A bootstrapping method for building subjectivity lexicons for languages with scarce resources

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 2764-2767

  Banea, Carmen ^a   Mihalcea, Rada ^a   Wiebe, Janyce ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

^b Learning Research and Development Ctr   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOOTSTRAPPING METHOD; F MEASURE; ONLINE DICTIONARIES; RULE BASED; SCARCE RESOURCES; SEMI-SUPERVISED METHOD; SENTENCE LEVEL; SIMILARITY MEASURE;

SUPERVISED LEARNING;

EID: 85037350895     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Alina Andreevskaia and Sabine Bergler. 2006. Mining wordnet for a fuzzy sentiment: Sentiment tag extraction from wordnet glosses. In Proceedings of the 11rd Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL-2006).
2. S. T. Dumais, G. W. Furnas, T. K. Landauer, S. Deerwester, and R. Harshman. 1988. Using latent semantic analysis to improve access to textual information. In CHI'88: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 281-285, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
3. A. Esuli and F. Sebastiani. 2006a. SentiWordNet: A publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006), Genova, IT.
4. Andrea Esuli and Fabrizio Sebastiani. 2006b. Determining term subjectivity and term orientation for opinion mining. In 11th Meeting of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL 2006).
5. R. Ghani, R. Jones, and D. Mladenic. 2001. Using the Web to create minority language corpora. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management.
6. Soo-Min Kim and Eduard Hovy. 2006. Identifying and analyzing judgment opinions. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL, pages 200-207, New York, New York.
7. R. Mihalcea, C. Banea, and J. Wiebe. 2007. Learning multilingual subjective language via cross-lingual projections. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Prague, Czech Republic.
8. G. Miller, C. Leacock, T. Randee, and R. Bunker. 1993. A semantic concordance. In Proceedings of the 3rd DARPA Workshop on Human Language Technology, Plainsboro, New Jersey.
9. E. Riloff and J. Wiebe. 2003. Learning extraction patterns for subjective expressions. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-03), pages 105-112.
10. Hiroya Takamura, Takashi Inui, and Manabu Okumura. 2006. Latent variable models for semantic orientations of phrases. In Proceedings of the 11th Meeting of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL 2006), Trento, Italy.
11. P. Turney. 2001. Mining the web for synonyms: PMI-IR versus LSA on TOEFL. In Proceedings of the Twelfth European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML-2001), Freiburg, Germany.
12. P. Turney. 2002. Thumbs up or thumbs down? semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2002), pages 417-424, Philadelphia.
13. J. Wiebe and E. Riloff. 2005. Creating subjective and objective sentence classifiers from unannotated texts. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (CICLing-2005) (invited paper), Mexico City, Mexico.
14. J. Wiebe. 2000. Learning subjective adjectives from corpora. In Proceedings of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2000), pages 735-740, Austin, Texas.
15. Theresa Wilson, Janyce Wiebe, and Paul Hoffmann. 2005. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In hltemnlp2005, pages 347-354, Vancouver, Canada.
16. Hong Yu and Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou. 2003. Towards answering opinion questions: Separating facts from opinions and identifying the polarity of opinion sentences. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-03), pages 129-136, Sapporo, Japan.