Improving the use of pseudo-words for evaluating selectional preferences

ACL 2010 - 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 445-453

  Chambers, Nathanael ^a   Jurafsky, Dan ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVALUATION FRAMEWORK; SELECTIONAL PREFERENCES; WORD SENSE DISAMBIGUATION;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; RATING; SEMANTICS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84855240161     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Collin F. Baker, Charles J. Fillmore, and John B. Lowe. 1998. The Berkeley FrameNet project. In Christian Boitet and Pete Whitelock, editors, ACL-98, pages 86-90, San Francisco, California. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
2. Shane Bergsma, Dekang Lin, and Randy Goebel. 2008. Discriminative learning of selectional preference from unlabeled text. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 59-68, Honolulu, Hawaii.
3. Lou Burnard. 1995. User Reference Guide for the British National Corpus. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
4. Ido Dagan, Lillian Lee, and Fernando C. N. Pereira. 1999. Similarity-based models of word cooccurrence probabilities. Machine Learning, 34(1):43-69.
5. Katrin Erk. 2007. A simple, similarity-based model for selectional preferences. In 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Prague, Czech Republic.
6. William A. Gale, Kenneth W. Church, and David Yarowsky. 1992. Work on statistical methods for word sense disambiguation. In AAAI Fall Symposium on Probabilistic Approaches to Natural Language, pages 54-60.
7. Tanja Gaustad. 2001. Statistical corpus-based word sense disambiguation: Pseudowords vs. real ambiguous words. In 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics - Student Research Workshop.
8. David Graff. 2002. English Gigaword. Linguistic Data Consortium.
9. Frank Keller and Mirella Lapata. 2003. Using the web to obtain frequencies for unseen bigrams. Computational Linguistics, 29(3):459-484.
10. Maria Lapata, Scott McDonald, and Frank Keller. 1999. Determinants of adjective-noun plausibility. In European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL).
11. Preslav I. Nakov and Marti A. Hearst. 2003. Categorybased pseudowords. In Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology, pages 67-69, Edmonton, Canada.
12. Fernando Pereira, Naftali Tishby, and Lillian Lee. 1993. Distributional clustering of english words. In 31st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 183-190, Columbus, Ohio.
13. Mats Rooth, Stefan Riezler, Detlef Prescher, Glenn Carroll, and Franz Beil. 1999. Inducing a semantically annotated lexicon via em-based clustering. In 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 104-111.
14. Hinrich Schutze. 1992. Context space. In AAAI Fall Symposium on Probabilistic Approaches to Natural Language, pages 113-120.
15. Alexander Yeh. 2000. More accurate tests for the statistical significance of result differences. In International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING).
16. Beat Zapirain, Eneko Agirre, and Llus Mrquez. 2009. Generalizing over lexical features: Selectional preferences for semantic role classification. In Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, Singapore.