Haptic signals of texture while eating a food. Multisensory cognition as interacting discriminations from norm

Appetite

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 386-393

  Mobini, Sirous ^a   Platts, Rosemary G ^a   Booth, David A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Auditory texture; Biscuit fracture perception; Normed multiple discrimination; Personal cognition; Tactile texture

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BITE; COGNITION; CONCEPT FORMATION; DECISION MAKING; EATING; FOOD; FOOD TEXTURE; HALF DISCRIMINATED DISPARITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MASTICATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; SENSORY STIMULATION; SHORTBREAD BISCUIT; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; THINKING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COGNITION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); EATING; FOOD; HARDNESS; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LINEAR MODELS; MASTICATION; SENSATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79551585600     PISSN: 01956663     EISSN: 10958304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.12.024     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abercrombie M.L. The anatomy of judgement. An investigation into the processes of perception and reasoning 1960, Hutchinson, London.
2. Ballester J., Patris B., Symoneaux R., Valentin D. Conceptual vs. perceptual wine spaces. Does expertise matter?. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:267-276.
3. Booth D.A. Practical measurement of the strengths of actual influences on what consumers do. Scientific brand design. Journal of the Market Research Society (U.K.) 1988, 30:127-146.
4. Booth D.A. Perceiving the texture of a food. Biomechanical and cognitive mechanisms and their measurement. Food colloids. Interactions, microstructure and processing 2005, 339-355. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge. E. Dickinson (Ed.).
5. Booth D.A. Physiological regulation through learnt control of appetites by contingencies among signals from external and internal environments. Appetite 2008, 51:433-441.
6. Booth D.A., Conner M.T. Characterisation and measurement of influences on food acceptability by analysis of choice differences. Theory and practice. Food Quality & Preference 1991, 2:75-85.
7. Booth D.A., Freeman R.P.J. Discriminative feature integration by individuals. Acta Psychologica 1993, 84:1-16.
8. Booth D.A., Earl T., Mobini S. Perceptual channels for the texture of a food. Appetite 2003, 40:69-76.
9. Booth D.A., Konle M., Sharpe O. Taste of savoury foods does not need a fifth receptor type. Appetite 2008, 51:355.
10. Booth D.A., Freeman R.P.J., Kendal-Reed M.S. Recognition of aromas by subconscious cognitive integration of receptor patterns. Aroma. Perception, formation, evaluation, 1995, 101-116. Deutsches Institut für Ernährungsforschung, Potsdam. M. Rothe, H.-P. Kruse (Eds.).
11. Booth D.A., Kendal-Reed M.S., Freeman R.P.J. A strawberry by any other name would smell as sweet, green, fruity and buttery. Multisensory cognition of a food aroma. Appetite 2010, 55:738-741.
12. Booth D.A., Lovett D., McSherry G.M. Postingestive modulation of the sweetness preference gradient in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1972, 78:485-512.
13. Booth D.A., Mobini S., Earl T., Wainwright C.J. Consumer-specified instrumental quality of short-dough cookie texture using penetrometry and break force. Journal of Food Science 2003, 68:382-387.
14. Booth D.A., Mobini S., Earl T., Wainwright C.J. Market-optimum instrumental values from individual consumers' discriminations of standard sensory quality of the texture of short-dough biscuits. Journal of Food Quality 2003, 26:425-439.
15. Booth D.A., Thompson A.L., Shahedian B. A robust, brief measure of an individual's most preferred level of salt in an ordinary foodstuff. Appetite 1983, (4):301-312.
16. Brown W.E., Braxton D. Dynamics of food breakdown during eating in relation to perceptions of texture and preference. A study on biscuits. Food Quality and Preference 2000, 11:259-267.
17. Conner M.T., Booth D.A. Preferred sweetness of a lime drink and preference for sweet over non-sweet foods, related to sex and reported age and body weight. Appetite 1988, 10:25-35.
18. Conner M.T., Haddon A.V., Booth D.A. Very rapid, precise measurement of effects of constituent variation on product acceptability. Consumer sweetness preferences in a lime drink. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und -Technologie 1986, 19:486-490.
19. Conner M.T., Booth D.A., Clifton V.J., Griffiths R.P. Do comparisons of a food characteristic with ideal necessarily involve learning?. British Journal of Psychology 1988, 79:121-128.
20. Conner M.T., Haddon A.V., Pickering E.S., Booth D.A. Sweet tooth demonstrated. Individual differences in preference for both sweet foods and foods highly sweetened. Journal of Applied Psychology 1988, 73:275-280.
21. Conner M.T., Pickering E.S., Birkett R.J., Booth D.A. Using an individualised attribute tolerance model in consumer acceptability tests. Food Quality and Preference 1994, 5:225-232.
22. Coombs C.H. A theory of data 1964, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
23. Dan H., Hayakawa F., Kohyama K. Modulation of biting procedures induced by the sensory evaluation of cheese hardness with different definitions. Appetite 2008, 50:158-166.
24. Freeman, R. P. J. (1996). Cognitive processes in multimodal object recognition. Ph.D. Thesis. Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham.
25. Freeman R.P.J., Booth D.A. Users of 'diet' drinks who think that sweetness is calories. Appetite 2010, 55:152-155.
26. Freeman R.P.J., Richardson N.J., Kendal-Reed M.S., Booth D.A. Bases of a cognitive technology for food quality. British Food Journal 1993, 95(9):37-44.
27. Galea J., Chechlacz M., Booth D.A., Higgs S., Birbaumer N., Nouwen A. Perceptual and affective processing in appetite for foods. Appetite 2008, 51:367.
28. Hearst E. Discrimination learning as the summation of excitation and inhibition. Science 1968, 162:1303-1306.
29. Johnsen S.E., Trulsson M. Receptive field properties of human periodontal afferents responding to loading of premolar and molar teeth. Journal of Neurophysiology 2003, 89:1478-1487.
30. Johnsen S.E., Svensson K.G., Trulsson M. Forces applied by anterior and posterior teeth and roles of periodontal afferents during hold-and-split tasks in human subjects. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 178:126-134.
31. Kendal-Reed M., Booth D.A. Human odor perception by multidimensional discrimination from remembered patterns. Chemical Senses 1992, 17(5):649. (Abstract 142).
32. McBride R.L., Booth D.A. Using classical psychophysics to determine ideal flavour intensity. Journal of Food Technology 1986, 21:775-780.
33. Morgan M.J., Watamaniuk S.N., McKee S.P. The user of an implicit standard for measuring discrimination thresholds. Vision Research 2000, 40:2341-2349.
34. Nachmias J. The role of virtual standards in visual discrimination. Vision Research 2006, 46:2456-2464.
35. Platts R.G., Booth D.A. User's guide. Cognitive modelling system in Microsoft Access 2.0 1999, University of Birmingham, School of Psychology, Birmingham, UK.
36. Richardson N.J., Booth D.A. Multiple physical patterns in judgments of the creamy texture of milks and creams. Acta Psychologica 1993, 84:93-101.
37. Santos, M. L. (1998). Influences on flesh-avoidance behaviour among British students. Ph.D. Thesis. Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham.
38. Shepard R.N. Stimulus and response generalisation. A stochastic model relating generalization to distance in psychological space. Psychometrika 1957, 22:325-345.
39. Svensson K.G., Trulsson M. Regulation of bite force increase during splitting of food. European Journal of Oral Sciences 2009, 117:704-710.
40. Torgerson W.S. Theory and methods of scaling 1958, John Wiley, New York.
41. Trulsson M., Francis S.T., Bowfell R., McGlone F. Brain activations in response to vibrotactile tooth stimuli. A psychophysical and fMRI study. Journal of Neurophysiology 2010, 104:2257-2265.
42. Varela P., Salvador A., Fiszman S. On the assessment of fracture in brittle foods II. Biting or chewing?. Food Research International 2009, 42:1468-1474.
43. Vickers Z.M. Crackliness. Relationships of auditory judgements to tactile judgements and instrumental acoustic measurements. Journal of Texture Studies 1984, 15:49-58.
44. Vickers Z.M. Crispness vs. crunchiness. A difference in pitch. Journal of Texture Studies 1984, 15:157-163.