High-Throughput Analyses and Curation of Protein Interactions in Yeast

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 759, Issue , 2011, Pages 381-406

  Wodak, Shoshana J ^a,b   Vlasblom, Jim ^a,b   Pu, Shuye ^a  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

protein complexes; Protein protein interaction (PPI) networks; yeast interactome

Indexed keywords

HIGH THROUGHPUT ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; RELIABILITY; YEAST; ARTICLE; GENETIC EPISTASIS; GENETICS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PLEIOTROPY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATABASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

FUNGAL PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN;

DATABASES, PROTEIN; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; FUNGAL PROTEINS; GENETIC PLEIOTROPY; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; UBIQUITIN;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 80054756712     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: 19406029     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-173-4_22     Document Type: Chapter

References (92)

1. Gasch, A. P., Spellman, P. T., Kao, C. M., et al. (2000) Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 4241–4257.
2. Hughes, J. D., Estep, P. W., Tavazoie, S., and Church, G. M. (2000) Computational identification of cis-regulatory elements associated with groups of functionally related genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Mol. Biol. 296, 1205–1214.
3. Spellman, P. T., Sherlock, G., Zhang, M. Q., et al. (1998) Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 3273–3297.
4. Harbison, C. T., Gordon, D. B., Lee, T. I., et al. (2004) Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 431, 99–104.
5. Lee, T. I., Rinaldi, N. J., Robert, F., et al. (2002) Transcriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 298, 799–804.
6. Wingender, E., Chen, X., Hehl, R., et al. (2000) TRANSFAC: an integrated system for gene expression regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 316–319.
7. Huh, W. K., Falvo, J. V., Gerke, L. C., et al. (2003) Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 425, 686–691.
8. Kumar, A., Agarwal, S., Heyman, J. A., et al. (2002) Subcellular localization of the yeast proteome. Genes Dev. 16, 707–719.
9. Collins, S. R., Miller, K. M., Maas, N. L., et al. (2007) Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map. Nature 446, 806–810.
10. Hillenmeyer, M. E., Fung, E., Wildenhain, J., et al. (2008) The chemical genomic portrait of yeast: uncovering a phenotype for all genes. Science 320, 362–365.
11. Tong, A. H., Lesage, G., Bader, G. D., et al. (2004) Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303, 808–813.
12. Belle, A., Tanay, A., Bitincka, L., Shamir, R., and O’Shea, E. K. (2006) Quantification of protein half-lives in the budding yeast proteome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 13004–13009.
13. Ghaemmaghami, S., Huh, W. K., Bower, K., et al. (2003) Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425, 737–741.
14. Fields, S., and Song, O. (1989) A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature 340, 245–246.
15. Stagljar, I., Korostensky, C., Johnsson, N., and te Heesen, S. (1998) A genetic system based on split-ubiquitin for the analysis of interactions between membrane proteins in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 5187– 5192.
16. Morell, M., Ventura, S., and Aviles, F. X. (2009) Protein complementation assays: approaches for the in vivo analysis of protein interactions. FEBS Lett. 583, 1684–1691.
17. Puig, O., Caspary, F., Rigaut, G., et al. (2001) The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. Methods 24, 218–229.
18. Gavin, A. C., Aloy, P., Grandi, P., et al. (2006) Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440, 631–636.
19. Krogan, N. J., Cagney, G., Yu, H., et al. (2006) Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 440, 637–643.
20. Wodak, S. J., Pu, S., Vlasblom, J., and Seraphin, B. (2009) Challenges and rewards of interaction proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 8, 3–18.
21. Collins, S. R., Kemmeren, P., Zhao, X. C., et al. (2007) Toward a comprehensive atlas of the physical interactome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 439–450.
22. Pu, S., Vlasblom, J., Emili, A., Greenblatt, J., and Wodak, S. J. (2007) Identifying functional modules in the physical interactome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proteomics 7, 944–960.
23. Ito, T., Tashiro, K., Muta, S., et al. (2000) Toward a protein-protein interaction map of the budding yeast: A comprehensive system to examine two-hybrid interactions in all possible combinations between the yeast proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 1143–1147.
24. Ito, T., Chiba, T., Ozawa, R., Yoshida, M., Hattori, M., and Sakaki, Y. (2001) A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4569–4574.
25. Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., et al. (2000) A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403, 623–627.
26. Yu, H., Braun, P., Yildirim, M. A., et al. (2008) High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science 322, 104–110.
27. Tarassov, K., Messier, V., Landry, C. R., et al. (2008) An in vivo map of the yeast protein interactome. Science 320, 1465–1470.
28. Miller, J. P., Lo, R. S., Ben-Hur, A., et al. (2005) Large-scale identification of yeast integral membrane protein interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 12123–12128.
29. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J. (2001) The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. New York, NY: Springer.
30. Brohee, S., and van Helden, J. (2006) Evaluation of clustering algorithms for protein-protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 488.
31. Vlasblom, J., and Wodak, S. J. (2009) Markov clustering versus affinity propagation for the partitioning of protein interaction graphs. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 99.
32. Ben-Hur, A., and Noble, W. S. (2006) Choosing negative examples for the prediction of protein-protein interactions. BMC Bioinformatics 7(Suppl 1), S2.
33. Hart, G. T., Ramani, A. K., and Marcotte, E. M. (2006) How complete are current yeast and human protein-interaction networks? Genome Biol. 7, 120.
34. Mewes, H. W., Frishman, D., Guldener, U., et al. (2002) MIPS: a database for genomes and protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 31–34.
35. Pu, S., Wong, J., Turner, B., Cho, E., and Wodak, S. J. (2009) Up-to-date catalogues of yeast protein complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 825–831.
36. Remy, I., and Michnick, S. W. (2004) Mapping biochemical networks with protein-fragment complementation assays. Methods Mol. Biol. 261, 411–426.
37. Eyckerman, S., Verhee, A., der Heyden, J. V., et al. (2001) Design and application of a cytokine-receptor-based interaction trap. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 1114–1119.
38. Wang, H., Kakaradov, B., Collins, S. R., et al. (2009) A complex-based reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae interactome. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 8, 1361–1381.
39. Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., et al. (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The gene ontology consortium. Nat. Genet. 25, 25–29.
40. Deane, C. M., Salwinski, L., Xenarios, I., and Eisenberg, D. (2002) Protein interactions: two methods for assessment of the reliability of high throughput observations. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 349–356.
41. Deng, M., Mehta, S., Sun, F., and Chen, T. (2002) Inferring domain-domain interactions from protein-protein interactions. Genome Res. 12, 1540–1548.
42. Gentleman, R., and Huber, W. (2007) Making the most of high-throughput protein-interaction data. Genome Biol. 8, 112.
43. Hakes, L., Pinney, J. W., Robertson, D. L., and Lovell, S. C. (2008) Protein-protein interaction networks and biology-what’s the connection? Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 69–72.
44. Huang, H., Jedynak, B. M., and Bader, J. S. (2007) Where have all the interactions gone? Estimating the coverage of two-hybrid protein interaction maps. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3, e214.
45. Stumpf, M. P., Thorne, T., de Silva, E., et al. (2008) Estimating the size of the human interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 6959–6964.
46. Hart, G. T., Lee, I., and Marcotte, E. R. (2007) A high-accuracy consensus map of yeast protein complexes reveals modular nature of gene essentiality. BMC Bioinformatics 8, 236.
47. Qiu, J., and Noble, W. S. (2008) Predicting co-complexed protein pairs from heterogeneous data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000054.
48. Reguly, T., Breitkreutz, A., Boucher, L., et al. (2006) Comprehensive curation and analysis of global interaction networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. 5, 11.
49. Goldberg, D. S., and Roth, F. P. (2003) Assessing experimentally derived interactions in a small world. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 4372–4376.
50. Qi, Y., Suhail, Y., Lin, Y. Y., Boeke, J. D., and Bader, J. S. (2008) Finding friends and enemies in an enemies-only network: a graph diffusion kernel for predicting novel genetic interactions and co-complex membership from yeast genetic interactions. Genome Res. 18, 1991–2004.
51. Boone, C., Bussey, H., and Andrews, B. J. (2007) Exploring genetic interactions and networks with yeast. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 437–449.
52. Pan, X., Yuan, D. S., Ooi, S., et al. (2007) dSLAM analysis of genome-wide genetic interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods 41, 206–221.
53. Tong, A. H. Y., and Boone, C. (2006) Synthetic genetic array analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol. Biol. 313, 171–192.
54. Costanzo, M., and Boone, C. (2009) SGAM: an array-based approach for high-resolution genetic mapping in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol. Biol. 548, 37–53.
55. Schuldiner, M., Collins, S. R., Thompson, N. J., et al. (2005) Exploration of the function and organization of the yeast early secretory pathway through an epistatic miniarray profile. Cell 123, 507–519.
56. Segre, D., Deluna, A., Church, G. M., and Kishony, R. (2005) Modular epistasis in yeast metabolism. Nat. Genet. 37, 77–83.
57. Kelley, R., and Ideker, T. (2005) Systematic interpretation of genetic interactions using protein networks. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 561–566.
58. Bandyopadhyay, S., Kelley, R., Krogan, N. J., and Ideker, T. (2008) Functional maps of protein complexes from quantitative genetic interaction data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000065.
59. Ulitsky, I., Shlomi, T., Kupiec, M., and Shamir, R. (2008) From E-MAPs to module maps: dissecting quantitative genetic interactions using physical interactions. Mol. Syst. Biol. 4, 209.
60. Prelic, A., Bleuler, S., Zimmermann, P., et al. (2006) A systematic comparison and evaluation of biclustering methods for gene expression data. Bioinformatics 22, 1122–1129.
61. Pu, S., Ronen, K., Vlasblom, J., Greenblatt, J., and Wodak, S. J. (2008) Local coherence in genetic interaction patterns reveals prevalent functional versatility. Bioinformatics 24, 2376–2383.
62. Stark, C., Breitkreutz, B. J., Reguly, T., Boucher, L., Breitkreutz, A., and Tyers, M. (2006) BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D535–D539.
63. Xenarios, I., Salwinski, L., Duan, X. J., Higney, P., Kim, S. M., and Eisenberg, D. (2002) DIP, the database of interacting proteins: a research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 303–305.
64. von Mering, C., Jensen, L. J., Snel, B., et al. (2005) STRING: known and predicted protein-protein associations, integrated and transferred across organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, D433–D437.
65. Hoffmann, R., Krallinger, M., Andres, E., Tamames, J., Blaschke, C., and Valencia, A. (2005) Text mining for metabolic pathways, signaling cascades, and protein networks. Sci. STKE, 283, pe21.
66. Cusick, M. E., Yu, H., Smolyar, A., et al. (2009) Literature-curated protein interaction datasets. Nat. Methods 6, 39–46.
67. Salwinski, L., Licata, L., Winter, A., et al. (2009) Recurated protein interaction datasets. Nat. Methods 6, 860–861.
68. Orchard, S., Jones, P., Taylor, C., et al. (2007) Proteomic data exchange and storage: the need for common standards and public repositories. Methods Mol. Biol. 367, 261–270.
69. Chaurasia, G., Malhotra, S., Russ, J., et al. (2009) UniHI 4: new tools for query, analysis and visualization of the human protein-protein interactome. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D657–D660.
70. Jayapandian, M., Chapman, A., Tarcea, V. G., et al. (2007) Michigan Molecular Interactions (MiMI): putting the jigsaw puzzle together. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D566– D571.
71. Kamburov, A., Wierling, C., Lehrach, H., and Herwig, R. (2009) ConsensusPathDB – a database for integrating human functional interaction networks. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D623–D628.
72. Prieto, C., and De Las Rivas, J. (2006) APID: Agile Protein Interaction DataAna-lyzer. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W298–W302.
73. Razick, S., Magklaras, G., and Donaldson, I. M. (2008) iRefIndex: a consolidated protein interaction database with provenance. BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 405.
74. Bader, G. D., Betel, D., and Hogue, C. W. (2003) BIND: the biomolecular interaction network database. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 248–250.
75. Ruepp, A., Brauner, B., Dunger-Kaltenbach, I., et al. (2008) CORUM: the comprehensive resource of mammalian protein complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, D646–D650.
76. Kerrien, S., Alam-Faruque, Y., Aranda, B., et al. (2007) IntAct – open source resource for molecular interaction data. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D561–D565.
77. Prasad, T. S., Kandasamy, K., and Pandey, A. (2009) Human protein reference database and human proteinpedia as discovery tools for systems biology. Methods Mol. Biol. 577, 67–79.
78. Chatr-aryamontri, A., Ceol, A., Palazzi, L. M., et al. (2007) MINT: the Molecular INTeraction database. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D572–D574.
79. Guldener, U., Munsterkotter, M., Oesterheld, M., et al. (2006) MPact: the MIPS protein interaction resource on yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D436–D441.
80. Pagel, P., Kovac, S., Oesterheld, M., et al. (2005) The MIPS mammalian protein-protein interaction database. Bioinformatics 21, 832–834.
81. Kim, P. M., Lu, L. J., Xia, Y., and Gerstein, M. B. (2006) Relating three-dimensional structures to protein networks provides evolutionary insights. Science, 314, 1938–1941.
82. Cochran, A. G. (2001) Protein-protein interfaces: mimics and inhibitors. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 5, 654–659.
83. Wepf, A., Glatter, T., Schmidt, A., Aeber-sold, R., and Gstaiger, M. (2009) Quantitative interaction proteomics using mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 6, 203–205.
84. Hernandez, H., Dziembowski, A., Taverner, T., Seraphin, B., and Robinson, C. V. (2006) Subunit architecture of multimeric complexes isolated directly from cells. EMBO Rep. 7, 605–610.
85. Kamal, J. K., and Chance, M. R. (2008) Modeling of protein binary complexes using structural mass spectrometry data. Protein Sci. 17, 79–94.
86. Janin, J., and Wodak, S. (2007) The third CAPRI assessment meeting Toronto, Canada, April 20–21, 2007. Structure 15, 755–759.
87. Lensink, M.F., Mendez, R., and Wodak, S. J. (2007) Docking and scoring protein complexes: CAPRI 3rd Edition. Proteins 69, 704–718.
88. Ben-Hur, A., Ong, C. S., Sonnenburg, S., Scholkopf, B., and Ratsch, G. (2008) Support vector machines and kernels for computational biology. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000173.
89. Noble, W. S. (2006) What is a support vector machine? Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 1565–1567.
90. Guyon, I., Weston, J., Barnhill, S., and Vap-nik, V. (2002) Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Mach. Learn. 46, 389–422.
91. Batada, N. N., Reguly, T., Breitkreutz, A., et al. (2007) Still stratus not altocumulus: further evidence against the date/party hub distinction. PLoS Biol. 5, e154.
92. Lord, P. W., Stevens, R. D., Brass, A., and Goble, C. A. (2003) Investigating semantic similarity measures across the gene ontology: the relationship between sequence and annotation. Bioinformatics 19, 1275–1283.