Accounting for solvent accessibility and secondary structure in protein phylogenetics is clearly beneficial

Systematic Biology

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 277-287

  Le, Si Quang ^a,b   Gascuel, Olivier ^a  

^a LIRMM   (France)

^b WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Amino acid substitutions; Maximum likelihood; Partition models; Replacement rate matrices; Structural annotation of proteins; Topological impact

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL; PROCEDURES;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CLASSIFICATION; DATABASES, GENETIC; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SOFTWARE;

EID: 77950851573     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syq002     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Akaike H. 1974. A new look at statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control. 19:716-722.
2. Bateman A., Birney E., Cerruti L., Durbin R., Etwiller L., Eddy S.R., Griffiths-Jones S., Howe K.L., Marshall M., Sonnhammer E.L.L. 2002. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:276-280. Available from: http://pfam.cgb.ki.se/.
3. Berman H.M., Westbrook J., Feng Z., Gilliland G., Bhat T.N., Weissig H., Shindyalov I.N., Bourne P.E. 2000. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:235-242. Available from: http://www.pdb.org.
4. Berry V., Gascuel O. 1996. Interpretation of bootstrap trees: threshold of clade selection and induced gain. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:999-1011.
5. Branden C., Tooze J. 1999. Introduction to protein structure. 2nd ed. New York: Garland Publishing.
6. Bryant D., Galtier N., Poursat M.A. 2005. Likelihood calculations in phylogenetics. In: Gascuel O., editor. Mathematics of evolution and phylogeny. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 33-62.
7. Chothia C., Lesk A.M. 1986. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J. 5:823-826.
8. Dayhoff M.O., Eyck R.V., Park C.M. 1972. A model of evolutionary change in proteins. In: Dayhoff M.O., editor. Atlas of protein sequence and structure. Vol.5. Washington: National Biomedical Research Foundation. p. 89-99.
9. Felsenstein J. 2003. Inferring phylogenies. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates, Inc.
10. Gascuel O. 1997. BIONJ: an improved version of the NJ algorithm based on a simple method of sequence data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14: 685-695.
11. Gascuel O., Guindon S. 2007. Modelling the variability of evolutionary processes. In: Gascuel O., Steels M., editors. Reconstructing evolution: new mathematical and computational advances. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 65-99.
12. Goldman N., Thorne J.L., Jones D.T. 1998. Assessing the impact of secondary structure and solvent accessibility on protein evolution. Genetics. 149:445-458.
13. Guindon S., Gascuel O. 2003. A simple, fast and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52:696-704.
14. Guindon S., Dufayard J.-F., Lefort V., Anisimova M., Hordijk W., Gascuel O. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59(3):307-321.
15. Holder M.T., Sukumaran J., Lewis P.O. 2008. A justification for reporting the majority-rule consensus tree in Bayesian phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 57:814-821.
16. Holmes I., Rubin G.M. 2002. An expectation maximization algorithm for training hidden substitution models. J. Mol. Biol. 317:753-764.
17. Hordijk W., Gascuel O. 2005. Improving the efficiency of SPR moves in phylogenetic tree search methods based on maximum likelihood. Bioinformatics. 21(24):4338-4347.
18. Jones D.T., Taylor W.R., Thornton J.M. 1994. A mutation data matrix for transmembrane proteins. FEBS Lett. 339:269-275.
19. Jones D.T., Taylor W.R., Thornton J.M. 1992. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 8:275-282.
20. Kabsch W., Sander C. 1983. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers. 22:2577-2637.
21. Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:111-120.
22. Kishino H., Hasegawa M. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29:170-179.
23. Klosterman P.S., Uzilov A.V., Benda ña Y.R., Bradley R.K., Chao S., Kosiol C., Goldman N., Holmes I. 2006. XRate: a fast prototyping, training and annotation tool for phylo-grammars. BMC Bioinformatics. 7(1):428.
24. Koshi J.M., Goldstein R.A. 1995. Context-dependent optimal substitution matrices. Protein Eng. 8:641-645.
25. Lanave C., Preparata G., Saccone C., Serio G. 1984. A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. J. Mol. Evol. 20:86-93.
26. Le S.Q., Gascuel O. 2008. An improved general amino-acid replacement matrix. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25:1307-1320.
27. Le S.Q., Gascuel O., Lartillot N. 2008. Empirical profile mixture models for phylogenetic reconstruction. Bioinformatics. 24:2317-2323.
28. Le S.Q., Lartillot N., Gascuel. 2008. Phylogenetic mixture models for proteins. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 363:3965-3976.
29. Lio P., Goldman N., Thorne J.L., Jones D.T. 1998. PASSML: combining evolutionary inference and protein secondary structure prediction. Bioinformatics. 14:726-733.
30. Pagel M., Meade A. 2005. Mixture models in phylogenetic inference. In: Gascuel O., editor. Mathematics of evolution and phylogeny. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 121-142.
31. Pollastri G., Martin A.J.M., Mooney C., Vullo C. 2007. Accurate prediction of protein secondary structure and solvent accessibility by consensus combiners of sequence and structure information. BMC Bioinformatics. 8:201.
32. Raman P., Cherezov V., Caffrey M. 2006. The membrane protein data bank. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 63:36-51.
33. Rannala B., Yang Z.Z. 2008. Phylogenetic inference using whole genomes. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 9:217-231.
34. Robinson D., Foulds L. 1979. Comparison of weighted labeled trees. Berlin (Germany): Springer-Verlag (Lecture notes in mathematics; vol. 748), p. 119-126.
35. Schneider R., de Daruvar A., Sander C. 1997. The HSSP database of protein structure-sequence alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 226-230.
36. Shimodaira H. 1997. Assessing the error probability of the model selection test. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 49:395-410.
37. Shrake A., Rupley J.A. 1973. Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. Lysozyme and insulin. J. Mol. Biol. 79:351-372.
38. Tavaré S. 1986. Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences. Providence (RI): American Mathematical Society (Lectures on mathematics in the life sciences; vol. 17). p. 57-86.
39. Thorne J.L., Goldman N., Jones D.T. 1996. Combining protein evolution and secondary structure. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:666-673.
40. Whelan S., Goldman N. 2001. A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:691-699.
41. Yang Z. 1993. Maximum-likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1396-1401.
42. Yang Z. 2006. Computational molecular evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.