Cacophony or embarrassment of riches: Building a system of support for quality teaching

Journal of Teacher Education

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 383-394

  Wilson, Suzanne M ^a   Rozelle, Jeffrey J ^b   Mikeska, Jamie N ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

professional development; teacher education; teacher quality

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053005918     PISSN: 00224871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022487111409416     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2. Ball D.L.,Forzani F.The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education.Journal of Teacher Education.2009;60:497-511.
3. Ball D.L.,Sleep L.,Boerst T.,Bass H.Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education.Elementary School Journal.2009;109:458-474.
4. The opportunity equation: Transforming mathematics and science education for citizenship and the global economy.New York, NY: Institute for Advanced Study and Carnegie Corporation of New York; 2009:.
5. Clift, R. T., & Brady, P. (2005). Research on methods courses and field experiences. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education (pp. 309-424). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the American Educational Research Association panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Cohen D.,Raudenbush S.,Ball D.Resources, instruction, and research.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis.2003;25 (2): 1-24.
8. Cohen D.K.,Spillane J.P.Policy and practice: The relations between governance and instruction.Review of Research in Education.1992;18:3-49.
9. Education Resource Strategies.(2004).Becoming a capable and accountable system: A review of professional development and curriculum in the Baltimore City Public School System.Retrieved from http://erstrategies.org/resources.
10. Elmore R.F.Building a new structure for school leadership.Washington, DC: The Albert Shanker Institute; 2000:.
11. Elmore R.,Burney D.Investing in teacher learning: Staff development and instructional improvement in Community School District #2.New York, NY: National Commission on Teaching & America's Future & the Consortium for Policy Research in Education; 1997:.
12. Feiman-Nemser S.From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching.Teachers College Record.2001;103:1013-1055.
13. FrankeM.L.ChanA.(2006).High leverage practices.Retrieved from http://gallery.carnegiefoundation.org/insideteaching/quest/megan_loef_franke_and_angela_grace_chan_high.html.
14. Grossman P.,Hammerness K.,McDonald M.Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education.Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice.2009;15:273-289.
15. Grossman P.,McDonald M.Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education.American Educational Research Journal.2008;45:184-205.
16. Grossman P.L.,Smagorinsky P.,Valencia S.W.Appropriating tools for teaching English: A theoretical framework for research on learning to teach.American Journal of Education.1999;108:1-29.
17. Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 127-150). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
18. Kazemi E.,Franke M.L.Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective inquiry.Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education.2004;7 (3): 203-235.
19. Kennedy, M. M. (1987). Inexact sciences: Professional education and the development of expertise. In E. Z. Rothkopf (Ed.),Review of research in education (Vol. 14, pp. 133-167). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
20. Lampert M.Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: What do we mean?.Journal of Teacher Education.2010;61:21-34.
21. Loucks-Horsley S.,Hewson P.,Love N.,Stiles K.Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin/National Institute for Science Education; 1998:.
22. Miles K.H.,Bouchard F.,Winner K.,Cohen M.A.,Guiney E.Professional development spending in the Boston Public Schools: A joint report of the Boston Plan for Excellence and the Boston Public Schools.Boston, MA: Boston Plan for Excellence and the Boston Public Schools; 1999:.
23. Miles K.H.,Odden A.,Fermanich M.,Archibald S.,Gallagher A.Inside the black box of school district spending on professional development: Lessons from comparing five urban school districts.Journal of Education Finance.2004;30:1-26.
24. National Academy of Education. (2009). Teacher quality: Education policy white paper (Wilson, S., Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
25. National Research Council, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. (2002). Scientific research in education (Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research, R. J. Shavelson & L. Towne, Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
26. Putnam R.T.,Borko H.What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning?.Educational Researcher.2000;29 (1): 4-15.
27. Mathematical proficiency for all students: Toward a strategic research and development program in mathematics education.Santa Monica, CA: RAND; 2003:.
28. Sfard A.On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one.Educational Researcher.1998;27 (2): 4-13.
29. Shulman L.S.Stanford Educator.2005:7.
30. Slick S.K.Assessing versus assisting: The supervisor's roles in the complex dynamics of the student teaching triad.Teaching and Teacher Education.1997;13:713-726.
31. Spillane J.P.District leaders' perceptions of teacher learning.Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education; 2000:.
32. Sykes G.,Bird T.,Kennedy M.Journal of Teacher Education.2010:464-476.
33. Tamir E.,Wilson S.M.Who should guard the gates? Evidentiary and professional warrants for claiming jurisdiction.Journal of Teacher Education.2005;56:332-342.
34. Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2009, June). Learning progressions as vision tools for advancing novice teachers' pedagogical performance. Paper produced for LeaPS Conference, Iowa City, IA.
35. Wang J.,Odell S.J.,Schwille S.A.Effects of teacher induction on beginning teachers' teaching: A critical review of the literature.Journal of Teacher Education.2008;59:132-152.
36. Wilson S.M.,Berne J.Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development.Review of Research in Education.1999;24:173-209.
37. Wilson S.M.,Floden R.F.,Ferrini-Mundy J.Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, recommendations, and priorities for the future.Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching Policy, University of Washington; 2001:.
38. Wilson, S. M., & Tamir, E. (2008). The evolving field of teacher education: How understanding the challenge(r)s might improve the preparation of teachers. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, J. D. McIntyre, & K. Demers (Eds.), Handbook for teacher educators: Enduring questions and changing contexts (3rd ed., pp. 908-936). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor, and Francis/Association of Teacher Educators.