Applications of systems biology towards microbial fuel production

Trends in Microbiology

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 516-524

  Gowen, Christopher M ^a   Fong, Stephen S ^a  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; BUTANOL; PETROLEUM;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; BIOENERGY; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; BIOPROCESS; CELL FUNCTION; CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM; COCULTURE; CYTOLOGY; DNA SYNTHESIS; ENERGY METABOLISM; ENERGY RESOURCE; GRAM NEGATIVE BACTERIUM; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; MICROBIAL FUEL CELL; MICROBIAL METABOLISM; MICROORGANISM; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; REVIEW;

BACTERIA; BIOELECTRIC ENERGY SOURCES; BIOFUELS; HUMANS; INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 80053293747     PISSN: 0966842X     EISSN: 18784380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2011.07.005     Document Type: Review

References (75)

1. Munasinghe P.C., Khanal S.K. Biomass-derived syngas fermentation into biofuels: opportunities and challenges. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:5013-5022.
2. Lynd L.R., et al. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2002, 66:506-577.
3. Carere C.R., et al. Third generation biofuels via direct cellulose fermentation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2008, 9:1342-1360.
4. Xu Q., et al. Perspectives and new directions for the production of bioethanol using consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulose. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2009, 20:364-371.
5. Higashide W., et al. Metabolic engineering of Clostridium cellulolyticum for production of isobutanol from cellulose. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77:2727-2733.
6. Jin M., et al. Consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) performance of Clostridium phytofermentans on AFEX-treated corn stover for ethanol production. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011, 108:1290-1297.
7. Atsumi S., et al. Direct photosynthetic recycling of carbon dioxide to isobutyraldehyde. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009, 27:1177-1180.
8. Semêdo L.T.A.S., et al. Streptomyces drozdowiczii sp. nov., a novel cellulolytic streptomycete from soil in Brazil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2004, 54:1323-1328.
9. Kim B.-C., et al. Paenibacillus pini sp. nov., a cellulolytic bacterium isolated from the rhizosphere of pine tree. J. Microbiol. (Seoul, Korea) 2009, 47:699-704.
10. Distel D.L., et al. Teredinibacter turnerae gen. nov., sp. nov., a dinitrogen-fixing, cellulolytic, endosymbiotic gamma-proteobacterium isolated from the gills of wood-boring molluscs (Bivalvia: Teredinidae). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2002, 52:2261-2269.
11. Podosokorskaya O.A., et al. Thermosipho affectus sp. nov., a thermophilic, anaerobic, cellulolytic bacterium isolated from a mid-Atlantic ridge hydrothermal vent. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2011, 61:1160-1164.
12. Miroshnichenko M.L., et al. Caldicellulosiruptor kronotskyensis sp. nov. and Caldicellulosiruptor hydrothermalis sp. nov., two extremely thermophilic, cellulolytic, anaerobic bacteria from Kamchatka thermal springs. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008, 58:1492-1496.
13. Chassard C., et al. Ruminococcus champanellensis sp. nov., a cellulose-degrading bacteria from the human gut microbiota. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2011, 10.1099/ijs.0.027375-0.
14. Chang L., et al. Characterization of a bifunctional xylanase/endoglucanase from yak rumen microorganisms. App. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 90:1933-1942.
15. Bruant G., et al. Genomic analysis of carbon monoxide utilization and butanol production by Clostridium carboxidivorans strain P7. PloS ONE 2010, 5:e13033.
16. Araujo G.S., et al. Bioprospecting for oil producing microalgal strains: evaluation of oil and biomass production for ten microalgal strains. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:5248-5250.
17. Li L.-L., et al. Bioprospecting metagenomes: glycosyl hydrolases for converting biomass. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2009, 2:10.
18. Sommer M.O.A., et al. A functional metagenomic approach for expanding the synthetic biology toolbox for biomass conversion. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2010, 6:360.
19. Schirmer A., et al. Microbial biosynthesis of alkanes. Science 2010, 329:559-562.
20. Bayer T.S., et al. Synthesis of methyl halides from biomass using engineered microbes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131:6508-6515.
21. Shi Z., Blaschek H.P. Transcriptional analysis of Clostridium beijerinckii NCIMB 8052 and the hyper-butanol-producing mutant BA101 during the shift from acidogenesis to solventogenesis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74:7709-7714.
22. Chen Y., et al. Small RNAs in the genus Clostridium. mBio 2011, 2:e00340-e410.
23. Senger R.S., Papoutsakis E.T. Genome-scale model for Clostridium acetobutylicum: part I. Metabolic network resolution and analysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008, 101:1036-1052.
24. Lee J., et al. Genome-scale reconstruction and in silico analysis of the Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 metabolic network. App. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 80:849-862.
25. Senger R.S., Papoutsakis E.T. Genome-scale model for Clostridium acetobutylicum: part II. Development of specific proton flux states and numerically determined sub-systems. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008, 101:1053-1071.
26. Lee J.Y., et al. Metabolic engineering of Clostridium acetobutylicum M5 for highly selective butanol production. Biotechnol. J. 2009, 4:1432-1440.
27. Yang S., et al. Improved genome annotation for Zymomonas mobilis. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009, 27:893-894.
28. Yang S., et al. Transcriptomic and metabolomic profiling of Zymomonas mobilis during aerobic and anaerobic fermentations. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:34.
29. Yang S., et al. Paradigm for industrial strain improvement identifies sodium acetate tolerance loci in Zymomonas mobilis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:10395-10400.
30. Gowen C.M., Fong S.S. Exploring biodiversity for cellulosic biofuel production. Chem. Biodivers. 2010, 7:1086-1097.
31. Raman B., et al. Impact of pretreated Switchgrass and biomass carbohydrates on Clostridium thermocellum ATCC 27405 cellulosome composition: a quantitative proteomic analysis. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e5271.
32. Herrero A.A., et al. Ethanol-induced changes in the membrane lipid composition of Clostridium thermocellum. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1982, 693:195-204.
33. Roberts S.B., et al. Genome-scale metabolic analysis of Clostridium thermocellum for bioethanol production. BMC Syst. Biol. 2010, 4:31.
34. Gowen C.M., Fong S.S. Genome-scale metabolic model integrated with RNAseq data to identify metabolic states of Clostridium thermocellum. Biotechnol. J. 2010, 5:759-767.
35. Jarboe L.R., et al. Metabolic engineering for production of biorenewable fuels and chemicals: contributions of synthetic biology. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2010, 761042.
36. Krivoruchko A., et al. Opportunities for yeast metabolic engineering: lessons from synthetic biology. Biotechnol. J. 2011, 6:262-276.
37. Atsumi S., et al. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for 1-butanol production. Metab. Eng. 2008, 10:305-311.
38. Mallick P., Kuster B. Proteomics: a pragmatic perspective. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28:695-709.
39. Gold N.D., Martin V.J.J. Global view of the Clostridium thermocellum cellulosome revealed by quantitative proteomic analysis. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189:6787-6795.
40. Blouzard J.-C., et al. Modulation of cellulosome composition in Clostridium cellulolyticum: adaptation to the polysaccharide environment revealed by proteomic and carbohydrate-active enzyme analyses. Proteomics 2010, 10:541-554.
41. Tolonen A.C., et al. Proteome-wide systems analysis of a cellulosic biofuel-producing microbe. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011, 7:461.
42. Ekborg N.A., et al. Genomic and proteomic analyses of the agarolytic system expressed by Saccharophagus degradans 2-40. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72:3396-3405.
43. Taylor L.E., et al. Complete cellulase system in the marine bacterium Saccharophagus degradans strain 2-40T. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188:3849-3861.
44. Herpoël-Gimbert I., et al. Comparative secretome analyses of two Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30 and CL847 hypersecretory strains. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2008, 1:18.
45. Zhang Y., Lynd L.R. Quantification of cell and cellulase mass concentrations during anaerobic cellulose fermentation: development of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based method with application to Clostridium thermocellum batch cultures. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75:219-227.
46. Zhang Y.-H.P., Lynd L.R. Regulation of cellulase synthesis in batch and continuous cultures of Clostridium thermocellum. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187:99-106.
47. Nataf Y., et al. Clostridium thermocellum cellulosomal genes are regulated by extracytoplasmic polysaccharides via alternative sigma factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:18646-18651.
48. Portnoy T., et al. Differential regulation of the cellulase transcription factors XYR1, ACE2 and ACE1 in high and low cellulase producing strains of Trichoderma reesei. Eukaryot. Cell 2010, 10:262-271.
49. Deng Y., Fong S.S. Development and application of a PCR-targeted gene disruption method for studying CelR function in Thermobifida fusca. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76:2098-2106.
50. Deng Y., Fong S.S. Influence of culture aeration on the cellulase activity of Thermobifida fusca. App. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 85:965-974.
51. Castellanos F., et al. Crucial factors of the light perception machinery and their impact on growth and cellulase gene transcription in Trichoderma reesei. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2010, 47:468-476.
52. Gyalai-Korpos M., et al. Relevance of the light signaling machinery for cellulase expression in Trichoderma reesei (Hypocrea jecorina). BMC Res. Notes 2010, 3:330.
53. Ding J., et al. Response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to ethanol stress involves actions of protein Asr1p. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 20:1630-1636.
54. Zhu L., et al. Engineering the robustness of Clostridium acetobutylicum by introducing glutathione biosynthetic capability. Metab. Eng. 2011, 13:426-434.
55. Hasunuma T., et al. Metabolic pathway engineering based on metabolomics confers acetic and formic acid tolerance to a recombinant xylose-fermenting strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb. Cell Factories 2011, 10:2.
56. Brynildsen M.P., Liao J.C. An integrated network approach identifies the isobutanol response network of Escherichia coli. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2009, 5:277.
57. Atsumi S., et al. Evolution, genomic analysis, and reconstruction of isobutanol tolerance in Escherichia coli. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2010, 6:449.
58. Minty J.J., et al. Evolution combined with genomic study elucidates genetic bases of isobutanol tolerance in Escherichia coli. Microb. Cell Factories 2011, 10:18.
59. Price N.D., et al. Genome-scale models of microbial cells: evaluating the consequences of constraints. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2:886-897.
60. Henry C.S., et al. High-throughput generation, optimization and analysis of genome-scale metabolic models. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28:969-974.
61. Stolyar S., et al. Metabolic modeling of a mutualistic microbial community. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2007, 3:92.
62. Mahadevan R., et al. Dynamic flux balance analysis of diauxic growth in Escherichia coli. Biophys. J. 2002, 83:1331-1340.
63. Hanly T.J., Henson M.A. Dynamic flux balance modeling of microbial co-cultures for efficient batch fermentation of glucose and xylose mixtures. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010, 108:376-385.
64. Salimi F., et al. Genome-scale metabolic modeling of a clostridial co-culture for consolidated bioprocessing. Biotechnol. J. 2010, 5:726-738.
65. Hucka M., et al. The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinformatics 2003, 9:524-531.
66. Millard B.L., et al. Adaptive informatics for multifactorial and high-content biological data. Nat. Methods 2011, 8:487-493.
67. Arkin A. Setting the standard in synthetic biology. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26:771-774.
68. Gibson D.G., et al. Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome. Science 2010, 329:52-56.
69. Wang H.H., et al. Programming cells by multiplex genome engineering and accelerated evolution. Nature 2009, 460:894-898.
70. Feist A.M., et al. A genome-scale metabolic reconstruction for Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 that accounts for 1260 ORFs and thermodynamic information. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2007, 3:121.
71. Duarte N.C., et al. Reconstruction and validation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae iND750, a fully compartmentalized genome-scale metabolic model. Genome Res. 2004, 14:1298-1309.
72. Shinfuku Y., et al. Development and experimental verification of a genome-scale metabolic model for Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb. Cell Factories 2009, 8:43.
73. Sun J., et al. Constraint-based modeling analysis of the metabolism of two Pelobacter species. BMC Syst. Biol. 2010, 4:174.
74. Widiastuti H., et al. Genome-scale modeling and in silico analysis of ethanologenic bacteria Zymomonas mobilis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010, 108:655-665.
75. Montagud A., et al. Flux coupling and transcriptional regulation within the metabolic network of the photosynthetic bacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC6803. Biotechnol. J. 2011, 6:330-342.