Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty: 2- to 5-year results with a modular titanium alloy stem

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 194-201

  Smith, Jason A ^a   Dunn, Harold K ^a   Manaster, B J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

arthroplasty; cementless; femoral; revision; S ROM

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW UP; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; SEPSIS; SURVIVAL; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 0031020719     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0883-5403(97)90066-8     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Cameron HU: The two to six year results with a proximally modular noncemented total hip replacement used in hip revisions. Clin Orthop 298:47, 1994
2. Engh CA, Classman AH, Suthers KE: The case for porous-coated hip implants: the femoral side. Clin Orthop 210:63, 1991
3. Gustilo RB, Pasternak HS: Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bonegrafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening. Clin Orthop 235:111, 1988
4. Hedley AK, Gruen TA, Ruoff DP: Revision of failed total hip arthroplasties with uncemented Porous-Coated Anatomic components. Clin Orthop 235:75, 1988
5. Hungerford DS, Jones LC: The rationale of cementless revision of cemented arthroplasty failures. Clin Orthop 235:12, 1988
6. Harris WH: Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty: an end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg 51A:737, 1969
7. D'Antonio J, McCarthy JC, Bargar WL et al: Classification of femoral abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 296:133, 1994
8. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC: "Modes of failure" of cemented stem type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 141:17, 1979
9. Rosner B: Fundamentals of biostatistics. 3rd ed. PWS-Kent, Boston, 1990
10. McCarthy CK, Steinberg GG, Agren M et al: Quantifying bone loss from the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 738:774, 1991
11. Kavanaugh BF, Fitzgerald RH: Multiple revisions for failed total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 69A:1144, 1987
12. Pellici PM, Wilson PD, Sledge CB et al: Long term rates of revision total hip arthroplasty: a follow-up report. J Bone Joint Surg 67A:513, 1985
13. Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH: Porous-coated hip replacement: the factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg 69B:45, 1987
14. Dunn HK, Smith JA: Modular components in femoral reconstruction. In JO Galante JO, AG Rosenberg AG, and JJ Calaghan JJ (eds): Total hip revision surgery. Lippincott-Raven, New York, 1995
15. Bobyn JD, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ et al: Concerns with modularity in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 298:27, 1994
16. Martin WR, Sutherland CJ: Complications of proximal femoral allografts in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 295:161, 1993
17. Engh CA, Bobyn JD: The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after cementless hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 231:7, 1988
18. Otani T, Whiteside LA, White SE, McCarthy DS: Effects of femoral component material properties on cementless fixation in total hip arthroplasty: a comparison study between carbon composite, titanium alloy, and stainless steel. J Arthroplasty 8:67, 1993
19. Hughes SS, Furia JP, Smith P, Pelligrini VD: Atrophy of the proximal part of the femur after total hip arthroplasty without cement. J Bone Joint Surg 77A:231, 1995