Students as Web 2.0 authors: Implications for assessment design and conduct

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 105-122

  Gray, Kathleen ^a   Thompson, Celia ^b   Sheard, Judithe ^c   Clerehan, Rosemary ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955826155     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14495554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1105     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. ACLS (American Council of Learned Societies) (2006). Our Cultural Commonwealth: The report of the ACLS Commission on Cyberinfrastructure for the Humanities and Social Sciences. American Council of Learned Societies. [viewed 1 Apr 2008, verified 21 Feb 2010]. http://www.acls.org/cyberinfrastructure/OurCulturalCommonwealth.pdf
2. Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A New wave of innovation for teaching and learning? EDUCAUSE Review, 41(2), 32-44. [viewed 1 April 2008]. http://connect.educause.edu/ Library/EDUCAUSE+Review/Web20ANewWaveofInnovation/40615
3. Amitay, E., Yogev, S. & Yom-Tov, E. (2007). Serial sharers: Detecting split identities of web authors. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR Workshop on Plagiarism Analysis, Authorship Identification, and Near-Duplicate Detection (PAN), Amsterdam, Netherlands. [viewed 1 Apr 2008, verified 21 Feb 2010]. http://einat.Webir.org/SIGIR_PAN_workshop_2007.pdf
4. Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC Technology & Standards Watch, February. [viewed 1 Apr 2008, verified 21 Feb 2010]. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf
5. Barnes, C. & Tynan, B. (2007). The adventures of Miranda in the brave new world: Learning in a Web 2.0 millennium. ALT-Journal, 15(3), 189-200. [verified 21 Feb 2010] http://repository.alt.ac.uk/724/
6. Batson, T. (2007). The ePortfolio hijacked. Campus Technology, 12 December. [viewed 1 Apr 2008, verified 21 Feb 2010]. http://www.campustechnology.com/articles/56617/
7. Berlanga, A., Sloep, P., Brouns, F., Van Rosmalen, P., Bitter-Rijpkema, M. & Koper, R. (2007). Functionality for learning networks: Lessons learned from social web applications. Paper presented at e-Portfolio Conference, October 17-19, in Maastricht, Netherlands. http://hdl.handle.net/1820/1011 [viewed 1 Apr 2008, verified 21 Feb 2010].
8. Biggs, J. (2003a). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. 2nd Edition. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education: Open University Press.
9. Biggs, J. (2003b). Aligning teaching and assessment to course objectives. Paper presented at ICHEd Conference: Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: New Trends and Innovations, April 13-17, in University of Aveiro, Portugal. [viewed 1 Apr 2008, verified 21 Feb 2010]. http://event.ua.pt/iched/main/invcom/p182.pdf
10. Boulos, M., Maramba, I. & Wheeler, S. (2006). Wikis, blogs and podcasts: A new generation of web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Medical Education, 6(41). http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1472-6920-6-41.pdf [viewed 1 Apr 2008, verified 21 Feb 2010].
11. Brown, J. & Adler, R. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(1), 16-32. http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0811.pdf
12. Bughin, J. (2008). The rise of enterprise 2.0. Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 9(3), 251-259.
13. Burgess, J., Foth, M. & Klaebe, H. (2006). Everyday creativity as civic engagement: A cultural citizenship view of new media. In Proceedings Communications Policy & Research Forum, Sydney, Australia. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/archive/00005056/01/5056_1.pdf
14. Carey, G. (n.d). Gleeson Year 9 Assignments. https://gleeson9itc.pbwiki.com/Assignments [viewed 20 Nov 2008, verified 21 Feb 2010 at http://gleeson9itc.pbworks.com/Assignments]
15. Chalmers, D. (2007). A review of Australian and international quality systems and indicators of learning and teaching. Chippendale, NSW: Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. [verified 21 Feb 2010] http://www.altc.edu.au/resource-reviewindicators-teaching-learning-2007
16. Clark, D., Sampson, V., Weinberger, A. & Erkens. G. (2007). Analytic frameworks for assessing dialogic argumentation in online learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 343-74.
17. Collis, B. & Moonen, J. (2005). An on-going journey: Technology as a learning workbench. University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. http://www.bettycollisjefmoonen.nl/rb.htm
18. Crisp, G. (2007). The e-Assessment Handbook. London: Continuum.
19. Crook, C., Fisher, T., Graber, R., Harrison, C., Lewin, C., Logan, C., Luckin, R., Oliver, M. & Sharples, M. (2008). Web 2.0 technologies for learning: The current landscape - opportunities, challenges and tensions. BECTA Research Report. [viewed 1 Feb 2010]. http://partners.becta.org.uk/uploaddir/ downloads/page_documents/research/Web2_technologies_learning.pdf
20. Dalsgaard, C. (2006). Social software: E-learning beyond learning management systems. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 2. http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2006/Christian_Dalsgaard.htm
21. Darbyshire, P. & Burgess, S. (2006). Strategies for dealing with plagiarism and the web in higher education. Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics, 1(4), 27-39. http://www.jbsge.vu.edu.au/issues/vol01no4/Darbyshire-Burgess.pdf
22. Downes, S. (2007). Open source assessment. Message posted to Half an Hour (blog). http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2007/06/open-source-assessment.html [viewed 12 Dec 2008, verified 20 Feb 2010].
23. Dron, J. (2006). The pleasures and perils of social software. In Proceedings of the Higher Education Academy Information and Computer Sciences 7th Annual Conference, 127-131. Dublin, Ireland. [viewed 1 Apr 2008, verified 21 Feb 2010]. http://www.ics.heacademy.ac.uk/Events/ HEADublin2006_V2/papers/Jon%20Dron%2024.pdf
24. Ehlers, U. (2009). Web 2.0 - e-learning 2.0 - quality 2.0? Quality for new learning cultures. Quality Assurance in Education, 17(3), 296-314.
25. Elander, J., Harrington, K., Norton, L., Robinson, H. & Reddy, P. (2006). Complex skills and academic writing: A review of evidence about the types of learning required to meet core assessment criteria. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(1), 71-90.
26. Elliott, B. (2007). E-assessment: What is Web 2.0? Glasgow: Scottish Qualifications Authority. http://www.sqa.org.uk/sqa/22941.html [viewed 1 Apr 2008, verified 21 Feb 2010].
27. Franklin, T. & van Harmelen, M. (2007). Web 2.0 for content for learning and teaching in higher education. JISC Report. [viewed 1 Apr 2008, verified 21 Feb 2010]. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/digitalrepositories/Web2-contentlearning-and-teaching.pdf
28. Godwin, P. (2007). The Web 2.0 challenge to information literacy. Paper presented at Inforum 2007: 13th Conference on Professional Information Resources, May 22-24, Prague. [viewed 1 Apr 2008, verified 21 Feb 2010]. http://www.inforum.cz/pdf/2007/godwin-peter.pdf
29. Gray, K., Thompson, C., Clerehan, R., Sheard, J. & Hamilton, M. (2008). Web 2.0 authorship: Issues of referencing and citation for academic integrity. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 112-118.
30. Hemmi, A., Bayne, S. & Land, R. (2009). The appropriation and repurposing of social technologies in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(1), 19-30.
31. Horizon Report (2008). Stanford, California, USA: New Media Consortium / EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. http://www.nmc.org/pdf/2008-Horizon-Report.pdf
32. Hughes, J. (2008). Open accreditation - a model. Pontydysgu - bridge to learning blog. [viewed 1 Apr 2008, verified 21 Feb 2010]. http://www.pontydysgu.org/2008/10/openaccreditation-a-model/
33. Isaacs, G. (2002). Assessing Group Tasks. Brisbane: University of Queensland Teaching & Educational Development Institute. [viewed Apr 2008, verified 21 Feb 2010]. http://www.tedi.uq.edu.au/downloads/T&L_Assess_group_tasks.pdf
34. James, R., McInnis, C. & Devlin, M. (2002). Assessing Learning in Australian Universities: Ideas, Strategies and Resources for Quality in Assessment: Five Practical Guides. The University of Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education / Australian Universities Teaching Committee. http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/assessinglearning/03/ and http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/assessinglearning/06/ [viewed 1 Apr 2008, verified 21 Feb 2010].
35. JISC (2007). Effective practice with e-assessment: An overview of technologies, policies and practice in further and higher education. UK: HEFCE. [viewed 1 Apr 2008, verified 21 Feb 2010]. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/themes/elearning/effpraceassess.pdf
36. Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Gray, K., Judd, T., Waycott, J., Bennett, S., Maton, K., Krause, K. L., Bishop, A., Chang, R. & Churchward, A. (2007). The Net Generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: preliminary findings. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/kennedy.pdf
37. Kirkwood, A. & Price, L. (2008). Assessment and student learning: a fundamental relationship and the role of information and communication technologies. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 23(1), 5-16.
38. Lamb, K. & McLaughlin, C. (2008). e-Assessment 07/08: Training and support initiatives. Edinburgh: JISC Regional Support Centres for Scotland. http://www.rsc-swscotland. ac.uk/eAssessment/docfiles/e-Assessment_Initiatives_2007-08.pdf
39. Martin, A. (2005). The landscape of digital literacy. DigEuLit Project. http://www.digeulit.ec/docs/public.asp [viewed 1 Apr 2008, not found 21 Feb 2010, see http://www.elearningeuropa.info/directory/index.php?page=doc&doc_id=6007&doclng=6]
40. Nillson, L., Eklof, A. & Ottosson, T. (2005). What's so original? The discourse on education and dishonesty in the wake of a technological revolution. Paper presented at The 11th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Nicosia, Cyprus. [viewed 1 Apr 2008, verified 21 Feb 2010] http://www.distans.hkr.se/ILLWebb/Earli_paper2005_whats_so_original_final.pdf
41. Race, P. (2001). A briefing on self, peer and group assessment. Assessment Series No. 9. UK: LTSN Generic Centre. http://internt.iha.dk/paedagogik/seminarer/Chris%20Rust/ASS009 PhilRace.pdf [viewed 1 Apr 2008, verified 21 Feb 2010 at http://www.palatine.ac.uk/files/970.pdf]
42. REAP (ReEngineering Assessment Practices in Scottish Higher Education Project) (2007). Assessment principles: Some possible candidates. [viewed 1 Apr 2008, verified 21 Feb 2010]. http://www.reap.ac.uk/resourcesPrinciples.html
43. Reeves, T. (2006). How do you know they are learning? The importance of alignment in higher education. International Journal of Learning Technology, 2(4), 294-309. [verified 21 Feb 2010] http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI08105A.pdf
44. Renner, W. (2006). E-learning 2.0: New frontier for student empowerment. Paper presented at Edu-Com 2006, 22-24 November, Nong Khai, Thailand. [viewed 1 Apr 2008, verified 21 Feb 2010]. http://blogs.usyd.edu.au/elearning/elearning2.pdf
45. Richardson, W. (2006). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms. Thousand Oaks, California, USA: Corwin Press.
46. Roberts, E. (2007). Transforming digital content into learning. Presentation at The Sixth Annual ECAR/HP Summer Symposium for Higher Education IT Executives, 11-13 June, Boulder, Colorado. http://connect.educause.edu/Library/ECAR/TransformingDigitalConten/45012 [viewed 1 Apr 2008, verified 21 Feb 2010]
47. Sankey, M. & Huijser, H. (2009). A 'likely benefit' from aligning Web 2.0 technologies with an institution's learning and teaching agenda. In: 2009 World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare & Higher Education (E-LEARN 2009), 26-30 Oct 2009, Vancouver, Canada. http://eprints.usq.edu.au/6055/
48. Selwyn, N. (2007). Web 2.0 applications as alternative environments for informal learning - a critical review. Paper presented at the OECD-KERIS Expert Meeting - Session 6 - Alternative learning environments in practice: Using ICT to change impact and outcomes. [viewed 1 Apr 2008, verified 21 Feb 2010]. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/32/3/39458556.pdf
49. Sener, J. (2007). In search of student-generated content in online education. e-mentor, 4(21). [viewed 1 Apr 2008, verified 21 Feb 2010]. http://e-mentor.edu.pl/_xml/wydania/21/467.pdf
50. Varvel, V. (2005). Honesty in online education. Pointers and Clickers, 6(1), 1-20. [verified 21 Feb 2010] http://www.ion.uillinois.edu/resources/pointersclickers/2005_01/VarvelCheatPoint2005.pdf
51. Wenger, E. (2006). Learning for a small planet: A research agenda. [viewed 1 Dec 2008, verified 21 Feb 2010]. http://ewenger.com/research/LSPfoundingdoc.doc
52. Wyatt-Smith, C. & Kimber, K. (2008). Valuing and evaluating student-generated online multimodal texts: Rethinking what counts. English in Education, 39(2), 22-43.