Thumbs up or thumbs down? semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 2002-July, Issue , 2002, Pages 417-424

  Turney, Peter D ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

CLASSIFIEDS; DIFFERENT DOMAINS; MOVIE REVIEWS; MUTUAL INFORMATIONS; SEMANTIC ORIENTATION; SIMPLE++; UNSUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION; UNSUPERVISED LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 85136072040     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Agresti, A. 1996. An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
2. Brill, E. 1994. Some advances in transformation-based part of speech tagging. Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 722-727). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
3. Church, K.W., & Hanks, P. 1989. Word association norms, mutual information and lexicography. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the ACL (pp. 76-83). New Brunswick, NJ: ACL.
4. Frank, E., & Hall, M. 2001. A simple approach to ordinal classification. Proceedings of the Twelfth European Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 145-156). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
5. Hatzivassiloglou, V., & McKeown, K.R. 1997. Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 8th Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL (pp. 174-181). New Brunswick, NJ: ACL.
6. Hatzivassiloglou, V., & Wiebe, J.M. 2000. Effects of adjective orientation and gradability on sentence subjectivity. Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. New Brunswick, NJ: ACL.
7. Hearst, M.A. 1992. Direction-based text interpretation as an information access refinement. In P. Jacobs (Ed.), Text-Based Intelligent Systems: Current Research and Practice in Information Extraction and Retrieval. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Landauer, T.K., & Dumais, S.T. 1997. A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
9. Santorini, B. 1995. Part-of-Speech Tagging Guidelines for the Penn Treebank Project (3rd revision, 2nd printing). Technical Report, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania.
10. Spertus, E. 1997. Smokey: Automatic recognition of hostile messages. Proceedings of the Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1058-1065). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
11. Tong, R.M. 2001. An operational system for detecting and tracking opinions in on-line discussions. Working Notes of the ACM SIGIR 2001 Workshop on Operational Text Classification (pp. 1-6). New York, NY: ACM.
12. Turney, P.D. 2001. Mining the Web for synonyms: PMI-IR versus LSA on TOEFL. Proceedings of the Twelfth European Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 491-502). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
13. Wiebe, J.M. 2000. Learning subjective adjectives from corpora. Proceedings of the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
14. Wiebe, J.M., Bruce, R., Bell, M., Martin, M., & Wilson, T. 2001. A corpus study of evaluative and speculative language. Proceedings of the Second ACL SIG on Dialogue Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue. Aalborg, Denmark.