Team Size and Quality of Group Experience: The More the Merrier?

Group Dynamics

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 357-375

  Aubé, Caroline ^a   Rousseau, Vincent ^b   Tremblay, Sébastien ^c  

^a HEC MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Counterproductive behaviors; Quality of group experience; Team size; Work teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 83755172625     PISSN: 10892699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0025400     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. Adams J.S. Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1963, 10:422-436. doi: 10.1037/h0040968.
2. Adams J.S. Inequity in social exchange. Advances in experimental social psychology 1965, 2:267-299. Academic Press, New York, NY. L. Berkowitz (Ed.).
3. Allen N.J., Hecht T.D. The " romance of teams": Toward an understanding of its psychological underpinnings and implications. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 2004, 77:439-461. doi: 10.1348/0963179042596469.
4. Amason A.C., Sapienza H.J. The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management 1997, 23:495-516.
5. Ancona D.G., Caldwell D.F. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 1992, 37:634-665. doi: 10.2307/2393475.
6. Andersson L.M., Pearson C.M. Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review 1999, 24:452-471.
7. Arbuckle J.L. IBM SPSS Amos 19: User's guide 2010, SPSS, Chicago.
8. Aubé C., Rousseau V. Team goal commitment and team effectiveness: The role of task interdependence and supportive behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 2005, 9:189-204. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.9.3.189.
9. Aubé C., Rousseau V., Mama C., Morin E.M. Counterproductive behaviors and psychological well-being: The moderating effect of task interdependence. Journal of Business and Psychology 2009, 24:351-361. doi: 10.1007/s10869-009-9113-5.
10. Badea C., Jetten J., Czukor G., Askevis-Leherpeux F. The bases of identification: When optimal distinctiveness needs face social identity threats. British Journal of Social Psychology 2010, 49:21-41. doi: 10.1348/000712608X397665.
11. Bandura A. Mechanisms of moral disengagement. Origins of terrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, theologies, and states of mind 1990, 161-191. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. W. Reich (Ed.).
12. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. Handbook of moral behavior and development: Theory, research and applications 1991, 1:71-129. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. W.M. Kurtines, J.L. Gewirtz (Eds.).
13. Bandura A., Barbaranelli C., Caprara G.V., Pastorelli C. Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996, 71:364-374. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364.
14. Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 51:1173-1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
15. Blau P.M. Inequality and heterogeneity 1977, Free Press, New York, NY.
16. Bogart D., Lundgren D. Group size, member dissatisfaction, and group radicalism. Human Relations 1974, 27:339-355. doi: 10.1177/001872677402700402.
17. Brewer M.B. The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1991, 17:475-482. doi: 10.1177/0146167291175001.
18. Brown M.E., Treviño L.K. Socialized charismatic leadership, values congruence, and deviance in work group. Journal of Applied Psychology 2006, 91:954-962. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.954.
19. Brown N.W. The destructive narcissistic pattern. Social Behavior and Personality 1996, 24:263-272. doi: 10.2224/sbp.1996.24.3.263.
20. Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research 2004, 33:261-304. doi: 10.1177/0049124104268644.
21. Buunk B.P., Verhoeven K. Companionship and support at work: A microanalysis of the stress-reducing features of social interaction. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 1991, 12:243-258. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp1203_1.
22. Campion A.C., Medsker G.J., Higgs A.C. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology 1993, 46:823-850. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb01571.x.
23. Chen P.Y., Spector P.E. Relationships of work stressors with aggression, withdrawal, theft and substance use: An exploratory study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 1992, 65:177-184.
24. Cohen G.C., Ledford G.E., Spreitzer G.M. A predictive model of self-managing work team effectiveness. Human Relations 1996, 49:643-673. doi: 10.1177/001872679604900506.
25. Cole M.S., Walter F., Bruch H. Affective mechanisms linking dysfunctional behavior to performance in work teams: A moderated mediation study. Journal of Applied Psychology 2008, 93:945-958. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.945.
26. Comer D.R. A model of social loafing in real work groups. Human Relations 1995, 48:647-667. doi: 10.1177/001872679504800603.
27. Costa A.C. Work team trust and effectiveness. Personnel Review 2003, 32:605-622. doi: 10.1108/00483480310488360.
28. Crosby F. Relative deprivation in organizational settings. Research in organizational behavior 1984, 6:51-93. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT. B.M. Staw, L.L. Cummings (Eds.).
29. De Jong B.A., Elfring T. How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity monitoring, and effort. Academy of Management Journal 2010, 53:535-549. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.51468649.
30. Denison D.R., Hart S.L., Kahn J.A. From chimneys to cross-functional teams: Developing and validating a diagnostic model. Academy of Management Journal 1996, 39:1005-1023. doi: 10.2307/256721.
31. Eisenhardt K. Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Management Science 1985, 31:134-149. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.31.2.134.
32. Essens P.J.M.D., Vogelaar L.W., Mylle J.J.C., Blendell C., Paris C., Halpin S.M., Baranski J.V. Team effectiveness in complex settings: A framework. Team effectiveness in complex organizations: Cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches 2009, 293-320. Taylor & Francis, New York, NY. E. Salas, G.F. Goodwin, C.S. Burke (Eds.).
33. Felps W., Mitchell T.R., Byington E. How, when, and why bad apples spoil the barrel: Negative group members and dysfunctional groups. Research in organizational behavior 2006, 27:175-222. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. B.M. Staw (Ed.).
34. Fisher P.H. An analysis of the primary group. Sociometry 1953, 16:272-276. doi: 10.2307/2786095.
35. Forsyth D.R. Methodological advances in the study of group dynamics. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 1998, 2:211-212. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.2.4.211.
36. Garcia S.M., Weaver K., Moskowitz G.B., Darley J.M. Crowded minds: The implicit bystander effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 83:843-853. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.843.
37. Gladstein D.L. Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administration Science Quarterly 1984, 29:499-517. doi: 10.2307/2392936.
38. Glomb T.M., Liao H. Interpersonal aggression in work groups: Social influence, reciprocal, and individual effects. Academy of Management Journal 2003, 46:486-496. doi: 10.2307/30040640.
39. Gooding R.Z., Wagner J.A. A meta-analytic review of the relationship between size and performance: The productivity and efficiency of organizations and their subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly 1985, 30:462-481. doi: 10.2307/2392692.
40. Guzzo R.A. Financial incentives and their varying effects on productivity. Psychology and productivity 1988, 81-92. Plenum Press, New York, NY. P. Whitney, R.B. Ochsman (Eds.).
41. Guzzo R.A., Shea G.P. Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology 1992, 2:269-313. Consulting Psychologist Press, Palo Alto, CA. M.D. Dunnette, L.M. Hough (Eds.).
42. Hackman J.R. The design of work teams. Handbook of organizational behavior 1987, 315-342. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. J.W. Lorsch (Ed.).
43. Hackman J.R., Wageman R. A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review 2005, 30:269-287. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2005.16387885.
44. Hausknecht J.P., Trevor C.O., Howard M.J. Unit-level voluntary turnover rates and customer service quality: Implications of group cohesiveness, newcomer concentration, and size. Journal of Applied Psychology 2009, 94:1068-1075. doi: 10.1037/a0015898.
45. Hoegl M. Smaller teams-Better teamwork: How to keep project teams small. Business Horizons 2005, 48:209-214. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2004.10.013.
46. Horwitz S.K., Horwitz I.B. The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management 2007, 33:987-1015. doi: 10.1177/0149206307308587.
47. Ilgen D.R. Teams embedded in organizations. American Psychologist 1999, 54:129-139. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.2.129.
48. Jackson S.E., Joshi A. Work team diversity. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology 2011, 1:651-686. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. S. Zedeck (Ed.).
49. Jackson S.E., May K.E., Whitney K. Under the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams. Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations 1995, 204-261. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. R.A. Guzzo, E. Salas (Eds.).
50. James L.R., Demaree R.G., Wolf G. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology 1984, 69:85-98. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85.
51. wg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology 1993, 78:306-309. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306.
52. Janis I.L. Groupthink 1982, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA. 2nd ed.
53. Jensen M.C., Meckling W. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 1976, 3:305-360. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.
54. Jones G.R. Task visibility, free riding, and shirking: Explaining the effect of structure and technology on employee behavior. Academy of Management Review 1984, 9:684-695.
55. Joshi A., Roh H. The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal 2009, 52:599-627. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2009.41331491.
56. Karau S.J., Williams K.D. Social loafing: Research findings, implications, and future directions. Current Directions in Psychology 1995, 4:134-140. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772570.
57. Katzenbach J.R., Smith D.K. The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization 1993, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
58. Kerr N.L. Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1983, 45:819-828. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.819.
59. Kerr N.L. Illusions of efficacy: The effects of group size on perceived efficacy in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology 1989, 25:287-313. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(89)90024-3.
60. Kerr N.L., Tindale R.S. Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology 2004, 55:623-655. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142009.
61. Kozlowski S.W.J., Bell B.S. Work groups and teams in organizations. Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology 2003, 333-375. Wiley, London, England. W.C. Borman, D.R. Ilgen, R.J. Klimoski (Eds.).
62. Kozlowski S.W.J., Ilgen D.R. Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2006, 7:77-124.
63. Kunda Z. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 1990, 108:480-498. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480.
64. Latané B., Williams K., Harkins S. Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979, 37:822-832. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.822.
65. Leatherwood M.L., Spector L.C. Enforcements, inducements, expected utility and employee misconduct. Journal of Management 1991, 17:535-569. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700302.
66. Leonardelli G.J., Pickett C.L., Brewer M.B. Optimal distinctiveness theory: A framework for social identity, social cognition, and intergroup relations. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 2010, 43:63-113. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(10)43002-6.
67. LePine J.A., Piccolo R.F., Jackson C.L., Mathieu J.E., Saul J.R. A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology 2008, 61:273-307. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00114.x.
68. Liden R.C., Wayne S.J., Jaworski R.A., Bennett N. Social loafing: A field investigation. Journal of Management 2004, 30:285-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jm.2003.02.002.
69. Lim S., Cortina L.M., Magley V.J. Personal and workgroup incivility: Impact on work and health outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology 2008, 93:95-107. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.95.
70. Littlepage G.E., Silbiger H. Recognition of expertise in decision-making groups: Effects of group size and participation patterns. Small Group Research 1992, 23:344-355. doi: 10.1177/1046496492233005.
71. Loch C.H., Galunic D.C., Schneider S. Balancing cooperation and competition in human groups: The role of emotional algorithms and evolution. Managerial and Decision Economics 2006, 27:217-233. doi: 10.1002/mde.1294.
72. Locke E.A., Tirnauer D., Roberson Q., Goldman B., Latham M.E., Weldon W. The importance of the individual in an age of groupism. Groups at work: Theory and research 2001, 501-528. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. M.E. Turner (Ed.).
73. Maassen G.H., Bakker A.B. Suppressor variables in path models: Definitions and interpretation. Sociological Methods & Research 2001, 30:241-270. doi: 10.1177/0049124101030002004.
74. Magjuka R.J., Baldwin T.T. Team-based employee involvement programs: Effects of design and administration. Personnel Psychology 1991, 44:793-812. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00699.x.
75. Mann L. The baiting crowd in episodes of threatened suicide. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1981, 41:703-709. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.41.4.703.
76. Markham S.E., Dansereau F., Alutto J.A. Group size and absenteeism rates: A longitudinal analysis. Academy of Management Journal 1982, 25:921-927. doi: 10.2307/256108.
77. Mathieu J., Maynard M.T., Rapp T., Gilson L. Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management 2008, 34:410-476. doi: 10.1177/0149206308316061.
78. McGrath J.E. Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Research 1991, 22:147-174. doi: 10.1177/1046496491222001.
79. Mulvey P.W., Klein H.J. The impact of perceived loafing and collective efficacy on group goal processes and group performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1998, 74:62-87. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2753.
80. Neuman J.H., Baron R.A. Aggression in the workplace: A social-psychological perspective. Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets 2005, 13-40. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, doi: 10.1037/10893-001. S. Fox, P.E. Spector (Eds.).
81. Pearce G.L., Giacalone R.A. Team behaving badly: Factors associated with anti-citizenship behavior in teams. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2003, 33:58-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb02073.x.
82. Pearce G.L., Herbik P.A. Citizenship behavior at the team level of analysis: The effects of team leadership, team commitment, perceived team support, and team size. The Journal of Social Psychology 2004, 144:293-310. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.144.3.293-310.
83. Pettigrew T.F. Summing up: Relative deprivation as a key social psychological concept. Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration 2002, 351-374. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. I. Walter, H.J. Smith (Eds.).
84. Pierce B.D., White R. The evolution of social structure: Why biology matters. Academy of Management Review 1999, 24:843-853. doi: 10.2307/259358.
85. Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Lee J.Y., Podsakoff N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 2003, 88:879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
86. Poulton B.C., West M.A. The determinants of effectiveness in primary health care. Journal of Interprofessional Care 1999, 13:7-18. doi: 10.3109/13561829909025531.
87. Preacher K.J., Hayes A.F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 2008, 40:879-891. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.
88. Roberson Q.M., Colquitt J.A. Shared and configural justice: A social network model of justice in teams. Academy of Management Review 2005, 30:595-607. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2005.17293715.
89. Robinson S.L., O'Leary-Kelly A.M. Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of work groups on the antisocial behavior of employees. Academy of Management Journal 1998, 41:658-672. doi: 10.2307/256963.
90. Scharf A. How to change seven rowdy people. Industrial Management 1989, 21:20-22.
91. Seashore S.E. Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group 1954, University of Michigan, Oxford, England.
92. Sharma M., Ghosh A. Does team size matter? A study of the impact of team size on transactive memory system and performance of IT sector teams. South Asian Journal of Management 2007, 14:96-114.
93. Shepperd J.A. Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivation analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1993, 113:67-81. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.113.1.67.
94. Shepperd J.A., Malone W., Sweeny K. Exploring causes of the self-serving bias. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2008, 2:895-908. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00078.x.
95. Sonnentag S. Work group factors and individual well-being. Handbook of work group psychology 1996, 345-367. Wiley, Chichester, England. M.A. West (Ed.).
96. Steiner I.D. Models for inferring relationships between group size and potential group productivity. Behavioral Science 1966, 11:273-283. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830110404.
97. Steiner I.D. Group processes and productivity 1972, Academic Press, New York, NY.
98. Stewart G.L. A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management 2006, 32:29-54. doi: 10.1177/0149206305277792.
99. Stock R. Drivers to team performance: What do we know and what have we still to learn?. Schmalenbach Business Review 2004, 56:274-306.
100. Stouffer S.A., Suchman E.A., DeVinney L.C., Star S.W., Williams R.M. The American soldier 1949, 1. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
101. Sundstrom E., De Meuse K.P., Futrell D. Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist 1990, 45:120-133. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.120.
102. Tesluk P.E., Mathieu J.E. Overcoming roadblocks to effectiveness: Incorporating management of performance barriers into models of work group effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology 1999, 84:200-217. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.200.
103. Tyler T.R. Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity-based perspective. Research in organizational behavior 1999, 21:201-247. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT. R.I. Sutton, B.M. Staw (Eds.).
104. Tzelgov J., Henik A. Suppression situations in psychological research: Definitions, implications, and applications. Psychological Bulletin 1991, 109:524-536. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.3.524.
105. Van Hootegem G., Benders J., Delarue A., Procter S. Teamworking: Looking back and looking forward. International Journal of Human Resource Management 2005, 16:167-173. doi: 10.1080/0958519042000311372.
106. Wageman R. Critical success factors for creating superb self-managing teams. Organizational Dynamics 1997, 26:49-61. doi: 10.1016/S0090-2616(97)90027-9.
107. Watson W.E., Minzenmayer T., Bowler M. Type A personality characteristics and the effect on individual and team academic performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2006, 36:1110-1128. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00033.x.
108. Wegge J., Roth C., Neubach B., Schmidt K., Kanfer R. Age and gender diversity as determinants of performance and health in a public organization: The role of task complexity and group size. Journal of Applied Psychology 2008, 93:1301-1313. doi: 10.1037/a0012680.
109. Weiss H.M., Cropanzano R. Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes, and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in organizational behavior 1996, 18:1-74. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT. B.M. Staw, L.L. Cummings (Eds.).
110. West M.A., Borrill C.S., Unsworth K.L. Team effectiveness in organizations. International review of industrial and organizational psychology 1998, 13:1-48. Wiley, New York, NY. C.L. Cooper, I.T. Robertson (Eds.).
111. Wheelan S.A. Group size, group development, and group productivity. Small Group Research 2009, 40:247-262. doi: 10.1177/1046496408328703.
112. Yeatts D.E., Hyten C. High-performing self-managed work teams: A comparison of theory and practice 1998, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
113. Yetton P., Bottger P. The relationships among group size, member ability, social decision schemes, and performance. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance 1983, 32:145-159. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(83)90144-7.