Complex revision total hip arthroplasty with modular stems at a mean of 14 years

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 465, Issue , 2007, Pages 166-169

  McCarthy, Joseph C ^a,b   Lee, Jo Ann ^a  

^a NEW ENGLAND BAPTIST HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Green Building   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASEPSIS; BONE ALLOGRAFT; BONE GROWTH; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CORTICAL BONE; DEATH; DIAPHYSIS; FEMUR; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE FIXATION; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; HYPERTROPHY; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MORTALITY; OSTEOLYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVISION SURGERY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT DURATION; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; HIP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; INSTRUMENTATION; JOINT INSTABILITY; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADIOGRAPHY; REOPERATION; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

TITANIUM;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; FEMUR; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOLYSIS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 37349054394     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e318159cb97     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Bobyn JD, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ, Dujovne AR, Brooks CE. Concerns with modularity in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;298:27-36.
2. Bono JV, McCarthy JC, Lee J, Carangelo RJ, Turner RH. Fixation with a modular stem in revision total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2000;49:131-139.
3. Brown SA, Flemming CA, Kawalec JS, Placko HE, Vassaux C, Merritt K, Payer JH, Kraay MJ. Fretting corrosion accelerates crevice corrosion of modular hip tapers. J Appl Biomater. 1995;6:19-26.
4. Buly R. The S-ROM stem: versatility of stem/sleeve combinations and head options. Orthopedics. 2005;28:s1025-s1032.
5. Cameron HU. Solution options: modular hip stem design. Orthopedics. 1995;18:824-826.
6. Cameron HU. The long-term success of modular proximal fixation stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:138-141.
7. Chandler HP, Ayres DK, Tan RC, Anderson LC, Varma AK. Revision total hip replacement using the S-ROM femoral component. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;319:130-140.
8. Christie MJ, DeBoer DK, Tingstad EM, Capps M, Brinson MF, Trick LW. Clinical experience with a modular noncemented femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty: 4- to 7-year results. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:840-848.
9. Engh CA, Glassman AH, Griffin WL, Mayer JG. Results of cementless revision for failed cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;235:91-110.
10. Engh CA Jr, Ellis TJ, Koralewicz LM, McAuley JP, Engh CA Sr. Extensively porous-coated femoral revision for severe femoral bone loss: minimum 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:955-960.
11. Goldberg VM. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a cementless modular femoral hip design. Am J Orthop. 2002;31:202-204.
12. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assn. 1958;53:457-481.
13. Krishnamurthy AB, MacDonald SJ, Paprosky WG. 5- to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:839-847.
14. Malkani AL, Lewallen DG, Cabanela ME, Wallrichs SL. Femoral component revision using an uncemented, proximally coated, longstem prosthesis. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:411-418.
15. McAuley JP, Engh CA Jr. Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: cylindrical and extensively coated femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:215-221.
16. Moreland JR, Moreno MA. Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty of the hip: minimum 5 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:194-201.
17. Mulliken BD, Rorabeck CH. Bourne RB. Uncemented revision total hip arthroplasty: a 4-to-6-year review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;325:156-162.
18. Paprosky WG, Bradford MS, Younger TI. Classification of bone defects in failed prostheses. Chir Organi Mov. 1994;79:285-291.
19. Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;369:230-242.
20. Rosenthall L, Bobyn JD, Tanzer M. Bone densitometry: influence of prosthetic design and hydroxyapatite coating on regional adaptive bone remodelling. Int Orthop. 1999;23:325-329.
21. Spitzer AI. The S-ROM cementless femoral stem: history and literature review. Orthopedics. 2005;28:s1117-s1124.
22. Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the limits of fully coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:203-209.
23. Walter WL, Walter WK, Zicat B. Clinical and radiographic assessment of a modular cementless ingrowth femoral stem system for revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:172-178.
24. Weeden SH, Paprosky WG. Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:134-137.
25. Woolson ST, Delaney TJ. Failure of a proximally porous-coated femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10(suppl):S22-S28.