Giftedness and metacognition: A short-term longitudinal investigation of metacognitive monitoring in the classroom

Gifted Child Quarterly

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 181-193

  Snyder, Kate E ^a   Nietfeld, John L ^b   Linnenbrink Garcia, Lisa ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

calibration; gifted; metacognition; self regulated learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959791283     PISSN: 00169862     EISSN: 19349041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0016986211412769     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Alexander J. M.,Carr M.,Schwanenflugel P. J.Development of metacognition in gifted children: Directions for future research.Developmental Review. 1995;15:1-37.
2. Alexander J. M.,Schwanenflugel P. J.Development of metacognitive concepts about thinking in gifted and nongifted children: Recent research.Learning and Individual Differences. 1996;8:305-325.
3. Arthur A. W.Development of a short form for the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices Test.Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1994;54:394-403.
4. Baker L.Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult reader.Educational Psychology Review. 1989;1:3-38.
5. Baron R. M.,Kenny D. A.The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;51:1173-1182.
6. Bol L.,Hacker D. J.A comparison of the effects of practice tests and traditional review on performance and calibration.Journal of Experimental Education. 2001;69:133-151.
7. Bouffard-Bouchard T.,Parent S.,Larivée S.Self-regulation on a concept-formation task among average and gifted students.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 1993;56:115-134.
8. Brown A.Metacognition, motivation, and understanding. Weinert F.Kluwe R., ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1987:65-116.
9. Butler D. L.,Winne P. H.Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis.Review of Educational Research. 1995;65:245-281.
10. Calero M. D.,García-Martín M. B.,Jiménez M. I.,Kazén M.,Araque A.Self-regulation advantage for high-IQ children: Findings from a research study.Learning and Individual Differences. 2007;17:328-343.
11. Carpenter P. A.,Just M. A.,Shell P.What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test.Psychological Review. 1990;97:404-431.
12. Carr M.,Alexander J.,Schwanenflugel P.Where gifted children do and do not excel on metacognitive tasks.Roeper Review. 1996;18:212-217.
13. Carr M.,Taasoobshirazi G.Metacognition: A recent review of research, theory, and perspectives. Shaughnessy M. F.Veenman M. V. J.Kleyn-Kennedy C., ed. Hauppauge, NY: NOVA; 2008:109-125.
14. Dark V. J.,Benbow C. P.Differential enhancement of working memory with mathematical versus verbal precocity.Journal of Educational Psychology. 1991;83:48-60.
15. Dresel M.,Haugwitz M.The relationship between cognitive abilities and self-regulated learning: Evidence for interactions with academic self-concept and gender.High Ability Studies. 2005;16:201-218.
16. Dunlosky J.,Metcalfe J.Metacognition: A textbook for cognitive, educational, life span, and applied psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009:.
17. Education program for gifted students. (1998). Retrieved from http://www.doe.k12.ga.us/_documents/doe/legalservices/160-4-2-.38.pdf.
18. Flavell J. H.Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry.American Psychologist. 1979;34:906-911.
19. Flavell J. H.Metacognition, motivation, and understanding. Weinert F.Kluwe R., ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1987:21-29.
20. Glaser R.,Chi M. T. H.The nature of expertise. Chi M. T. H.Glaser R.Farr M. J., ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum; 1988:xv-xxviii.
21. Greene J. A.,Moos D. C.,Azevedo R.,Winters F. I.Exploring differences between gifted and grade-level students' use of self-regulatory learning processes with hypermedia.Computers in Education. 2008;50:1069-1083.
22. Hacker D. J.,Bol L.,Horgan D. D.,Rakow E. A.Test prediction and performance in a classroom context.Journal of Educational Psychology. 2000;92:160-170.
23. Hannah C. L.,Shore B. M.Metacognition and high intellectual ability: Insights from the study of learning-disabled gifted students.Gifted Child Quarterly. 1995;39:95-109.
24. Jaušovec N.Are gifted individuals less chaotic thinkers?.Personality and Individual Differences. 1998;25:253-267.
25. Keren G.Calibration and probability judgments: Conceptual and methodological issues.Acta Psychologica. 1991;77:217-273.
26. Martini R.,Shore B. M.Pointing to parallels in ability-related differences in the use of metacognition in academic and psychomotor tasks.Learning and Individual Differences. 2008;18:237-247.
27. Neber H.,Schommer-Aikins M.Self-regulated science learning with highly gifted students: The role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological and environmental variables.High Ability Studies. 2002;13:59-74.
28. Nietfeld J. L.,Cao L.,Osborne J. W.Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the postsecondary classroom.Journal of Experimental Education. 2005;74:7-28.
29. Nietfeld J. L.,Cao L.,Osborne J. W.The effect of distributed monitoring exercises and feedback on performance, monitoring accuracy, and self-efficacy.Metacognition and Learning. 2006;1:159-179.
30. Nietfeld J. L.,Schraw G.The effect of knowledge and strategy training on monitoring accuracy.Journal of Educational Research. 2002;95:131-142.
31. Raven J. C.Advanced progressive matrices, set II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1962:.
32. Schraw G.The effect of metacognitive knowledge on local and global monitoring.Contemporary Educational Psychology. 1994;19:143-154.
33. Schraw G.Measures of feeling-of-knowing accuracy: A new look at an old problem.Applied Cognitive Psychology. 1995;9:321-332.
34. Schraw G.Promoting general metacognitive awareness.Instructional Science. 1998;26:113-125.
35. Schraw G.,Dennison R. S.Assessing metacognitive awareness.Contemporary Educational Psychology. 1994;19:460-475.
36. Schraw G.,Moshman D.Metacognitive theories.Educational Psychology Review. 1995;7:351-371.
37. Schraw G.,Roedel T. D.Test difficulty and judgment bias.Memory & Cognition. 1994;22:63-69.
38. Schwanenflugel P. J.,Stevens T. P. M.,Carr M.Metacognitive knowledge of gifted children and nonidentified children in early elementary school.Gifted Child Quarterly. 1997;41:25-35.
39. Schwartz B. L.Working memory load differentially affects tip-of-the-tongue states and feeling-of-knowing judgments.Memory & Cognition. 2008;36:9-19.
40. Shore B. M.Friedman R. C.Shore B. M., ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2000:167-187.
41. Shore B. M.,Koller M.,Dover A.More from the water jars: A reanalysis of problem-solving performance among gifted and nongifted children.Gifted Child Quarterly. 1994;38:179-183.
42. Shore B. M.,Lazar L.IQ-related differences in time allocation during problem solving.Psychological Reports. 1996;78:848-850.
43. Sobel M. E.Sociological methodology. Leinhardt S., ed. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association; 1982:290-312.
44. Steiner H. H.A microgenetic analysis of strategic variability in gifted and average-ability children.Gifted Child Quarterly. 2003;50:62-74.
45. Steiner H. H.,Carr M.Cognitive development in gifted children: Toward a more precise understanding of emerging differences in intelligence.Educational Psychology Review. 2003;15:215-246.
46. Sternberg R. J.Giftedness as developing expertise: A theory of the interface between high abilities and achieved excellence.High Ability Studies. 2001;12:159-179.
47. Stone N. J.Exploring the relationship between calibration and self-regulated learning.Educational Psychology Review. 2000;12:437-475.
48. Tang M.,Neber H.Motivation and self-regulated science learning in high-achieving students: Differences related to nation, gender, and grade-level.High Ability Studies. 2008;19:103-116.
49. Thiede K. W.,Anderson M. C. M.,Therriault D.Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts.Journal of Educational Psychology. 2003;95:66-73.
50. White B.,Frederiksen J.A theoretical framework and approach for fostering metacognitive development.Educational Psychologist. 2005;40:211-223.
51. Yates J. F.Judgment and decision making. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1990:.
52. Yoon C.Self-regulated learning and instructional factors in the scientific inquiry of scientifically gifted Korean middle school students.Gifted Child Quarterly. 2009;53:203-216.