Regulators of ribonucleotide reductase inhibit Ty1 mobility in saccharomyces cerevisiae

Mobile DNA

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  O'Donnell, John P ^a,b   Gehman, Marie ^a,c   Keeney, Jill B ^a  

^a JUNIATA COLLEGE   (United States)

^b Cornell University ^*  (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEMENTARY DNA; DEOXYRIBONUCLEOTIDE; DEOXYRIBONUCLEOTIDE TRIPHOSPHATE; FUNGAL PROTEIN; PROTEIN RFX1; PROTEIN SML1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME REGULATION; FUNGAL CELL; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS MUTANT; GENE DELETION; GENETIC IDENTIFICATION; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROPOSON; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TEMPERATURE SENSE;

EID: 80054942818     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17598753     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1759-8753-1-23     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. The diversity of LTR retrotransposons. Havecker ER, Gao X, Voytas DF, Genome Biol 2004 5 225 10.1186/gb-2004-5-6-225 15186483 (Pubitemid 39077451)
2. Ty RNA levels determine the spectrum of retrotransposition events that activate gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curcio MJ, Hedge AM, Boeke JD, Garfinkel DJ, Mol Gen Genet 1990 220 213 221 10.1007/BF00260484 2157950 (Pubitemid 20036251)
3. Ty1 defect in proteolysis at high temperature. Lawler JF Jr, Haeusser DP, Dull A, Boeke JD, Keeney JB, J Virol 2002 76 4233 4240 10.1128/JVI.76.9.4233- 4240.2002 11932388 (Pubitemid 34309558)
4. Regulation of retrotransposition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curcio MJ, Garfinkel DJ, Molecular microbiology 1991 5 1823 1829 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991. tb00806.x 1662752 (Pubitemid 21896214)
5. Functional genomics reveals relationships between the retrovirus-like Ty1 element and its host Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Griffith JL, Coleman LE, Raymond AS, Goodson SG, Pittard WS, Tsui C, Devine SE, Genetics 2003 164 867 879 12871900 (Pubitemid 36935666)
6. Retroviruses and yeast retrotransposons use overlapping sets of host genes. Irwin B, Aye M, Baldi P, Beliakova-Bethell N, Cheng H, Dou Y, Liou W, Sandmeyer S, Genome research 2005 15 641 654 10.1101/gr.3739005 15837808 (Pubitemid 41043634)
7. Multiple regulators of Ty1 transposition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae have conserved roles in genome maintenance. Scholes DT, Banerjee M, Bowen B, Curcio MJ, Genetics 2001 159 1449 1465 11779788 (Pubitemid 34087588)
8. Increase in Ty1 cDNA recombination in yeast sir4 mutant strains at high temperature. Radford SJ, Boyle M, Sheely CJ, Graham J, Haeusser DP, Keeney JB, Genetics 2004 168 89 101 10.1534/genetics.102.012708 15454529 (Pubitemid 39346581)
9. The take and give between retrotransposable elements and their hosts. Beauregard A, Curcio MJ, Belfort M, Annual review of genetics 2008 42 587 617 10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091549 18680436
10. Host factors that control long terminal repeat retrotransposons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: implications for regulation of mammalian retroviruses. Maxwell PH, Curcio MJ, Eukaryot Cell 2007 6 1069 1080 10.1128/EC.00092-07 17496126 (Pubitemid 47077159)
11. The DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways induce transcription by inhibition of the Crt1 repressor. Huang M, Zhou Z, Elledge SJ, Cell 1998 94 595 605 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81601-3 9741624 (Pubitemid 28427578)
12. Molecular genetic analysis of the yeast repressor Rfx1/Crt1 reveals a novel two-step regulatory mechanism. Zhang Z, Reese JC, Mol Cell Biol 2005 25 7399 7411 10.1128/MCB.25.17.7399-7411.2005 16107689 (Pubitemid 41170104)
13. Identification of new genes regulated by the Crt1 transcription factor, an effector of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Zaim J, Speina E, Kierzek AM, J Biol Chem 2005 280 28 37 15494396 (Pubitemid 40164961)
14. The ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor, Sml1, is sequentially phosphorylated, ubiquitylated and degraded in response to DNA damage. Andreson BL, Gupta A, Georgieva BP, Rothstein R, Nucl Acids Res kq552
15. Role of the C terminus of the ribonucleotide reductase large subunit in enzyme regeneration and its inhibition by Sml1. Zhang Z, Yang K, Chen CC, Feser J, Huang M, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007 104 2217 2222 10.1073/pnas.0611095104 17277086 (Pubitemid 46391378)
16. Loss of yeast peroxiredoxin Tsa1p induces genome instability through activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and elevation of dNTP levels. Tang H-MV, Siu KL, Wong CM, Jin DY, PLoS Genet 2009 5 1000697 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000697 19851444
17. Elevated dNTP levels suppress hyper-recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae S-phase checkpoint mutants. Fasullo M, Tsaponina O, Sun M, Chabes A, Nucleic Acids Res 2010 38 1195 1203 10.1093/nar/gkp1064 19965764
18. A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Zhao X, Muller EG, Rothstein R, Mol Cell 1998 2 329 340 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80277-4 9774971 (Pubitemid 128379273)
19. Survival of DNA damage in yeast directly depends on increased dNTP levels allowed by relaxed feedback inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase. Chabes A, Georgieva B, Domkin V, Zhao X, Rothstein R, Thelander L, Cell 2003 112 391 401 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00075-8 12581528 (Pubitemid 36183658)
20. The ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1 is a new target of the Mec1/Rad53 kinase cascade during growth and in response to DNA damage. Zhao X, Chabes A, Domkin V, Thelander L, Rothstein R, Embo J 2001 20 3544 3553 10.1093/emboj/20.13.3544 11432841 (Pubitemid 32634361)
21. Recruitment of Mec1 and Ddc1 checkpoint proteins to double-strand breaks through distinct mechanisms. Kondo T, Wakayama T, Naiki T, Matsumoto K, Sugimoto K, Science 2001 294 867 870 10.1126/science.1063827 11679674 (Pubitemid 33032107)
22. Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo. Melo JA, Cohen J, Toczyski DP, Genes Dev 2001 15 2809 2821 11691833 (Pubitemid 33042052)
23. Elg1 forms an alternative RFC complex important for DNA replication and genome integrity. Bellaoui M, Chang M, Ou J, Xu H, Boone C, Brown GW, EMBO J 2003 22 4304 4313 10.1093/emboj/cdg406 12912927 (Pubitemid 37021757)
24. ELG1, a yeast gene required for genome stability, forms a complex related to replication factor C. Ben-Aroya S, Koren A, Liefshitz B, Steinlauf R, Kupiec M, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003 100 9906 9911 10.1073/pnas.1633757100 12909721 (Pubitemid 37087041)
25. Elg1 forms an alternative PCNA-interacting RFC complex required to maintain genome stability. Kanellis P, Agyei R, Durocher D, Curr Biol 2003 13 1583 1595 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00578-5 13678589 (Pubitemid 37215882)
26. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Sanchez Y, Bachant J, Wang H, Hu F, Liu D, Tetzlaff M, Elledge SJ, Science 1999 286 1166 1171 10.1126/science.286.5442.1166 10550056 (Pubitemid 29522279)
27. Rad53 FHA domain associated with phosphorylated Rad9 in the DNA damage checkpoint. Sun Z, Hsiao J, Fay DS, Stern DF, Science 1998 281 272 274 10.1126/science.281.5374.272 9657725 (Pubitemid 28334513)
28. The Dun1 checkpoint kinase phosphorylates and regulates the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1. Zhao X, Rothstein R, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002 99 3746 3751 10.1073/pnas.062502299 11904430 (Pubitemid 34252177)
29. DUN1 encodes a protein kinase that controls the DNA damage response in yeast. Zhou Z, Elledge SJ, Cell 1993 75 1119 1127 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90321-G 8261511 (Pubitemid 24006108)
30. The S-phase checkpoint: targeting the replication fork. Segurado M, Tercero JA, Biol Cell 2009 101 617 627 10.1042/BC20090053 19686094
31. S-Phase checkpoint pathways stimulate the mobility of the retrovirus-like transposon Ty1. Curcio MJ, Kenny AE, Moore S, Garfinkel DJ, Weintraub M, Gamache ER, Scholes DT, Mol Cell Biol 2007 27 8874 8885 10.1128/MCB.01095-07 17923678
32. Activation of a LTR-retrotransposon by telomere erosion. Scholes DT, Kenny AE, Gamache ER, Mou Z, Curcio MJ, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003 100 15736 15741 10.1073/pnas.2136609100 14673098 (Pubitemid 38021059)
33. Retrotransposon reverse-transcriptase-mediated repair of chromosomal breaks. Teng SC, Kim B, Gabriel A, Nature 1996 383 641 644 10.1038/383641a0 8857543 (Pubitemid 26347589)
34. Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Winzeler EA, Shoemaker DD, Astromoff A, Liang H, Anderson K, Andre B, Bangham R, Benito R, Boeke JD, Bussey H, et al. Science 1999 285 901 906 10.1126/science.285.5429.901 10436161 (Pubitemid 29381993)
35. Single-step selection for Ty1 element retrotransposition. Curcio MJ, Garfinkel DJ, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991 88 936 940 10.1073/pnas.88.3.936 1846969 (Pubitemid 21916139)
36. The yeast GRASP Grh1 colocalizes with COPII and Is dispensable for organizing the secretory pathway. Levi SK, Bhattacharyya D, Strack RL, II JRA, Glick BS, Traffic 2010 11 1168 79 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2010.01089.x 20573068
37. ninety-six haploid yeast strains with individual disruptions of open reading frames between YOR097C and YOR192C, constructed for the Saccharomyces Genome Deletion Project, have an additional mutation in the mismatch repair gene MSH3. Lehner KR, Stone MM, Farber RA, Petes TD, Genetics 2007 177 1951 1953 10.1534/genetics.107.079368 17947417 (Pubitemid 350277084)
38. Constitutively high dNTP concentration inhibits cell cycle progression and the DNA damage checkpoint in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chabes A, Stillman B, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007 104 1183 1188 10.1073/pnas.0610585104 17227840 (Pubitemid 46183979)
39. Ty1 proteolytic cleavage sites are required for transposition: all sites are not created equal. Merkulov GV, Lawler JF Jr, Eby Y, Boeke JD, J Virol 2001 75 638 644 10.1128/JVI.75.2.638-644.2001 11134277 (Pubitemid 32037267)
40. Efficient homologous recombination of Ty1 element cDNA when integration is blocked. Sharon G, Burkett TJ, Garfinkel DJ, Mol Cell Biol 1994 14 6540 6551 7523854 (Pubitemid 24299723)
41. Cold response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: new functions for old mechanisms. Aguilera J, Randez-Gil F, Prieto JA, FEMS microbiology reviews 2007 31 327 341 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00066.x 17298585 (Pubitemid 46525310)
42. Hydroxyurea arrests dna replication by a mechanism that preserves basal dNTP pools. Koc A, Wheeler LJ, Mathews CK, Merrill GF, J Biol Chem 2004 279 223 230 10.1074/jbc.M303952200 14573610 (Pubitemid 38044818)
43. Macrophage tropism of HIV-1 depends on efficient cellular dNTP utilization by reverse transcriptase. Diamond TL, Roshal M, Jamburuthugoda VK, Reynolds HM, Merriam AR, Lee KY, Balakrishnan M, Bambara RA, Planelles V, Dewhurst S, Kim B, J Biol Chem 2004 279 51545 51553 10.1074/jbc.M408573200 15452123 (Pubitemid 40017904)
44. Mechanisms of Rad52-independent spontaneous and UV-induced mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Coic E, Feldman T, Landman AS, Haber JE, Genetics 2008 179 199 211 10.1534/genetics.108.087189 18458103
45. Activity of ribonucleotide reductase helps determine how cells repair DNA double strand breaks. Burkhalter MD, Roberts SA, Havener JM, Ramsden DA, DNA Repair 2009 8 1258 1263 10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.07.009 19713159
46. Role of yeast SIR genes and mating type in directing DNA double-strand breaks to homologous and non-homologous repair paths. Lee SE, Paques F, Sylvan J, Haber JE, Curr Biol 1999 9 767 770 10.1016/S0960-9822(99)80339-X 10421582 (Pubitemid 29350858)
47. A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication. Santocanale C, Diffley JF, Nature 1998 395 615 618 10.1038/27001 9783589 (Pubitemid 28475717)
48. Replication-independent MCB gene induction and deoxyribonucleotide accumulation at G1/S in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Koc A, Wheeler LJ, Mathews CK, Merrill GF, J Biol Chem 2003 278 9345 9352 10.1074/jbc.M213013200 12643263 (Pubitemid 36800421)
49. Spk1/Rad53 is regulated by Mec1-dependent protein phosphorylation in DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways. Sun Z, Fay DS, Marini F, Foiani M, Stern DF, Genes Dev 1996 10 395 406 10.1101/gad.10.4.395 8600024 (Pubitemid 26085995)
50. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Sanchez Y, Desany BA, Jones WJ, Liu Q, Wang B, Elledge SJ, Science 1996 271 357 360 10.1126/science.271.5247.357 8553072
51. Rose MD, Winston F, Hieter P, Methods in Yeast Genetics: a Laboratory Course Manual Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor, Laboratory 1990
52. High efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells using single stranded nucleic acids as a carrier. Schiestl RH, Gietz RD, Curr Genet 1989 16 339 346 10.1007/BF00340712 2692852 (Pubitemid 20034019)
53. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Brachmann CB, Davies A, Cost GJ, Caputo E, Li J, Hieter P, Boeke JD, Yeast 1998 14 115 132 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19980130)14:2<115::AID- YEA204>3.0.CO;2-2 9483801 (Pubitemid 28062863)
54. The DNA intermediate in yeast Ty1 element transposition copurifies with virus-like particles: cell-free Ty1 transposition. Eichinger DJ, Boeke JD, Cell 1988 54 955 966 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90110-9 2843295
55. In-frame linker insertion mutagenesis of yeast transposon Ty1: mutations, transposition and dominance. Monokian GM, Braiterman LT, Boeke JD, Gene 1994 139 9 18 10.1016/0378-1119(94)90517-7 8112595 (Pubitemid 24086733)
56. (Pubitemid 24085636)