Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Fluted and Tapered Modular Distal Fixation Stem With and Without Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 993-999

  Park, Youn Soo ^a   Moon, Young Wan ^a   Lim, Seung Jae ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

cementless; extended trochanteric osteotomy; modular stem; revision; total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE PLATE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL BONE; CORTICAL PERFORATION; DIAPHYSEAL SPLIT FRACTURE; DISLOCATION; EXTENDED TROCHANTERIC OSTEOTOMY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP; HUMAN; INFECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; OSTEOTOMY; PERFORATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REOPERATION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT FAILURE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; INTERNAL FIXATORS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOTOMY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34848893916     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.017     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Mulroy W.F., and Harris W.H. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques for aseptic loosening of the femoral component: a fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78 (1996) 325
2. Davis III C.M., Berry D.J., and Harmsen W.S. Cemented revision of failed uncemented femoral components oftotal hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85 (2003) 1264
3. Weeden S.H., and Paprosky W.G. Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17 Suppl 1 (2002) 134
4. Engh Jr. C.A., Ellis T.J., Koralewicz L.M., et al. Extensively porous-coated femoral revision for severe femoral bone loss: minimum 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 17 (2002) 955
5. Böhm P., and Bischel O. The use of tapered stems for femoral revision surgery. Clin Orthop 420 (2004) 148
6. Meek R.M., Garbuz D.S., Masri B.A., et al. Intraoperative fracture of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty with a diaphyseal fitting stem. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86 (2004) 480
7. Kolstad K., Adalberth G., Mallmin H., et al. The Wagner revision stem for severe osteolysis: 31 hips followed for 1.5-5 years. Acta Orthop Scand 67 (1996) 541
8. Grünig R., Morscher E., and Ochsner P.E. Three-to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 116 (1997) 187
9. Isacson J., Stark A., and Wallensten R. The Wagner revision prosthesis consistently restores femoral bone structure. Int Orthop 24 (2000) 139
10. Mardones R., Gonzalez C., Cabanela M.E., et al. Extended femoral osteotomy for revision of hip arthroplasty: results and complications. J Arthroplasty 20 (2005) 79
11. Harris W.H. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51 (1969) 737
12. Engh C.A., Massin P., and Suthers K.E. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop 257 (1990) 107
13. Wirtz D.C., Heller K.D., Holzwarth U., et al. A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THR. Int Orthop 24 (2000) 134
14. Kwong L.M., Miller A.J., and Lubinus P. A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study. JArthroplasty 18 Suppl 1 (2003) 94
15. Schuh A., Werber S., Holzwarth U., et al. Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years' follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124 (2004) 306
16. Murphy S.B., and Rodriguez J. Revision total hip arthroplasty with proximal bone loss. J Arthroplasty 19 Suppl 1 (2004) 115
17. McInnis D.P., Horne G., and Devane P.A. Femoral revision with a fluted, tapered, modular stem. Seventy patients followed for a mean of 3.9 years. J Arthroplasty 21 (2006) 372
18. Alberton G.M., High W.A., and Morrey B.F. Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of risk factors and treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84 (2002) 1788
19. Mahomed N.N., Barrett J.A., Katz J.N., et al. Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States Medicare population. JBone Joint Surg Am 85 (2003) 27
20. Warren P.J., Thompson P., and Fletcher M.D. Transfemoral implantation of the Wagner SL stem. The abolition of subsidence and enhancement of osteotomy union rate using Dall-Miles cables. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122 (2002) 557
21. Garbuz D.S., Toms A., Marsi B.A., et al. Improved outcome in femoral revision arthroplasty with tapered fluted modular titanium stems. Clin Orthop 453 (2006) 199
22. Crowninshield R.D., Maloney W.J., Wentz D.H., et al. Therole of proximal femoral support in stress development within hip prostheses. Clin Orthop 420 (2004) 176
23. Busch C.A., Charles M.N., Haydon C.M., et al. Fractures of distally-fixed femoral stems after revision arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 (2005) 1333