Functional outcome of endoprosthetic proximal femoral replacement

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 426, Issue , 2004, Pages 44-48

  Ogilvie, Christian M ^a,b   Wunder, Jay S ^a   Ferguson, Peter C ^a   Griffin, Anthony M ^a   Bell, Robert S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDUCTOR SOFT TISSUE RECONSTRUCTION; ADULT; BIPOLAR HIP ENDOPROSTHETIC PROXIMAL FEMUR REPLACEMENT; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE TUMOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; DISABILITY; ENDOPROSTHESIS; ENDOPROSTHETIC PROXIMAL FEMUR REPLACEMENT; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL TUMOR SOCIETY SCORE; PLASTIC SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROXIMAL FEMUR ENDOPROSTHESIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SOFT TISSUE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TISSUE REPAIR; TORONTO EXTREMITY SALVAGE SCORE; TOTAL HIP ENDOPROSTHETIC PROXIMAL FEMUR REPLACEMENT; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 4444234030     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000136840.67864.78     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Anderson ME, Hyodo A. Zehr RJ, Marks KE, Muschler GF: Abductor reattachment with a custom proximal femoral replacement prosthesis. Orthopedics 25:722-726, 2002.
2. Davis AM, Wright JG, Williams JI, et al: Development of a measure of physical function for patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Qual Life Res 5:508-516, 1996.
3. Davis AM, Bell RS, Badley EM, Yoshida K, Williams JI: Evaluating functional outcome in patients with lower extremity sarcoma. Clin Orthop 358:90-100, 1999.
4. Donati D, Zavatta M, Gozzi E, et al: Modular prosthetic replacement of the proximal femur after resection of a bone tumour a long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 836:1156-1160, 2001.
5. Enneking WF: Modification of the System for Functional Evaluation of Surgical Management of Musculoskeletal Tumors. In Enneking WF (ed). Limb Salvage in Musculoskeletal Oncology. New York, Churchill Livingstone 626, 1987.
6. Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ: A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop 286:241-246, 1993.
7. Kabukcuoglu Y, Grimer RJ, Tillman RM, Carter SR: Endoprosthetic replacement for primary malignant tumors of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop 358:8-14, 1999.
8. Kawai A, Backus SI, Otis JC, Inoue H, Healey JH: Gait characteristics of patients after proximal femoral replacement for malignant bone tumour. J Bone Joint Surg 826:666-669, 2000.
9. Malkani AL, Settecerri JJ, Sim FH, Chao EY, Wallrichs SL: Long-term results of proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic disorders. J Bone Joint Surg 77B:351-356, 1995.
10. Malo M, Davis AM, Wunder J, et al: Functional evaluation in distal femoral endoprosthetic replacement for bone sarcoma. Clin Orthop 389:173-180, 2001.
11. Markhede G, Stener B: Function after removal of various hip and thigh muscles for extirpation of tumors. Acta Orthop Scand 52:373-395, 1981.
12. McGoveran BM, Davis AM, Gross AE, Bell RS: Evaluation of the allograft-prosthesis composite technique for proximal femoral reconstruction after resection of a primary bone tumour. Can J Surg 42:37-45, 1999.
13. Morris HG, Capanna R, Del Ben M, Campanacci D: Prosthetic reconstruction of the proximal femur after resection for bone tumors. J Arthroplasty 10:293-299, 1995.
14. Unwin PS, Cannon SR, Grimer RJ, et al: Aseptic loosening in cemented custom-made prosthetic replacements for bone tumours of the lower limb. J Bone Joint Surg 78B:5-13, 1996.
15. Veth RP, Nielsen HK, Oldhoff J, et al: Megaprostheses in the treatment of primary malignant and metastatic tumors in the hip region. J Surg Oncol 40:214-218, 1989.
16. Ward WG, Johnston KS, Dorey FJ, Eckardt JJ: Loosening of massive proximal femoral cemented endoprostheses: Radiographic evidence of loosening mechanism. J Arthroplasty 12:741-750, 1997.
17. Zehr RJ, Enneking WF, Scarborough MT: Allograft-prosthesis composite versus megaprosthesis in proximal femoral reconstruction. Clin Orthop 322:207-223, 1996.
18. Zwart HJ, Taminiau AH, Schimmel JW, van Horn JR: Kotz modular femur and tibia replacement: 28 tumor cases followed for 3(1-8) years. Acta Orthop Scand 65:315-318, 1994.