The evolution of an automated reading strategy tutor: From the classroom to a game-enhanced automated system

New Science of Learning: Cognition, Computers and Collaboration in Education

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 283-306

  Jackson, G Tanner ^a   Dempsey, Kyle B ^a   McNamara, Danielle S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959298124     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-5716-0_14     Document Type: Chapter

References (63)

1. Alexander P. A. Murphy P. K.,Woods B. S. Duhon K. E. & Parker D. (1997). College instruction and concomitant changes in students' knowledge interest and strategy use: A study of domain learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology 22 125-146
2. Anderson J. R. Corbett A. T. Koedinger K. & Pelletier R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of Learning Sciences 4 167-207
3. Bandura A. (2000). Self-efficacy: The foundation of agency. InW. Perig & A. Grob (Eds.) Control of human behavior mental processes and consciousness: Essays in honor of the 60th birthday of August Flammer (pp. 17-33). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum
4. Bielaczyc K. Pirolli P. L. & Brown A. L. (1995). Training in self-explanation and self-regulation strategies: Investigating the effects of knowledge acquisition activities on problem solving. Cognition and Instruction 13 221-252
5. Boyer K. E. Phillips R.,Wallis M. Vouk M. & Lester J. (2008). Balancing cognitive and motivational scaffolding in tutorial dialogue. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 239-249). Canada: Montreal
6. Bransford J. Brown A. & Cocking R. (Eds.) (2000). How people learn: Brain mind experience and school. Washington DC: National Academy Press. Retrieved form http://www.nap.edu/html/howpeople1/.
7. Brown A. L. & Palincsar A. S. (1982). Inducing strategic learning from texts by means of informed self-control training. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities 2 1-17
8. Chi M. T. H. de Leeuw N. Chiu M. H. & Lavancher C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science 18 439-477
9. Conole G. Dyke M. Oliver M. & Seale J. (2004). Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design. Computers & Education 43 17-33
10. Cox R. McKendree J. Tobin R. Lee J. & Mayes T. (1999). Vicarious learning from dialogue and discourse. Instructional Science 27 431-458
11. Craig S. D. Driscoll D. M. & Gholson B. (2004). Constructing knowledge from dialog in an intelligent tutoring system: Interactive learning vicarious learning and pedagogical agents. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 13 163-183
12. Csikszentmihaly M. (1990). Flow the psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Collins
13. Dempsey K. B. Brunelle J. F. Jackson G. T. Boonthum C. Levinstein I. B. & McNamara D. S. (2009). MiBoard: Multiplayer interactive board game. In H.C. Lane A. Ogan & V. Shute (Eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Intelligent Educational Games at the 14th Annual Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 113-116). Brighton UK: AIED
14. Dynarski M. Agodini R. Heaviside S. Novak T. Carey N. Campuzano L. et al. (2007). Effectiveness of reading and mathematics software products: Findings from the first student cohort. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences
15. Foltz P. W. Kintsch W. & Landauer T. K. (1998). The measurement of textual coherence with Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes 25 285-307
16. Graesser A. C. Chipman P. Leeming F. & Biedenbach S. (2009). Deep learning and emotion in serious games. In U. Ritterfield M. Cody & P. Vorderer (Eds.) Serious games: Mechanisms and effects (pp. 81-100). Mahwah NJ: Routledge Taylor and
17. Francis. Graesser A. C. Hu X. & McNamara D. S. (2005). Computerized learning environments that incorporate research in discourse psychology cognitive science and computational linguistics. In A. F. Healy (Ed.) Experimental cognitive psychology and its applications: Festschrift in honor of Lyle Bourne Walter Kintsch and Thomas Landauer (pp. 183-194). Washington DC: American Psychological Association
18. Graesser A. C. Hu X. & Person N. (2001). Teaching with the help of talking heads. In T. Okamoto R. Hartley D. G. S. Kinshuk & J. P. Klus (Eds.) Proceedings IEEE international conference on advanced learning technology: Issues achievements and challenges (pp. 460-461). Los Alamitos CA: IEEE Computer Society
19. Graesser A. C. Wiemer-Hastings P. Wiemer-Hastings K. Harter D. Person N. & the TRG (2000). Using latent semantic analysis to evaluate the contributions of students in AutoTutor. Interactive Learning Environments 8 129-148
20. Gredler M. E. (2004). Games and simulations and their relationships to learning. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 571-582). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
21. Greene J. A. & Azevedo R. (2007). Adolescents' use of self-regulatory processes and their relation to qualitative mental model shifts while using hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research 36 125-148
22. Hu X. Graesser A. C. & the Tutoring Research Group (1998). Using WordNet and latent semantic analysis to evaluate the conversational contributions of learners in tutorial dialog. Proceedings of the international conference on computers in education Vol. 2 (pp. 337-341). Beijing: Springer
23. Jackson G. T. Boonthum C. &McNamara D. M. (2009). iSTART-ME: Situating extended learning within a game-based environment. Proceedings of the 14th international conference on artificial intelligence in Education
24. Jackson G. T. & Graesser A. C. (2007). Content matters: An investigation of feedback categories within an ITS. In R. Luckin K. R. Koedinger & J. Greer (Eds.) Proceedings of AIED 2007 Conference (pp. 127-134). Amsterdam: IOS Press
25. Kennedy D. (1998). Software development teams in higher education: An educator's view. In R. M. Corderoy (Ed.) ASCILITE '98. flexibility: The next wave? Proceedings (pp. 373-385). Wollongong: ASCILITE
26. Landauer T. & Dumais S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's Problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review 104 211-240
27. Landauer T. Foltz P. W. & Laham D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes 25 259-284
28. Landauer T. McNamara D. S. Dennis S. & Kintsch W. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum
29. Levinstein I. B. Boonthum C. Pillarisetti S. P. Bell C. & McNamara D. S. (2007). iSTART 2: Improvements for efficiency and effectiveness. Behavior Research Methods 39 224-232
30. Louwerse M. M. Graesser A. C. Olney A. & the TRG (2002). Good computational manners: Mixed-initiative dialog in conversational agents. In C. Miller (Ed.) Etiquette for human-computer work (pp. 71-76). Falmouth MA: Sea Crest Conference Center
31. Magliano J. P. Todaro S. Millis K. Wiemer-Hastings K. Kim H. J. & McNamara D. S. (2005). Changes in reading strategies as a function of reading training: A comparison of live and computerized training. Journal of Educational Computing Research 32 185-208
32. McNamara D. S. (2000a). Background knowledge assessment as a key to improving learning from text (Project JSMF 95-56). Final report submitted to James S. McDonnell Foundation Program in Cognitive Studies for Educational Practice
33. McNamara D. S. (2000b). Promoting active reading strategies to improve undergraduate students' understanding of science. Final report submitted to the ODU College of Sciences and ODU Office of Academic Affairs
34. McNamara D. S. (2004a). Aprender del texto: Efectos de la estructura textual y las estrategias del lector. Revista Signos 37 19-30
35. McNamara D. S. (2004b). SERT: Self-explanation reading training. Discourse Processes 38 1-30
36. McNamara D. S. Boonthum C. Levinstein I. B. & Millis K. (2007). Evaluating selfexplanations in iSTART: Comparing word-based and LSA algorithms. In T. Landauer D. S. McNamara S. Dennis & W. Kintsch (Eds.) Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 227-241). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum
37. McNamara D. S. Jackson G. T. & Graesser A. C. (2009). Intelligent tutoring and games. Proceedings of the 14th International conference on artificial intelligence in Education
38. McNamara D. S. Jackson G. T. & Graesser A. C. (in press). Intelligent tutoring and games (ITaG). In Y. Baek (Ed.) Gaming for classroom-based learning: Digital role playing as a motivator of study. Plainsboro NJ: IGE Global Press
39. McNamara D. S. Levinstein I. B. & Boonthum C. (2004). iSTART: Interactive strategy trainer for active reading and thinking. Behavioral Research Methods Instruments & Computers 36 222-233
40. McNamara D. S. O'Reilly T. Best R. & Ozuru Y. (2006). Improving adolescent students' reading comprehension with iSTART. Journal of Educational Computing Research 34 147-171
41. McNamara D. S. & Scott J. L. (1999). Training reading strategies. In M. Hahn & S. C. Stoness (Eds.) Proceedings of the twenty first annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 387-392). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum
42. McNamara D. S. & Shapiro A. M. (2005). Multimedia and hypermedia solutions for promoting metacognitive engagement coherence and learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research 33 1-29
43. Millis K. Kim H. J. Todaro S. Magliano J. P. Wiemer-Hastings K. & McNamara D. S. (2004). Identifying reading strategies using latent semantic analysis: Comparing semantic benchmarks. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers 36 213-221
44. Moreno R. & Mayer R. E. (2005). Role of guidance reflection and interactivity in an agent-based multimedia game. Journal of Educational Psychology 97 117-128
45. Muñoz B. Magliano J. P. Sheridan R. & McNamara D. S. (2006). Typing versus thinking aloud when reading: Implications for computer-based assessment and training tools. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers 38 211-217
46. Okan Z. (2003). Edutainment: Is learning at risk? British Journal of Educational Technology 34 255-264
47. Oliver R. (2002). Winning the toss and electing to bat: Maximizing the opportunities of online learning. In C. Rust (Ed.) Proceedings of the 9th improving student learning conference (pp. 35-44). Oxford: OCSLD
48. O'Reilly T. Best R. & McNamara D. S. (2004). Self-Explanation reading training: Effects for low-knowledge readers. In K. Forbus D. Gentner T. Regier (Eds.) Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 1053-1058). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum
49. O'Reilly T. Sinclair G. P. & McNamara D. S. (2004a). iSTART: A web-based reading strategy intervention that improves students' science comprehension. In Kinshuk D. G. S. & P. Isaías (Eds.) Proceedings of the IADIS international conference cognition and exploratory learning in digital age: CELDA 2004 (pp. 173-180). Lisbon Portugal: IADIS Press
50. O'Reilly T. Sinclair G. P. & McNamara D. S. (2004b). Reading strategy training: Automated verses live. In K. Forbus D. Gentner T. Regier (Eds.) Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 1059-1064). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum
51. O'Reilly T. Taylor R. S. & McNamara D. S. (2006). Classroom based reading strategy training: Self-explanation vs. reading control. In R. Sun & N. Miyake (Eds.) Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1887). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum
52. Palincsar A. S. & Brown A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction 1 117-175
53. Pashler H. Bain P. Bottage B. Graesser A. Koedinger K. McDaniel M. et al. (2007). Organizing instruction and study to improve student learning (NCER 2007-2004).Washington
54. DC: National Center for Educational Research Institute of Education Sciences U.S. Department of Education
55. Pressman R. S. (1997). Software engineering: A practitioner's approach (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc
56. Ricci K. Salas E. & Cannon-Bowers J. A. (1996). Do computer-based games facilitate knowledge acquisition and retention? Military Psychology 8(4) 295-307
57. Roy M. & Chi M. T. H. (2005). The self-explanation principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.) The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 271-286). New York: Cambridge University Press
58. Shapiro A. M. & McNamara D. S. (2000). The use of latent semantic analysis as a tool for the quantitative assessment of understanding and knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research 22 1-36
59. Taylor R. O'Reilly T. Sinclair G. &McNamara D. S. (2006). Enhancing learning of expository science texts in a remedial reading classroom via iSTART. Proceedings of the 7th international conference of learning sciences (pp. 765-770). Bloomington IN.
60. Thomas R. Cahill J. & Santilli L. (1997). Using an interactive computer game to increase skill and self-efficacy regarding safer sex negotiation: Field test results. Health Education & Behavior 24 71-86
61. Vygotsky L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press
62. Wiemer-Hastings P.,Wiemer-Hastings K. & Graesser A. (1999). Improving an intelligent tutor's comprehension of students with Latent Semantic Analysis. In S. P. Lajoie & M. Vivet (Eds.) Artificial intelligence in education (pp. 535-542). Amsterdam: IOS Press
63. Witmer B. G. & Singer M. J. (1994). Measuring immersion in virtual environments (Technical Rep. 1014). Alexandria VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences