A systematic guide for reading and interpreting diagnostic accuracy studies;Eine systematische Anleitung zum Lesen und Interpretieren diagnostischer Genauigkeitsstudien

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 183, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 909-912

  Panner, J ^a   Schuetz, G M ^a   Hamm, B ^a   Dewey, M ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

CHECKLIST; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MANUSCRIPTS, MEDICAL; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; READING; WRITING;

EID: 80053448303     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: 14389010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1281684     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Schuetz G M., Tackmann R, Hamm B et al. Qualität diagnostischer Genauigkeitsstudien: QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies included in Systematic Reviews). Fortschr Röntgenstr 2010 182 939-942
2. Puig S, Felder-Puig R. Evidenzbasierte Radiologie: Ein neuer Ansatz zur Bewertung von klinisch angewandter radiologischer Diagnostik und Therapie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006 178 671-679 (Pubitemid 44195154)
3. Puesken M, Buerke B, Fortkamp R et al. Liver Lesion Segmentation in MSCT: Effect of Slice Thickness on Segmentation Quality, Measurement Precision and Interobserver Variability. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2011 183 372-380
4. Lemburg S, Atta A, Peters S et al. Lagebeurteilung transpedikulärer Schrauben nach dorsaler Spondylodese mittels konventioneller Röntgenaufnahmen: ein Vergleich zur Mehrzeilen-Computertomografie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2010 182 327-333
5. Baltzer P A., Dietzel M, Vag T et al. Clinical MR Mammography: Impact of Hormonal Status on Background Enhancement and Diagnostic Accuracy. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2011 183 441-447
6. Bauer R W., Kraus B, Bernhardt D et al. Computer-Based Automated Left Atrium Segmentation and Volumetry from ECG-Gated Coronary CT Angiography Data: Comparison with Manual Slice Segmentation and Ultrasound Planimetric Methods. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2010 182 1110-1117
7. Born M, Franke I, Schild H H. Sonographic Bladder Volumetry in Children: Comparison of Conventional B-Mode Sonography and Automatic Volumetry with a Handheld Scanning Device without Imaging. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2010 182 341-347
8. Dietzel M, Baltzer P A., Vag T et al. Magnetic Resonance Mammography in Small vs. Advanced Breast Lesions Systematic Comparison Reveals Significant Impact of Lesion Size on Diagnostic Accuracy in 936 Histologically Verified Breast Lesions. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2011 183 126-135
9. Groth M, Henes F O., Bannas P et al. Intraindividual Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Unenhanced SSFP Sequences of Stenotic and Non-stenotic Pulmonary Artery Diameters. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2011 183 47-53
10. Heilmaier C, Schlosser T, Bruder O et al. Comparison of a Multi-Breath-Hold and a Single Breath-Hold Cine Imaging Approach for 4D Guide-Point Modeling of the Left Ventricle. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2010 182 780-787
11. Hoffstetter P, Schreyer A G., Schreyer C I. et al. Multidetector CT (MD-CT) in the Diagnosis of Uncertain Open Globe Injuries. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2010 182 151-154
12. Kuhlemann J, Blondin D, Grotemeyer D et al. Gadofosveset- unterstützte MR-Bildgebung zur präoperativen Evaluation potenzieller Lebendnierenspender: Vergleich mit intraoperativen Befunden. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2010 182 1001-1009
13. Moritz J D., Hoffmann B, Meuser S H. et al. Ist die Sonografie der Röntgendiagnostik in der pädiatrischen Frakturdiagnostik gleichwertig? Fortschr Röntgenstr 2010 182 706-714
14. Thieme S F., Dietrich O, Maxien D et al. Oxygen-Enhanced MRI of the Lungs: Intraindividual Comparison Between 1.5 and 3 Tesla. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2011 183 358-364
15. Zimmermann E, Dewey M. Whole-Heart 320-Row Computed Tomography: Reduction of Radiation Dose via Prior Coronary Calcium Scanning. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2011 183 54-59
16. Kyriakou Y, Kolditz D, Langner O et al. Digitale Volumentomografie (DVT) und Mehrschicht-Spiral-CT (MSCT): eine objektive Untersuchung von Dosis und Bildqualität. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2011 183 144-153
17. Dietzel M, Baltzer P A., Vag T et al. Potential of MR Mammography to Predict Tumor Grading of Invasive Breast Cancer. Fortschr Röntgenstr Epub
18. Mathys C, Blondin D, Wittsack H J. et al. T2* Imaging of Native Kidneys and Renal Allografts a Feasibility Study. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2011 183 112-119
19. Volz G, Schwaderer E, Dammann F. Protokolloptimierung zur 3D-CT des Gesichtsschädels. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2011 183 244-250
20. The Evidence-Based Radiology Working Group. Evidence-based radiology: a new approach to the practice of radiology. Radiology 2001 220 566-575
21. Tackmann R, Schuetz G, Hamm B et al. Berichtsqualität diagnostischer klinischer Studien: STARD (Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies). Fortschr Röntgenstr 2010 182 655-659
22. Hopewell S, Clarke M, Moher D et al. CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts. Lancet 2008 371 281-283
23. Bossuyt P M., Reitsma J B., Bruns D E. et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration. Croatian Medical Journal 2003 44 639-650 (Pubitemid 37392154)
24. Whiting P, Rutjes A WS, Reitsma J B. et al. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003 3 25
25. Liberati A, Altman D G., Tetzlaff J et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 2009 62 e1-34
26. Stoffner R, Augschöll C, Widmann G et al. Accuracy and Feasibility of Frameless Stereotactic and Robot-Assisted CT-Based Puncture in Interventional Radiology: a Comparative Phantom Study. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009 181 851-858
27. Zangos S, Eichler K, Thalhammer A et al. Aktueller Stand der MR-gesteuerten Prostata-Interventionen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2010 182 947-953
28. Werncke T, Albrecht T, Wolf K J. et al. Dual Energy CT of the Peripheral Arteries: a Phantom Study to Assess the Effect of Automatic Plaque Removal on Stenosis Grading. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2010 182 682-689
29. Gruber R, Bernt R, Helbich T H. Kosteneinsparungspotenzial der Nadelbiopsie im Vergleich zur offenen Biopsie bei der Diagnose suspekter, nichtpalpabler Brustläsionen: Metaanalyse der Literatur und Vergleich mit Daten aus dem deutschen Sprachraum. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2008 180 134-142 (Pubitemid 351251494)
30. du Prell J, Rohrig B, Blettner M. Critical Appraisal of Scientific Articles. Deutsches Arzteblatt International 2009 106 100-105
31. Kallet R H. How to write the methods section of a research paper. Respir Care 2004 49 1229-1232
32. Moher D, Schulz K F., Altman D G. The CONSORT Statement. Revised recommendations on improving the quality of reports on parallel-design randomized studies. Schmerz 2005 19 156-162 (Pubitemid 40591166)
33. Budovec J J., Kahn C E. Evidence-Based Radiology: A Primer in Reading Scientific Articles. American Journal of Roentgenology 2010 195 1-4
34. Whiting P, Rutjes A WS, Reitsma J B. et al. Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy A systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine 2004 140 189-202 (Pubitemid 38155650)
35. Eng J. Sample Size Estimation: How Many Individuals Should Be Studied? Radiology 2003 227 309-313 (Pubitemid 36514740)
36. Provenzale J M., Stanley R J. A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. American Journal of Roentgenology 2005 185 848-854
37. Rutjes A W., Reitsma J B., Di Nisio M et al. Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies. CMAJ 2006 174 469-476
38. Leeflang M M., Deeks J J., Gatsonis C et al. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Ann Intern Med 2008 149 889-897
39. Schueler S, Schuetz G M., Hamm B et al. Lesen und Interpretieren von Metaanalysen diagnostischer Genauigkeitsstudien. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2011 183 im Druck
40. The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening. New England Journal of Medicine 2011 365 (5) 395-409
41. Fewell Z, Smith G D., Sterne J AC. The impact of residual and unmeasured confounding in epidemiologic studies: A simulation study. American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 166 646-655 (Pubitemid 47347902)
42. Sutton A J., Duval S J., Tweedie R L. et al. Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses. British Medical Journal 2000 320 1574-1577 (Pubitemid 30336090)
43. Dewey M, Hamm B. Kosteneffizienz in der Diagnostik der koronaren Herzkrankheit. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003 175 749-751 (Pubitemid 36806755)
44. Schmidt T, Mühlberger N, Chemelli-Steingruber I E. et al. Benefit, Risks and Cost-Effectiveness of Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2010 182 573-580
45. Schreyer A G., Friedrich C, Mrosek S et al. Kostenanalyse einer kontrastgestützten MRT des Schädels an einem Universitä tsklinikum. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2010 182 891-899
46. Huppertz A, Schmidt M, Wagner M et al. Whole-Body MR Imaging versus Sequential Multimodal Diagnostic Algorithm for Staging Patients with Rectal Cancer: Cost Analysis. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2010 182 793-802
47. Schönenberger E, Schnapauff D, Teige F et al. Patient Acceptance of Noninvasive and Invasive Coronary Angiography. PLoS One 2007 2 e246
48. Schunemann H J., Oxman A D., Brozek J et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ 2008 336 1106-1110 (Pubitemid 351731739)