Personality: Its measurement and validity for employee selection

Handbook of Employee Selection

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 299-319

  Hough, Leaetta ^a   Dilchert, Stephan ^b  

^a Dunnette Group Ltd   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80051470654     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203809808     Document Type: Chapter

References (161)

1. Alliger, G. M., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Mitchell, K. E. (1996). The susceptibility of overt and covert integrity tests to coaching and faking. Psychological Science, 7, 32-39.
2. Arthur, W., Day, E. A., Mc Nelly, T. L., & Edens, P. S. (2003). A meta-analysis of the criterion-related validity of assessment center dimensions. Personnel Psychology, 56, 125-154.
3. Averill, J. R. (1997). The emotions: An integrative approach. In R. Hogan, J. A. Johnson, & S. R. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 513-541). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4. Barge, B. N., & Hough, L. M. (1988). Utility of biographical data for the prediction of job performance. In L. M. Hough (Ed.), Literature review: Utility of temperament, biodata, and interest assessment for predicting job performance (ARI Research Note 88-020). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute.
5. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A metaanalysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
6. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (2005). Yes, personality matters: Moving on to more important matters. Human Performance, 18, 359-372.
7. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9-30.
8. Barrick, M. R., Patton, G. K., & Haugland, S. N. (2000). Accuracy of interviewer judgments of job applicant personality traits. Personnel Psychology, 53, 925-951.
9. Bartram, D. (2005). The Great Eight competencies: A criterion-centric approach to validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1185-1203.
10. Baumeister, R. F., Gailliot, M., DeWall, C., & Oaten, M. (2006). Self-regulation and personality: How interventions increase regulatory success, and how depletion moderates the effects of traits on behavior. Journal of Personality, 74, 1773-1801.
11. Benson, M. J., & Campbell, J. P. (2007). To be, or not to be, linear: An expanded representation of personality and its relationship to leadership performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 249.
12. Birkland, A. S., & Ones, D. S. (2006). The structure of emotional stability: A meta-analytic investigation. Paper presented at the International Congress of Applied Psychology, Athens, Greece.
13. Blackman, M. C., & Funder, D. C. (2002). Effective interview practices for accurately assessing counterproductive traits. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 109-116.
14. Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187-215.
15. Borman, W. C., Penner, L. A., Allen, T. D., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2001). Personality predictors of citizenship performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 52-69.
16. Chan, D. (2004). Individual differences in tolerance for contradiction. Human Performance, 17, 297-324.
17. Chan, D. (2008). So why ask me? Are self-report data really that bad? In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Received doctrine, verity, and fable in the organizational and social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (2002). Situational judgment and job performance. Human Performance, 15, 254.
19. Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (2005). Situational judgment tests. In A. Evers, O. Voskuijl, & N. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of selection (pp. 219-242). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
20. Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S., Drasgow, F., & Roberts, B. W. (2007). Constructing personality scales under the assumptions of an ideal point response process: Toward increasing the flexibility of personality measures. Psychological Assessment, 19, 88-106.
21. Christiansen, N. D. (1997). The development and validation of a job-related choice method of personality assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL.
22. Connelly, B. S. (2008). The reliability, convergence, and predictive validity of personality ratings: Another perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
23. Connelly, B. S., Davies, S. E., Ones, D. S., & Birkland, A. S. (2008a, April). Agreeableness: A meta-analytic review of structure, convergence, and predictive validity. In J. P. Thomas & C. Viswesvaran (Chairs), Personality in the workplace: Advances in measurement and assessment. Symposium conducted at the annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco, CA.
24. Connelly, B. S., Davies, S. E., Ones, D. S., & Birkland, A. S. (2008b, January). Opening up openness: A meta-analytic review of measures of the personality construct. Poster session presented at the annual conference of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Albuquerque, NM.
25. Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2007, April). Combining conscientiousness scales: Can’t get enough of the trait, baby. Poster session presented at the annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New York, NY.
26. Connolly, J. J., Kavanagh, E. J., & Viswesvaran, C. (2007). The convergent validity between self and observer ratings of personality: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 110-117.
27. Cortina, J. M., Goldstein, N. B., Payne, S. C., Davison, H., & Gilliland, S. W. (2000). The incremental validity of interview scores over and above cognitive ability and conscientiousness scores. Personnel Psychology, 53, 325-351.
28. Costa, P. T., & Mc Crae, R. R. (1988). From catalog to classification: Murray’s needs and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 258-265.
29. Costa, P. T., & Mc Crae, R. R. (1992). The revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
30. Coward, W., & Sackett, P. R. (1990). Linearity of ability-performance relationships: A reconfirmation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 297-300.
31. Davies, M., Stankov, L., & Roberts, R. D. (1998). Emotional intelligence: In search of an elusive construct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 989-1015.
32. Davies, S. E., Connelly, B. S., Ones, D. S., & Birkland, A. S. (2008, April). Enhancing the role of extraversion for work related behaviors. Poster session presented at the annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco, CA.
33. Day, D. V., & Silverman, S. B. (1989). Personality and job performance: Evidence of incremental validity. Personnel Psychology, 42, 25-36.
34. DeGroot, T., & Kluemper, D. (2007). Evidence of predictive and incremental validity of personality factors, vocal attractiveness and the situational interview. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 30-39.
35. Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246-1256.
36. Dilchert, S., Ones, D. S., Van Rooy, D. L., & Viswesvaran, C. (2006). Big Five factors of personality. In J. H. Greenhaus & G. A. Callanan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of career development (pp. 36-42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Dilchert, S., Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Deller, J. (2006). Response distortion in personality measurement: Born to deceive, yet capable of providing valid self-assessments? Psychology Science, 48, 209-225.
38. Dudley, N. M., Orvis, K. A., Lebiecki, J. E., & Cortina, J. M. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: Examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 40-57.
39. Foldes, H. J., Duehr, E. E., & Ones, D. S. (2008). Group differences in personality: Meta-analyses comparing five U.S. racial groups. Personnel Psychology, 61, 579-616.
40. Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652-670.
41. Ghiselli, E. E. (1966). The validity of occupational aptitude tests. New York, NY: Wiley.
42. Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34.
43. Gough, H. G. (1968). The Chaplin social insight test manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
44. Gough, H. G. (1994). Theory, development, and interpretation of the CPI Socialization scale. Psychological Reports, 75, 651-700.
45. Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26, 463-488.
46. Guion, R. M. (1991). Personnel assessment, selection, and placement. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 327-397). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
47. Harold, C. M., Mc Farland, L. A., & Weekley, J. A. (2006). The validity of verifiable and non-verifiable biodata items: An examination across applicants and incumbents. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 336-346.
48. Heggestad, E. D., Morrison, M., Reeve, C. L., & Mc Cloy, R. A. (2006). Forced-choice assessments of personality for selection: Evaluating issues of normative assessment and faking resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 9-24.
49. Hicks, L. E. (1970). Some properties of ipsative, normative, and forced-choice normative measures. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 167-184.
50. Hogan, J., & Holland, B. (2003). Using theory to evaluate personality and job-performance relations: A socio-analytic perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 100-112.
51. Hogan, J., & Ones, D. S. (1997). Conscientiousness and integrity at work. In R. Hogan & J. A. Johnson (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 849-870). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
52. Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. W. (1996). Issues and non-issues in the fidelity-bandwidth trade-off. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 627-637.
53. Hogan, R. T. (1969). Development of an empathy scale. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 33, 307-316.
54. Hogan, R. T. (2005a). Comments. Human Performance, 18, 405-407.
55. Hogan, R. T. (2005b). In defense of personality measurement: New wine for old whiners. Human Performance, 18, 331-341.
56. Hough, L. M. (1989). Biodata and the measurement of individual differences. In T. W. Mitchell (Chair), Biodata vs. personality: The same or different class of individual differences? Symposium conducted at the annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Boston, MA.
57. Hough, L. M. (1992). The “Big Five” personality variables—construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5, 139-155.
58. Hough, L. M. (1997). The millennium for personality psychology: New horizons or good ole daze. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 47, 233-261.
59. Hough, L. M. (1998). Personality at work: Issues and evidence. In M. D. Hakel (Ed.), Beyond multiple choice: Evaluating alternatives to traditional testing for selection (pp. 131-166). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
60. Hough, L. M. (2001). I-Owes its advances to personality. In B. W. Roberts & R. Hogan (Eds.), Personality psychology in the workplace (pp. 19-44). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
61. Hough, L. M., Eaton, N. K., Dunnette, M. D., Kamp, J. D., & Mc Cloy, R. A. (1990). Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 581-595.
62. Hough, L. M., & Furnham, A. (2003). Use of personality variables in work settings. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology. Vol. 12: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 131-169). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
63. Hough, L. M., & Ones, D. S. (2001). The structure, measurement, validity, and use of personality variables in industrial, work, and organizational psychology. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology. Vol. 1: Personnel psychology (pp. 233-277). London, England: Sage.
64. Hough, L. M., Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1998, April). Personality correlates of managerial performance constructs. Poster session presented at the annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, TX.
65. Hough, L. M., & Oswald, F. L. (2000). Personnel selection: Looking toward the future—Remembering the past. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 631-664.
66. Hough, L. M., & Oswald, F. L. (2005). They’re right, well… mostly right: Research evidence and an agenda to rescue personality testing from 1960s insights. Human Performance, 18, 373-387.
67. Hough, L. M., & Oswald, F. L. (2008). Personality testing and I-O psychology: Reflections, progress, and prospects. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 272-290.
68. Hough, L. M., Oswald, F. L., & Ployhart, R. E. (2001). Determinants, detection and amelioration of adverse impact in personnel selection procedures: Issues, evidence and lessons learned. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 152-194.
69. Hough, L. M., & Paullin, C. (1994). Construct-oriented scale construction: The rational approach. In G. S. Stokes & M. D. Mumford (Eds.), Biodata handbook: Theory, research, and use of biographical information in selection and performance prediction (pp. 109-145). Palo Alto, CA: CPP Books.
70. Hough, L. M., & Schneider, R. J. (1996). Personality traits, taxonomies, and applications in organizations. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Individual differences and behavior in organizations (pp. 31-88). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
71. Houston, J. S., Borman, W. C., Farmer, W., & Bearden, R. M. (2005). Development of the Enlisted Computer Adaptive Personality Scales (ENCAPS), Renamed Navy Computer Adaptive Personality Scales (NCAPS) (Institute Report #503). Minneapolis, MN: Personnel Decisions Research Institutes.
72. Huffcutt, A. I., & Arthur, W. (1994). Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 184-190.
73. Huffcutt, A. I., Conway, J. M., Roth, P. L., & Stone, N. J. (2001). Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 897-913.
74. Huffcutt, A. I., Roth, P. L., & Mc Daniel, M. A. (1996). A meta-analytic investigation of cognitive ability in employment interview evaluations: Moderating characteristics and implications for incremental validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 459-473.
75. Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72-98.
76. Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869-879.
77. Jackson, D. N., Wroblewski, V. R., & Ashton, M. C. (2000). The impact of faking on employment tests: Does forced choice offer a solution? Human Performance, 13, 371-388.
78. Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 530-541.
79. Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 797-807.
80. Kamp, J. D., & Gough, H. G. (1986). The Big Five personality factors from an assessment context. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
81. Kenny, D. A., Albright, L., Malloy, T. E., & Kashy, D. A. (1994). Consensus in interpersonal perception: Acquaintance and the Big Five. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 245-258.
82. Kilcullen, R. N., White, L. A., Mumford, M. D., & Mack, H. (1995). Assessing the construct validity of rational biodata scales. Military Psychology, 7, 17-28.
83. Kohlberg, L., Levine, C., & Hewer, A. (1994). Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics. In B. Puka (Ed.), Moral development: A compendium. Vol. 5: New research in moral development (pp. 126-188). New York, NY: Garland.
84. Krause, D. E., & Thornton, G. C. (2009). A cross-cultural look at assessment center practices: Survey results from Western Europe and North American. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 58, 557-585.
85. LaHuis, D. M., Martin, N. R., & Avis, J. M. (2005). Investigating nonlinear conscientiousness—Job performance relations for clerical employees. Human Performance, 18, 199-212.
86. Lievens, F., Dilchert, S., & Ones, D. S. (2005, April). Personality validity increases in medical school: A seven-year longitudinal investigation. In L. M. Hough & D. S. Ones (Chairs), Power of personality: Longitudinal studies and meta-analyses. Symposium conducted at the annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Los Angeles, CA.
87. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22, 55.
88. Manley, G. G., Benavidez, J., & Dunn, K. (2007). Development of a personality biodata measure to predict ethical decision making. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 664-682.
89. Martin, B. A., Bowen, C. C., & Hunt, S. T. (2002). How effective are people at faking on personality questionnaires? Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 247-256.
90. Mc Cloy, R. A., Heggestad, E. D., & Reeve, C. L. (2005). A silk purse from the sow’s ear: Retrieving normative information from multidimensional forced-choice items. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 222-248.
91. Mc Daniel, M. A., Hartman, N. S., Whetzel, D. L., & Grubb, W. (2007). Situational judgment tests, response instructions, and validity: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60, 63-91.
92. Mc Daniel, M. A., Whetzel, D. L., Schmidt, F. L., & Maurer, S. D. (1994). The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 599-616.
93. Mc Farland, L. A., & Ryan, A. M. (2000). Variance in faking across noncognitive measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 812-821.
94. Mc Henry, J. J., Hough, L. M., Toquam, J. L., Hanson, M. A., & Ashworth, S. (1990). Project A validity results: The relationship between predictor and criterion domains. Personnel Psychology, 43, 335-354.
95. Mc Manus, M. A., & Kelly, M. L. (1999). Personality measures and biodata: Evidence regarding their incremental predictive value in the life insurance industry. Personnel Psychology, 52, 137-148.
96. Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N. (2007a). Are we getting fooled again? Coming to terms with limitations in the use of personality tests for personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 60, 1029-1049.
97. Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N. (2007b). Reconsidering the use of personality tests in personnel selection contexts. Personnel Psychology, 60, 683-729.
98. Moscoso, S. (2000). Selection interview: A review of validity evidence, adverse impact and applicant reactions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 237-247.
99. Motowidlo, S. J., Dunnette, M. D., & Carter, G. W. (1990). An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 640-647.
100. Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Strauss, J. P. (1994). Validity of observer ratings of the big five personality factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 272-280.
101. Murphy, K. R., & Dzieweczynski, J. L. (2005). Why don’t measures of broad dimensions of personality perform better as predictors of job performance? Human Performance, 18, 343-357.
102. Nilsen, D. (1995). An investigation of the relationship between personality and leadership performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
103. Ones, D. S. (1993). The construct validity of integrity tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
104. Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (2008, February). Recent assessment center research: Dimensions, exercises, group differences, and incremental validity. Paper presented at the annual Assessment Centre Study Group conference, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
105. Ones, D. S., Dilchert, S., Viswesvaran, C., & Judge, T. A. (2007). In support of personality assessment in organizational settings. Personnel Psychology, 60, 995-1027.
106. Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1996). Bandwidth-fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 609-626.
107. Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2001). Personality at work: Criterion-focused occupational personality scales used in personnel selection. In B. W. Roberts & R. Hogan (Eds.), Personality psychology in the workplace (pp. 63-92). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
108. Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2008). Customer service scales: Criterion-related, construct, and incremental validity evidence. In J. Deller (Ed.), Research contributions to personality at work (pp. 19-46). Mering, Germany: Hampp.
109. Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Dilchert, S. (2005). Personality at work: Raising awareness and correcting misconceptions. Human Performance, 18, 389-404.
110. Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679-703.
111. Oswald, F. L., & Hough, L. M. (2008). Personality testing and I-O psychology: A productive exchange and some future directions. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 323-332.
112. Oviedo-Garcia, M. (2007). Internal validation of a biodata extraversion scale for salespeople. Social Behavior and Personality, 35, 675-692.
113. Paunonen, S. V., & Jackson, D. N. (1996). The Jackson Personality Inventory and the Five-Factor Model of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 42-59.
114. Ployhart, R. E., & Ehrhart, M. G. (2003). Be careful what you ask for: Effects of response instructions on the construct validity and reliability of situational judgment tests. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 1-16.
115. Reilly, R. R., & Chao, G. R. (1982). Validity and fairness of some alternative employee selection procedures. Personnel Psychology, 35, 1-62.
116. Roberts, B. W., Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S. E., & Goldberg, L. R. (2005). The structure of conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires. Personnel Psychology, 58, 103-139.
117. Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313-345.
118. Robie, C., & Ryan, A. M. (1999). Effects of nonlinearity and heteroscedasticity on the validity of conscientiousness in predicting overall job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7, 157-169.
119. Rothstein, M. G., & Goffin, R. D. (2000). The assessment of personality constructs in industrial-organizational psychology. In R. D. Goffin & E. Helmes (Eds.), Problems and solutions in human assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy (pp. 215-248). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
120. Rothstein, M. G., & Goffin, R. D. (2006). The use of personality measures in personnel selection: What does current research support? Human Resource Management Review, 16, 155-180.
121. Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (1999). On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 3-30.
122. Ryan, A. M., Mc Farland, L., Baron, H., & Page, R. (1999). An international look at selection practices: Nation and culture as explanations for variability in practice. Personnel Psychology, 52, 359-391.
123. Salgado, J. F. (2002). The Big Five personality dimensions and counterproductive behaviors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 117-125.
124. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1996). Measurement error in psychological research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios. Psychological Methods, 1, 199-223.
125. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., Mc Kenzie, R. C., & Muldrow, T. W. (1979). Impact of valid selection procedures on work-force productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 609-626.
126. Schmitt, N., Gooding, R. Z., Noe, R. A., & Kirsch, M. (1984). Meta-analyses of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982 and the investigation of study characteristics. Personnel Psychology, 37, 407-422.
127. Schmitt, N., & Kunce, C. (2002). The effects of required elaboration of answers to biodata questions. Personnel Psychology, 55, 569-587.
128. Schmitt, N., Oswald, F. L., Kim, B. H., Gillespie, M. A., Ramsay, L. J., & Yoo, T.-Y. (2003). Impact of elaboration on socially desirable responding and the validity of biodata measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 979-988.
129. Schneider, R. J., Ackerman, P. L., & Kanfer, R. (1996). To “act wisely in human relations”: Exploring the dimensions of social competence. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 469-481.
130. Schneider, R. J., & Hough, L. M. (1995). Personality and industrial/organizational psychology. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 75-129). Chichester, England: Wiley.
131. Schneider, R. J., Hough, L. M., & Dunnette, M. D. (1996). Broadsided by broad traits: How to sink science in five dimensions or less. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 639-655.
132. Scholz, G., & Schuler, H. (1993). Das nomologische Netzwerk des Assessment Centers: eine Metaanalyse. [The nomological network of the assessment center: A meta-analysis]. Zeitschrift fur Arbeits-und Organisationspsychologie, 37, 73-85.
133. Sisco, H., & Reilly, R. R. (2007a). Development and validation of a biodata inventory as an alternative method to measurement of the Five Factor Model of personality. Social Science Journal, 44, 383-389.
134. Sisco, H., & Reilly, R. R. (2007b). Five Factor Biodata Inventory: Resistance to faking. Psychological Reports, 101, 3-17.
135. Stark, S., & Chernyshenko, O. S. (2007, June). Adaptive testing with the multi-unidimensional pairwise preference model. Paper session: New CAT models: Graduate Management Admission Council Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. Minneapolis, MN.
136. Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Drasgow, F. (2005). An IRT approach to constructing and scoring pairwise preference items involving stimuli on different dimensions: The multi-unidimensional pairwise-preference model. AppliedPsychologicalMeasurement, 29, 184-203.
137. Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., Drasgow, F., & Williams, B. A. (2006). Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: Should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring? Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 25-39.
138. Stokes, G. S., & Cooper, L. A. (2001). Content/construct approaches in life history form development for selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 138-151.
139. Stokes, G. S., & Cooper, L. A. (2004). Biodata. In J. C. Thomas (Ed.), Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment (Vol. 4: Industrial and organizational assessment, pp. 243-268). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
140. Stokes, G. S., Hogan, J. B., & Snell, A. F. (1993). Comparability of incumbent and applicant samples for the development of biodata keys: The influence of social desirability. Personnel Psychology, 46, 739-762.
141. Tenopyr, M. L. (1994). Big Five, structural modeling, and item response theory. In G. S. Stokes, M. D. Mumford & W. A. Owens (Eds.), Biodata handbook: Theory, research, and use of biographical information in selection and performance prediction (pp. 519-533). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
142. Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 500-517.
143. Tett, R. P., & Christiansen, N. D. (2007). Personality tests at the crossroads: A response to Morgeson, Campion, Dipboye, Hollenbeck, Murphy, and Schmitt (2007). Personnel Psychology, 60, 967-993.
144. Tett, R. P., & Guterman, H. A. (2000). Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 397-423.
145. Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., Rothstein, M., & Reddon, J. R. (1999). Meta-analysis of bidirectional relations in personality-job performance research. Human Performance, 12, 1-29.
146. Thornton, G. C., & Rupp, D. E. (2003). Simulations and assessment centers. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 319-344). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
147. Thurstone, L. L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. American Journal of Sociology, 33, 529-554.
148. Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1958). Stability of personality trait rating factors obtained under diverse conditions (WADC-TN-58-61). Lackland Airforce Base, TX: Personnel Laboratory, Wright Air Development Center, U.S. Air Force.
149. Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1961). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings (ASD-TR-61-97). Lackland Airforce Base, TX: Personnel Laboratory, Aeronautical Systems Division, U.S. Air Force.
150. Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1992). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of Personality, 60, 225-251.
151. Underhill, C. M. (2006). Investigation of item-pair presentation and construct validity of the Navy Computer Adaptive Personality Scales (NCAPS). Millington, TN: Navy Personnel Research, Studies, Technology Division, Bureau of Naval Personnel.
152. Van Iddekinge, C. H., Raymark, P. H., Eidson, C. E., Jr., & Attenweiler, W. J. (2004). What do structured selection interviews really measure? The construct validity of behavior description interviews. Human Performance, 17, 71-93.
153. Van Iddekinge, C. H., Raymark, P. H., & Roth, P. L. (2005). Assessing personality with a structured employment interview: Construct-related validity and susceptibility to response inflation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 536-552.
154. Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2000). Measurement error in “Big Five factors” personality assessment: Reliability generalization across studies and measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 224-235.
155. Wernimont, P. F., & Campbell, J. P. (1968). Signs, samples, and criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 372-376.
156. White, L. A., Young, M. C., Hunter, A. E., & Rumsey, M. G. (2008). Lessons learned in transitioning personality measures from research to operational settings. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 291-295.
157. White, L. A., Young, M. C., & Rumsey, M. G. (2001). ABLE implementation issues and related research. In J. P. Campbell & D. J. Knapp (Eds.), Exploring the limits in personnel selection and classification (pp. 525-558). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
158. Wiesner, W. H., & Cronshaw, S. F. (1988). A meta-analytic investigation of the impact of interview format and degree of structure on the validity of the employment interview. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 275-290.
159. Wiggins, J. S., & Trapnell, P. D. (1997). Personality structure: The return of the Big Five. In R. Hogan, J. A. Johnson, & S. R. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology. (pp. 737-765). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
160. Young, M. C., White, L. A., Heggestad, E. D., & Barnes, J. D. (2004). Operational validation of the Army’s new pre-enlistment attrition screening measure. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Psychological Association, Honolulu, HI.
161. Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D. M., Joireman, J., Teta, P., & Kraft, M. (1993). A comparison of three structural models for personality: The Big Three, the Big Five, and the Alternative Five. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 65, 757-768.