Collaborative interaction in turn-taking: A comparative study of European bilingual (CLIL) and mainstream (MS) foreign language learners in early secondary education

International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 531-549

  Moore, Pat ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD PABLO DE OLAVIDE   (Spain)

Author keywords

CLIL; Collaboration; Interaction; Turn taking

Indexed keywords

EID: 79961147596     PISSN: 13670050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13670050.2010.537741     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Admiraal, W., G. Westhoff, and K. de Bot. 2006. Evaluation of bilingual secondary education in the Netherlands: Students' language proficiency in English. Educational Research and Evaluation 12, no. 1: 75-93.
2. Alexander, R.J. 2008. Towards dialogic thinking: Rethinking classroom talk. New York: Dialogos.
3. Allwright, R.L. 1984. The importance of interaction in classroom language learning. Applied Linguistics 5, no. 2: 156-71.
4. Bolden, G.B. 2003. Multiple modalities in collaborative turn sequences. Gesture 3, no. 2: 187-212.
5. Brown, P., and S. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Burmeister, P., and A. Daniel. 2002. How effective is late partial immersion? Some findings of a secondary school program in Germany. In An integrated view of language development: Papers in honour of Henning Wode, ed. P. Burmeister, T. Piske, and A. Rohde, 499-512. Berlin: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Traer.
7. Casal, S., and P. Moore. 2009. The Andalusian Bilingual Sections scheme: Evaluation and consultancy. International CLIL Research Journal 1, no. 2: 36-46.
8. Chapman, R.S. 2000. Children's language learning: An interactionist perspective. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines 41, no. 1: 33-54.
9. Cheng, W. 2003. Intercultural conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
10. Coulthard, M. 1985. An introduction to discourse analysis. 2nd ed. London/New York: Longman.
11. Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Coyle, D. 2007. Content and Language Integrated Learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 10, no. 5: 543-62.
13. Dalton-Puffer, C. 2007. Discourse in content and language integrated classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
14. Dalton-Puffer, C. 2008. Outcomes and processes in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Current research from Europe. In Future perspectives for English language teaching, ed. W. Delanoy and L. Volkmann, 139-57. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
15. Dalton-Puffer, C., and U. Smit, eds. 2007. Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
16. Dalton-Puffer, C., U. Smit, and T. Nikula, eds. 2010. Language use in content-and-language integrated learning (CLIL). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
17. DESI-Konsortium. 2006. Unterricht und Kompetenzerwerb in Deutsch und Englisch. Zentrale Befunde der Studie Deutsch-Englisch-Schü lerleistungen-International [Education and skills acquisition in German and English. Key findings of the International German-English School Services Study]. Frankfurt/Main: Deutsches Institut für Internationale Pädagogische Forschung.
18. Edwards, D., and N. Mercer. 1987. Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Methuen.
19. Együd, G., and P. Glover. 2001. Oral testing in pairs: A secondary school perspective. ELT Journal 55, no. 1: 70-6.
20. Ellis, R. 1999. Learning a second language through interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
21. Galaczi, E.D. 2008. Peer-peer interaction in a speaking test: The case of the first certificate in English examination. Language Assessment Quarterly 5, no. 2: 89-119.
22. Gassner, D., and D. Maillat. 2006. Spoken competence in CLIL: A pragmatic take on recent Swiss data. ViewZ (Vienna English Working Papers) 15, no. 3: 15-22.
23. Heritage, J. 1998. Conversation analysis and institutional talk: Analyzing distinctive turn taking systems. In Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of IADA (International Association for Dialog Analysis), ed. S. Cmejrková, J. Hoffmannová, O. Müllerová, and J. Svetlá, 3-17. Tubingen: Niemeyer.
24. Hüttner, J., and A. Rieder-Bünemann. 2007. The effect of CLIL instruction on children's narrative competence. ViewZ 16, no. 3: 20-8.
25. Ikeda, K. 1998. The paired learner interview: A preliminary investigation applying Vygotskian insights. Language, Culture and Curriculum 11, no. 1: 71-96.
26. Iwasaki, S. 2009. Initiating interactive turn spaces in Japanese conversation: Local projection and collaborative action. Discourse Processes 46, nos. 2-3: 226-46.
27. Jaffe, J., and S. Feldstein. 1970. Rhythms of dialogue. New York: Academic Press.
28. Jäppinen, A.-K. 2005. Thinking and content learning of mathematics and science as cognitional development in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Teaching through a foreign language in Finland. Language and Education 19, no. 2: 148-69.
29. Lasagabaster, D., and J.M. Sierra. 2009. Language attitudes in CLIL and traditional FL classes. International Journal of CLIL Research 1, no. 2: 4-17.
30. Lerner, G.H. 2002. Turn-sharing: The choral co-production of talk in interaction. In The language of turn and sequence, ed. C. Ford, B. Fox, and S. Thompson, 225-56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Lerner, G.H. 2004. Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
32. Lorenzo, F., S. Casal, V. Alba Quiñones, and P. Moore, eds. 2007. Models and practice in CLIL. La Rioja: Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada.
33. Lorenzo, F., S. Casal, and P. Moore. 2010. The effects of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in European education: Key findings from the Andalusian Bilingual Sections evaluation project. Applied Linguistics 31, no. 3: 418-42.
34. Lorenzo, F., and P. Moore. 2009. European language policies in monolingual southern Europe: Implementation and outcomes. European Journal of Language Policy 1, no. 2: 121-35.
35. Lyster, R. 2002. Negotiation in immersion teacher-student interaction. International Journal of Educational Research 37, nos. 3-4: 237-53.
36. Maclure, M., T. Phillips, and A. Wilkinson, eds. 1988. Oracy matters. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
37. McCarthy, M. 1991. Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Merisuo-Storm, T. 2007. Pupils' attitudes towards foreign-language learning and the development of literacy skills in bilingual education. Teaching and Teacher Education 23, no. 2: 226-35.
39. Mewald, C. 2007. A comparison of oral foreign language performance of learners in CLIL and mainstream classes at lower secondary level in Lower Austria. In Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse, ed. C. Dalton-Puffer and U. Smit, 139-73. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
40. Moore, P. 2009. On the emergence of L2 oracy in bilingual education: A comparative analysis of CLIL and mainstream learner talk. PhD diss, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville.
41. Moore, P. 2010. Towards a model of oracy for CLIL. ViewZ 19, no. 3: 56-64.
42. Nikolov, M., and J. Mihaljević Djigunović. 2006. Recent research on age, second language acquisition and early foreign language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 26: 234-60.
43. Nikula, T. 2007a. Speaking English in Finnish content-based classrooms. World Englishes 26, no. 2: 206-23.
44. Nikula, T. 2007b. The IRF pattern and space for interaction: Comparing CLIL and EFL classrooms. In Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse, ed. C. Dalton-Puffer and U. Smit, 179-204. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
45. ÓRiagáin, P., and G. Lüdi. 2003. Bilingual education: Some policy issues. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
46. Sacks, H., E.A. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50, no. 4: 696-735.
47. Schegloff, E.A. 1987. Recycled turn beginnings: A precise repair mechanism in conversation's turn-taking organization. In Talk and social organization, ed. G. Button and J.R.E. Lee, 75-85. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
48. Schegloff, E.A. 2000. Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society 29, no. 1: 1-63.
49. Seikkula-Leino, J. 2007. CLIL learning: Achievement levels and affective factors. Language and Education 21, no. 4: 328-41.
50. Serra, C. 2007. Assessing CLIL in primary school: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 10, no. 5: 582-602.
51. Skidmore, D. 2006. Pedagogy and dialogue. Cambridge Journal of Education 36, no. 4: 503-14.
52. Smit, U. 2007. ELF (English as a Lingua Franca) as medium of instruction - Interactional repair in international hotel management education. In Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse, ed. C. Dalton-Puffer and U. Smit, 227-52. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
53. Smit, U. 2008. The AILA research network - CLIL and immersion classrooms: Applied linguistic perspectives. Language Teaching 41, no. 2: 295-8.
54. Stohler, U. 2006. The acquisition of knowledge in bilingual learning: An empirical study on the role of content in language learning. ViewZ 15, no. 3: 41-6.
55. Swain, M. 2001. Examining dialogue: Another approach to content specification and to validating inferences drawn from test scores. Language Testing 18, no. 3: 275-302.
56. Swain, M., and S. Lapkin. 1998. Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal 82, no. 3: 320-37.
57. Van de Craen, P., E. Ceuleers, and K. Mondt. 2007. Cognitive development and bilingualism in primary schools: Teaching maths in a CLIL environment. In Diverse contexts -converging goals. CLIL in Europe, ed. D. Marsh and D. Wolff, 185-200. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
58. Vollmer, H. 2008. Constructing tasks for content and language integrated assessment. In Research on task-based language learning and teaching. Theoretical, methodological and pedagogical perspectives, ed. J. Eckerth and S. Siekmann, 227-90. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
59. Wannagat, U. 2007. Learning through L2 - Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) and English as Medium of Instruction (EMI). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 10, no. 5: 663-82.
60. Wells, G., ed. 1981. Learning through interaction: The study of language development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Wells, G. 1999. Language and education: Reconceptualising education as dialogue. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 19: 135-55.
62. Wiemann, J.M., and M.L. Knapp. 2007. Turn-taking in conversations. In Communication theory, ed. C.D. Mortensen, 226-46. Edison, NJ: Transaction.
63. Wolf, J.P. 2008. The effects of backchannels on fluency in L2 task production. System 36, no. 2: 279-94.