Human-agent teamwork in dynamic environments

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 23-33

  Van Wissen, A ^a   Gal, Y ^b,c   Kamphorst, B A ^d   Dignum, M V ^e  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cooperative behavior; Dynamic environments; Human computer interaction; Teamwork

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL STUDIES; CO-OPERATIVE BEHAVIORS; COMPUTER AGENTS; DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS; HUMAN-AGENT INTERACTION; HUMAN-AGENT TEAMWORK; HUMAN-COMPUTER; PARTIAL INFORMATION; TEAM MEMBERS; TEAMWORK; TIME FRAME;

DEFECTS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 80255137050     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Babaian, T., Grosz, B., & Shieber, S. (2002). A writer's collaborative assistant. In Intelligent user interfaces conference (pp. 7-14).
2. G. Bernstein, and M. Ben-Yossef Cooperation in intergroup and single-group social dilemmas Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 30 1994 52 67
3. S. Blount When social outcomes aren't fair Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 63 1995 131 144
4. Bolton, G., & Brosig, J. (2007). How do coalitions get built: Evidence from an extensive form coalition game with renegotiation and externalities. Working paper series in economics, University of Cologne.
5. T. Bosse, C. Jonker, J. Treur, and D. Tykhonov Formal analysis of trust dynamics in human and software agent experiments Proceedings of the eleventh international workshop on cooperative information agents, CIA'07. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence 2007 Springer Verlag 343 359 (Pubitemid 350271467)
6. J. Bradshaw, A. Acquisti, J. Allen, M. Breedy, L. Bunch, and N. Chambers Teamwork-centered autonomy for extended human-agent interaction in space applications Proceedings of the AAAI spring symposium 2004 AAAI Press 22 24
7. Breban, S., & Vassileva, J. (2002). Using inter-agent trust relationships for efficient coalition formation. In Proceedings of the 13th Canadian conference on AI.
8. C.H. Brooks, and E.H. Durfee Congregating and market formation Proceedings of the first international joint conference on autonomous agents in multi-agent systems 2002 ACM Press 96 103 (Pubitemid 34975434)
9. C. Castelfranchi, and R. Falcone Principles of trust for mas: Cognitive anatomy, social importance, and quantification Proceedings of the international conference on multi-agent systems 1998 IEEE Press 72 79
10. J. Clancey, P. Sachs, M. Sierhuis, and R. van Hoof Brahms: Simulating practice for work systems design International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 1998 831 865 (Pubitemid 128398701)
11. N. Dahlbäck, A. Jönsson, and L. Ahrenberg Wizard of oz studies - Why and how Knowledge-Based Systems 6 1993 258 266
12. E. Fehr, and K. Schmidt A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation The Quarterly Journal of Economics 144 1999 817 868
13. Gal, Y., & Pfeffer, A. (2007). Modeling reciprocity in human bilateral negotiation. In Proceedings of association for the advancement of artificial intelligence.
14. Gal, Y., Pfeffer, A., Marzo, F., & Grosz, B. (2004). Learning social preferences in games. In Proceedings of association for the advancement of artificial intelligence.
15. Y. Gal, B. Grosz, S. Kraus, A. Pfeffer, and S. Shieber Agent decision-making in open-mixed networks Artificial Intelligence 174 2010 1460 1480
16. S. Goschnick People-oriented programming: From agent-oriented analysis to the design of interactive systems J. Jacko, LNCS 5610: Human computer interaction, Part I 2009 Springer 836 845
17. N. Griffiths, and M. Luck Coalition formation through motivation and trust Proceedings of international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems 2003 ACM New York, NY, USA 17 24
18. Grosz, B., Kraus, S., Talman, S., Stossel, B., & Havlin, M. (2004). The influence of social dependencies on decision-making: Initial investigations with a new game. In Proceedings of international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems.
19. W. Guth, R. Schmittberger, and B. Schwarz An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1982 367 388
20. Hennes, D., Tuyls, K., Neerincx, M., & Rauterberg, G. (2009). Micro-scale social network analysis for ultra-long space flights. In The IJCAI-09 workshop on artificial intelligence in space.
21. B. Hinckley Coalitions and politics 1981 Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc. New York
22. P. Hinds, K. Carley, D. Krackhardt, and D. Wholey Choosing work group members: Balancing similarity, competence, and familiarity Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 81 2000 226 251
23. E. Hoffman, K. McCabe, and V. Smith On expectations and monetary, stakes in ultimatum games International Journal of Game Theory 1996
24. Huynh, D., Jennings, N., & Shadbolt, N. (2004). Developing an integrated trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems. In Proceedings of the 7th international workshop on trust in agent societies.
25. C. Jones, K. Fullam, and S. Barber Exploiting untrustworthy agents in team formation Proceedings of IEEE 2007 IEEE Computer Society Washington, DC, USA 299 302
26. G. Jones, and J. George The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork The Academy of Management Review 23 1998 531 546
27. M. Joseph, and R. Willis An experiment analog to two party bargaining Behavioral Science 8 1963 17 1127
28. Kamar, E., Gal, Y., & Grosz, B. (2009). Modeling user perception of interaction opportunities for effective teamwork. In IEEE conference on social computing. Vancouver, British Columbia (pp. 271-277).
29. E. Kamar, E. Horvitz, and C. Meek Mobile opportunistic commerce: Mechanisms, architecture, and application Proceedings of international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems 2008 ACM New York, NY, USA 1087
30. R. Katz, Y. Amichai-Hamburger, E. Manisterski, and S. Kraus Different orientations of males and females in computer-mediated negotiations Computers in Human Behavior 24 2008 516 534
31. J. Kelley An iterative design methodology for user-friendly natural language office information applications ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 2 1984 26 41
32. Lin, R., Kraus, S., Tykhonov, D., Hindriks, K., & Jonker, C. (2009a). Supporting the design of general automated negotiators. In International workshop on agent-based complex automated negotiations.
33. Lin, R., Oshrat, Y., & Kraus, S. (2009b). Investigating the benefits of automated negotiations in enhancing negotiation skills of people. In Proceedings of international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems.
34. R.R. Murphy Human-robot interaction in rescue robotics IEEE Transactions On Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part C: Applications and Reviews 34 2004
35. C. Nass, B. Fogg, and Y. Moon Can computers be teammates? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 1996 65
36. A. Okada, and A. Riedl Inefficiency and social exclusion in a coalition formation game: Experimental evidence Games and Economic Behavior 50 2005 278 311 (Pubitemid 40071337)
37. Oshrat, Y., Lin, R., & Kraus, S. (2009). Facing the challenge of human-agent negotiations via effective general opponent modeling. In Proceedings of international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (pp. 377-384).
38. M. Pollack Intelligent technology for an aging population: The use of AI to assist elders with cognitive impairment AI Magazine 26 2005 9 24 (Pubitemid 40889946)
39. Pommeranz, A., Brinkman, W., Wiggers, P., Broekens, J., & Jonker, C. (2009). Towards design guidelines for negotiation support systems: An expert perspective using scenarios. In Proceedings of European conference on cognitive ergonomics (ECCE).
40. D. Pruitt, and P. Carnevale Negotiation in social conflict 1993 Open University Press Buckingham
41. Rajarshi, D., Hanson, J., Kephart, J., & Tesauro, G. (2001). Agent-human interactions in the continuous double auction. In Proceedings of the international joint conference on artificial intelligence.
42. B. Reeves, and C. Nass The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places (CSLI Lecture Notes S.) Center for the Study of Language and Informatics 2003
43. Riedl, A., & Vyrastekova, J. (2003). Responder behavior in three-person ultimatum game experiments. Technical Report Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
44. A. Roth The handbook of experimental economics 1995 Princeton University Press
45. A. Rubinstein Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model Econometrica 1982 97 109
46. A. Sanfey, J. Rilling, J. Aronson, L. Nystrom, and J. Cohen The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game Science 300 2003 1755 1758 (Pubitemid 36712573)
47. Schurr, N., Patil, P., Pighin, F., & Tambe, M. (2006). Using multiagent teams to improve the training of incident commanders. In Proceedings of international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems.
48. S. Sen Reciprocity: a foundational principle for promoting cooperative behavior among self-interested agents Proceedings of the second international conference on multiagent systems 1996 AAAI Press 315 321
49. S.M. Shieber A call for collaborative interfaces Computing Surveys 28A 1996 [electronic]
50. B. Shneiderman Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction 1987 Addison-Wesley Publishing Company
51. R. Slonim, and A. Roth Financial incentives and learning in ultimatum and market games: An experiment in the slovak republic Econometrica 66 1998 569 596 (Pubitemid 128469075)
52. H. Tajfel, and J. Turner An integrative theory of intergroup conflict The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations 33 1979 33 47
53. M. Tambe Implementing agent teams in dynamic multi-agent environments Applied Artificial Intelligence 12 1998 189 210 (Pubitemid 127619178)
54. M. Tambe, W.L. Johnson, R.M. Jones, F. Koss, J.E. Laird, and P.S. Rosenbloom Intelligent agents for interactive simulation environments AI Magazine 16 1995 15 39
55. van Beest, I. (2002). The social psychology of coalition formation. In Proceedings of ECPR conference. Turin, Italy.
56. I. van Beest, R.B. Andeweg, L. Koning, and P.A.M. van Lange Do groups exclude others more readily than individuals in coalition formation? Group Processes Intergroup Relations 11 2008 55 67
57. I. van Beest, E. van Dijk, and H. Wilke The interplay of self-interest and equity in coalition formation European Journal of Social Psychology 34 2004 547 565 (Pubitemid 39557938)
58. van de Vijsel, M., & Anderson, J. (2004). Coalition formation in multi-agent systems under real-world conditions. In Proceedings of association for the advancement of artificial intelligence.
59. van Diggelen, J., Bradshaw, J., Grant, T., Johnson, M., & Neerincx, M. (2009). Policy-based design of human-machine collaboration in manned space missions. In Proceedings of the third IEEE international conference on space mission challenges for information technology.
60. van Wissen, A., van Diggelen, J., & Dignum, V. (2009). The effects of cooperative agent behavior on human cooperativeness. In Proceedings of international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (pp. 1179-1180).
61. R. Wooffitt Humans Computers and Wizards. Analysing Human (Simulated) Computer Interaction 1997 Routledge London
62. Yorke-Smith, N., Saadati, S., Myers, K., & Morley, D. (2009). Like an intuitive and courteous butler: A proactive personal agent for task management. In Proceedings of international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (pp. 337-344).