Femoral Revision With a Fluted, Tapered, Modular Stem. Seventy Patients Followed for a Mean of 3.9 Years

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 372-380

  McInnis, Douglas P ^a   Horne, Geoffrey ^b   Devane, Peter A ^b  

^a Orthopaedic Associates of Coeur d'Alene   (United States)

^b WELLINGTON HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

cementless; femoral; fluted; revision; tapered

Indexed keywords

ANESTHETIC AGENT; ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CAUSE OF DEATH; CERCLAGE; CORTICAL BONE; COXITIS; DEBRIDEMENT; DIAPHYSIS; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; FEMALE; FEMUR FRACTURE; FEMUR MALFORMATION; FOLLOW UP; HIP DISLOCATION; HUMAN; LEG LENGTH INEQUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METAPHYSIS; OSTEOLYSIS; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PELVIS FRACTURE; PERFORATION; PERONEUS NERVE PARALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; REIMPLANTATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SURVIVAL TIME; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 33646033120     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.08.022     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Gorab R.S., Covino B.M., and Borden L.S. The rationale for cementless revision total hip replacement with contemporary technology. Orthop Clin North Am 24 (1993) 627
2. Rubash H.E., and Harris W.H. Revision of nonseptic, loose, cemented femoral components using modem cementing techniques. J Arthroplasty 3 (1988) 241
3. Estok D.M., and Harris W.H. Long-term results of cemented femoral revision surgery using second-generation techniques. Clin Orthop 299 (1994) 190
4. Mulroy W.F., and Harris W.H. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second generation cementing techniques for aseptic loosening of the femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78 (1996) 325
5. Katz R.P., Callaghan J.J., Sullivan P.M., et al. Results of cemented femoral revision total hip arthroplasty using improved cementing techniques. Clin Orthop 319 (1995) 178
6. Rosenberg A.G. Fixation for the millennium: the hip. J Arthroplasty 17 Suppl 13 (2002)
7. Hungerford D.S., and Jone L.C. The rationale of cementless revision of cemented arthroplasty failures. Clin Orthop 235 (1988) 12
8. Berry D.J., Harmsen W.S., Ilstrup D., et al. Survivorship of uncemented proximally porous-coated femoral components. Clin Orthop 319 (1995) 168
9. Berry D.J. Femoral revision: distal fixation with fluted, tapered grit-blasted stems. J Arthroplasty 17 Suppl 1 (2002) 142
10. Bohm P., and Bischel O. Femoral revision with the Wagner SL stem. Evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83 (2001) 1023
11. Kolstad K., Adalberth G., Mallmin H., et al. The Wagner revision stem for severe osteolysis, 31 hips followed for 1.5-5 years. Acta Orthop Scand 67 (1996) 541
12. Suominen S., and Santavirta S. Revision total hip arthroplasty in deficient proximal femur using a distal load-bearing prosthesis. Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl 85 (1996) 253
13. Michelinakis E., Papapolychroniou T., and Vafiadis J. The use of a cementless femoral component for the management of bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 55 (1996) 28
14. Isacson J., Stark A., and Wallensten R. The Wagner revision prosthesis consistently restores femoral bone structure. Int Orthop 24 (2000) 139
15. Pak J.H., Paprosky W.G., Jablonsky W.S., et al. Femoral strut allografts in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 295 (1993) 172
16. Morrey B.F., and Kavanagh B.F. Complications with revision of the femoral component of total hip arthroplasty. Comparison between cemented and uncemented techniques. J Arthroplasty 7 (1992) 71
17. Dawson J., Fitzpatrick R., Carr A., et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78 (1996) 185
18. Dawson J., Fitzpatrick R., Frost S., et al. Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83 (2001) 1125
19. Cameron H.U. The two- to six-year results with a proximally modular noncemented total hip replacement used in hip revisions. Clin Orthop 298 (1994) 47
20. Callaghan J.J., Salvati E.A., Pellici P.M., et al. Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two to five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67 (1985) 1074
21. Barnett E., and Nordin B.E.C. The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach. Clin Radiol 11 (1960) 167
22. Weeden S.H., and Paprosky W.G. Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17 Suppl 1 (2002) 134
23. Lawrence J.M., Engh C.A., Macalino G.E., et al. Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty done without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76 (1994) 965
24. Paprosky W.G., Greidanus N.V., and Antoniou J. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 369 (1999) 230
25. Lawrence J.M., Engh C.A., and Macalino G.E. Revision total hip arthroplasty. Long-term results without cement. Orthop Clin North Am 24 (1993) 635
26. Engh C.A., Sychterz C., and Engh C. Factors affecting femoral bone remodelling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 14 (1999) 637
27. Engh C.A., Bobyn J.D., and Glassman A.H. Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69 (1987) 45
28. Smith J.A., Dunn H.K., and Manaster B.J. Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty. 2- to 5-year results with a modular titanium alloy stem. J Arthroplasty 12 (1997) 194
29. Moreland J.R., and Bernstein M.L. Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems. Clin Orthop 319 (1995) 141
30. Warren P.J., Thompson P., and Fletcher M.D. Transfemoral implantation of the Wagner SL stem. The abolition of subsidence and enhancement of osteotomy union rate using Dall-Miles cables. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122 (2002) 557
31. West J.D., Mayor M.B., and Collier J.P. Potential errors inherent in quantitative densitometric analysis of orthopaedic radiographs. A study after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69 (1987) 58
32. Alberton G.M., High W.A., and Morrey B.F. Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of risk factors and treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84 (2002) 1788
33. Mahomed N.N., Barrett J.A., Katz J.N., et al. Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85 (2003) 27
34. Cameron H.U. The long-term success of modular proximal fixation stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17 Suppl 1 (2002) 138
35. Head W.C., Emerson R.H., and Higgins L.L. A titanium cementless calcar replacement prosthesis in revision surgery of the femur. J Arthroplasty 16 Suppl 1 (2001) 183
36. Mulliken B.D., Rorabeck C.H., and Bourne R.B. Uncemented revision total hip arthroplasty. A 4- to 6-year review. Clin Orthop 325 (1996) 156