Accuracy and feasibility of frameless stereotactic and robot-assisted ct-based puncture in interventional radiology: A comparative phantom study

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 181, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 851-858

  Stoffner, R ^a   Augscholl C ^b   Widmann, G ^a   Bohler D ^b   Bale, R ^a  

^a INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^b LKH Salzburg ^*  (Austria)

Author keywords

Accuracy evaluation; Frameless stereotactic navigation; Percutaneous; Phantom study; Robot assisted puncture

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; KIRSCHNER WIRE; PATIENT SAFETY; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUNCTURE; RELIABILITY; ROBOTICS; ADULT; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CHILD; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; NEEDLE BIOPSY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; TASK PERFORMANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; CHILD; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; REFERENCE STANDARDS; ROBOTICS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME AND MOTION STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 70149092020     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: 14389010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1109380     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Wood B J., Locklin J K., Viswanathan A, et al. Technologies for guidance of radiofrequency ablation in the multimodality interventional suite of the future. JVasc Interv Radiol 2007 18 9-24
2. Melzer A, Gutmann B, Remmele T, et al. INNOMOTION for percutaneous image-guided interventions: principles and evaluation of this MR- and CT-compatible robotic system. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2008 27 66-73
3. Eljamel M S. Validation of the PathFinder neurosurgical robot using a phantom. Int J Med Robot 2007 3 372-377
4. West J B., Fitzpatrick J M., Toms S A., et al. Fiducial point placement and the accuracy of point-based, rigid body registration. Neurosurgery 2001 48 810-816; discussion 816 817
5. West J B., Maurer C R. Designing optically tracked instruments for image-guided surgery. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 2004 23 533-545
6. Cleary K Jr, Melzer A, Watson V, et al. Interventional robotic systems: applications and technology state-of-the-art. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2006 15 101-113
7. Jantschke R, Haas T, Madoerin P, et al. Preparation, assistance and imaging protocols for robotically assisted MR and CT- based procedures. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2007 16 217-221
8. Bartsch H J. Taschenbuch mathematischer Formeln. Leipzig Fachbuchverlag Leipzig GmbH 1994
9. Bale R, Widmann G. Navigated CT-guided interventions. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2007 16 196-204
10. Stoianovici D, Cleary K, Patriciu A, et al. AcuBot: A robot for radiological interventions. Ieee Transactions on Robotics and Automation 2003 19 927-930
11. Meier-Meitinger M, Nagel M, Kalender W, et al. Computergesttztes Navigationssystem fr CT-gesteuerte Interventionen: Ergebnisse am Phantom und im klinischen Einsatz. Röntgenstr Fortschr 2008 180 310-317
12. Benardete E A., Leonard M A., Weiner H L. Comparison of frameless stereotactic systems: accuracy, precision, and applications. Neurosurgery 2001 49 1409-1415; discussion 1415 1406
13. Krempien R, Hassfeld S, Kozak J, et al. Frameless image guidance improves accuracy in three-dimensional interstitial brachytherapy needle placement. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 2004 60 1645-1651
14. Dorward N L., Alberti O, Palmer J D., et al. Accuracy of true frameless stereotaxy: in vivo measurement and laboratory phantom studies. Technical note. Journal of neurosurgery 1999 90 160-168
15. Khan M F., Dogan S, Maataoui A, et al. Accuracy of biopsy needle navigation using the Medarpa system computed tomography reality superimposed on the site of intervention. European radiology 2005 15 2366-2374
16. Solomon S B., Patriciu A, Bohlman M E., et al. Robotically driven interventions: a method of using CT fluoroscopy without radiation exposure to the physician. Radiology 2002 225 277-282
17. Pereles F S., Baker M, Baldwin R, et al. Accuracy of CT biopsy: laser guidance versus conventional freehand techniques. Academic radiology 1998 5 766-770
18. Galiano K, Obwegeser A A., Walch C, et al. Ultrasound-guided versus computed tomography-controlled facet joint injections in the lumbar spine: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Regional anesthesia and pain medicine 2007 32 317-322
19. Schaefer P J., Schaefer F K., Heller M, et al. CT fluoroscopy guided biopsy of small pulmonary and upper abdominal lesions: efficacy with a modified breathing technique. JVasc Interv Radiol 2007 18 1241-1248