Self-Regulated learning and instructional factors in the scientific inquiry of scientifically gifted korean middle school students

Gifted Child Quarterly

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 203-216

  Yoon, Cho Hee ^a  

^a Chosun University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Scientific inquiry; Self regulated learning; The scientifically gifted

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650498316     PISSN: 00169862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0016986209334961     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adams, C.M., & Callahan, C.M. (1995). The reliability and validity of a performance task for evaluating science process skills. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 14-20.
2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Berg, C.A.R., Bergendahl, C.B., Lundberg, B.K.S., & Tibell, L.A.E. (2003). Benefiting from an open-ended experiment? A comparison of attitudes to, and outcomes of, an expository versus an open-inquiry version of the same experiment. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 351-372. (Pubitemid 37492118)
4. Chinn, C.A., & Malhotra, B.A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175-218. (Pubitemid 37230332)
5. Dweck, C.S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
6. Eccles, J., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., & Buchanan, C.M. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents' experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48, 90-101.
7. Ee, J., Moore, P.J., & Atputhasamy, L. (2003). High-achieving students: Their motivational goals, self-regulation and achievement and relationship to their teachers' goals and strategy-based instruction. High Ability Studies, 14, 23-39. (Pubitemid 37513043)
8. Enger, S.K., & Yager, R.E. (2001). Assessing student understanding in science: A standard-based K-12 handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
9. Eshel, Y., & Kohavi, R. (2003). Perceived classroom control, self-regulated learning strategies, and academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 23, 249-260.
10. Fowler, M. (1990). The Diet Cola test. Science Scope, 13, 32-34.
11. Gabel, C. (2001). Effectiveness of a scaffolded approach for teaching students to design scientific inquiries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado at Denver.
12. Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P.R. (1991, April). Student motivation and self-regulated learning: A LISREL model. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
13. Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P.R. (1994). Regulating motivation and cognition in the classroom: The role of self-schemas and self-regulatory strategies. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational application (pp. 127-153). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (1995). Investigative work in the science curriculum. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
15. Jones, A.T., Simon, S.A., Black, P.J., Fairbrother, R.W., & Watson, J.R. (1992). Open work in science: Development of investigations in schools. Hatfield, UK: Association for Science Education.
16. Kyle, D.C., Jr. (1980). The distinction between inquiry and scientific inquiry and why high school students should be cognizant of the distinction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17, 123-130.
17. Lott, G.W. (1983). The effect of inquiry teaching and advance organizers upon student outcomes in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 437-451.
18. Malpasss, J.R., O'Neil, J.F., Jr., & Hocevar, D. (1999). Self-regulation, goal orientation, self-efficacy, worry, and high-stakes math achievement for mathematically gifted high school students. Roeper Review, 21, 281-288.
19. Meece, J.L., Blumenfeld, P.C., & Hoyle, R.H. (1998). Students' goal orientation and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 514-523.
20. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
21. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
22. Neber, H., & Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). Self-regulated science learning with highly gifted students: The role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables. High Ability Studies, 13, 59-74.
23. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs and mathematical problem-solving of gifted students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 325-344. (Pubitemid 126164640)
24. Pajares, F., & Graham, L. (1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 124-139.
25. Pajares, F., & Kranzler, J. (1995). Self-efficacy beliefs and general mental ability in mathematical problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 426-443.
26. Perry, N.E. (1999). Young children's self-regulated learning and contexts that support it. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 715-729.
27. Pintrich, P.R., & DeGroot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
28. Pintrich, P.R., Roeser, R.W., & DeGroot, E.V. (1994). Classroom and individual differences in early adolescents' motivation and self-regulated learning. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 139-161.
29. Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W.J. (1991). Reliability and predictive validity of motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 901-813.
30. Polman, J.L. (2000). Designing project-based science: Connecting learners through guided inquiry. New York: Teachers College Press.
31. Posnanski, T.J. (2002). Professional development programs for elementary science teachers: An analysis of teacher self-efficacy beliefs and a professional development model. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 189-220.
32. Schunk, D.H. (1984). Self-efficacy perspective in achievement behavior. Educational Psychologist, 19, 48-58.
33. Schunk, D.H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 25, 71-86.
34. Schunk, D.H. (1995, April). Learning goals and self-evaluation: Effects on children's cognitive skill acquisition. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
35. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational application. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36. Snow, R.E., & Lohman, D.F. (1984). Toward a theory of cognitive aptitude for learning from instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 347-376.
37. Trumbull, D.J., Bonney, R., & Gridens-Schuck, N. (2005). Developing materials to promote inquiry: Lessons learned. Science Education, 89, 879-900. (Pubitemid 41728641)
38. Turner, J.C. (1995). The influence of classroom contexts on young children's motivation for literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 410-441.
39. VanTassel-Baska, J., Bass, G., Reis, R., Polan, D., & Avery, L.D. (1998). A national study of science curriculum effectiveness with high ability students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 200-211. (Pubitemid 128458688)
40. Williams, D.C., Ma, Y., Prejean, L., Ford, M., & Lai, G. (2007). Acquisition of physics content knowledge and scientific inquiry skills in a Robotis Summer Camp. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40, 201-216.
41. Zimmerman, B.J. (1990). Self-regulating academic learning and achievement: The emergence of a social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 173-201.
42. Zimmerman, B.J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational application (pp. 3-21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43. Zimmerman, B.J., & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 845-862.
44. Zimmerman, B.J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 51-59.
45. Zion, M., Michalsky, T., & Mevarech, Z.R. (2005). The effects of metacognitive instruction embedded within an asynchronous learning network on scientific inquiry skills. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 957-983. (Pubitemid 41007387)
46. Zusho, A., & Pintrich, P.R. (2003). Skill and will: The role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1081-1094. (Pubitemid 37496913)