Resources, Instruction, and Research

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 119-142

  Cohen, David K ^a   Raudenbush, Stephen W ^a   Ball, Deborah Loewenberg ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Experiments; Instructional effects; Research and policy; School effects

Indexed keywords

EID: 0142138736     PISSN: 01623737     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/01623737025002119     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Alexander K., Entwisle, D., & Olson, L. (2001). Schools, achievement, and inequality: A seasonal perspective. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 71-191.
2. Betts, J. R., & Skolnik, J. L., (2001). The behavioral effects of variation in class size: The case of math teachers Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 193-215.
3. Bishop, J. (1998). The effect of curriculum-based external exit exam systems on student achievement. Consortium For Policy Research In Education. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
4. Bishop, J., & Mane, F. (1998, November). The New York state reform strategy: Incentive effects of minimum competency exam graduation requirements. Paper presented at the National Invitational Conference on "Education in Cities: What Works and What Doesn't," Wisconsin.
5. Blatchford, P. Moriarty, V., Edmonds, S., & Martin, C., (2002). Relationships between class size and teaching: A multimethod analysis of British infant schools American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 101-132.
6. Brophy, J. (1988). Research on teacher effects: Uses and abuses. The Elementary School Journal, 89, 3-22.
7. Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, third ed., (pp. 328-375). MacMillian Publishing.
8. Bryk, A., Lee V., & Holland, P. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Coleman, J., Campbell, E., Hobsen, C., McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfeld, F., & York, R., (1966). Equality of educational opportunity survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
10. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. (1979). Quasi-experimentation. New York: Rand McNally.
11. Cook, T. D., Hunt, H. D., & Murphy, R. F. (1999). Comer's school development program in Chicago: A theory-based evaluation. Unpublished paper, Chicago, IL: Northwestern University.
12. Cooley, W., & Leinhardt, (1978). Instructional dimensions study. Pittsburgh, PA: Learning Research And Development Center, University of Pittsburgh.
13. Dewey, J. (1905). The child and the curriculum, and school and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
14. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 5, 1179-1187.
15. Dweck, C. S. (1988). Children's thinking about traits: Implications for judgments of the self and others. Child Development, 69(2), 391-403.
16. Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37, 15-27.
17. Edmonds, R. (1984). School effects and teacher effects. Social Policy, 15, 37-39.
18. Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Andersen, L. M., Anthony, H. M., & Stevens, D. D. (1991). Making strategies and self-talk visible: Writing instruction in regular and special education classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 337-372.
19. Ehrenberg, R., Brewer, D., Gamoran, A., & Willms, D., (2001). Class size and student achievement. Psychological Science In The Public Interest, 2(1), 1-30.
20. Evertson, C. M., & Folger, J. K. (1989, March). Small class, large class: What do teachers do differently? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
21. Evertson, C. M., & Randoph. (1990). Teaching practices and class size: A new look at an old issue. Peabody Journal Of Education 85-105.
22. Ferguson, R. F. (1991). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28, 465-498.
23. Finn, J. D., & Achilles, C. (1990). Answers and questions about class size: A statewide experiment. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 557-77.
24. Finn, J. D., & Achilles, C. M. (1999). Tennessee's class size study: Findings, implications, misconceptions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 97-109.
25. Folger, J., (1989). Lessons For Class Size Policy And Research, Peabody Journal Of Education, 67(1) 123-132.
26. Goldstein, H., & Blatchford, P. (1998) Class size and educational achievement: A review of methodology with particular reference to study design. British Educational Research Journal, 24(3), 255-268.
27. Hanushek, E. A. (1981). Throwing money at schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1, 19-41.
28. Hanushek, E. A. (1989). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance. Educational Researcher, 18(4), 45-65.
29. Hanushek, E. A., (1996). School resources and student performance. In G. Burtless (Ed.), Does money matter?, (pp.) Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
30. Hanushek, E. A., (1999) Some findings from an independent investigation of the Tennessee STAR Experiment, and from other investigations of class size effects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 143-163.
31. Hedges, L. V., Laine, R. D., & Greenwald, R. (1994). Does money matter? A meta-analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes (An exchange: Part I). Educational Researcher, 25(3), 5-14.
32. Holland, P. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396), 945-960.
33. Jencks, C., Smith, M., Acland, H., Bone, M., Cohen, D., Gintis, H., Heyns, B., & Michelson, S. (1972). Inequality. New York, Basic Books.
34. Krueger, A. (1999). Experimental effects of education production functions, Quarterly Journal Of Economics, 114(2).
35. Lampert, M. M., (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36. Leinhardt, G., Zigmond, N., & Cooley, W., Reading instruction and its effects. American Educational Research Journal, 18(3), 343-361.
37. Levin, H., Glass, G., & Meister, G., (1984), Cost-effectiveness of educational interventions. Report # 84-A11, Stanford, CA: Stanford Center For Educational Research.
38. McLaughlin, M. & Talbert, J. (1999). Professional community and the work of high school teaching. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39. Mitchell, D., Beach, S., & Badarak, G. (1989). Modelling the relationship between achievement and class size: A re-analysis Of the Tennessee Project Star Data. Peabody Journal Of Education 34-74
40. Molnar, A., Smith, P. Zahoric, J., Parker, A., Hallbach, A., & Ehrle, K. (1999). Evaluating the SAGE Program: A pilot program in targeted pupil-teacher reduction in Wisconsin. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 165-177.
41. Mosteller, F. (1995). The Tennessee study of class size in the early school grades. Future of Children, 5(2), 113-127.
42. Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G. G. (1995). Successful school restructuring: A report to the public and educators. Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools, University of Wisconsin-Madison: U.S. Department of Education, OERI. R117Q00005-95.
43. Odden, A, & Busch, C., (1998). Financing schools for high performance: Strategies for improving the use of educational resources. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
44. Palinscar, A. M., (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction, Educational Psychologist, 21, 73-98.
45. Palinscar, A. M., & Brown, A., (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities, Cognition and Instruction, I, 117-175.
46. Raudenbush, S. W. (1984). Magnitude of teacher expectancy effects on pupil IQ as a function of the credibility of expectancy induction: A synthesis of findings from 18 experiments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1), 85-97.
47. Rice, J. (1999). The impact of class size on instructional strategies and the use of time in high school mathematics and science courses pp. 215-29.
48. Ritter, G. W., & Boruch, R. F. (1999). The political and institutional origins of a randomized controlled trial on elementary school class size: Tennessee's Project STAR. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 111-126.
49. Robins, J. M., Greenland, S., & Hu, F. (1999). Estimation of the causal effect of a time-varying exposure on the marginal mean of a repeated binary outcome. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(447), 687-701.
50. Rosenholz, S. J. (1985). Effective schools: Interpreting the evidence. American Journal of Education, 93, 352-388.
51. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
52. Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688-701.
53. Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., Ousten, M., & Smith, A. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary schools and their effects on children. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54. Skrla, L., Scheurich, J. J. (2001). Displacing deficit thinking in school district leadership. Education and Urban Society, 33(3), 235-262.
55. Slavin, R., (1990). Class size and student achievement: Is smaller better? Contemporary Education, 62(1), 6-12.
56. Slavin, R., (1990). Class size and student achievement: Small effects of small classes. Educational Psychologist, 24, 99-110.
57. Zahoric, J. (1999). Reduced class size leads to individualized instruction. Educational Leadership, 57(1), 50-53.