Cost-effectiveness in diagnosis of coronary artery disease;Kosteneffizienz in der diagnostik der koronaren herzkrankheit

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 175, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 749-751

  Dewey, M ^b   Hamm, B ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; EDITORIAL; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART SCINTISCANNING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY DISEASE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; GERMANY; HUMANS; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS;

EID: 0038113363     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-39926     Document Type: Editorial

References (20)

1. Statistisches Bundesamt. Statistisches Jahrbuch 2000 für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Saarbrücken: Metzler-Poeschel, 2000: 424
2. Statistisches Bundesamt. Gesundheitsbericht für Deutschland: Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes. Saarbrücken: Metzler-Poeschel, 1998: 162-164
3. Klever-Deichert G, Hinzpeter B, Hunsche E, Lauterbach KW. Costs of coronary heart diseases over the remaining life time in coronary heart disease cases - an analysis of the current status of coronary heart disease cases in Germany from the social perspective. Z Kardiol 1999; 88: 991-1000
4. Mattke S. Cardiology and cost control: the ethical challenge for the new millennium. Z Kardiol 2000; 89: 649-657
5. Patterson RE, Eng C, Horowitz SF, Gorlin R, Goldstein SR. Bayesian comparison of cost-effectiveness of different clinical approaches to diagnose coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 4: 278-289
6. Henry P, Makowski S, Guermonprez JL, Guize L. A comparative study of 4 diagnostic strategies in coronary artery disease. A theoretical approach. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 1997; 90: 327-335
7. Maddahi J, Gambhir SS. Cost-effective selection of patients for coronary angiography. J Nucl Cardiol 1997; 4: S141-S151
8. Patterson RE, Eisner RL, Horowitz SF. Comparison of cost-effectiveness and utility of exercise ECG, single photon emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and coronary angiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Circulation 1995; 91: 54-65
9. Raggi P, Callister TQ, Cooil B, Russo DJ, Lippolis NJ, Patterson RE. Evaluation of chest pain in patients with low to intermediate pretest probability of coronary artery disease by electron beam computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2000; 85: 283-288
10. Rumberger JA, Behrenbeck T, Breen JF, Sheedy PF 2nd. Coronary calcification by electron beam computed tomography and obstructive coronary artery disease: a model for costs and effectiveness of diagnosis as compared with conventional cardiac testing methods. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 453-462
11. Shaw U, Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, et al. The economic consequences of available diagnostic and prognostic strategies for the evaluation of stable angina patients: an observational assessment of the value of precatheterization ischemia. Economics of Noninvasive Diagnosis (END) Multicenter Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 661-669
12. Underwood SR, Godman B, Salyani S, Ogle JR, Ell PJ. Economics of myocardial perfusion imaging in Europe - the EMPIRE Study. Eur Heart J 1999; 20: 157-166
13. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Kiat H, Cohen I, Friedman JD, Shaw LJ. Value of stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in patients with normal resting electrocardiograms: an evaluation of incremental prognostic value and cost-effectiveness. Circulation 2002; 105: 823-829
14. Kuntz KM, Fleischmann KE, Hunink MG, Douglas PS. Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for patients with chest pain. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130: 709-718
15. Kymes SM, Bruns DE, Shaw LJ, Gillespie KN, Fletcher JW. Anatomy of a meta-analysis: a critical review of "exercise echocardiography or exercise SPECT imaging? A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance". J Nucl Cardiol 2000; 7: 599-615
16. Fleischmann KE, Hunink MG, Kuntz KM, Douglas PS. Exercise echocardiography or exercise SPECT imaging? A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance. JAMA 1998; 280: 913-920
17. Garber AM, Solomon NA. Cost-effectiveness of alternative test strategies for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130: 719-728
18. Sommer T, Hofer U, Hackenbroch M, et al. Submillimeter 3D co ronary MR angiography with real-time navigator correction in 107 patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 459-466
19. Flohr T, Bruder H, Stierstorfer K, Simon J, Schaller S, Ohnesorge B. New technical developments in multislice CT, part 2: sub-millimeter 16-slice scanning and increased gantry rotation speed for cardiac imaging. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 1022-1027
20. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cardiovascular system. Present state of the art and future potential. Council on Scientific Affairs. Report of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Panel. JAMA 1988; 259: 253-259