Comparison of a multi-breath-hold and a single breath-hold cine imaging approach for 4D guide-point modeling of the left ventricle

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 182, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 780-787

  Heilmaier, C ^a   Schlosser, T ^a   Bruder, O ^b   Nassenstein K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

^b ELISABETH KRANKENHAUS ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

cardiac MRI; left ventricular function; volumetry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREATH HOLDING; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; FEMALE; GUIDE POINT MODELING; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDSYSTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE VOLUME; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VOLUMETRY; ARTIFACT; BREATHING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; IMAGE PROCESSING; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTIFACTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RESPIRATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE; STROKE VOLUME; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77956028079     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: 14389010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245503     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Hammermeister K E., DeRouen T A., Dodge H T. Variables predictive of survival in patients with coronary disease. Selection by univariate and multivariate analyses from the clinical, electrocardiographic, exercise, arteriographic, and quantitative angiographic evaluations. Circulation 1979 59 421-430
2. White H D., Norris R M., Brown M A. et al. Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation 1987 76 44-51
3. Juilliere Y, Barbier G, Feldmann L et al. Additional predictive value of both left and right ventricular ejection fractions on long-term survival in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J 1997 18 276-280
4. Debatin J F., Nadel S N., Paolini J F. et al. Cardiac ejection fraction: phantom study comparing cine MR imaging, radionuclide blood pool imaging, and ventriculography. JMagn Reson Imaging 1992 2 135-142
5. Bellenger N G., Marcus N J., Davies C et al. Left ventricular function and mass after orthotopic heart transplantation: a comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with echocardiography. JHeart Lung Transplant 2000 19 444-452
6. Gutberlet M, Abdul-Khaliq H, Grothoff M et al. Evaluation of left ventricular volumes in patients with congenital heart disease and abnormal left ventricular geometry. Comparison of MRI and transthoracic 3-dimensional echocardiography. Fortschr Rntgenstr 2003 175 942-951
7. Alfakih K, Reid S, Jones T et al. Assessment of ventricular function and mass by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2004 14 1813-1822
8. Pennell D J., Sechtem U P., Higgins C B. et al. Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report. JCardiovasc Magn Reson 2004 6 727-765
9. Lyne J C., Pennell D J. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the quantitative assessment of left ventricular mass, volumes and contractile function. Coron Artery Dis 2005 16 337-343
10. Nassenstein K, Bruder O, Breuckmann F et al. Prevalence, pattern, and functional impact of late gadolinium enhancement in left ventricular hypertrophy due to aortic valve stenosis. Fortschr Rntgenstr 2009 181 472-476
11. Lotz J, Kivelitz D, Fischbach R et al. Recommendations for utilizing computerized tomography and magnetic resonance tomography in heart diagnosis. 2-Magnetic resonance tomography. Fortschr Rntgenstr 2009 181 800-814
12. Lüders F, Fischbach R, Seifarth H et al. Dual-source computed tomography: effect on regional and global left ventricular function assessment compared to magnetic resonance imaging. Fortschr Rntgenstr 2009 181 962-969
13. Young A A., Cowan B R., Thrupp S F. et al. Left ventricular mass and volume: fast calculation with guide-point modeling on MR images. Radiology 2000 216 597-602
14. Heilmaier C, Nassenstein K, Nielles-Vallespin S et al. Assessment of left ventricular function with single breath-hold highly accelerated cine MRI combined with guide-point modeling. Eur J Radiol 2009 74 492-499
15. Eberle H C., Nassenstein K, Jensen C J. et al. Rapid MR assessment of left ventricular systolic function after acute myocardial infarction using single breath-hold cine imaging with the temporal parallel acquisition technique (TPAT) and 4D guide-point modelling analysis of left ventricular function. Eur Radiol 2010 20 73-80
16. Young A A., Cowan B R., Schoenberg S O. et al. Feasibility of single breath-hold left ventricular function with 3 Tesla TSENSE acquisition and 3D modeling analysis. JCardiovasc Magn Reson 2008 10 24
17. Barkhausen J, Ruehm S G., Goyen M et al. MR evaluation of ventricular function: true fast imaging with steady-state precession versus fast low-angle shot cine MR imaging: feasibility study. Radiology 2001 219 264-269
18. Karamitsos T D., Hudsmith L E., Selvanayagam J B. et al. Operator induced variability in left ventricular measurements with cardiovascular magnetic resonance is improved after training. JCardiovasc Magn Reson 2007 9 777-783
19. Bland J M., Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986 1 307-310
20. Wintersperger B J., Reeder S B., Nikolaou K et al. Cardiac CINE MR imaging with a 32-channel cardiac coil and parallel imaging: impact of acceleration factors on image quality and volumetric accuracy. JMagn Reson Imaging 2006 23 222-227
21. Gutberlet M, Schwinge K, Freyhardt P et al. Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2D CINE magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of 1.5T vs. 3.0T. Eur Radiol 2005 15 1586-1597
22. Wintersperger B J., Bauner K, Reeder S B. et al. Cardiac steady-state free precession CINE magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 tesla: impact of parallel imaging acceleration on volumetric accuracy and signal parameters. Invest Radiol 2006 41 141-147
23. Miller S, Simonetti O P., Carr J et al. MR Imaging of the heart with cine true fast imaging with steady-state precession: influence of spatial and temporal resolutions on left ventricular functional parameters. Radiology 2002 223 263-269
24. Krenning B J., Voormolen M M., Geuns R J. et al. Rapid and accurate measurement of left ventricular function with a new second-harmonic fast-rotating transducer and semi-automated border detection. Echocardiography 2006 23 447-454
25. Geuns R J. van, Baks T van, Gronenschild E H. et al. Automatic quantitative left ventricular analysis of cine MR images by using three-dimensional information for contour detection. Radiology 2006 240 215-221
26. Chandler A G., Pinder R J., Netsch T et al. Correction of misaligned slices in multi-slice cardiovascular magnetic resonance using slice-to-volume registration. JCardiovasc Magn Reson 2008 10 13
27. Rominger M B., Bachmann G F., Geuer M et al. Accuracy of right and left ventricular heart volume and left ventricular muscle mass determination with cine MRI in breath holding technique. Fortschr Rntgenstr 1999 170 54-60
28. Miller S, Hahn U, Bail D M. et al. Cardiac MRI for determining functional left ventricular parameters. Fortschr Rntgenstr 1999 170 47-53
29. Bellenger N G., Francis J M., Davies C L. et al. Establishment and performance of a magnetic resonance cardiac function clinic. JCardiovasc Magn Reson 2000 2 15-22
30. Moon J C., Lorenz C H., Francis J M. et al. Breath-hold FLASH and FISP cardiovascular MR imaging: left ventricular volume differences and reproducibility. Radiology 2002 223 789-797