Cooperation and the Use of Technology

Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, Third Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 401-423

  Johnson, David W ^a   Johnson, Roger T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning: Students working together to maximize their own and each other s learning (i.e., to achieve shared learning goals); synonymous with cooperative learning in this chapter.; Competitive learning: Students working individually to achieve a grade or recognition attainable by or restricted to only a few.; Computer supported cooperative learning: The instructional use of technology combined with the use of cooperative learning.; Constructive controversy: Occurs when group members have different information, perceptions, opinions, reasoning processes, theories, and conclusions, and they must reach agreement in order to make progress or proceed.; Cooperative learning: Students working together to maximize their own and each other s learning (i.e., to achieve shared learning goals); synonymous with collaborative learning in this chapter.; Positive interdependence: Occurs when individuals perceive that they can reach their goals if and only if the other individuals with whom they are cooperatively linked also reach their goals.

Indexed keywords

EID: 85144982332     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203880869-37     Document Type: Chapter

References (194)

1. Adams, D., Carson, H., and Hamm, M. (1990). Cooperative Learning and Educational Media. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
2. Ahuja, M. K. and Carley, K. M. (1998). Network structure in virtual organizations. J. Comput.-Mediated Commun., 3(4) (http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue4/ahuja.html).
3. Allen, R. (2001). Technology and learning: how schools map routes to technology’s promised land. ASCD Curric. Update, Fall, 1-3, 6-8.
4. Amigues, R. and Agostinelli, S. (1992). Collaborative problemsolving with computer: how can an interactive learning environment be designed? Eur. J. Psychol. Educ., 7(4), 325-337.
5. Anderson, A., Mayes, T., and Kibby, M. (1995). Small group collaborative discovery learning from hypertext. In Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, edited by C. O’Malley, pp. 23-38. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
6. Baker, C. (1985). The microcomputer and the curriculum: a critique. J. Curric. Stud., 17, 449-451.
7. Baker, M. J. (2003). Computer-mediated argumentative interactions for the co-elaboration of scientific notions. In Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments, edited by J. Andriessen, M. Baker, and D. Suthers, pp. 47-78. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
8. Baker, M. J. (2004). Recherches sur l’elaboration de connaissances dans le dialogue [Research on knowledge elaboration in dialogues]. Synthese pour l’habilitation a diriger les recherches. Université Nancy 2.
9. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10. Battista, M. and Clements, D. (1986). The effects of LOGO and CAI problem-solving environments on problem-solving abilities and mathematics achievement. Comput. Hum. Behav., 2, 183-193.
11. Baylor, A. L. (2002). Expanding preservice teachers’ metacognitive awareness of instructional planning through pedagogical agents. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 50(2), 5-22.
12. Beane, W. and Lemke, E. (1971). Group variables influencing the transfer of conceptual behavior. J. Educ. Psychol., 62(3), 215-218.
13. Becker, H. (1984). School Uses of Microcomputers: Reports from a National Survey, Issue No. 6. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
14. Becker, H. and Sterling, C. (1987). Equity in schools computer use: national data and neglected considerations. J. Educ. Comput. Res., 3, 289-311.
15. Bell, P. (2001). Using argument map representations to make thinking visible in the classroom. In CSCL2: Carrying Forward the Conversation, edited by T. Koschmann, R. Hall, and N. Miyake, pp. 449-485. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Berndt, T., Perry, T., and Miller, K. (1988). Friends’ and classmates’ interactions on academic tasks. J. Educ. Psychol., 80, 506-513.
17. Biocca, F. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: review and suggested criteria. Presence, 12(5), 456-480.
18. Bonk, C. and King, K. (1998a). Computer conferencing and collaborative writing tools: starting a dialogue about student dialogue. In Electronic Collaborators: Learner-Centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse, edited by C. Bonk and K. King, pp. 3-24. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Bonk, C. and King, K., Eds. (1998b). Electronic Collaborators: Learner-Centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Britton, J. (1990). Research currents: second thoughts on learning. In Perspectives on Small Group Learning: Theory and Practice, edited by M. Brubacher, R. Payne, and K. Richett, pp. 3-11. Oakville, Ontario: Rubicon.
21. Brush, T. (1997). The effects on student achievement and attitudes when using integrated learning systems with cooperative pairs. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 45(1), 51-64.
22. Carlson, H. and Falk, D. (1989). Effective use of interactive videodisc instruction in understanding and implementing cooperative group learning with elementary pupils in social studies. Theory Res. Soc. Educ., 17(3), 241-158.
23. Carrier, C. (1984). Do learners make good choices? A review of research on learner control in instruction. Instruct. Innovator, 29(2), 15-17.
24. Carrier, C. and Sales, G. (1987). Pair versus individual work on the acquisition of concepts in a computer-based instructional lesson. J. Comput.-Based Instruct., 14(1), 11-17.
25. Chernick, R. and White, M. (1981). Pupils’ Interaction with Microcomputers vs. Interaction in Classroom Settings. New York: Teachers College Press.
26. Chernick, R. and White, M. (1983). Pupil Cooperation in Computer Learning vs. Learning with Classroom Materials. Paper presented at New York State Psychological Association Meeting, May, Liberty, NY.
27. Clements, D. and Nastasi, B. (1985). Effects of computer environments on social-emotional development: LOGO and computer-assisted instruction. Comput. Schools, 2(2/3), 11-31.
28. Clements, D. and Nastasi, B. (1988). Social and cognitive interaction in educational computer environments. Am. Educ. Res. J., 25, 87-106.
29. Cockayne, S. (1991). Effects of small group sizes on learning with interactive videodisc. Educ. Technol., 31(2), 43-45.
30. Cosen, M. and English, J. (1987). The effects of grouping, selfesteem, and locus of control on microcomputer performance and help seeking by mildly handicapped students. J. Educ. Comput. Res., 3, 443-460.
31. Cox, D. and Berger, C. (1985). The importance of group size in the use of problem-solving skills on a microcomputer. J. Educ. Comput. Res., 1, 459-468.
32. Crook, C. (1994). Computers and the Collaborative Experience of Learning. London: Routledge.
33. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and Machines: The Classroom Use of Technology Since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
34. Dalton, D. (1990a). The effects of cooperative learning strategies on achievement and attitudes during interactive video. J. Comput.-Based Instruct., 17, 8-16.
35. Dalton, D. (1990b). The Effects of Prior Learning on Learner Interaction and Achievement During Cooperative Computer-Based Instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 16-20, Boston, MA.
36. Dalton, D., Hannafin, J., and Hooper, S. (1987). Effects of individual and cooperative computer-assisted instruction on student performance and attitudes. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 37(2), 15-24.
37. Dalton, D., Hannafin, M., and Hooper, S. (1989). Effects of individual and cooperative computer-assisted instruction on student performance and attitudes. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 37(2), 15-24.
38. Davis, J. and Huttenlocher, D. (1995). Shared annotation for cooperative learning. In Proceedings of CSCL95: First International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39. Dees, R. (1991). The role of cooperative learning in increasing problem-solving ability in a college remedial course. J. Res. Math. Educ., 22(5), 409-421.
40. Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Hum. Relat., 2, 129-152.
41. Deutsch, M. (1962). Cooperation and trust: some theoretical notes. In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, edited by M. R. Jones, pp. 275-319. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
42. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In Collaborative-Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, edited by P. Dillenbourg, pp. 1-19. Oxford: Elsevier.*
43. Doering, A. (2006). Adventure learning: transformative hybrid online education. Dist. Educ., 27(2), 197-216.
44. Doering, A. (in press). Adventure learning: situating learning in an authentic context. Innovate-J. Online Educ.
45. Doering, A. and Veletsianos, G. (in press). Multi-scaffolding learning environment: an analysis of scaffolding and its impact on cognitive load and problem-solving ability. J. Educ. Comput. Res.
46. Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., and Yerasimou, T. (in press). Conversational agents and their longitudinal afffordances on communication and learning. J. Interact. Learn. Res.
47. Druckman, D., Rozelle, R., and Baxter, J. (1982). Nonverbal Communication: Survey, Theory, and Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
48. Dwyer, D. (1994). Apple classrooms of tomorrow: what we’ve learned. Educ. Leadership, 51(7), 4-10.
49. Dyer, L. (1993). An Investigation of the Effects of Cooperative Learning on Computer Monitored Problem Solving. Ph.D. dissertation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
50. Eraut, M. (1995). Groupwork with computers in British primary schools. J. Educ. Comput. Res., 13(1), 61-87.
51. Federico, P. (1980). Adaptive instruction: trends and issues. In Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction. Vol. 1. Cognitive Process Analysis of Aptitude, edited by R. Snow, P. Federico, and W. Montague, pp. 1-26. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Fishman, B. and Gomez, L. (1997). How activities foster CMC tool use in classrooms. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL’97), December 10-14, Toronto, Canada, edited by R. Hall, N. Miyake, and N. Enyedy, pp. 37-44. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53. Fletcher, B. (1985). Group and individual learning of junior high school children on a micro-computer-based task. Educ. Rev., 37, 252-261.
54. Fletcher-Flinn, C. and Gravatt, B. (1995). The efficacy of computer assisted instruction (CAI): a meta-analysis. J. Educ. Comput. Res., 12(3), 219-241.
55. Funk, J. B., Hagen, J. D., and Schimming, J. L. (1999). Children and electronic games: a comparison of parent and child perceptions of children’s habits and preferences in a United States sample. Psychol. Rep., 85, 883-888.
56. Garhart, C. and Hannafin, M. (1986). The accuracy of cognitive monitoring during computer-based instruction. J. Comput.-Based Instruct., 13, 88-93.
57. Gunawardena, C. N. and Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. Am. J. Dist. Educ., 11(3), 8-26.
58. Hannafin, M. (1984). Guidelines for using locus of instructional control in the design of computer-assisted instruction. J. Instruct. Dev., 7(3), 6-10.
59. Hannafin, M. and Rieber, L. (1989). Psychological foundations of instructional design for emerging computer-based interactive technologies, Part II. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 37(2), 102-114.
60. Hativa, A. (1988). Computer-based drill and practice in arithmetic: widening the gap between high- and low-achieving students. Am. Educ. Res. J., 25(3), 366-397.
61. Hawkins, S., Sheingold, K., Gearhart, M., and Berger, C. (1982). Microcomputers in schools: impact on the social life of elementary classrooms. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol., 3, 361-373.
62. Hiltz, S. R. (1998). Collaborative Learning in Asynchronous Learning Networks: Building Learning, http://web.njit.edu/~hiltz/collaborative_learning_in_asynch.htm.
63. Homans, G. C. (1961). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
64. Hooper, S. (1992a). Effects of peer interaction during computerbased mathematics instruction. J. Educ. Res., 85(3), 180-189.
65. Hooper, S. (1992b). Cooperation learning and computer-based instruction. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 40(3), 21-38.
66. Hooper, S. (2003). The effects of persistence and small group interaction during computer-based instruction. Comput. Hum. Behav., 19, 211-220.
67. Hooper, S. and Hannafin, M. (1988). Cooperative CBI: the effects of heterogeneous versus homogeneous groups on the learning of progressively complex concepts. J. Educ. Comput. Res., 4(4), 413-424.
68. Hooper, S. and Hannafin, M. (1991). The effects of group composition on achievement, interaction, and learning efficiency during computer-based cooperative instruction. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 39(3), 27-40.*
69. Hooper, S., Ward, T., Hannafin, M., and Clark, H. (1989). The effects of aptitude composition on achievement during small group learning. J. Comput.-Based Instruct., 16, 102-109.
70. Hooper, S., Temiyakarn, C., and Williams, M. (1993). The effects of cooperative learning and learner control on high- and average-ability students. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 41(2), 5-18.
71. Huang, C. (1993). The Effects of Feedback on Performance and Attitude in Cooperative and Individualized Computer-Based Instruction. Ph.D. dissertation, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
72. Hythecker, V., Rocklin, T., Dansereau, D., Lambiotte, J., Larson, C., and O’Donnell, A. M. (1985). A computer-based learning strategy training module: development and evaluation. J. Educ. Comput. Res., 1(3), 275-283.
73. Inkpen, K., Booth, K., Klawe, M., and Upitis, R. (1995). Playing together beats playing apart, especially for girls. In Proceedings of CSCL 1995: The First International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, edited by J. Schnase and E. Cunnius, pp. 177-181. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
74. Isenberg, R. (1992). Social skills at the computer. Cooperative Link, 2(6), 1-2.
75. Jarvela, S. (1996). New models of teacher-student interaction: a critical review. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ., 6(3), 246-268.
76. Jaspers, J. and Erkens, G. (2002). VCRI: Virtual Collaborative Research Institute, Version 1.0. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Utrecht University.
77. Johnson, D. W. (1970). Social Psychology of Education. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.*
78. Johnson, D. W. (1991). Human Relations and Your Career. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
79. Johnson, D. W. (2003). Social interdependence: the interrelationships among theory, research, and practice. Am. Psychol., 58(11), 931-945.
80. Johnson, D. W. (2006). Reaching Out: Interpersonal Effectiveness and Self-Actualization, 9th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
81. Johnson, D. W. and Johnson, F. (2006). Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills, 9th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.*
82. Johnson, D. W. and Johnson, R. (1979). Conflict in the classroom: controversy and learning. Rev. Educ. Res., 49, 51-70.
83. Johnson, D. W. and Johnson, R. (1986). Computer-assisted cooperative learning. Educ. Technol., 26(1), 12-18.*
84. Johnson, D. W. and Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.*
85. Johnson, D. W. and Johnson, R. (1995). Creative Controversy: Intellectual Challenge in the Classroom, 3rd ed. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
86. Johnson, D. W. and Johnson, R. (2003). Controversy and peace education. J. Res. Educ., 13(1), 71-91.
87. Johnson, D. W. and Johnson, R. (2005). New developments in social interdependence theory: the interrelationships among theory, research, and practice. Genet. Soc. Gen. Psychol. Monogr., 131(4), 285-358.
88. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., and Richards, P. (1986a). A scale for assessing student attitudes toward computers: preliminary findings. Comput. Schools, 3(2), 31-38.
89. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., Richards, S., and Buckman, L. (1986b). The effect of prolonged implementation of cooperative learning on social support within the classroom. J. Psychol., 119, 405-411.*
90. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., and Stanne, M. (1989). Impact of goal and resource interdependence on problem-solving success. J. Soc. Psychol., 129(5), 621-629.
91. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., Stanne, M., and Garibaldi, A. (1990). The impact of leader and member group processing on achievement in cooperative groups. J. Soc. Psychol., 130, 507-516.
92. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., and Holubec, E. (2002). Circles of Learning, 5th ed. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
93. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., and Smith, K. (2006). Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom, 3rd ed. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.*
94. Johnson, R., Johnson, D. W., and Stanne, M. (1985). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on computer-assisted instruction. J. Educ. Psychol., 77, 668-677.
95. Johnson, R., Johnson, D. W., and Stanne, M. (1986c). A comparison of computer-assisted cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Am. Educ. Res. J., 23, 382-392.
96. Johnson, R., Johnson, D. W., Stanne, M., Smizak, B., and Avon, J. (1987). Effect of Composition Pairs at the Word Processor on Quality of Writing and Ability to Use the Word Processor. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
97. Kelley, H. and Thibaut, J. (1978). Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence. New York: Wiley.
98. Keeler, C. and Anson, R. (1995). An assessment of cooperative learning used for basic computer skills instruction in the college classroom. J. Educ. Comput. Res., 19(4), 379-393.
99. Khalili, A. and Shashaani, L. (1994). The effectiveness of computer applications: a meta-analysis. J. Res. Comput. Educ., 27(1), 48-62.
100. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., and McGuire, T. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. Am. Psychol., 39(10), 1123-1134.
101. King, A. (1989). Verbal interaction and problem solving within computer-assisted cooperative learning groups. J. Educ. Comput. Res., 5(1), 1-15.
102. Klopfer, E. and Squire, K. (in press). Environmental detectives: the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev.
103. Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt Psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
104. Kreijns, K. (2004). Sociable CSCL Environments: Social Affordances, Sociability, and Social Presence. Ph.D. dissertation. Heerlen: Open University of the Netherlands.
105. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., and Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Comput. Hum. Behav., 19, 335-353.
106. Lee, M. (1993). Gender, group composition, and peer interaction in computer-based cooperative learning. J. Educ. Comput. Res., 9(4), 549-577.
107. Lehtinen, E. and Repo, S. (1996). Activity, social interaction and reflective abstraction: learning advanced mathematics in a computer environment. In International Perspectives on the Design of Technology Supported Learning Environments, edited by S. Vosniadou, E. DeCorte, R. Glaser, and H. Mandl, pp. 105-128. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
108. Lehtinen, E., Hamalainen, S., and Malkonen, E. (1998). Learning Experimental Research Methodology and Statistical Inference in a Computer Environment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, San Diego, CA.
109. Lepper, M. and Gurtner J. (1989). Children and computers: approaching the twenty-first century. Am. Psychol., 44(2), 170-178.
110. Lesgold, A., Weiner, A., and Suthers, D. (1995). Tools for Thinking About Complex Issues. Paper presented at the 6th European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, August 26-31, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
111. Levin, J. and Kareev, Y. (1980). Problem-solving in everyday situations. Q. Newslett. Lab. Compar. Hum. Cogn., 2, 47-51.
112. Lin, J., Wu, C., and Liu, H. (1999). Using SimCPU in cooperative learning laboratories. J. Educ. Comput. Res., 20(3), 259-277.
113. Love, W. (1969). Individual Versus Paired Learning of an Abstract Algebra Presented by Computer Assisted Instruction. Tallahassee: Florida State University.
114. McAlister, S., Ravenscroft, A., and Scanlon, E. (2004). Combining interaction and context design to support collaborative argumentation using a tool for synchronous CMC. J. Comput. Assist. Learn., 20(3), 194-204.
115. McConnell, D. (1994). Managing open learning in computer supported collaborative learning environments. Stud. Higher Educ., 19(3), 175-191.
116. McDonald, C. (1993). Learner-Controlled Lesson in Cooperative Learning Groups During Computer-Based Instruction. Ph.D. dissertation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
117. McGuire, T., Kiesler, S., and Siegel, J. (1987). Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 52, 917-930.
118. McInerney, V., McInerney, D., and Marsh, H. (1997). Effects of metacognitive strategy training within a cooperative group learning context on computer achievement and anxiety: an aptitudetreatment interaction study. J. Educ. Psychol., 89(4), 686-695.
119. Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent Messages. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
120. Mevarech, Z. (1993). Who benefits from cooperative computerassisted instruction? J. Educ. Comput. Res., 9(4), 451-464.
121. Mevarech, Z., Stern, D., and Levita, I. (1987). To cooperate or not to cooperate in CAI: that is the question. J. Educ. Res., 80(3), 164-167.
122. Mevarech, Z., Silber, O., and Fine, D. (1991). Learning with computers in small groups: cognitive and affective outcomes. J. Educ. Comput. Res., 7(2), 233-243.
123. Milheim, W. and Martin, B. (1991). Theoretical bases for the use of learner control: three different perspectives. J. Comput.-Based Instruct., 18(3), 99-105.
124. Muirhead, B. (2004). Encouraging interaction in online classes. Int. J. Instruct. Technol. Dist. Learn., 1(6).
125. Muller, A. and Perlmutter, M. (1985). Preschool children’s problem-solving interactions at computers and jigsaw puzzles. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol., 6, 173-186.
126. Munneke, L., van Amelsvoort, M., and Andriessen, J. (2003). The role of diagrams in collaborative argumentation-based learning. Int. J. Educ. Res., 39, 113-131.
127. Nastasi, B. and Clements, D. (1992). Social-cognitive behaviors and higher-order thinking in educational computer environments. Learn. Instruct., 2, 215-238.
128. Nastasi, B., Clements, D., and Battista, M. (1990). Social-cognitive interactions, motivation, and cognitive growth in LOGO programming and CAI problem-solving environments. J. Educ. Psychol., 82, 150-158.
129. Noell, J. and Carnine, D. (1989). Group and individual computer-based video instruction. Educ. Technol., 29(1), 36-37.
130. Ocker, R. J. and Yaverbaum, G. (1999). Asynchronous computer-mediated communication versus face-to-face collaboration: results on student learning, quality, and satisfaction. Group Decis. Negot., 8, 427-440.
131. Okey, J. R. and Majer, K. (1976). Individual and small-group learning with computer-assisted instruction. AV Commun. Rev., 24(1), 79-86.
132. O’Mahony, S. and Barley, S. (1999). Do digital telecommunications affect work and organization? The state of our knowledge. Res. Org. Behav., 21, 125-161.
133. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books.*
134. Pauli, C. and Reusser, K. (1997). Supporting collaborative problem solving: supporting collaboration and supporting problem solving. In Proc. of Swiss Workshop on Collaborative and Distributed Systems, May 2, Lausanne, Switzerland.
135. Pea, R. D., Edelson, E., and Gomez, L. (1994). The CoVis Collaboratory: High School Science Learning Supported by a Broadband Education Network with Scientific Visualization, Videoconferencing, and Collaborative Computing. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 4-8, New Orleans, LA.
136. Piaget, J. (1950). The Psychology of Intelligence. New York: Harcourt.*
137. Pilkington, R. and Walker, A. (2003). Facilitating debate in networked learning: reflecting on online synchronous discussion in higher education. Instruct. Sci., 31, 41-63.
138. Postthast, M. (1995). Cooperative Learning Experiences in Introductory Statistics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 18-22, San Francisco, CA.
139. Prusak, L. and Cohen, D. (2001). In Good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
140. Reeves, B. and Nass, C. I. (1996). The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media as Real People and Places. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
141. Regin, G. (1990). The effects of individualized and cooperative computer assisted instruction on mathematics achievement and mathematics anxiety for prospective teachers. J. Res. Comput. Educ., 22, 404-412.
142. Reigeluth, C. M. and Stein, F. S. (1983). The elaborative theory of instruction. In Instructional Design Theories and Models, edited by C. M. Reigeluth, pp. 335-382. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
143. Repman, J. (1993). Collaborative, computer-based learning: cognitive and affective outcomes. J. Educ. Comput. Res., 9(2), 149-163.
144. Rocklin, T., O’Donnell, A., Dansereau, D., Lambiotte, J., Hythecker, V. I., and Larson, C. (1985). Training learning strategies with computer-aided cooperative learning. Comput. Educ., 9(1), 67-71.
145. Rourke, L. (2000). Operationalizing social interaction in computer conferencing. In Proc. of the 16th Annual Conf. of the Canadian Association for Distance Education, http://www.ulaval.ca/aced2000cade/english/proceedings.html.
146. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., and Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous textbased computer conferencing. J. Dist. Educ., 14(3), 51-70.
147. Rubin, A. (1983). The computer confronts language arts: cans and shoulds for education. In Classroom Computers and Cognitive Science, edited by A. Wilkinson, pp. 201-218. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
148. Rysavy, D. and Sales, G. (1991). Cooperative learning in computer-based instruction. Educ. Technol., Res. Dev., 39(2), 70-79.
149. Salomon, G. (1983). The differential investment of mental effort in learning from different sources. Educ. Psychol., 18(1), 42-50.
150. Salomon, G. (1985). Information technologies: what you see is not (always) what you get. Educ. Psychol., 20(4), 207-216.*
151. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., McLearn, R., Swallow, J., and Woodruff, D. (1989). Computer supported intentional learning environments. J. Educ. Comput. Res., 5(1), 51-68.*
152. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, K., and Lamon, M. (1994). The CSILE project: trying to bring the classroom into world 3. In Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom Practice, edited by K. McGilly, pp. 201-228. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
153. Shlechter, T. (1990). The relative instructional efficiency of small group computer-based training. J. Educ. Comput. Res., 6, 329-341.*
154. Short, J., Williams, E., and Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: Wiley.
155. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., and McGuire, T. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. Proc., 37, 157-187.
156. Simsek, A. and Hooper, S. (1992). The effects of cooperative versus individual videodisc learning on student performance and attitudes. Int. J. Instruct. Media, 19(3), 209-218.
157. Simsek, A. and Tsai, B. (1992). The impact of cooperative group composition on student performance and attitudes during interactive videodisc instruction. J. Comput.-Based Instruct., 19(3), 86-91.
158. Skinner, B. (1968). The Technology of Teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.*
159. Snow, R. (1980). Aptitude, learner control, and adaptive instruction. Educ. Psychol., 15, 151-158.*
160. Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1991). Computers, networks and work. Sci. Am., 65, 116-123.
161. Squire, K. (2006). From content to context: videogames as designed experience. Educ. Res., 35(8), 19-29.
162. Steinberg, E. R. (1977). Review of student control in computerassisted instruction. J. Comput.-Based Instruct., 3(3), 84-90.
163. Steinberg, E. R. (1984). Teaching Computers to Teach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
164. Steinberg, E. R. (1989). Cognition and learner control: a literature review, 1977-1988. J. Comput.-Based Instruct., 16(4), 117-124.*
165. Stephenson, S. (1992). Effects of student-instructor interaction and paired/individual study on achievement in computerbased training (CBT). J. Comput.-Based Instruct., 19(1), 22-26.*
166. Susman, E. (1998). Cooperative learning: a review of factors that increase the effectiveness of cooperative computerbased instruction. J. Educ. Comput. Res., 18(4), 303-332.
167. Suthers, D. D. (1998). Computer Aided Education and Training Initiative, Technical Report 12. Pittsburgh, PA: Learning and Research Development Center, University of Pittsburgh.
168. Suthers, D. D. (2001). Towards a systematic study of representational guidance for collaborative learning discourse. J. Universal Comput. Sci., 7(3), 254-277.
169. Suthers, D. D. (2003). Studies of representational support for collaborative inquiry with Belvedere. In Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments, edited by J. Andriessen, M. Baker, and D. Suthers, pp. 27-46. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
170. Suthers, D. D. and Hundhausen, C. D. (2003). An experimental study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning processes. J. Learn. Sci., 12(2), 183-218.
171. Sutton, S. (1996). Planning for the twenty-first century: the California State University. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci., 47(11), 821-825.
172. Tennyson, R. D., Christensen, D., and Park, O. (1984). The Minnesota Adaptive Instructional System: a review of its theory and research. J. Comput.-Based Instruct., 11(1), 2-13.*
173. Tobias, S. (1987). Mandatory text review and interaction with student characteristics. J. Educ. Psychol., 79, 154-161.
174. Trevino, L., Lengel, R., and Daft, R. (1987). Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organizations: a symbolic interactionist perspective. Commun. Res., 14, 553-574.
175. Trowbridge, D. and Durnin, R. (1984). Results from an Investigation of Groups Working at the Computer. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.
176. Tu, C. H. and Corry, M. (2002). The Relationships of Social Presence, Tasks, and Social Relationships in Online Learning Environment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 1-5, New Orleans, LA.
177. Tu, C. H. and McIsaac, M. S. (2002). An examination of social presence to increase interaction in online classes. Am. J. Dist. Educ., 16(3), 131-150.
178. Underwood, G. and McCaffrey, M. (1990). Gender differences in a cooperative computer-based language task. Educ. Res., 32, 44-49.
179. van Bruggen, J. M., Boshuizen, H. P. A., and Kirschner, P. A. (2003). A cognitive framework for cooperative problem solving with argument visualization. In Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Education Sense-Making, edited by P. A. Kirschner, S. J. Buckinghan Shum, and C. S. Carr, pp. 25-47. London: Springer.
180. Veerman, A. L. (2000). Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning through Argumentation. Ph.D. dissertation. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Utrecht University.
181. Veletsianos, G. (2006). Contextual Pedagogical Agents: Stereotypes and First Impressions and their Impact on Student Learning and Perceptions of Agent Persona. Master’s thesis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
182. Veletsianos, G. (2007). Conversing with intelligent agents: a phenomenological exploration of communication with digital entities. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 9-13, Chicago, IL.
183. Vygotsky, L. (1978) Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.*
184. Webb, N. (1984). Microcomputer learning in small groups: cognitive requirements and group processes. J. Educ. Psychol., 76, 1076-1088.
185. Webb, N., Ender, P., and Lewis, S. (1986). Problem solving strategies and group processes in small group learning computer programming. Am. Educ. Res. J., 23(2), 243-261.
186. Weinberger, A., Etrl, B., Fischer, F., and Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instruct. Sci., 33, 1-30.
187. Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt: II. Psychologische Forschung, 4, 301-350.
188. Whitelock, D., Scanlon, E., Taylor, J., and O’Shea, T. (1995). Computer support for pupils collaborating: a case study on collisions. In Proceedings of CSCL 1995: The First International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, edited by J. Schnase and E. Cunnius, pp. 380-384. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
189. Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M., and Haythornwaite, C. (1996). Computer networks as social networks: collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annu. Rev. Soc., 22, 213-238.
190. Williams, D. (2003). The video game lightning rod. Inform. Commun. Soc., 6(4), 523-550.
191. Wizer, D. R. (1987). Cooperative learning with microcomputers. Pointer, 32, 31-33.
192. Yager, S., Johnson, D. W, and Johnson, R. (1985). Oral discussion, group-to-individual transfer, and achievement in cooperative learning groups. J. Educ. Psychol., 77(1), 60-66.
193. Yager, S., Johnson, R., Johnson, D. W., and Snider, B. (1986). The impact of group processing on achievement in cooperative learning groups. J. Social Psychol., 126, 389-397.
194. Yeuh, J. and Alessi, S. (1988). The effects of reward structure and group ability composition on cooperative computerassisted instruction. J. Comput.-Based Instruct., 15, 18-22.