A Prospective Outcomes Analysis of Femoral Component Fixation in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 662-669

  Iorio, Richard ^a   Healy, William L ^a   Presutti, Anthony H ^b  

^a LAHEY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Dartmouth Hitchcock Keene ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

femoral fixation; Paprosky types I and II femoral bone; revision total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW UP; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE CEMENTS; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERNAL FIXATORS; KAPLAN-MEIERS ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; REOPERATION;

EID: 47649122858     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.06.009     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Mendenhall S. Hip and knee implant review. Orthop Netw News 16 (2005) 1
2. Older J. Charnley low friction arthroplasty: a worldwide retrospective review at 15 to 20 years. J Arthroplasty 17 (2002) 675
3. Callaghan J.J., Templeton J.E., Liu S.S., et al. Results of Charnley total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of thirty years. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86 (2004) 690
4. Iorio R., Eftekhar N., Grelsamer R.P., et al. Cemented revision of failed total hip arthroplasty. Survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1995) 121
5. Mulroy W.F., and Harris W.H. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques for aseptic loosening of the femoral component. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78 (1996) 325
6. Kershaw C.J., Atkins R.M., Dodd C.A., et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty for aseptic failure. A review of 276 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73 (1991) 564
7. Engelbrecht D.J., Weber F.A., Sweet M.B., et al. Long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72 (1990) 41
8. Rubash H.E., and Harris W.H. Revision of nonseptic, loose, cemented femoral components using modern cementing techniques. J Arthroplasty 3 (1988) 241
9. Turner R.H., Mattingly D.A., and Scheller A. Femoral revision total hip arthroplasty using a long-stem femoral component. Clinical and radiographic analysis. J Arthroplasty 2 (1987) 247
10. Kavanagh B.F., Ilstrup D.M., and Fitzgerald Jr. R.H. Revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67 (1985) 517
11. Pellicci P.M., Bostrom M., and Poss R. Posterior approach to total hip replacement using enhanced posterior soft tissue repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355 (1998) 224
12. Hedley A.K., Gruen T.A., and Ruoff D.P. Revision of failed total hip arthroplasties with uncemented porous-coated anatomic components. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1988) 75
13. Engh C.A., Glassman A.H., Griffin W.L., et al. Results of cementless revision for failed cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235 (1988) 91
14. Gustilo R.B., and Pasternak H.S. Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1988) 111
15. Harris W.H., Krushell R.J., and Galante J.O. Results of cementless revisions of total hip arthroplasties using the Harris-Galante prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1988) 120
16. Malkani A.L., Lewallen D.G., and Cabanela M.E. Two to five year follow-up of femoral component revisions using an uncemented, proximally-coated, chrome cobalt, long-stem, curved prosthesis. Orthop Trans 17 (1993) 940
17. Trousdale R.T., and Morrey B.F. Uncemented femoral revision of total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Trans 17 (1993) 964
18. Rivero D., Jacobs J.J., Galante J.O., et al. Revision cementless total hip arthroplasty: two to five year results. Orthop Trans 17 (1993) 171
19. Dorr L.D. Results of noncemented revision. Semin Arthroplasty 4 (1993) 50
20. McCarthy J.C., Mattingly D., Turner R.H., et al. Revision of the deficient femur with a modular femoral component. Orthop Trans 17 (1993) 966
21. Lawrence J.M., Engh C.A., and Macalino G.E. Revision total hip arthroplasty. Long-term results without cement. Orthop Clin North Am 24 (1993) 635
22. Paprosky W.G., Jablonsky W., and Magnus R.E. Cementless femoral revision in the presence of severe proximal bone loss using diaphyseal fixation. Orthop Trans 17 (1993) 965
23. Rudicel S., and Esdaile J. The randomized clinical trial in orthopaedics: obligation or option?. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67 (1985) 1284
24. Rothman R.H., Hozack W.J., Ravawat A., et al. Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems. A matched-pair analysis of coated and uncoated implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78 (1996) 319
25. Maloney W.J., and Harris W.H. Comparison of a hybrid with an uncemented total hip replacement. A retrospective matched-pair study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72 (1990) 1349
26. Haydon C.M., Mehin R., Burnet S., et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of a cemented femoral component, results at a mean of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86 (2004) 1179
27. Mattingly D. Femoral revision: modular proximally porous-coated stems. In: Liebermann J., and Berry D.J. (Eds). Advanced reconstruction: hip (2005), American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont (Ill) 417
28. Eisler T., Svensson O., Iyer V., et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty using third generation cementing technique. J Arthroplasty 15 (2000) 974
29. Mahomed N.N., Barrett J.A., Katz J.N., et al. Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85 (2003) 27
30. Christie M.J., DeBoer D.K., Tingstad E.M., et al. Clinical experience with a modular noncemented femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty: 4 to 7 year results. J Arthroplasty 15 (2000) 840
31. Rubash H.E., and Manning D. Femoral revision: overview and strategy. In: Liebermann J., and Berry D.J. (Eds). Advanced reconstruction: hip (2005), American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont (Ill) 381
32. Iorio R., Healy W.L., and Appleby D. Preoperative demand matching is a valid indicator of patient activity after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19 (2004) 825
33. Healy W.L., Kirven F.M., Iorio R., et al. Implant standardization for total hip arthroplasty: an implant selection and a cost reduction program. J Arthroplasty 10 (1995) 177
34. Healy W.L., Ayers M.E., Iorio R., et al. Impact of a clinical pathway and implant standardization on total hip arthroplasty: a clinical and economic study of short-term patient outcome. J Arthroplasty 13 (1998) 266
35. Kobayashi S., Saito N., Horiuchio H., et al. Poor bone quality or hip structure as risk factors affecting survival of total hip arthroplasty. Lancet 355 (2000) 1499
36. Noble P.C., Alexander J.W., Lindahl L.J., et al. The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235 (1988) 148
37. Pellicci P.M., Wilson Jr. P.D., Sledge C.B., et al. Long-term results of revision total hip replacement. A follow-up report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67 (1985) 513
38. Iorio R., Healy W.L., Patch D.A., et al. A computerized evaluation system for total hip arthroplasty: clinical, radiographic, and outcome data assessment. Orthop Trans 18 (1994) 1209
39. Kaplan E.L., and Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53 (1958) 457
40. Gruen T.A., McNeice G.M., and Amstutz H.C. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components. A radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141 (1979) 17
41. Gramkow J., Jensen J.H., Varmarken J.E., et al. Long term results after cemented revision of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16 (2001) 777
42. Tanzer M. The role of capsular closure in preventing dislocation following revision total hip arthroplasty (2005), Interim Hip Society, Pittsburgh (Pa)
43. Lachiewicz P.F., and Soileau E.S. Risk of early dislocation with 36 and 40 mm femoral heads in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (2005), Interim Hip Society, Pittsburgh (Pa)
44. Paprosky W.G., and Sporer S.M. Dislocation in revision total hip arthroplasty: have large heads and femoral anteversion made a difference? (2005), Interim Hip Society, Pittsburgh (Pa)
45. Phillips C.B., Barrett J.A., Losina E., et al. Incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection during the first 6 months after elective total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85 (2003) 20