)
40. Gustilo RB, Pasternak HS. Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;235:111-9.
41. Harris WH, Krushell RJ, Galante JO. Results of cementless revisions of total hip arthroplasties using the Harris-Galante prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;235:120-6.
42. Hedley AK, Gruen TA, Ruoff DP. Revision of failed total hip arthroplasties with uncemented porouscoated anatomic components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;235:75-90.
43. Woolson ST, Delaney TJ. Failure of a proximally porous-coated femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10 Suppl:S22-8. (Pubitemid 26001811)
44. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Ilstrup D, Lewallen DG, Cabanela ME. Survivorship of uncemented proximally porous-coated femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;319:168-77.
45. Malkani AL, Lewallen DG, Cabanela ME, Wallrichs SL. Femoral component revision using an uncemented, proximally coated, long-stem prosthesis. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:411-8.
46. Mulliken BD, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Uncemented revision total hip arthroplasty: a 4-to-6-year review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;325:156-62. (Pubitemid 26108441)
47. Christie MJ, DeBoer DK, Tingstad EM, Capps M, Brinson MF, Trick LW. Clinical experience with a modular noncemented femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty: 4- to 7-year results. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:840-8.
48. Cameron HU. The long-term success of modular proximal fixation stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(4 Suppl 1):138-41. (Pubitemid 34663245)
49. Smith JA, Dunn HK, Manaster BJ. Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty. 2- to 5-year results with a modular titanium alloy stem. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:194-201. (Pubitemid 27108291)
50. McCarthy JC, Lee JA. Complex revision total hip arthroplasty with modular stems at a mean of 14 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:166-9. (Pubitemid 350306510)
51. Bolognesi MP, Pietrobon R, Clifford PE, Vail TP. Comparison of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve and a porous-coated sleeve with a modular revision hip stem. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2720-5. (Pubitemid 39628376)
52. Engh CA Jr, Hopper RH Jr, Engh CA Sr. Distal ingrowth components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:135-41.
53. Lawrence JM, Engh CA, Macalino GE, Lauro GR. Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty done without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:965-73. (Pubitemid 24258412)
54. Moreland JR, Bernstein ML. Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;319:141-50.
55. Moreland JR, Moreno MA. Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty of the hip: minimum 5 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:194-201. (Pubitemid 33101713)
56. Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the limits of fully coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:203-9. (Pubitemid 37499526)
57. Engh CA Jr, Ellis TJ, Koralewicz LM, McAuley JP, Engh CA Sr. Extensively porous-coated femoral revision for severe femoral bone loss: minimum 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:955-60. (Pubitemid 35462935)
58. Böhm P, Bischel O. Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem: evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1023-31. (Pubitemid 32662104)
59. Kolstad K, Adalberth G, Mallmin H, Milbrink J, Sahlstedt B. The Wagner revision stem for severe osteolysis. 31 hips followed for 1.5-5 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1996;67:541-4.
60. Suominen S, Santavirta S. Revision total hip arthroplasty in deficient proximal femur using a distal load-bearing prosthesis. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1996;85:253-62. (Pubitemid 26399853)
61. Grünig R, Morscher E, Ochsner PE. Three-to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1997;116:187-97. (Pubitemid 27168311)
62. Berry DJ. Femoral revision: distal fixation with fluted, tapered grit-blasted stems. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(4 Suppl 1):142-6. (Pubitemid 34663246)
63. Kwong LM, Miller AJ, Lubinus P. A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18(3 Suppl 1):94-7. (Pubitemid 36542570)
64. McInnis DP, Horne G, Devane PA. Femoral revision with a fluted, tapered, modular stem seventy patients followed for a mean of 3.9 years. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:372-80.
65. Murphy SB, Rodriguez J. Revision total hip arthroplasty with proximal bone loss. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(4 Suppl 1):115-9. (Pubitemid 38746732)
66. Park YS, Moon YW, Lim SJ. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a fluted and tapered modular distal fixation stem with and without extended trochanteric osteotomy. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:993-9.
67. Schuh A, Werber S, Holzwarth U, Zeiler G. Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years' follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124:306-9. Epub 2004 Apr 3.
68. Weiss RJ, Beckman MO, Enocson A, Schmalholz A, Stark A. Minimum 5-year follow-up of a cementless, modular, tapered stem in hip revision arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:16-23. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
69. Ovesen O, Emmeluth C, Hofbauer C, Overgaard S. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a modular tapered stem with distal fixation: good short-term results in 125 revisions. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:348-54. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
70. Wirtz DC, Heller KD, Holzwarth U, Siebert C, Pitto RP, Zeiler G, Blencke BA, Forst R. A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THR. Int Orthop. 2000;24:134-8. (Pubitemid 30601510)
71. Postak PD, Greenwald AS. The influence of modularity on the endurance performance of the LINK MP hip stem. Cleveland: Orthopaedic Research Laboratories; 2001.
72. Lee SH, Ahn YJ, Chung SJ, Kim BK, Hwang JH. The use of allograft prosthesis composite for extensive proximal femoral bone deficiencies: a 2- to 9.8-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:1241-8. Epub 2009 Jul 30.
73. Safir O, Kellett CF, Flint M, Backstein D, Gross AE. Revision of the deficient proximal femur with a proximal femoral allograft. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:206-12. Epub 2008 Oct 30.
74. Graham NM, Stockley I. The use of structural proximal femoral allografts in complex revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:337-43. (Pubitemid 38559484)
75. Babis GC, Sakellariou VI, O'Connor MI, Hanssen AD, Sim FH. Proximal femoral allograft-prosthesis composites in revision hip replacement: a 12-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:349-55.
76. Bosquet M, Burssens A, Mulier JC. Long term follow-up results of a femoral megaprosthesis. A review of thirteen patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1980;97:299-304. (Pubitemid 11253400)
77. Donati D, Zavatta M, Gozzi E, Giacomini S, Campanacci L, Mercuri M. Modular prosthetic replacement of the proximal femur after resection of a bone tumour a long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:1156-60. (Pubitemid 33138684)
78. Kawai A, Backus SI, Otis JC, Inoue H, Healey JH. Gait characteristics of patients after proximal femoral replacement for malignant bone tumour. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:666-9. (Pubitemid 30497073)
79. Johnsson R, Carlsson A, Kisch K, Moritz U, Zetterström R, Persson BM. Function following mega total hip arthroplasty compared with conventional total hip arthroplasty and healthy matched controls. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;192:159-67. (Pubitemid 15166124)
80. Morris HG, Capanna R, Del Ben M, Campanacci D. Prosthetic reconstruction of the proximal femur after resection for bone tumors. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:293-9.
81. Ogilvie CM, Wunder JS, Ferguson PC, Griffin AM, Bell RS. Functional outcome of endoprosthetic proximal femoral replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:44-8. (Pubitemid 39167106)
82. Zehr RJ, Enneking WF, Scarborough MT. Allograftprosthesis composite versus megaprosthesis in proximal femoral reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;322:207-23. (Pubitemid 26023408)
83. Sim FH, Chao EY. Hip salvage by proximal femoral replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63:1228-39. (Pubitemid 11022299)
84. Parvizi J, Sim FH. Proximal femoral replacements with megaprostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:169-75. (Pubitemid 38436573)
85. Parvizi J, Tarity TD, Slenker N,Wade F, Trappler R, Hozack WJ, Sim FH. Proximal femoral replacement in patients with non-neoplastic conditions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1036-43. (Pubitemid 46724594)
86. Malkani AL, Settecerri JJ, Sim FH, Chao EY, Wallrichs SL. Long-term results of proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:351-6.
87. Rodriguez JA, Fada R, Murphy SB, Rasquinha VJ, Ranawat CS. Two-year to five-year follow-up of femoral defects in femoral revision treated with the link MP modular stem. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:751-8.