Beyond Literal Comprehension: A Strategy to Promote Deep Understanding of Text

Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions, and Technologies

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 267-290

  King, Alison ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956729257     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203810033-14     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Baker, L. (1985).Differences in standards used by college students to evaluate their comprehension of expository prose. Reading Research Quarterly 20 298-313.
2. Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., Barnes, M. A., and Bryant, P. E. (2001).Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory and Cognition 29 850-859.
3. Chi, M. T. H., deLeeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., and LaVancher, C. (1994).Eliciting self explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science 18 439-477.
4. Davoudi, M. (2005).Inference generation skill and text comprehension. The Reading Matrix 5 106-122.
5. Dominowski, R. L. (1998).Verbalization and problem solving. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice 1-23 Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
6. Graesser, A. C., and Person, N. K. (1994).Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal 31 104-137.
7. Graesser, A., Singer, M., and Trabasso, T. (1994).Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review 35 371-395.
8. Hacker, D. (1998).Definitions and empirical foundations. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. Graesser (Eds.) Metacognition in educational theory and practice 1-23 Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
9. King, A. (1989).Effects of self-questioning training on college students’ comprehension of lectures. Contemporary Educational Psychology 14 1-16.
10. King, A. (1991).Effects of training in strategic questioning on children’s problem-solving success. Journal of Educational Psychology 83(3), 307-317.
11. King, A. (1994a).ASK to THINK-TEL WHY©® Unpublished manuscript and materials, California State University San Marcos
12. King, A. (1994b).Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal 30 338-368.
13. King, A. (1996).A sequenced inquiry model of peer tutoring. npublished manuscript, California State University, San Marcos.
14. King, A. (1997).ASK to THINK-TEL WHY©®: A model of transactive peer tutoring for scaffolding higher-level complex learning. Educational Psychologist 32 221-235.
15. King, A. (1998).Transactive peer tutoring: Distributing cognition and metacognition. Educational Psychology Review 10 57-74.
16. King, A. (1999). Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. In A. O’Donnell and A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 3-37). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
17. King, A. (2007). Scripting collaborative learning processes: A cognitive perspective. In F. Fischer, H. Mandl, J. Haake, and I. Kollar (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives (pp. 13-37). New York: Springer.
18. King, A., Burton, S., Galloway, L., and Verdusco, E. (1996).Effects of metacognitive questioning during sequenced inquiry peer tutoring on fourth graders’ higher-level learning Unpublished manuscript, California State University San Marcos.
19. King, A., and Rosenshine, B. (1993).Effects of guided cooperative questioning on children’s knowledge construction. Journal of Experimental Education 61 127-148.
20. King, A., Staffieri, A., and Adelgais, A. (1998).Mutual peer tutoring: Effects of structuring tutorial interaction to scaffold peer learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 90 134-152.
21. Kintsch, W. (1974).The representation of meaning in memory Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
22. Kintsch, W. (1988).The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A constructiveintegration model. Psychological Review 95 163-182.
23. Kuhn, D. (1991).The skills of argument New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Lepper, M. R., Aspinwall, L. G., Mumme, D. L., and Chabey, R. W. (1990). Self-perception and social perception processes in tutoring: Subtle social control strategies of expert tutors. In Self-inference processes: The Ontario Symposium (pp. 217-237). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
25. Long, D. L., Oppy, B. J., and Seely, M. R. (1994).Individual differences in the time course of inferential processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20 1456-1470.
26. McGee, A., and Johnson, H. (2003).The effects of inference training on skilled and less killed comprehenders. Educational Psychology 23 49-59.
27. Mevarech, Z. R., and Kramarski, B. (1997).IMPROVE: A multidimensional method for teaching mathematics in heterogeneous classrooms.A merican Educational Research Journal 34 365-394.
28. Otero, J., and Kintsch, W. (1992).Failures to detect contradictions in text: What readers believe versus what they read. Psychological Science 3 229-235.
29. Paris, S. G., and Winograd, P. (1990).Promoting metacognition and motivation of exceptional children. Remedial and Special Education 11 7-15.
30. Perkins, D. N., Allen, R., and Hafner, J. (1983).Difficulties in everyday reasoning. In W. Maxwell (Ed.), Thinking: The expanding frontier 177-189 Philadelphia:Franklin Institute
31. Perkins, D. N., Jay, E., and Tishman, S. (1993).Beyond abilities: A dispositional theory of thinking. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 39 1-21.
32. Perkins, D. N., Tishman, S., Ritchart, R., Donis, K., and Andrade, A. (2000).Intelligence in the wild: A dispositional view of intellectual traits. Educational Psychology Review 12 269-293.
33. Piaget, J. (1985).The equilibrium of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. Pressley, M., Wood, E., Woloshyn, V. E., Martin, V., King, A., and Menke, D. (1992).Encouraging mindful use of prior knowledge: Attempting to construct explanatory answers facilitates learning. Educational Psychologist 27 91-109.
35. Rogoff, B. (1990).Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Rowe, M. B. (1986).Wait time: Slowing down may be a way to speeding up! Journal of Teacher Education 37 43-50.
37. Samuels, S. J., and Kamil, M. L. (1984).Models of the reading process. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research 185-224 New York: Longman
38. van den Broek, P., Young, M., and Linderholm, Y. T. T. (1999).The landscape model of reading:Inferences and the online construction of a memory representation. In S. R. Goldman and H. V. Oostendorp (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading 71-98 Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
39. Vonk, W., and Noordman, L. G. M. (1990).On the control of inferences in text understanding. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores D’Arcais, and K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading 447-464 Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
40. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Webb, N. M. (1989).Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research 13 21-39.
42. Webb, N., and Farivar, S. (1994).Promoting helping behavior in cooperative small groups in middle school mathematics. American Educational Research Journal 31 369-395.