Modular prosthetic replacement of the proximal femur after resection of a bone tumour

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 83, Issue 8, 2001, Pages 1156-1160

  Donati, D ^a   Zavatta, M ^a   Gozzi, E ^a   Giacomini, S ^a   Campanacci, L ^a   Mercuri, M ^a  

^a RIZZOLI ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ACETABULUM; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; ASEPTIC NECROSIS; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE STRESS; CANCER RECURRENCE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEBRIDEMENT; FEMALE; FEMUR FRACTURE; FEMUR TUMOR; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GAIT DISORDER; HIP DISLOCATION; HUMAN; JOINT STIFFNESS; MALE; OSTEOPOROSIS; PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RELIABILITY; SCHOOL CHILD; WOUND IRRIGATION;

EID: 0035207759     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.83B8.12165     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. A modular femur tibia reconstruction system
2. Prosthetic reconstruction of the proximal femur after resection for bone tumours
3. Prosthetic and extremity survivorship after limb salvage for sarcoma: How long does the reconstruction last?
4. Function of reinserted abductor muscles after femoral replacement
5. Tendons attached to prostheses by tendon-bone block fixation: An experimental study in dogs
6. Biologic attachment of an allograft bone and tendon transplant to a titanium prosthesis
7. Capsular replacement with synthetic mesh: Effectiveness in preventing postoperative dislocation after wide resection of proximal femoral tumours and prosthetic reconstruction
8. Allograft prosthesis composite versus megaprosthesis in proximal femoral reconstruction
9. Allograft prosthetic composite arthroplasty for osteosarcoma and other aggressive bone tumours
10. Determinants of stress shielding: Design versus materials versus interface
11. Producing and avoiding stress shielding: Laboratory and clinical observations of non-cemented total hip arthroplasty
12. Follow-up protocols in orthopaedic oncology
13. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumours of the musculoskeletal system
14. Megaprostheses in the treatment of primary malignant and metastatic tumors in the hip region
15. Endoprosthetic replacement for primary malignant tumors of the proximal femur
16. Long-term follow-up results of a femoral megaprosthesis: A review of thirteen patients
17. Hip salvage by proximal femoral replacement
18. Massive resection and prosthetic replacement for the treatment of metastases of the trochanteric and subtrochanteric femoral region, bipolar arthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty
19. Bipolar arthroplasty for 496 hip fractures
20. Experience with bipolar prosthesis in femoral neck fractures in the elderly and debilitated
21. Clinical and motion studies of the Bateman bipolar prosthesis in osteonecrosis of the hip
22. Avascular necrosis of the hip treated by hemiarthroplasty: Results in renal transplant recipients
23. The Bateman bipolar femoral head replacement: A fluoroscopic study of movement over a four-year period
24. Bipolar prosthetic replacement for treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head
25. Acetabular osteolysis and migration in bipolar arthroplasty of the hip: 5 to 13 year follow-up study
26. Wear of bipolar hip prostheses
27. Large amounts of polyethylene debris in the interface tissue surrounding bipolar endoprostheses: Comparison to total hip prostheses
28. Bipolar cup design may lead to osteolysis around the uncemented femoral component
29. Bony atrophy after mega total hip replacement for bone tumors: 11 cases followed for 3-15 years
30. Loosening of massive proximal femoral cemented endoprostheses: Radiographic evidence of loosening mechanism
31. Long term results of proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic disorders
32. Reconstruction of the hip abductors after resection of the proximal femur
33. Function following mega total hip arthroplasty compared with conventional total hip arthroplasty and healthy matched controls