Comparative analysis of methods for detecting interacting loci

BMC Genomics

Volumn 12, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Chen, Li ^a   Yu, Guoqiang ^a   Langefeld, Carl D ^b   Miller, David J ^c   Guy, Richard T ^b   Raghuram, Jayaram ^c   Yuan, Xiguo ^a   Herrington, David M ^b   Wang, Yue ^a  

^a State University   (United States)

^b WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENTROPY; GENE INTERACTION; GENE LOCUS; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC EPISTASIS; GENETIC IDENTIFICATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY; SIMULATION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGY; GENETICS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MULTIFACTOR DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; GENETIC LOCI; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MULTIFACTOR DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; PROBABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE;

EID: 79959838298     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-344     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Brookes A. Review: the essence of SNPs. Gene 1999, 234:177-186. 10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00219-X, 10395891.
2. Couzin J, Kaiser J. Genome-wide association. Closing the net on common disease genes. Science 2007, 316:820-2. 10.1126/science.316.5826.820, 17495150.
3. Hirschhorn J. Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits. Nature reviews Genetics 2005, 6:95-108.
4. Donnelly P. Progress and challenges in genome-wide association studies in humans. Nature 2008, 456:728-31. 10.1038/nature07631, 19079049.
5. Manolio TA, et al. Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 2009, 461:747-53. 10.1038/nature08494, 2831613, 19812666.
6. T. W. T. C. C. Consortium Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature 2007, 447:661-78. 10.1038/nature05911, 2719288, 17554300, T. W. T. C. C. Consortium.
7. Wang WY, et al. Genome-wide association studies: theoretical and practical concerns. Nat Rev Genet 2005, 6:109-18. 10.1038/nrg1522, 15716907.
8. Hardy J, Singleton A. Genomewide association studies and human disease. N Engl J Med 2009, 360:1759-68. 10.1056/NEJMra0808700, 19369657.
9. Ku CS, et al. The pursuit of genome-wide association studies: where are we now?. Journal of Human Genetics 2010, 55:195-206. 10.1038/jhg.2010.19, 20300123.
10. Mohlke KL, et al. Metabolic and cardiovascular traits: an abundance of recently identified common genetic variants. Hum Mol Genet 2008, 17:R102-8. 10.1093/hmg/ddn275, 2570060, 18852197.
11. Kathiresan S, et al. Polymorphisms associated with cholesterol and risk of cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med 2008, 358:1240-9. 10.1056/NEJMoa0706728, 18354102.
12. Samani NJ, et al. Genomewide association analysis of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2007, 357:443-53. 10.1056/NEJMoa072366, 2719290, 17634449.
13. McPherson R, et al. A common allele on chromosome 9 associated with coronary heart disease. Science 2007, 316:1488-91. 10.1126/science.1142447, 2711874, 17478681.
14. Tsai FJ, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility variants for type 2 diabetes in Han Chinese. PLoS Genet 2007, 6:e1000847.
15. Scott LJ, et al. A genome-wide association study of type 2 diabetes in Finns detects multiple susceptibility variants. Science 2007, 316:1341-5. 10.1126/science.1142382, 17463248.
16. Paterson AD, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies a novel major locus for glycemic control in type 1 diabetes, as measured by both A1C and glucose. Diabetes 2010, 59:539-49. 10.2337/db09-0653, 2809960, 19875614.
17. Saxena R, et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies loci for type 2 diabetes and triglyceride levels. Science 2007, 316:1331-6.
18. Freedman BI, et al. Differential effects of MYH9 and APOL1 risk variants on FRMD3 association with diabetic ESRD in African Americans. PLoS Genet 2011,
19. Harley JB, et al. Genome-wide association scan in women with systemic lupus erythematosus identifies susceptibility variants in ITGAM, PXK, KIAA1542 and other loci. Nat Genet 2008, 40:204-10. 10.1038/ng.81, 18204446.
20. Harley IT, et al. Genetic susceptibility to SLE: new insights from fine mapping and genome-wide association studies. Nat Rev Genet 2009, 10:285-90. 10.1038/nrg2571, 2737697, 19337289.
21. Crow MK. Collaboration, genetic associations, and lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med 2008, 358:956-61. 10.1056/NEJMe0800096, 18204099.
22. Lettre G, Rioux JD. Autoimmune diseases: insights from genome-wide association studies. Hum Mol Genet 2008, 17:R116-21. 10.1093/hmg/ddn246, 2782355, 18852199.
23. Hussman JP, et al. A noise-reduction GWAS analysis implicates altered regulation of neurite outgrowth and guidance in autism. Mol Autism 2011, 2:1. 10.1186/2040-2392-2-1, 3035032, 21247446.
24. Easton DF, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies novel breast cancer susceptibility loci. Nature 2007, 447:1087-93. 10.1038/nature05887, 2714974, 17529967.
25. Easton DF, Eeles RA. Genome-wide association studies in cancer. Human Molecular Genetics 2008, 17:R109-R115. 10.1093/hmg/ddn287, 18852198.
26. Hunter DJ, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies alleles in FGFR2 associated with risk of sporadic postmenopausal breast cancer. Nat Genet 2007, 39:870-4. 10.1038/ng2075, 17529973.
27. Amundadottir L, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies variants in the ABO locus associated with susceptibility to pancreatic cancer. Nat Genet 2009, 41:986-90. 10.1038/ng.429, 2839871, 19648918.
28. Maher B. Personal genomes: The case of the missing heritability. Nature 2008, 456:18-21.
29. Cordell H. Detecting gene-gene interactions that underlie human diseases. Nature reviews Genetics 2009, 10:392-404. 2872761, 19434077.
30. Moore JH, et al. Bioinformatics challenges for genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:445-55. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp713, 2820680, 20053841.
31. Musani SK, et al. Detection of gene × gene interactions in genome-wide association studies of human population data. Hum Hered 2007, 63:67-84. 10.1159/000099179, 17283436.
32. Zhang Y, Liu JS. Bayesian inference of epistatic interactions in case-control studies. Nat Genet 2007, 39:1167-73. 10.1038/ng2110, 17721534.
33. Ritchie MD, et al. Multifactor-dimensionality reduction reveals high-order interactions among estrogen-metabolism genes in sporadic breast cancer. Am J Hum Genet 2001, 69:138-47. 10.1086/321276, 1226028, 11404819.
34. Moore JH, et al. A flexible computational framework for detecting, characterizing, and interpreting statistical patterns of epistasis in genetic studies of human disease susceptibility. J Theor Biol 2006, 241:252-61. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.11.036, 16457852.
35. Agresti A. Categorical data analysis 2002, New York: Wiley-Interscience, 2.
36. Kooperberg C, Ruczinski I. Identifying interacting SNPs using Monte Carlo logic regression. Genet Epidemiol 2005, 28:157-70. 10.1002/gepi.20042, 15532037.
37. Park MY, Hastie T. Penalized logistic regression for detecting gene interactions. Biostatistics 2008, 9:30-50.
38. G Y, et al. Detection of complex interactions of multi-locus SNPs," presented at IEEE Machine Learning for Signal Processing. 2008, Cancun, Mexico.
39. Yang C, et al. SNPHarvester: a filtering-based approach for detecting epistatic interactions in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:504-11. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn652, 19098029.
40. Miller DJ, et al. An Algorithm for Learning Maximum Entropy Probability Models of Disease Risk That Efficiently Searches and Sparingly Encodes Multilocus Genomic Interactions. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:2478-2485. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp435, 3140808, 19608708.
41. Marchini J, et al. Genome-wide strategies for detecting multiple loci that influence complex diseases. Nature Genetics 2005, 37:413-417. 10.1038/ng1537, 15793588.
42. Schwender H, Ickstadt K. Identification of SNP interactions using logic regression. Biostatistics 2008, 9:187-198.
43. Yang C, et al. Identifying main effects and epistatic interactions from large-scale SNP data via adaptive group Lasso. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11(Suppl 1):S18. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S1-S18, 20946601.
44. Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning 2001, 45:5-32.
45. Wang X, et al. The meaning of interaction. Human Heredity 2010, 70:269-277. 10.1159/000321967, 3025890, 21150212.
46. W L, Reich J. A complete enumeration and classification of two-locus disease models. Hum Hered 2000, 50:334-49. 10.1159/000022939, 10899752.
47. Szymczak S, et al. Machine learning in genome-wide association studies. Genet Epidemiol 2009, 33(Suppl 1):S51-7.
48. Van Steen K. Travelling the world of gene-gene interactions. Brief Bioinform 2011, 1-19.
49. Garcia-Magarinos M, et al. Evaluating the ability of tree-based methods and logistic regression for the detection of SNP-SNP interaction. Ann Hum Genet 2009, 73:360-9. 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2009.00511.x, 19291098.
50. Motsinger-Reif AA, et al. A comparison of analytical methods for genetic association studies. Genet Epidemiol 2008, 32:767-78. 10.1002/gepi.20345, 18561203.
51. Carlborg O, Haley C. Epistatis: too often neglected in complex trait studies?. Nature Reviews Genetics 2004, 5:618-625. 10.1038/nrg1407, 15266344.
52. Jakulin A, Bratko I. Testing the Significance of Attribute Interactions," presented at the 21st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-2004). 2004, Banff, Canada.
53. Jung HY, et al. New methods for imputation of missing genotype using linkage disequilibrium and haplotype information. Information Sciences 2007, 177:804-814.
54. Chen L, et al. A Ground Truth Based Comparative Study on Detecting Epistatic SNPs. presented at Proc. IEEE Intl Conf. on Bioinformatics & Biomedicine, Washington D.C., USA 2009,
55. Hochberg Y, Tamhane AC. Multiple comparison procedures 1987, New York: Wiley.
56. Neel J. Diabetes mellitus: a "thrifty" genotype rendered detrimental by "progress". Am J Hum Genet 1962, 14:353-362. 1932342, 13937884.
57. Wolf J, et al. Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process 2000, New York: Oxford University Press Inc..
58. Wright FA, et al. Simulating association studies: a data-based resampling method for candidate regions or whole genome scans. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:2581-8. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm386, 17785348.
59. Yuan X, et al. Simulating linkage disequilibrium structures in a human population for SNP association studies. Biochem Genet 2011, 49:395-409. 10.1007/s10528-011-9416-x, 21234669.
60. Cordell H. Epistasis: what it means, what it doesn't mean, and statistical methods to detect it in humans. Human Molecular Genetics 2002, 11:2463-2468. 10.1093/hmg/11.20.2463, 12351582.
61. Cover TM, Thomas JA. Elements of Information Theory 1991, New York City: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..