Investigating nonlinear Conscientiousness-job performance relations for clerical employees

Human Performance

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 199-212

  LaHuis, David M ^a   Martin, Nicholas R ^b   Avis, John M ^b  

^a WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b US Office of Personnel Management   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23844448152     PISSN: 08959285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327043hup1803_1     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
2. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 111-118.
3. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
4. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1995a). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21-50.
5. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1995b). The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
6. Cucina, J. M., & Vasilopoulos, N. L. (2005). Non-linear personality-performance relationships and the spurious moderating effects of traitedness. Journal of Personality, 73, 227-260.
7. Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. W. (1996). Issues and non-issues in the fidelity-bandwidth trade-off. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 627-637.
8. McRae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-216.
9. Murphy, K. R. (1996). Individual differences and behavior in organizations: Much more than g. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Individual differences and behavior in organizations (pp. 3-30). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10. Ones, D. S., Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Hunter, J. E. (1994). Personality and job performance: A critique of the Tett, Jackson, and Rothstein (1991) meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 47, 147-156.
11. Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1996). Bandwidth-fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 609-626.
12. Pearlman, K. (1979). The validity of tests used to select clerical personnel: A comprehensive summary and evaluation. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
13. Robie, C., & Ryan, A. M. (1999). Effects of nonlinearity and heteroscedasticity on the validity of conscientiousness in predicting overall job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7, 157-169.
14. Ruch, W. W., Stang, S. W., McKillip, R. H., & Dye, D. A. (1994). Employee aptitude survey: Technical manual. Los Angeles: Psychological Services.
15. Salgado, J. F. (1997). The five-factor model of personality and job performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30-43.
16. Tett, R. P. (1998). Is conscientiousness always positively related to job performance? Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 36, 24-49.
17. Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703-742.
18. Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., Rothstein, M., & Reddon, J. R. (1994). Meta-analysis of bi-directional relations in personality-job performance research. Human Performance, 12, 1-29.
19. Vasilopoulos, N. L., Cucina, J. M., Goldenberg, R. J., & Usala, P. D. (2002, April). Personality and training proficiency: Issues of bandwidth-fidelity, validity, and curvilinearity. Paper presented at the 17th meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto, ON.
20. Vasilopoulos, N. L., Usala, P. D., & Leaman, J. A. (1999, April). Demonstrating a curvilinear relationship between personality and performance in training. Poster presented at the 14th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA.