Insight into sight, touch, taste and smell by multiple discriminations from norm

Seeing and Perceiving

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 485-511

  Booth, David A ^a   Sharpe, Oliver ^a   Freeman, Richard P J ^b   Conner, Mark T ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Foods sensed and conceived; Perceived eating; Sensory and symbolic perception; Sight and oral senses

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY PATTERNS; MULTIPLE FEATURES; PERCEIVED EATING; SIGHT AND ORAL SENSES; SYMBOLIC FEATURES; VISUAL FEATURE; VISUAL INFORMATION;

BEVERAGES;

SENSORY PERCEPTION;

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SMELLING; TASTE; TOUCH; VISION;

DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; JUDGMENT; OLFACTORY PERCEPTION; TASTE PERCEPTION; TOUCH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 80053413450     PISSN: 18784755     EISSN: 18784763     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/187847511X588773     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Algom, D. (Ed.) (1992). Psychophysical Approaches to Cognition, 92. Elsevier, New York, USA.
2. Auvray, M. and Spence, C. (2008). The multisensory perception of flavor, Conscious. Cognit. 17, 1016-1031. (Pubitemid 351978261)
3. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition, Ann. Rev. Psychol. 59, 617-645.
4. Beidler, L. M. (1954). A theory of taste stimulation, J. Gen. Physiol. 38, 133-139.
5. Booth, D. A. (1994). Psychology of Nutrition. Psychology Press, Hove, UK.
6. Booth, D. A. (1995). Cognitive processes in odorant mixture assessment, Chem. Senses 20, 639-643. (Pubitemid 26002796)
7. Booth, D. A. (2005). Perceiving the texture of a food: biomechanical and cognitive mechanisms and their measurement, in:Food Colloids: Interactions, Microstructure and Processing , E. Dickinson (Ed.), pp. 339-355. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK.
8. Booth, D. (2007). Reviews. Sensation and Perception by J. Wolfe, K. Kluender and D. Levi, Psychol. Learn. Teach. 6, 169-170.
9. Booth, D. A. (2008). Salty, bitter, sweet and sour survive unscathed, Brain Behav. Sci. 31, 76-77. (Pubitemid 351516122)
10. Booth, D. A. and Booth, P. (2011). Targeting cultural changes supportive of the healthiest lifestyle patterns. A biosocial evidence-base for prevention of obesity, Appetite 56, 210-221.
11. Booth, D. A. and Freeman, R. P. J. (1993). Discriminative feature integration by individuals, Acta Psychologica 84, 1-16.
12. Booth, D. A., Lovett, D. and McSherry, G. M. (1972). Postingestive modulation of the sweetness preference gradient in the rat, J. Compar. Physiolog. Psychol. 78, 485-512.
13. Booth, D. A., Thompson, A. L. and Shahedian, B. (1983). A robust, brief measure of an individual's most preferred level of salt in an ordinary foodstuff, Appetite 4, 301-312.
14. Booth, D. A., Conner, M. T. and Gibson, E. L. (1989). Measurement of food perception, food preference, and nutrient selection, Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 561, 226-242. (Pubitemid 19195615)
15. Booth, D. A., Freeman, R. P. J. and Kendal-Reed, M. S. (1995). Recognition of aromas by subconscious cognitive integration of receptor patterns, in:Aroma: Perception, Formation, Evaluation . [Proc. 4th Wartburg Aroma Sympos., Eisenach, March 1994], M. Rothe and H.-P. Kruse (Eds), pp. 101-116. Deutsches Institut für Ernährungsforschung, Potsdam, Germany.
16. Booth, D. A., Konle, M. and Sharpe, O. (2008). Taste of savoury foods does not need a fifth receptor type, Appetite 51, 355 (Abstract).
17. Booth, D. A., Higgs, S., Schneider, J. and Klinkenberg, I. (2010a). Learned liking versus inborn delight. Can sweetness give sensual pleasure or is it just motivating? Psycholog. Sci. 21, 1656-1663.
18. Booth, D. A., Kendal-Reed, M. S. and Freeman, R. P. J. (2010b). A strawberry by any other name would smell as sweet, green, fruity and buttery. Multisensory cognition of a food aroma, Appetite 55, 738-741.
19. Booth, D. A., Sharpe, O. and Conner, M. T. (2011a). Discrimination without description of differences. Implicit or fully subconscious?, http://epapers.bham.ac.uk Booth.
20. Booth, D. A., Freeman, R. P. J., Konle, M., Wainwright, C. J. and Sharpe, O. (2011b). Perception as interacting psychophysical functions. Could the configuring of features replace a specialized receptor?, Perception 40, 509-529.
21. Breslin, P. A. S., Kemp, S. and Beauchamp, G. K. (1994). Single sweetness signal, Nature 369, 447-448.
22. Breslin, P. A. S., Beauchamp, G. K. and Pugh, E. N. (1996).Monogeusia for fructose, glucose, sucrose, and maltose, Percept. Psychophys. 58, 327-341. (Pubitemid 126423048)
23. Caicedo, A. and Roper, S. D. (2001). Taste receptor cells that discriminate between bitter stimuli, Science 291, 1557-1560. (Pubitemid 32179224)
24. Cain, W. S., Schiet, F. T., Olsson, M. J. and de Wijk, R. A. (1995). Comparison of models of odor interaction, Chem. Senses 20, 625-637. (Pubitemid 26002795)
25. Chechlacz, M., Rotshtein, P., Klamer, S., Preissl, H., Porubska, K., Higgs, S., Booth, D., Abele, H., Birbaumer, N. and Nouwen, A. (2009). Diabetes dietary management alters responses to food pictures in brain regions associated with motivation and emotion: an fMRI study, Diabetologia 52, 524-533.
26. Conner, M. T. and Booth, D. A. (1988). Preferred sweetness of a lime drink and preference for sweet over non-sweet foods, related to sex and reported age and body weight, Appetite 10, 25-35.
27. Conner, M. T., Haddon, A. V. and Booth, D. A. (1986). Very rapid, precise measurement of effects of constituent variation on product acceptability: consumer sweetness preferences in a lime drink, Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und -Technologie [Food Sci. Technol.] 19, 486-490.
28. Conner, M. T., Land, D. G. and Booth, D. A. (1987). Effects of stimulus range on judgments of sweetness intensity in a lime drink, Brit. J. Psychol. 78, 357-364.
29. Conner, M. T., Booth, D. A., Clifton, V. J. and Griffiths, R. P. (1988a). Individualized optimization of the salt content of white bread for acceptability, J. Food Sci. 53, 549-554.
30. Conner, M. T., Haddon, A. V., Pickering, E. S. and Booth, D. A. (1988b). Sweet tooth demonstrated: individual differences in preference for both sweet foods and foods highly sweetened, J. Appl. Psychol. 73, 275-280.
31. Conner, M. T., Pickering, E. S., Birkett, R. J. and Booth, D. A. (1994). Using an individualised attribute tolerance model in consumer acceptability tests, Food Qual. Pref. 5, 225-232.
32. Delwiche, J. F., Buletic, Z. and Breslin, P. A. S. (2002). Clustering bitter compounds via individual sensitivity differences: evidence supporting multiple receptor-transduction mechanisms, in:Chemistry of Taste: Mechanisms, Behaviors and Mimics , P. Given and D. Paredes (Eds), pp. 65-77. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA. (Pubitemid 135693070)
33. Ernst, M. O. and Banks,M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion, Nature 415, 429-433. (Pubitemid 34100953)
34. Freeman, R. P. J. (1996). Cognitive processes in multimodal object recognition, PhD Thesis, University of Birmingham, UK.
35. Freeman, R. P. J. and Booth, D. A. (1997). Cognitive integration of gustatory mixtures in fruit drink choice, Appetite 29, 234 (Abstract).
36. Freeman, R. P. J. and Booth, D. A. (2010). Users of 'diet' drinks who think that sweetness is calories, Appetite 55, 152-155.
37. Freeman, R. P. J., Richardson, N. J., Kendal-Reed,M. S. and Booth, D. A. (1993). Bases of a cognitive technology for food quality, Brit. Food J. 95, 37-44.
38. Galea, J., Chechlacz, M., Booth, D. A., Higgs, S., Birbaumer, N. and Nouwen, A. (2008). Perceptual and affective processing in appetite for foods, Appetite 51, 367 (Abstract).
39. Gibson, E. L. and Booth, D. A. (2000). Food-conditioned odour rejection in the late stages of the meal, mediating learnt control of meal volume by after-effects of food consumption, Appetite 34, 295-303.
40. Gibson, E. L.,Wainwright, C. J. and Booth, D. A. (1995). Disguised protein in lunch after low-protein breakfast conditions food-flavor preferences dependent on recent lack of protein intake, Physiol. Behav. 58, 363-371.
41. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, USA.
42. Halpern, B. P. and Darlington, R. B. (1998). Effects of amiloride on gustatory quality descriptions and temporal patterns produced by NaCl, Chem. Senses 23, 501-511. (Pubitemid 28463994)
43. Kemps, E. and Tiggemann, M. (2010). A cognitive experimental approach to understanding and reducing food cravings, Curr. Direct. Psycholog. Sci. 19, 86-90.
44. Kissileff, H. R., Booth, D. A., Thornton, J. C., Pi-Sunyer, F. X., Pierson, R. N. and Lee, J. (2008). Human food intake is discriminatively sensitive to gastric signaling, Appetite 51, 759 (Abstract).
45. Laing, D. G., Link, C., Jinks, A. L. and Hutchinson, I. (2002). The limited capacity of humans to identify the components of taste mixtures and taste-odour mixtures, Perception 31, 617-635.
46. Laming, D. R. J. (1986). Sensory Analysis. Academic Press, New York, USA.
47. Levitan, C. A., Zampini, M., Li, R. and Spence, C. (2008). Assessing the role of color cues and people's beliefs about color-flavor associations on the discrimination of the flavor of sugar-coated chocolates, Chem. Senses 33, 415-423. (Pubitemid 351858963)
48. Liu, Z. L., Knill, D. C. and Kersten, D. (1995). Object classification for human and ideal observers, Vision Research 35, 549-568.
49. Liu, Z. L., Kersten, D. and Knill, D. C. (1999). Dissociating stimulus information from internal representation - a case study in object recognition, Vision Research 39, 603-612. (Pubitemid 29051484)
50. Lockhead, G. R. (1992). Psychophysical scaling: judgments of attributes or objects? Behav. Brain Sci. 15, 543-559.
51. Macmillan, N. A. and Creelman, C. D. (2004). Detection Theory. A User's Guide, 2nd edn. Psychology Press, Hove, UK.
52. McBride, R. L. and Booth, D. A. (1986). Using classical psychophysics to determine ideal flavour intensity, J. Food Technol. 21, 775-780.
53. Marie, S., Land, D. G. and Booth, D. A. (1987). Comparison of flavour perception by smell and by mouth, in:Flavour Science and Technology , M. Martens, G. A. Dalen and H. Russwurm (Eds), pp. 301-308, (4th Weurman Aroma Conference) Wiley, Chichester, UK.
54. Mobini, S., Platts, R. G. and Booth, D. A. (2011). Haptic signals of texture while eating a food. Multisensory cognition as interacting discriminations from norm, Appetite 56, 386-393.
55. Morgan, M. J., Watamaniuk, S. N. and McKee, S. P. (2000). The use of an implicit standard for measuring discrimination thresholds, Vision Research 40, 2341-2349.
56. Murray, D. J., Ross, H. E. and Weber, E. H. (Eds) (1996). E. H. Weber and the Tactile Senses. Psychology Press, Hove, UK.
57. Nachmias, J. (2006). The role of virtual standards in visual discrimination, Vision Res. 46, 2456-2464.
58. Pearce, J. M. (2002). Evaluation and development of a connectionist theory of configural learning, Animal Learn. Behav. 30, 73-95. (Pubitemid 34651253)
59. Polak, E. H. (1973). Multiple profile-multiple receptor site model for vertebrate olfaction, J. Theoret. Biol. 40, 469-484.
60. Prescott, J. (1999). Flavour as a psychological construct: implications for perceiving and measuring the sensory qualities of foods, Food Qual. Pref. 10, 349-356. (Pubitemid 129595942)
61. Pugh, E. N. (1988). Vision: physics and retinal physiology, in:Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology. Volume I. Perception and Motivation , R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey and R. D. Luce (Eds), pp. 75-164. Wiley, New York, USA.
62. Richardson-Harman, N. J. and Booth, D. A. (2006). Do you like the sight or the feel of milk in coffee? Ecology and effortful attention in differential acuity and preference for sensed effects of milk substitute in vended coffee, Appetite 46, 130-136. (Pubitemid 43343422)
63. Roper, S. D. (2007). Signal transduction and information processing in mammalian taste buds, Pflügers Archiv - Eur. J. Physiol. 454, 759-776. (Pubitemid 46976603)
64. Stevenson, R. J. and Boakes, R. A. (2003). A mnemonic theory of odor perception, Psycholog. Rev. 110, 340-364. (Pubitemid 37189447)
65. Stevenson, R. J., Boakes, R. A. and Prescott, J. (1998). Changes in odor sweetness resulting from implicit learning of a simultaneous odor-sweetness association, Learn. Motivat. 29, 113-132. (Pubitemid 128346111)
66. Stewart, N., Brown, G. D. A. and Chater, N. (2005). Absolute identification by relative judgment, Psycholog. Rev. 112, 881-911. (Pubitemid 41677522)
67. Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment, Psycholog. Rev. 34, 273-286.
68. Torgerson, W. S. (1958). Theory and Methods of Scaling. Wiley, New York, USA.
69. Wansink, B., Bascoul, G. and Chen, G. T. (2006). The sweet tooth hypothesis: how fruit consumption relates to snack consumption, Appetite 47, 107-110. (Pubitemid 44038028)
70. Yeomans, M. R., Mobini, S., Elliman, T. D., Walker, H. C. and Stevenson, R. J. (2006). Hedonic and sensory characteristics of odors conditioned by pairing with tastants in humans, J. Exper. Psychol. - Animal Behav. Proc. 32, 215-228. (Pubitemid 44157633)