Revision total hip arthroplasty using a modular tapered stem with distal fixation. Good short-term results in 125 revisions

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 348-354

  Ovesen, Ole ^a,b   Emmeluth, Claus ^a   Hofbauer, Christian ^a   Overgaard, Søren ^a,b  

^a ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Modular taper stem; Revision; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

DICLOXACILLIN;

ACETABULOPLASTY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; BONE REMODELING; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; DISLOCATION; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; FEMALE; FEMUR FRACTURE; FEMUR INTERTROCHANTERIC OSTEOTOMY; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE FIXATION; FRACTURE HEALING; FRACTURE REDUCTION; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INFECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; REOPERATION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; DENMARK; FEMALE; FEMORAL FRACTURES; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REGISTRIES; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77950519539     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.11.106     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Paprosky W.G., Greidanus N.V., Antoniou J.A. Minimum 10-year results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1999, 369:230.
2. Weeden S.H., Paprosky W.G. Minimal 11 year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002, 17(4 Suppl 1):134.
3. Wagner H. Revisionsprothese für das hüftgelenk. Orthopäde 1989, 18:438.
4. Grunig R., Morscher E., Ochsner P.E. Three to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1997, 116:187.
5. Isacson J., Stark A., Wallensten R. The Wagner revision prosthesis consistently restores bone structure. Int Orthop 2000, 24:139.
6. Böhm P., Bischel O. The use of tapered stems for femoral revision surgery. Clin Orthop 2004, 420:148.
7. Sporer S.M., Paprosky W.G. Cementless femoral revision: the role of monoblock versus modular stems. Curr Orthop 2006, 20:171.
8. Femoral stem fractures in Zimmer modular revision (ZMR) hip systems. TGA News 2003, 40:20.
9. Saleh K.J., Holtzman J., Gafni A., et al. Reliability and intraoperative validity of preoperative assessment of standardized plain radiographs in predicting bone loss at revision hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2001, 83:1040.
10. Engh C.A., Massin P., Suthers K.E. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop 1990, 257:107.
11. Callaghan J.J., Salvati E.A., Pellici P.M., et al. Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1985, 67A:1074.
12. Harris W.H. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1969, 4:737.
13. Schenk R.K., Wehrli U. Reaction of bone to a cement-free SL femur revision prosthesis. Histologic findings in an autopsy specimen 5 1/2 months after surgery. Orthopäde 1989, 18:454.
14. Bircher H.P., Riede U., Luem M., et al. The value of the Wagner SL revision prosthesis for bridging large femoral defects. Orthopäde 2001, 30:294.
15. Kolstad K., Adalberth G., Mallmin H., et al. The Wagner revision stem for severe osteolysis. 31 hips followed for 1.5-5 years. Acta Orthop Scand 1996, 67:541.
16. Berry D.J. Femoral revision: distal fixation with fluted, tapered grit-blasted stems. J Arthroplasty 2002, 17:142.
17. Wirtz D.C., Heller K.D., Holzwarth U., et al. A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THR. Int Orthopaedics 2000, 24:134.
18. Kwong L.M., Miller A.J., Lubinus P. A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003, 18:94.
19. Schuh A., Werber S., Holzwarth U., et al. Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004, 124:306.
20. Murphy S.B., Rodriguez J. Revision total hip arthroplasty with proximal bone loss. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:115.
21. Mumme T., Müller-Rath R., Weisskopf M., et al. Die zementfreie modulare MRP-Hüftrevisionsschaftendoprothese im "klinischen follow-up". Z Orthop 2004, 142:314.
22. McInnis D.P., Horne G., Devane P.A. Femoral revision with a fluted, tapered, modular stem. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21:372.
23. Park Y.S., Moon Y.W., Lim S.J. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a fluted and tapered modular distal fixation stem with and without extended trochanteric osteotomy. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:993.
24. Hinrichs F., Boudriot U., Hünerkopf M., et al. Design und erste klinische ergebnisse mit dem ZMR-taper-revisionsschaft. Z Orthop 2005, 143:355.
25. Procenca A., Cabral R. Revision of the femoral side in total hip replacement. Eur Instr Course Lect 2005, 7:143.