Magnetic resonance mammography in small vs. advanced breast lesions - Systematic comparison reveals significant impact of lesion size on diagnostic accuracy in 936 histologically verified breast lesions;Magnet-Resonanz-Mammografie von kleinen vs. großen Herdbefunden - Systematischer Vergleich identifiziert signifikanten Einfluss der Herdgröße auf die diagnostische Genauigkeit in 936 histologisch verifizierten Herdbefunden

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 183, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 126-135

  Dietzel, M ^a   Baltzer, P A ^a   Vag, T ^b   Groschel T ^a   Richter, C ^a   Burmeister, H ^a   Kaiser, W A ^a,c  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

breast; contrast agents; decision analysis; mammography; neoplasms; pathology

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST LESION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; BREAST; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR BURDEN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79551513576     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: 14389010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245630     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Parkin D M., Bray F, Ferlay J et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005 55 74-108
2. Verschraegen C, Vinh-Hung V, Cserni G et al. Modeling the effect of tumor size in early breast cancer. Ann Surg 2005 241 309-318
3. Coburn N G., Chung M A., Fulton J et al. Decreased breast cancer tumor size, stage, and mortality in rhode island: an example of a well-screened population. Cancer Control 2004 11 222-230
4. Liberman L, Mason G, Morris E A. et al. Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size. Am J Roentgenol 2006 186 426-430
5. Carlomagno C, Perrone F, Lauria R et al. Prognostic significance of necrosis, elastosis, fibrosis and inflammatory cell reaction in operable breast cancer. Oncology 1995 52 272-277
6. Walker R A. The complexities of breast cancer desmoplasia. Breast Cancer Res 2001 3 143-145
7. Folkman J, Shing Y. Angiogenesis. J Biol Chem 1992 267 10 931-10 934
8. Bässsler R. Mamma. In Remmele W ed Pathologie. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York Springer 1997 135-368
9. Warren R, Ciatto S, Macaskill P et al. Technical aspects of breast MRI - do they affect outcomes? Eur Radiol 2009 19 1629-1638
10. DeMartini W, Lehman C. A review of current evidence-based clinical applications for breast magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2008 19 143-150
11. Malich A, Fischer D R., Wurdinger S et al. Potential MRI interpretation model: differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses. Am J Roentgenol 2005 185 964-970
12. American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR BIRADS - MRI. Breast imaging reporting and data system atlas (BI-RADS atlas). American College of Radiology Reston, VA 2003
13. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 1999 213 881-888
14. Narisada H, Aoki T, Sasaguri T et al. Correlation between numeric gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MRI ratios and prognostic factors and histologic type of breast carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 2006 187 297-306
15. Siegmann K C., Moron H U., Baur A et al. Diagnostische Wertigkeit des Göttinger Scores zur Malignitätsvorhersage von ausschlieβlich in der MRT darstellbaren Mammaläsionen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009 181 556-563
16. Fischer D R., Wurdinger S, Boettcher J et al. Further signs in the evaluation of magnetic resonance mammography: a retrospective study. Invest Radiol 2005 40 430-435
17. Fischer D R., Baltzer P, Malich A et al. Is the blooming sign a promising additional tool to determine malignancy in MR mammography? Eur Radiol 2004 14 394-401
18. Dietzel M, Baltzer P A., Vag T et al. The adjacent vessel sign on breast MRI: new data and a subgroup analysis for 1,084 histologically verified cases. Korean J Radiol 2010 11 178-186
19. Kaiser W A. Signs in MR-Mammography. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 2007
20. Dietzel M, Baltzer P A., Vag T et al. The hook sign for differential diagnosis of malignant from benign lesions in magnetic resonance mammography: experience in a study of 1084 histologically verified cases. Acta Radiol 2010 51 137-143
21. Bland M. An Introduction to Medical Statistics. Oxford University Press Oxford 2000
22. Siegmann K C., Muller K T., Vogel U et al. MR-Mammografie vor und nach neoadjuvanter Systemtherapie Enhancementcharakteristika und T 2-Signalinintensität von Mammakarzinomen und Drüsenparenchym. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2010 182 493-500
23. Winnekendonk G, Krug B, Warm M et al. Diagnostischer Stellenwert der präoperativen MR-Mammographie (MRM). Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004 176 688-693 (Pubitemid 38714933)
24. Vomweg T W., Teifke A, Schreiber W G. et al. Eine Kombination niedrig und hochauflösender dynamischer T 1-gewichteter Sequenzen zur besseren Beurteilung der Morphologie Kontrastmittel aufnehmender Läsionen in der MRT der weiblichen Brust. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002 174 1445-1449
25. Tot T, Gere M. Radiological-pathological correlation in diagnosing breast carcinoma: the role of pathology in the multimodality era. Pathol Oncol Res 2008 14 173-178
26. Aiello Bowles E J., Miglioretti D L., Sickles E A. et al. Accuracy of short-interval follow-up mammograms by patient and radiologist characteristics. Am J Roentgenol 2008 190 1200-1208
27. Henson D E., Chu K C., Levine P H. Histologic grade, stage, and survival in breast carcinoma: comparison of African American and Caucasian women. Cancer 2003 98 908-917