Effects of working memory capacity and content familiarity on literal and inferential comprehension in l2 reading

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 235-266

  Alptekin, Cem ^a   Erçetin, Gülcan ^a  

^a BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959461073     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5054/tq.2011.247705     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Ackerman, P. L., & Kyllonen, P. C. (1991). Trainee characteristics. In J. E. Morrison (Ed.), Training for performance: Principles of applied human learning (pp. 193-229). West Sussex, England: John Wiley.
2. Adaskou, K., Britten, D., & Fahsi, B. (1990). Design decisions on the cultural content of a secondary English course for Morocco. ELT Journal, 44, 3-10. doi:10.1093/elt/44.1.3.
3. Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
4. Alptekin, C. (2006). Cultural familiarity in inferential and literal comprehension in L2 reading. System, 34, 494-508. doi:10.1016/j.system.2006.05.003.
5. Alptekin, C., & Erçetin, G. (2009). Assessing the relationship of working memory to L2 reading: Does the nature of comprehension process and reading span task make a difference? System, 37, 627-639. doi:10.1016/j.system.2009.09.007.
6. Alptekin, C., & Erçetin, G. (2010). The role of L1 and L2 working memory in literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 33, 206-219. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01412.x.
7. Andreassen, R., & Bra ten, I. (2010). Examining the prediction of reading comprehension on different multiple-choice tests. Journal of Research in Reading, 33, 263-283. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01413.x.
8. Ardila, A. (2003). Language representation and working memory with bilinguals. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 233-240. doi:10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00022-4.
9. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
10. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
11. Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 417-423. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2.
12. Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189-208. doi:10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00019-4.
13. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1994). Developments in the concept of working memory. Neuropsychology, 8, 485-493. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.8.4.485.
14. Brown, G. D. A., & Hulme, C. (1992). Cognitive psychology and second language processing: The role of short-term memory. In R. J. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 105-121). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
15. Budd, D., Whitney, P., & Turley, K. J. (1995). Individual differences in working memory strategies for reading expository text. Memory & Cognition, 23, 735-748. doi:10.3758/BF03200926.
16. Bunting, M. F., Conway, A. R. A., & Heitz, R. P. (2004). Individual differences in the fan effect and working memory capacity. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 604-622. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.07.007.
17. Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. V. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing, 11, 489-503. doi:10.1023/A:1008084120205.
18. Calvo, M. G. (2001). Working memory and inferences: Evidence from eye fixations during reading. Memory, 9, 365-381. doi:10.1080/09658210143000083.
19. Carpenter, P. A., Miyake, A., & Just, M. A. (1994). Working memory constraints in comprehension. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 1075-1122). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20. Carrell, P. L. (1987). Content and formal schemata in ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 461-481. doi:10.2307/3586498.
21. Carrell, P. L., & Eisterhold, J. (1983). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 553-573. doi:10.2307/3586613.
22. Castello, E. (2008). Text complexity and reading comprehension tests. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
23. Chang, Y. (2006). On the use of the immediate recall task as a measure of second language reading comprehension. Language Testing, 23, 520-543. doi:10.1191/0265532206lt340oa.
24. Chun, D. C., & Payne, J. S. (2004). What makes students click: Working memory and look-up behavior. System, 32, 481-504. doi:10.1016/j.system.2004.09.008.
25. Clarke, M. A. (1980). The short-circuit hypothesis of ESL reading-or when language competence interferes with reading performance. The Modern Language Journal, 64, 203-209. doi:10.2307/325304.
26. Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: A resourcedependent inhibition model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 354-373. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.123.4.354.
27. Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769-786. doi:10.3758/BF03196772.
28. Cook, V. (1997). The consequences of bilingualism for cognitive processing. In A. M. B. de Groot & J. F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 279-299). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Crossley, S. A., Greenfield, J., & McNamara, D. S. (2008). Assessing text readability using cognitively based indices. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 475-493.
30. Crossley, S. A., McCarthy, P. M., Louwerse, M. M., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). A linguistic analysis of simplified and authentic texts. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 15-30. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00507.x.
31. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6.
32. Daneman, M., & Hannon, B. (2007). What do working memory span tasks like reading span really measure? In N. Osaka, R. H. Logie, & M. D'Esposito (Eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of working memory (pp. 21-42). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33. Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 422-433. doi:10.3758/BF03214546.
34. Day, R. R., & Park, J. (2005). Developing reading comprehension questions. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17, 60-73.
35. Duff, S. C., & Logie, R. H. (2001). Processing and storage in working memory span. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 31-48. doi:10.1080/02724980042000011.
36. Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., & Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102-134). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
37. Engle, R. W., & Oransky, N. (1999). The evolution from short-term to working memory: Multi-store to dynamic models of temporary storage. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of cognition (pp. 514-555). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211-245. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.211.
39. Fincher-Kiefer, R. (1992). The role of prior knowledge in inferential processing. Journal of Research in Reading, 15, 12-27. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.1992.tb00018.x.
40. Fish, S. (1980). Interpreting the variorum. In J. P. Tompkins (Ed.), Reader-response criticism from formalism to poststructuralism (pp. 164-184). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
41. Georgiou, G. K., Das, J. P., & Hayward, D. V. (2008). Comparing the contribution of two tests of working memory to reading in relation to phonological awareness and rapid naming speed. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 302-318. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.00373.x.
42. Geva, E., & Ryan, E. B. (1993). Linguistic and cognitive correlates of academic skills in first and second languages. Language Learning, 43, 5-42. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1993.tb00171.x.
43. Goldman, S. R., & Durán, R. P. (1988). Answering questions from oceanography texts: Learner, task and text characteristics. Discourse Processes, 11, 373-412. doi:10.1080/01638538809544710.
44. Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
45. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-395. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371.
46. Hambrick, D. Z., & Engle, R. W. (2002). Effects of domain knowledge, working memory capacity, and age on cognitive performance: An investigation of the knowledge-is-power hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 339-387. doi:10.1006/cogp.2001.0769.
47. Hambrick, D. Z., & Oswald, F. L. (2005). Does domain knowledge moderate involvement of working memory capacity in higher-level cognition? A test of three models. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 377-397. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.004.
48. Hannon, B., & Daneman, M. (2001). A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 103-128. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.103.
49. Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M. (1992). L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 25-38. doi:10.1017/S0272263100010457.
50. Havik, E. (2005, September). Working memory and second language acquisition. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Conference of EUROSLA, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
51. Hill, D. R. (2008). Graded readers in English. ELT Journal, 62, 184-204. doi:10.1093/elt/ccn006.
52. Horiba, Y. (1996). Comprehension processes in L2 reading: Language competence, textual coherence, and inferences. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 433-463. doi:10.1017/S0272263100015370.
53. Horiba, Y. (2000). Reader control in reading: Effects of language competence, text type, and task. Discourse Processes, 29, 223-267. doi:10.1207/S15326950dp2903_3.
54. Jonz, J. (1989). Textual sequence and second language comprehension. Language Learning, 39, 207-249. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1989.tb00422.x.
55. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 98, 122-149. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122.
56. King, A. (2007). Beyond literal comprehension: A strategy to promote deep understanding of text. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 267-290). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
57. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163.
58. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
59. Kintsch, W., Healy, A. F., Hegarty, M., & Pennington, B. F. (1999). Models of working memory: Eight questions and some general answers. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 412-441). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
60. Kintsch, W., & Rawson, K. A. (2007). Comprehension. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading (pp. 209-226). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
61. Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
62. Lee, J. F. (1986). On the use of the recall task to measure L2 reading comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 8, 201-211. doi:10.1017/S0272263100006082.
63. Lee, S. (2007). Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students' reading comprehension and learning of passive form. Language Learning, 57, 87-118. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00400.x.
64. Leeser, M. J. (2007). Learner-based factors in L2 reading comprehension and processing grammatical form: Topic familiarity and working memory. Language Learning, 57, 229-270. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00408.x.
65. Mestre, J. P. (1986). The problem with problems: Hispanic students and math. Bilingual Journal, 32, 15-19.
66. Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 339-364). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
67. Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
68. Murata, K. (2007). Unanswered questions: Cultural assumptions in text interpretation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17, 38-59. doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00132.x.
69. Nassaji, H. (2002). Schema theory and knowledge-based processes in second language reading comprehension: A need for alternative perspectives. Language Learning, 52, 439-481. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00189.
70. Oakhill, J. V. (1984). Inferential and memory skills in children's comprehension of stories. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 31-39.
71. Osaka, M., & Osaka, N. (1992). Language-independent working memory as measured by Japanese and English reading span tests. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 287-289.
72. Osaka, M., Osaka, N., & Groner, R. (1993). Language-independent working memory: Evidence from German and French reading span tests. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 117-118.
73. Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 19, 228-242. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.04.003.
74. Payne, T. W., Kalibatseva, Z., & Jungers, M. K. (2009). Does domain experience compensate for working memory capacity in second language reading comprehension? Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 119-123. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.05.003.
75. Pearson, P. D., & Johnson, D. D. (1978). Teaching reading comprehension. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
76. Perfetti, C. A. (1989). There are generalized abilities and one of them is reading. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing and learning: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 307-335). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
77. Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2007). The acquisition of the reading comprehension skill. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading (pp. 227-247). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
78. Proverbio, A. M., Roberta, A., & Alberto, Z. (2007). The organization of multiple languages in polyglots: Interference and independence. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20, 25-49. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.01.003.
79. Pulido, D. (2009). How involved are American L2 learners of Spanish in lexical input processing tasks during reading? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 31-58. doi:10.1017/S0272263109090020.
80. Rupp, A. A., Ferne, T., & Choi, H. (2006). How assessing reading comprehension with multiple-choice questions shapes the construct: A cognitive processing perspective. Language Testing, 23, 441-474. doi:10.1191/0265532206lt337oa.
81. Sasaki, M. (2000). Effects of cultural schemata on students' test taking processes for cloze tests: A multiple data source approach. Language Testing, 17, 85-114. doi:10.1191/026553200671343210.
82. Schwartz, D. (1978). In dreams begin responsibilities. In J. Atlas (Ed.), In dreams begin responsibilities and other stories (pp. 1-9). New York, NY: New Directions Publishing Corporation.
83. Seigneuric, A., Ehrlich, M., Oakhill, J. V., & Yuill, N. M. (2000). Working memory resources and children's reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 13, 81-103. doi:10.1023/A:1008088230941.
84. Service, E., & Craik, F. I. M. (1993). Differences between young and older adults in learning a foreign vocabulary. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 608-623. doi:10.1006/jmla.1993.1031.
85. Sinclair, J. (2004). Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. London, England: Routledge.
86. Singer, M. (1994). Discourse inference processes. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 479-515). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
87. Singer, M., & Ritchot, K. F. M. (1996). The role of working memory capacity and knowledge access in text inference processing. Memory & Cognition, 24, 733-743. doi:10.3758/BF03201098.
88. Sundermeier, B., Virtue, S. M., Marsolek, C. J., & Van den Broek, P. (2005). Evidence for dissociable neural mechanisms underlying inference generation in familiar and less familiar scenarios. Brain and Language, 95, 402-413. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2005.03.005.
89. Swanson, H. L. (1999). Reading comprehension and working memory in learningdisabled readers: Is the phonological loop more important than the executive system? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 1-31. doi:10.1006/jecp.1998.2477.
90. Swanson, H. L., & Alexander, J. E. (1997). Cognitive processes as predictors of word recognition and reading comprehension in learning-disabled and skilled readers: Revisiting the specificity hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 128-158. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.128.
91. Swanson, H. L., & Berninger, V. (1995). The role of working memory in skilled and less skilled readers' comprehension. Intelligence, 21, 83-108. doi:10.1016/0160-2896(95)90040-3.
92. Swanson, H. L., & Howell, M. (2001). Working memory, short-term memory, and speech rate as predictors of children's reading performance at different ages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 720-734. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.4.720.
93. Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295-312. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5.
94. Taillefer, G. (1996). L2 reading ability: Further insights into the short-circuit hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 461-477. doi:10.2307/329726.
95. Tarchi, C. (2010). Reading comprehension of informative texts in secondary school: A focus on direct and indirect effects of readers' prior knowledge. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 415-420. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.04.002.
96. Towse, J. N., & Hitch, G. J. (1995). Is there a relationship between task demand and storage space in tests of working memory capacity? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 108-124. doi:10.1080/14640749508401379.
97. Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127-154. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(89)90040-5.
98. Van den Noort, M., Bosch, P., & Hugdahl, K. (2006). Foreign language proficiency and working memory capacity. European Psychologist, 11, 289-296. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.11.4.289.
99. Walker, L., Munro, J., & Rickards, F. W. (1998). Teaching inferential reading strategies through pictures. Volta Review, 100, 87-104.
100. Walter, C. (2004). Transfer of reading comprehension skills to L2 is linked to mental representations of text and to L2 working memory. Applied Linguistics, 25, 315-339. doi:10.1093/applin/25.3.315.
101. Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1996). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 51-79. doi:10.1080/027249896392801.
102. Whitney, P., Arnett, P. A., Driver, A., & Budd, D. (2001). Measuring central executive functioning: What's in a reading span? Brain and Cognition, 45, 1-14. doi:10.1006/brcg.2000.1243.
103. Yano, Y., Long, M. H., & Ross, S. (1994). The effect of simplified and elaborated texts. Language Learning, 44, 189-219. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01100.x
104. Yeung, A. S., Jin, P., & Sweller, J. (1998). Cognitive load and learner expertise: Splitattention and redundancy effects in reading with explanatory notes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 1-21. doi:10.1006/ceps.1997.0951.
105. Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Effects of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 920-933. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.920.