Semantic relations in bilingual lexicons

ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Peirsman, Yves ^a   Padó, Sebastian ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bilingual lexicons; Multilingual knowledge induction; Selectional preferences; Semantic relations; Sentiment analysis; Vector space semantics

Indexed keywords

BILINGUAL LEXICONS; MULTILINGUAL KNOWLEDGE INDUCTION; SELECTIONAL PREFERENCES; SEMANTIC RELATIONS; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; VECTOR SPACE SEMANTICS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; PROFITABILITY; VECTOR SPACES;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 84855250465     PISSN: 15504875     EISSN: 15504883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/2050100.2050102     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. ABE, N. AND LI, H. 1996. Learning word association norms using tree cut pair models. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Machine Learning. 3-11.
2. AGIRRE, E., ALDEZABAL, I., AND POCIELLO, E. 2003. A pilot study of English selectional preferences and their cross-lingual compatibility with Basque. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Text, Speech and Dialogue. 12-19. (Pubitemid 37171156)
3. BANEA, C., MIHALCEA, R., AND WIEBE, J. 2008. A bootstrapping method for building subjectivity lexicons for languages with scarce resources. In Proceedings of the 6th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference.
4. BARONI, M. AND LENCI, A. 2010. Distributional memory: A general framework for corpus-based semantics. Computat. Linguis. 36, 4, 673-721.
5. BERGER, A., CARUANA, R., COHN, D., FREITAG, D., AND MITTAL, V. 2000. Bridging the lexical chasm: statistical approaches to answer-finding. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 192-199.
6. BHOGAL, J., MACFARLANE, A., AND SMITH, P. 2007. A review of ontology based query expansion. Infor. Process. Manage. 43, 4, 866-886. (Pubitemid 46431170)
7. BROCKMANN, C. 2002. Evaluating and combining approaches to selectional preference acquisition.M.S. thesis, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbr ücken, Germany.
8. BROCKMANN, C. AND LAPATA, M. 2003. Evaluating and combining approaches to selectional preference acquisition. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 27-34.
9. BUDANITSKY, A. AND HIRST, G. 2006. Evaluating WordNet-based measures of lexical semantic relatedness. Computat. Linguis. 32, 1, 13-47. (Pubitemid 43764024)
10. CHAMBERS, N. AND JURAFSKY, D. 2009. Unsupervised learning of narrative schemas and their participants. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing. 302-610.
11. CHAMBERS, N. AND JURAFSKY,D. 2010. Improving the use of pseudo-words for evaluating selectional preferences. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 445-453.
12. CHIAO, Y.-C. AND ZWEIGENBAUM, P. 2002. Looking for candidate translational equivalents in specialized, comparable corpora. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 1208-1212.
13. CLARK, S. AND WEIR, D. 2002. Class-based probability estimation using a semantic hierarchy. Computat. Linguis. 28, 2, 187-206.
14. DAGAN, I., GLICKMAN, O., AND MAGNINI, B. 2006. The PASCAL recognising textual entailment challenge. In Machine Learning Challenges, J. Quinonero-Candela, I. Dagan, B. Magnini, and F. d'Alché Buc, Eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3944. Springer, 177-190. (Pubitemid 44029923)
15. DAGAN, I., LEE, L., AND PEREIRA, F. C. N. 1999. Similarity-based models of word cooccurrence probabilities. Machine Learn. 34, 1-3, 43-69.
16. DE SMET, W. AND MOENS, M.-F. 2009. Cross-language linking of news stories on the web using interlingual topic modelling. In Proceedings of the CIKM Workshop on Social Web Search and Mining. 57-64.
17. DIAB, M. AND RESNIK, P. 2002. An unsupervised method for word sense tagging using parallel corpora. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 255-262.
18. DUMAIS, S., LANDAUER, T., AND LITTMAN,M. 1996. Automatic cross-linguistic information retrieval using Latent Semantic Indexing. In Proceedings of the SIGIR Workshop on Cross-Linguistic Information Retrieval. 16-23.
19. ERK, K., PADÓ, S., AND PADÓ, U. 2010. A flexible, corpus-driven model of regular and inverse selectional preferences. Computat. Linguis. 36, 4, 723-763.
20. ESULI, A. AND SEBASTIANI, F. 2006. SENTIWORDNET: A publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. In Proceedings of the 5th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference.
21. FELLBAUM, C., Ed. 1998. WordNet. An Electronic Lexical Database. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
22. FUNG, P. AND MCKEOWN, K. 1997. Finding terminology translations from non-parallel corpora. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Very Large Corpora. 192-202.
23. FUNG, P. AND YEE, L. Y. 1998. An IR approach for translating new words from non-parallel, comparable texts. In Proceedings of the 36th AnnualMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 414-420.
24. GAMALLO OTERO, P. 2008. Evaluating two different methods for the task of extracting bilingual lexicons from comparable corpora. In Proceedings of the LREC-2008 Workshop on Comparable Corpora. 19-26.
25. GARERA, N., CALLISON-BURCH, C., AND YAROWSKY, D. 2009. Improving translation lexicon induction from monolingual corpora via dependency contexts and part-of-speech equivalences. In Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Natural Language Learning. 129-137.
26. GILDEA, D. AND JURAFSKY, D. 2002. Automatic labeling of semantic roles. Computat. Linguis. 28, 3, 245-288.
27. HAGHIGHI, A., LIANG, P., KIRKPATRICK, T. B., AND KLEIN, D. 2008. Learning bilingual lexicons from monolingual corpora. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 771-779.
28. HARABAGIU, S. M., MOLDOVAN, D. I., PASCA, M., MIHALCEA, R., SURDEANU, M., BUNESCU, R. C., GIRJU, R., RUS, V., AND MORARESCU, P. 2000. Falcon: Boosting knowledge for answer engines. In Proceedings of the Text Retrieval Conference.
29. HARRIS, Z. 1954. Distributional structure. Word 10, 2/3, 146-162.
30. HOLMLUND, J., SAHLGREN, M., AND KARLGREN, J. 2005. Creating bilingual lexica using reference wordlists for alignment of monolingual semantic vector spaces. In Proceedings of the 15th Nordic Conference on Computational Linguistics. 71-77.
31. HWA, R., RESNIK, P., WEINBERG, A., CABEZAS, C., AND KOLAK, O. 2005. Bootstrapping parsers via syntactic projection across parallel texts. Natural Lang. Engin. 11, 3, 311-325. (Pubitemid 41398684)
32. KILGARRIFF, A. AND YALLOP, C. 2000. What's in a thesaurus? In Proceedings of the 2nd Language Resources and Evaluation Conference. 1371-1379.
33. KIM, S.-M. AND HOVY, E. 2004. Determining the sentiment of opinions. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 1367-1373.
34. KOTLERMAN, L.,DAGAN, I., SZPEKTOR, I., AND ZHITOMIRSKY-GEFFET, M. 2009. Directional distributional similarity for lexical expansion. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing. 69-72.
35. LANDAUER, T. K. AND DUMAIS, S. T. 1997. A solution to Plato's problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychol. Rev. 104, 2, 211-240.
36. LEE, L. 1999. Measures of distributional similarity. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 25-32.
37. LIN, D. 1993. Principle-based parsing without overgeneration. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 112-120.
38. LIN, D. AND PANTEL, P. 2001. Discovery of inference rules for question answering. Natural Lang. Engin. 7, 4, 342-360.
39. LOWE, W. 2001. Towards a theory of semantic space. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. 576-581.
40. MARKÓ, K., SCHULZ, S.,MEDELYAN, O., AND HAHN, U. 2005. Bootstrapping dictionaries for cross-language information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 528-535.
41. MARTIN, W. AND TOPS, G. A. J., Eds. 2006a. Van Dale Groot Woordenboek Engels-Nederlands (Electronic Ed. 2.1). Van Dale Lexicografie, Utrecht/Antwerp.
42. MARTIN, W. AND TOPS, G. A. J., Eds. 2006b. Van Dale Groot Woordenboek Nederlands-Engels (Electronic Ed. 2.1). Van Dale Lexicografie, Utrecht/Antwerp.
43. MAUSAM, SODERLAND, S., ETZIONI, O.,WELD, D., SKINNER, M., AND BILMES, J. 2009. Compiling a massive, multilingual dictionary via probabilistic inference. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing.
44. MCCARTHY, D. AND CARROLL, J. 2003. Disambiguating nouns, verbs and adjectives using automatically acquired selectional preferences. Computat. Linguis. 29, 4, 639-654. (Pubitemid 39056499)
45. MCRAE, K., SPIVEY-KNOWLTON, M., AND TANENHAUS, M. 1998. Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension. J. Memory Lang. 38, 3, 283-312. (Pubitemid 128347311)
46. MERLO, P., STEVENSON, S., TSANG, V., AND ALLARIA, G. 2002. A multilingual paradigm for automatic verb classification. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 207-214.
47. MICHELBACHER, L., EVERT, S., AND SCHüTZE, H. 2007. Asymmetric association measures. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing.
48. MIHALCEA, R., BANEA, C., AND WIEBE, J. 2007. Learning multilingual subjective language via cross-lingual projections. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 976-983.
49. MOHAMMAD, S.,GUREVYCH, I.,HIRST, G., AND ZESCH, T. 2007. Cross-lingual distributional profiles of concepts for measuring semantic distance. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning. 571-580.
50. MOHAMMAD, S. AND TURNEY, P. 2010. Emotions evoked by common words and phrases: Using Mechanical Turk to create an emotion lexicon. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLTWorkshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text. 26-34.
51. OCH, F. J. AND NEY, H. 2003. A systematic comparison of various statistical alignment models. Computat. Linguis. 29, 1, 19-52.
52. PADÓ, S. AND LAPATA, M. 2007. Dependency-based construction of semantic space models. Computat. Linguis. 33, 2, 161-199.
53. PANG, B. AND LEE, L. 2008. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found. Trends Infor. Retriev. 2, 1-135.
54. PEIRSMAN, Y. AND GEERAERTS,D. 2009. Predicting strong associations on the basis of corpus data. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 648-656.
55. PEIRSMAN, Y., HEYLEN, K., AND GEERAERTS, D. 2008. Size matters. Tight and loose context definitions in English word space models. In Proceedings of the ESSLLI Workshop on Distributional Lexical Semantics. 9-16.
56. PEIRSMAN, Y. AND PADÓ, S. 2010. Cross-lingual induction of selectional preferences with bilingual vector spaces. In Proceedings of the 11th Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technologies. 921-929.
57. RAPP, R. 1995. Identifying word translations in non-parallel texts. In Proceedings of the 33rd AnnualMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 320-322.
58. RAPP, R. 1999. Automatic identification of word translations from unrelated English and German corpora. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 519-526.
59. REMUS, R., QUASTHOFF, U., AND HEYER, G. 2010. SentiWS - a publicly available German-language resource for sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 7th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference.
60. RESNIK, P. 1996. Selectional constraints: An information-theoretic model and its computational realization. Cognition 61, 127-159. (Pubitemid 126410831)
61. RILOFF, E. AND SHEPHERD, J. 1999. A corpus-based bootstrapping algorithm for semi-automated semantic lexicon construction. J. Natural Lang. Engin. 5, 2, 147-156.
62. SADAT, F., YOSHIKAWA, M., AND UEMURA, S. 2003. Learning bilingual translations from comparable corpora to cross-language information retrieval: hybrid statistics-based and linguistics-based approach. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Information Retrieval with Asian Languages. 57-64.
63. SAHLGREN, M. 2006. The word-space model. Using distributional analysis to represent syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations between words in high-dimensional vector spaces. Ph.D. thesis, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
64. SCHEIBLE, C., LAWS, F., MICHELBACHER, L., AND SCHüTZE, H. 2010. Sentiment translation through multi-edge graphs. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 1104-1112.
65. SCHULTE IM WALDE, S., SCHMID, H., ROOTH, M., RIEZLER, S., AND PRESCHER, D. 2001. Statistical grammar models and lexicon acquisition. In Linguistic Form and its Computation, C. Rohrer, A. Rossdeutscher, and H. Kamp, Eds., CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, 389-440.
66. SNOW, R., JURAFSKY, D., AND NG, A. Y. 2006. Semantic taxonomy induction from heterogenous evidence. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 801-808.
67. SPRINGER, O., Ed. 2000. Langenscheidts Enzyklopädisches Wörterbuch der englischen und deutschen Sprache ("Der Große Muret-Sanders") Englisch-Deutsch 12. Ed. Langenscheidt.
68. SPRINGER, O., Ed. 2003. Langenscheidts Enzyklopädisches Wörterbuch der englischen und deutschen Sprache ("Der Große Muret-Sanders") Deutsch-Englisch 9. Ed. Langenscheidt.
69. TURNEY, P. AND PANTEL, P. 2010. From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics. J. Artifi. Intell. Res. 37, 141-188.
70. TURNEY, P. D. 2002. Thumbs up or thumbs down?: Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. 417-424.
71. WALTINGER, U. 2010. GERMANPOLARITYCUES: A lexical resource for German sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation.
72. WILSON, T., WIEBE, J., AND HOFFMANN, P. 2005. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 347-354.
73. YAROWSKY, D. AND NGAI, G. 2001. Inducing multilingual POS taggers and NP bracketers via robust projection across aligned corpora. In Proceedings of the 2nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technologies. 200-207.
74. ZEMAN, D. AND RESNIK, P. 2008. Cross-language parser adaptation between related languages. In Proceedings of the IJCNLP Workshop on NLP for Less Privileged Languages. 35-42.
75. ZHAO, H., SONG, Y., KIT, C., AND ZHOU, G. 2009. Cross language dependency parsing using a bilingual lexicon. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing. 55-63.