The Interactive Account of ventral occipitotemporal contributions to reading

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 246-253

  Price, Cathy J ^a   Devlin, Joseph T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENTAL DYSLEXIA; PRIOR EXPERIENCE; SENSORY INPUT; SPEECH SOUNDS; TOPDOWN; WRITTEN WORD;

SENSORY PERCEPTION;

USER INTERFACES;

BRAIN DAMAGE; BRAIN FUNCTION; DYSLEXIA; HUMAN; LEARNING; NEUROANATOMY; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; READING; REVIEW; TEMPORAL CORTEX;

DYSLEXIA; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; NEURAL PATHWAYS; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; READING; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TEMPORAL LOBE;

EID: 79957812481     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.001     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Xue G., et al. Language experience shapes fusiform activation when processing a logographic artificial language: an fMRI training study. Neuroimage 2006, 31:1315-1326.
2. Ben-Shachar M., et al. The development of cortical sensitivity to visual word forms. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 21615. 10.1162/jocn.2011.
3. Cohen L., et al. The pathophysiology of letter-by-letter reading. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:1768-1780.
4. Leff A.P., et al. Structural anatomy of pure and hemianopic alexia. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2006, 77:1004-1007.
5. Pflugshaupt T., et al. About the role of visual field defects in pure alexia. Brain 2009, 132:1907-1917.
6. Starrfelt R., et al. Too little, too late: reduced visual span and speed characterize pure alexia. Cereb. Cortex 2009, 19:2880-2890.
7. Dehaene S., Cohen L. Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron 2007, 56:384-398.
8. Dehaene S., et al. The neural code for written words: a proposal. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2005, 9:335-341.
9. Song Y., et al. The role of top-down task context in learning to perceive objects. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:9869-9876.
10. Starrfelt R., Gerlach C. The visual what for area: words and pictures in the left fusiform gyrus. Neuroimage 2007, 35:334-342.
11. Xue G., et al. Facilitating memory for novel characters by reducing neural repetition suppression in the left fusiform cortex. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e13204.
12. Amedi A., et al. Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4:324-330.
13. Buchel C., et al. A multimodal language region in the ventral visual pathway. Nature 1998, 394:274-277.
14. Costantini M., et al. Haptic perception and body representation in lateral and medial occipito-temporal cortices. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:821-829.
15. Price C.J., Devlin J.T. The myth of the visual word form area. Neuroimage 2003, 19:473-481.
16. Xue G., Poldrack R.A. The neural substrates of visual perceptual learning of words: implications for the visual word form area hypothesis. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2007, 19:1643-1655.
17. Devlin J.T., et al. The role of the posterior fusiform gyrus in reading. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2006, 18:911-922.
18. Price C.J., Friston K.J. Functional ontologies for cognition: the systematic definition of structure and function. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 2005, 22:262-275.
19. Woodhead Z.V., et al. The visual word form system in context. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:193-199.
20. Reinke K., et al. Functional specificity of the visual word form area: general activation for words and symbols but specific network activation for words. Brain Lang. 2008, 104:180-189.
21. Song Y., et al. Short-term language experience shapes the plasticity of the visual word form area. Brain Res. 2010, 1316:83-91.
22. Friston K. The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010, 11:127-138.
23. Hinton G.E. Learning multiple layers of representation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2007, 11:428-434.
24. Kassuba T., et al. The left fusiform gyrus hosts trisensory representations of manipulable objects. Neuroimage 2011, 56:1566-1577.
25. Luders H., et al. Basal temporal language area. Brain 1991, 114:743-754.
26. Cai Q., et al. The left ventral occipito-temporal response to words depends on language lateralization but not on visual familiarity. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:1153-1163.
27. Friston K., et al. A free energy principle for the brain. J. Physiol. Paris 2006, 100:70-87.
28. McClelland J.L., Rumelhart D.E. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception, part I: an account of basic findings. Psychol. Rev. 1981, 88:375-407.
29. Seidenberg M.S., McClelland J.L. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychol. Rev. 1989, 96:523-568.
30. Rueckl J., Seidenberg M.S. Computational modeling and the neural bases of reading and reading disorders. How Children Learn to Read 2009, 99-131. Psychology Press. K. Pugh, P. McCardle (Eds.).
31. Plaut D.C., et al. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychol. Rev. 1996, 103:56-115.
32. Coltheart M., et al. DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychol. Rev. 2001, 108:204-256.
33. Jacobs A.M., et al. Receiver operating characteristics in the lexical decision task: evidence for a simple signal-detection process simulated by the multiple read-out model. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2003, 29:481-488.
34. Hupe J.M., et al. Cortical feedback improves discrimination between figure and background by V1 V2 and V3 neurons. Nature 1998, 394:784-787.
35. Rao R.P., Ballard D.H. Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2:79-87.
36. Twomey T., et al. Top-down modulation of ventral occipito-temporal responses during visual word recognition. Neuroimage 2011, 55:1242-1251.
37. Yoncheva Y.N., et al. Auditory selective attention to speech modulates activity in the visual word form area. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:622-632.
38. Kherif F., et al. Automatic top-down processing explains common left occipito-temporal responses to visual words and objects. Cereb. Cortex 2011, 21:103-114.
39. Dehaene S., et al. Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4:752-758.
40. Price C.J., Mechelli A. Reading and reading disturbance. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2005, 15:231-238.
41. Price C.J., et al. Demonstrating the implicit processing of visually presented words and pseudowords. Cereb. Cortex 1996, 6:62-70.
42. Kronbichler M., et al. The visual word form area and the frequency with which words are encountered: evidence from a parametric fMRI study. Neuroimage 2004, 21:946-953.
43. Graves W.W., et al. Neural systems for reading aloud: a multiparametric approach. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:1799-1815.
44. Binder J.R., et al. Tuning of the human left fusiform gyrus to sublexical orthographic structure. Neuroimage 2006, 33:739-748.
45. Glezer L.S., et al. Evidence for highly selective neuronal tuning to whole words in the " visual word form area" Neuron 2009, 62:199-204.
46. Devlin J.T., et al. Morphology and the internal structure of words. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:14984-14988.
47. Wang X., et al. Left fusiform BOLD responses are inversely related to word-likeness in a one-back task. Neuroimage 2011, 55:1346-1356.
48. Duncan K.J., et al. Consistency and variability in functional localisers. Neuroimage 2009, 46:1018-1026.
49. Wright N.D., et al. Selective activation around the left occipito-temporal sulcus for words relative to pictures: individual variability or false positives?. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2008, 29:986-1000.
50. Szwed M., et al. Specialization for written words over objects in the visual cortex. Neuroimage 2011, 56:330-344.
51. Hegde J., Van Essen D.C. A comparative study of shape representation in macaque visual areas v2 and v4. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:1100-1116.
52. Connor C.E., et al. Transformation of shape information in the ventral pathway. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2007, 17:140-147.
53. Dehaene S., et al. How learning to read changes the cortical networks for vision and language. Science 2010, 330:1359-1364.
54. Goswami U., Ziegler J.C. A developmental perspective on the neural code for written words. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10:142-143.
55. Blau V., et al. Deviant processing of letters and speech sounds as proximate cause of reading failure: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of dyslexic children. Brain 2010, 133:868-879.
56. Brunswick N., et al. Explicit and implicit processing of words and pseudowords by adult developmental dyslexics: a search for Wernicke's Wortschatz?. Brain 1999, 122:1901-1917.
57. Richlan F., et al. A common left occipito-temporal dysfunction in developmental dyslexia and acquired letter-by-letter reading?. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e12073.
58. Shaywitz B.A., et al. Disruption of posterior brain systems for reading in children with developmental dyslexia. Biol. Psychiatry 2002, 52:101-110.
59. van der Mark S., et al. Children with dyslexia lack multiple specializations along the visual word-form (VWF) system. Neuroimage 2009, 47:1940-1949.
60. Wimmer H., et al. A dual-route perspective on poor reading in a regular orthography: an fMRI study. Cortex 2010, 46:1284-1298.
61. van der Mark S., et al. The left occipitotemporal system in reading: disruption of focal fMRI connectivity to left inferior frontal and inferior parietal language areas in children with dyslexia. Neuroimage 2011, 54:2426-2436.
62. Brem S., et al. Brain sensitivity to print emerges when children learn letter-speech sound correspondences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:7939-7944.
63. James K.H. Sensori-motor experience leads to changes in visual processing in the developing brain. Dev. Sci. 2010, 13:279-288.
64. Turkeltaub P.E., et al. Development of ventral stream representations for single letters. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1145:13-29.
65. McCrory E.J., et al. More than words: a common neural basis for reading and naming deficits in developmental dyslexia?. Brain 2005, 128:261-267.
66. Hillis A.E., et al. Restoring cerebral blood flow reveals neural regions critical for naming. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26:8069-8073.
67. Hillis A.E., et al. The roles of the " visual word form area" in reading. Neuroimage 2005, 24:548-559.
68. Marsh E.B., Hillis A.E. Cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying reading and naming: evidence from letter-by-letter reading and optic aphasia. Neurocase 2005, 11:325-337.
69. Gaillard R., et al. Direct intracranial FMRI, and lesion evidence for the causal role of left inferotemporal cortex in reading. Neuron 2006, 50:191-204.
70. Starrfelt R., et al. Visual processing in pure alexia: a case study. Cortex 2010, 46:242-255.
71. Sereno M.I., Tootell R.B. From monkeys to humans: what do we now know about brain homologies?. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2005, 15:135-144.
72. David S.V., et al. Spectral receptive field properties explain shape selectivity in area V4. J. Neurophysiol. 2006, 96:3492-3505.
73. Brincat S.L., Connor C.E. Underlying principles of visual shape selectivity in posterior inferotemporal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7:880-886.
74. Gross C.G., et al. Visual receptive fields of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the monkey. Science 1969, 166:1303-1306.
75. Changizi M.A., et al. The structures of letters and symbols throughout human history are selected to match those found in objects in natural scenes. Am. Nat. 2006, 167:E117-139.
76. Mumford D. The role of cortico-cortical loops. Biol. Cybern. 1992, 66:241-251.
77. Dayan P., et al. The Helmholtz machine. Neural Comput. 1995, 7:889-904.
78. Friston K., Kiebel S. Predictive coding under the free-energy principle. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2009, 364:1211-1221.