Edutainment: Is learning at risk?

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 255-264

  Okan, Zühal ^a  

^a CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMATION; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; TECHNOLOGY;

COGNITIVE STRUCTURES; EDUTAINMENT; ELECTRONIC GAMES;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

EID: 0037934455     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8535.00325     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Apple M W (1991) The new technology: is it part of the solution or part of the problem in education? Computers in the Schools 8, 1/2/3, 59-81.
2. Bloom M V and Hanych D A (2002) Skeptics and true believers hash it out Community College Week 4, 14.
3. Buckingham D and Scanlon M (2000) That is edutainment: media, pedagogy and the market place. Paper presented to the International Forum of Researchers on Young People and the Media, Sydney.
4. Carney R N and Levin J R (2002) Pictorial illustrations still improve students" learning from text Educational Psychology Review 14, 1, 5-26.
5. Covington M and Müeller K (2001) Intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation: an approach/avoidance reformulation Educational Psychology Review 13, 2, 157-176.
6. Gandz J (1997) The death of teaching: the rebirth of education Ivey Business Quarterly 62, 1.
7. Guthrie J T and McGough K et al (1996) Concept-oriented reading instruction: an integrated curriculum to develop motivations and strategies for reading In L Baker et al (eds) Developing engaged readers in school and home communities Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ.
8. Guthrie J T and VanMeter et al (1996) Growth of literacy engagement: changes in motivations and strategies during concept-oriented reading instruction Reading Research Quarterly 31, 306-332.
9. Healey J M (1998) The "meme" that ate childhood Education Week October 7.
10. Hinostroza E and Rehbein L et al (2000) Developing educational software: a professional tool perspective Education and Information Technologies 5, 2, 103-117.
11. Kommers P, Jonassen D and Mayes J T (eds) (1992) Cognitive tools for learning Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
12. Lepper M R and Chabay R W (1985) Intrinsic motivation and instruction: conflicting views on the role of motivational processes in computer-based education Educational Psychologist 20, 4, 217-230.
13. Mann D (1996) Serious play Teachers College Record 97, 3, 446-470.
14. Mayer R E and Moreno R (2002) Animation as an aid to multimedia learning Educational Psychology Review 14, 1, 87-99.
15. Mayes J T (1992) Cognitive tools: a suitable case for learning in P Kommers, D Jonassen and J T Mayes (eds) Cognitive tools for learning Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
16. McDonald D (2000) Engaged learning: turning students on to learning
17. McKenzie J (2000) Beyond edutainment and technotainment From Now On 10, 1.
18. Middleton J A and Toluk Z (1999) First steps in the development of an adaptive theory of motivation Educational Psychologist 34, 2, 99.
19. Morrisett L (1996) Habits of mind and a new technology of freedom First Monday 1, 3.
20. Olson J K and Clough M P (2001) Technology's tendency to undermine serious study: a cautionary note The Clearing House 75, 1.
21. Oppenheimer T (1997) The computer delusion The Atlantic Monthly 280, 45-65.
22. Postman N (1985) Amusing ourselves to death: public discourse in the age of show business Penguin, New York.
23. Rea D (1998) Achievement motivation as a dynamical system: dancing on the "edge of chaos" with "serious fun." Educational Resources Information Centre (ED 415 287)
24. Roberts J (1998) Language Teacher Education Arnold, London.
25. Salomon G (1983) The differential investment of mental effort in learning from different sources Educational Psychologist 18, 1, 42-50.
26. ____ (1998) Novel constructivist learning environments and novel technologies: some issues to be concered with http://cybercon98.harvard.edu/wcm/sal_article.html
27. Salomon G and Almog T (1998) Educational psychology and technology: a matter of reciprocal relations Teachers College Record 100, 1, 222-241.
28. Setzer V and Monke L (2001) Challenging the applications: an alternative view on why, when and how computers should be used in education in Muffoletto R (ed) Education and technology: critical and reflective practices Hampton Press, Cresskill, New Jersey, 141-172.
29. Schnotz W (2002) Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays Educational Psychology Review 14, 1, 101-120.
30. Sloan D (1984) For the record: on raising critical questions about the computer in education Teachers College Record 85, 4, 539-547.
31. Soumala J and Shaughnessy M F (2000) An interview with Richard E. Mayer: about technology Educational Psychology Review 12, 4, 477-483.