Learner-based factors in L2 reading comprehension and processing grammatical form: Topic familiarity and working memory

Language Learning

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 229-270

  Leeser, Michael J ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Incidental acquisition; Input processing; Intake; Reading comprehension; Spanish future tense; Topic familiarity; Working memory

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250341277     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: 14679922     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00408.x     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Atkins, W. B., & Baddeley, A. D. (1998). Working memory and distributed vocabulary learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 537 552.
2. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford : Clarendon Press.
3. Baddeley, A. D. (1997). Human memory: Theory and practice (revised edition). East Sussex, UK : Psychology Press.
4. Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189 208.
5. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bower (Ed Recent advances in learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47 90). New York : Academic Press.
6. Barry, S., & Lazarte, A. (1995). Embedded clause effects on recall: Does high prior knowledge of content domain overcome syntactic complexity in students of Spanish? The Modern Language Journal, 79, 491 504.
7. Bower, G., Black, J., & Turner, T. (1979). Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 177 220.
8. Bransford, J., & Johnson, M. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717 725.
9. Britton, B. K., Stimson, M., Stennett, B., & Gülgöz, S. (1998). Learning from instructional text: Test of an individual-differences model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 476 491.
10. Bügel, K., & Buunk, B. (1996). Sex differences in foreign language text comprehension: The role of interests and prior knowledge. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 15 31.
11. Carrell, P. (1983). Three components of background knowledge in reading comprehension. Language Learning, 33, 183 207.
12. Carrell, P., & Wise, T. (1998). The relationship between prior knowledge and topic interest in second language reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 285 309.
13. Chen, Q., & Donin, J. (1997). Discourse processing of first and second language biology texts: Effects of language proficiency and domain-specific knowledge. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 209 227.
14. Chern, C. (1993). Chinese students' word-solving strategies in reading in English. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & J. Coady (Eds Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 67 82). Norwood, NJ : Ablex.
15. Chun, D. M., & Payne, J. S. (2004). What makes students click: Working memory and look-up behavior. System, 32, 481 503.
16. Conway, A. R., Cowan, N., & Bunting, M. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 331 335.
17. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450 466.
18. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neurosciences, 18, 193 222.
19. Ellis, N. C., & Schmidt, R. (1997). Morphology and longer distance dependencies: Laboratory research illuminating the A in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 145 171.
20. Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The reading span test and its predictive power for reading comprehension ability. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 136 158.
21. Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. London : Longman.
24. Graesser, A., & Nakamura, G. (1982). The impact of a schema on comprehension and memory. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 16, 59 109.
25. Haenggi, D., & Perfetti, C. A. (1992). Individual differences in reprocessing of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 182 192.
26. Haenggi, D., & Perfetti, C. A. (1994). Processing components of college-level reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 17, 83 104.
27. Hambrick, D. Z., & Engle, R. W. (2002). Effects of domain knowledge, working memory capacity, and age on cognitive performance: An investigation of the knowledge-is-power hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 339 387.
28. Hammadou, J. (1991). Interrelationships among prior knowledge, inference, and language proficiency in foreign language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 75, 27 38.
29. Harrington, M. (2004). Input processing as a theory of processing input. In B. VanPatten (Ed Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 79 92). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M. (1992). L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 25 38.
31. Haynes, M. (1993). Patterns and perils of guessing in second language reading. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & J. Coady (Eds Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 46 64). Norwood, NJ : Ablex.
32. Huibregtse, I., Admiraal, W., & Meara, P. (2002). Scores on a yes-no vocabulary test: Correction for guessing and response style. Language Testing, 19, 227 245.
33. Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 541 577.
34. Johnson, P. (1982). Effects on reading comprehension of language complexity and cultural background of text. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 169 181.
35. Juffs, A. (2004). Representation, processing and working memory in a second language. Transactions of the Philological Society, 102, 199 225.
36. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122 149.
37. Kintsch, W. (1992). How readers construct situation models for stories: The role of syntactic cues and causal inferences. In A. F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds From learning processes to cognitive processes (pp. 261 278). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
39. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford : Pergamon.
40. Kroll, J., Michael, E., Tokowicz, N., & Dufour, R. (2002). The development of lexical fluency in a second language. Second Language Research, 18, 137 171.
41. Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451 468.
42. Lavie, N., & Cox, S. (1997). On the efficiency of visual selective attention: Efficient visual search leads to inefficient distractor rejection. Psychological Science, 8, 395 398.
43. Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 133, 339 354.
44. Lee, J. F. (1986). Background knowledge and L2 reading. Modern Language Journal, 70, 350 354.
45. Lee, J. F. (1998). The relationship of verb morphology to second language reading comprehension and input processing. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 33 48.
46. Lee, J. F. (2002). The incidental acquisition of Spanish future tense morphology through reading in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 55 80.
47. Lee, J. F., & Wolf, D. (1997). A quantitative and qualitative analysis of the word-meaning inferencing strategies of L1 and L2 readers. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 1, 24 64.
48. Leeser, M. J. (2003). Second language comprehension and processing grammatical form: The effects of topic familiarity, mode, and pausing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
49. Leeser, M. J. (2004). The effects of topic familiarity, mode, and pausing on second language learners' comprehension and focus on form. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 587 615.
50. Leow, R. (1993). To simplify or not to simplify: A look at intake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 333 355.
51. Leow, R. (1995). Modality and intake in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 79 89.
52. Leow, R. (1997). The effects of input enhancement and text length on adult L2 readers' comprehension and intake in second language acquisition. Applied Language Learning, 8, 151 182.
53. Leow, R. (2000). Attention, awareness, and Focus on Form research: A critical overview. In J. F. Lee & A. Valdman (Eds Form and meaning: Multiple perspectives. Boston : Heinle & Heinle.
54. Leow, R. (2001). Do learners notice enhanced forms while interacting with the L2? An online and offline study of the role of written input enhancement in L2 reading. Hispania, 84, 496 509.
55. Leow, R., Egi, T., Nuevo, A. M., & Tsai, Y. C. (2003). The roles of textual enhancement and type of linguistic item in adult L2 learners' comprehension and intake. Applied Language Learning, 13, 93 108.
56. Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing interactional feedback and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181 209). Philadelphia : Benjamins.
57. Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. F. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as "language aptitude In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne (Eds Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 339 364). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
58. Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (Eds 1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. New York : Cambridge University Press.
59. Montrul, S., & Slabakova, R. (2003). Competence similarities between native and near-native speakers: An investigation of the preterite-imperfect contrast in Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 351 398.
60. Moravcsik, J., & Kintsch, W. (1993). Writing quality, reading skills, and domain knowledge as factors in text comprehension. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 360 374.
61. Nagy, W., Anderson, R., & Herman, P. (1987). Learning word meanings from context during normal reading. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 237 270.
62. Nassaji, H. (2002). Schema theory and knowledge-based processes in second language reading comprehension: A need for alternative perspectives. Language Learning, 52, 439 481.
63. Osaka, M., & Osaka, N. (1992). Language-independent working memory as measured by Japanese and English reading span tests. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 287 289.
64. Osaka, M., Osaka, N., & Groner, R. (1993). Language-independent working memory: Evidence from German and French reading span tests. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 117 118.
65. Overstreet, M. (1998). Text enhancement and content familiarity: The focus of learner attention. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2, 229 258.
66. Pashler, H. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
67. Peretz, A., & Shoham, M. (1990). Testing reading comprehension in LSP: Does topic familiarity affect assessed difficulty and actual performance? Reading in a Foreign Language, 7, 447 455.
68. Pulido, D. C. (2003). Modeling the role of second language proficiency and topic familiarity in second language incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Language Learning, 53, 233 284.
69. Pulido, D. C. (2004). The relationship between text comprehension and second language incidental vocabulary acquisition: A matter of topic familiarity? Language Learning, 54, 469 523.
70. Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory and the "noticing" hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 283 331.
71. Robinson, P. (2002). Effects of individual differences in intelligence, aptitude and working memory on adult incidental SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 211 266). Philadelphia : Benjamins.
72. Rott, S. (1999). The effect of exposure frequency on intermediate language learners' incidental vocabulary acquisition and retention through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 589 619.
73. Rumelhart, D. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. Attention and performance, 6, 573 603.
74. Rumelhart, D. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce, & W. Brewer (Eds Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33 58). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
75. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in L2 learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129 158.
76. Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1 63). Honolulu : University of Hawai'i.
77. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3 32). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
78. Service, E. (1992). Phonology, working memory, and foreign-language learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 21 50.
79. Service, E., & Kohonen, V. (1995). Is the relation between phonological memory and foreign language learning accounted for by vocabulary acquisition? Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 155 172.
80. Shohamy, E. (1984). Does the testing method make a difference? The case of reading comprehension. Language Testing, 1, 147 170.
81. Shook, J. D. (1994). FL/L2 reading, grammatical information, and the input to intake phenomenon. Applied Language Learning, 5, 57 93.
82. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
83. Tomlin, R., & Villa, H. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183 203.
84. Turner, M., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127 154.
85. VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to form and the content in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287 301.
86. VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ : Ablex.
87. VanPatten, B. (2004). Input processing in SLA. In B. VanPatten (Ed Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 5 31). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
88. VanPatten, B., Lee, J., & Ballman, T. (2000). ¿Sabías que... ? Beginning Spanish. New York : McGraw Hill.
89. Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1996). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 51 79.
90. White, J. (1998). Getting the learners' attention: A typographical input enhancement study. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds Focus on form in second language classroom acquisition (pp. 91 128). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
91. Wolf, D. (1993). A comparison of assessment tasks used to measure FL reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 77, 473 489.
92. Williams, J. N. (1999). Memory, attention, and inductive learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 1 48.
93. Wong, W. (2003). The effects of textual enhancement and simplified input on L2 comprehension and acquisition of non-meaningful grammatical form. Applied Language Learning, 14, 109 132.