QuikChange shuffling: A convenient and robust method for site-directed mutagenesis and random recombination of homologous genes

New Biotechnology

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 320-325

  An, Yingfeng ^a,b   Chen, Liming ^c   Sun, Shouhui ^a   Lv, Anguo ^b   Wu, Wenfang ^b  

^a SHENYANG AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF APPLIED ECOLOGY   (China)

^c NORTHEAST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHIMERIC GENES; DNA SHUFFLING; HOMOLOGOUS GENES; RECOMBINANT PLASMID; ROBUST METHODS; SELF-PRIMING; SITE DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS; SITE-DIRECTED MUTATION;

LINEARIZATION; MUTAGENESIS;

GENES;

DNA FRAGMENT;

ARTICLE; DNA LIBRARY; DNA SHUFFLING; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUIKCHANGE SHUFFLING; RECOMBINANT PLASMID; SITE DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS;

BASE SEQUENCE; DNA SHUFFLING; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTAGENESIS, SITE-DIRECTED; PLASMIDS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

EID: 79958028224     PISSN: 18716784     EISSN: 18764347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2011.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Stemmer W.P. Rapid evolution of a protein in vitro by DNA shuffling. Nature 1994, 370:389-391.
2. Stemmer W.P. DNA shuffling by random fragmentation and reassembly: in vitro recombination for molecular evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994, 91:10747-10751.
3. Crameri A., et al. DNA shuffling of a family of genes from diverse species accelerates directed evolution. Nature 1998, 391:288-291.
4. Smith G.P. The progeny of sexual PCR. Nature 1994, 370:324-325.
5. Parales R.E., Ditty J.L. Laboratory evolution of catabolic enzymes and pathways. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2005, 16:315-325.
6. Yuan L., et al. Laboratory-directed protein evolution. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2005, 69:373-392.
7. Wang T.W., et al. Mutant library construction in directed molecular evolution: casting a wider net. Mol. Biotechnol. 2006, 34:55-68.
8. Kikuchi M., et al. An effective family shuffling method using single-stranded DNA. Gene 2000, 243:133-137.
9. Kikuchi M., et al. Novel family shuffling methods for the in vitro evolution of enzymes. Gene 1999, 236:159-167.
10. Arnold F.H. When blind is better: protein design by evolution. Nat. Biotechnol. 1998, 16:617-618.
11. Michnick S.W., Arnold F.H. 'Itching' for new strategies in protein engineering. Nat. Biotechnol. 1999, 17:1159-1160.
12. Miyazaki K. Random DNA fragmentation with endonuclease V: application to DNA shuffling. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30:e139.
13. Abécassis V., et al. High efficiency family shuffling based on multi-step PCR and in vivo DNA recombination in yeast: statistical and functional analysis of a combinatorial library between human cytochrome P450 1A1 and 1A2. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28:e88.
14. Liu H., Naismith J.H. An efficient one-step site-directed deletion, insertion, single and multiple-site plasmid mutagenesis protocol. BMC Biotechnol. 2008, 8:91.
15. Braman J., et al. Site-directed mutagenesis using double-stranded plasmid DNA templates. Methods Mol. Biol. 1996, 57:31-44.
16. Scott S.P., et al. One-step site-directed mutagenesis of ATM cDNA in large (20kb) plasmid constructs. Hum. Mutat. 2002, 20:323.
17. Salerno J.C., et al. A single-stage polymerase-based protocol for the introduction of deletions and insertions without subcloning. Mol. Biotechnol. 2005, 29:225-232.
18. Chapnik N., et al. A one-tube site-directed mutagenesis method using PCR and primer extension. Anal. Biochem. 2008, 372:255-257.
19. Li J., et al. Site-directed mutagenesis by combination of homologous recombination and DpnI digestion of the plasmid template in Escherichia coli. Anal. Biochem. 2008, 373:389-391.
20. Tseng W.C., et al. A novel megaprimed and ligase-free, PCR-based, site-directed mutagenesis method. Anal. Biochem. 2008, 375:376-378.
21. Klock H.E., et al. Combining the polymerase incomplete primer extension method for cloning and mutagenesis with microscreening to accelerate structural genomics efforts. Proteins 2008, 71:982-994.
22. Wang W., Malcolm B.A. Two-stage polymerase chain reaction protocol allowing introduction of multiple mutations, deletions, and insertions, using QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis. Methods Mol. Biol. 2002, 182:37-43.
23. Cabré A., et al. Generation of eight adjacent mutations in a single step using a site-directed mutagenesis kit. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2004, 42:384-386.
24. Kumar R., Rajagopal K. Single-step overlap-primer-walk polymerase chain reaction for multiple mutagenesis without overlap extension. Anal. Biochem. 2008, 377:105-107.
25. Zheng L., et al. An efficient one-step site-directed and site-saturation mutagenesis protocol. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32:e115.
26. Reetz M.T., et al. Directed evolution of enantioselective enzymes: iterative cycles of CASTing for probing protein-sequence space. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2006, 45:1236-1241.
27. Hogrefe H.H. Fine-tuning enzyme activity through saturation mutagenesis. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010, 634:271-283.
28. Miyazaki K., Takenouchi M. Creating random mutagenesis libraries using megaprimer PCR of whole plasmid. Biotechniques 2002, 33:1033-1034. 1036-1038.
29. Hogrefe H.H., et al. Creating randomized amino acid libraries with the QuikChange multi site-directed mutagenesis kit. Biotechniques 2002, 33:1158-1160. 1162, 1164-1165.
30. Geiser M., et al. Integration of PCR fragments at any specific site within cloning vectors without the use of restriction enzymes and DNA ligase. Biotechniques 2001, 31:88-90. 92.
31. An Y., et al. A QuikChange-like method to realize efficient blunt-ended DNA directional cloning and site-directed mutagenesis simultaneously. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 397:136-139.
32. Jézéquel L., et al. Sequence-independent construction of ordered combinatorial libraries with predefined crossover points. Biotechniques 2008, 45:523-532.
33. Meyer M.M., et al. Library analysis of SCHEMA-guided protein recombination. Protein Sci. 2003, 12:1686-1693.
34. Hiraga K., Arnold F.H. General method for sequence-independent site-directed chimeragenesis. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 330:287-296.
35. Joern J.M., et al. Analysis of shuffled gene libraries. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 316:643-656.
36. Chaparro-Riggers J.F., et al. Revealing biases inherent in recombination protocols. BMC Biotechnol. 2007, 7:77.
37. Clarke T.F., Clark P.L. Rare codons cluster. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e3412.
38. Kane J.F. Effects of rare codon clusters on high-level expression of heterologous proteins in Escherichia coli. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1995, 6:494-500.
39. Kim S., Lee S.B. Rare codon clusters at 5'-end influence heterologous expression of archaeal gene in Escherichia coli. Protein Exp. Purif. 2006, 50:49-57.
40. Moore J.C., Arnold F.H. Directed evolution of a para-nitrobenzyl esterase for aqueous-organic solvents. Nat. Biotechnol. 1996, 14:458-467.