What teachers of science need to know about models: An overview

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1109-1130

  Oh, Phil Seok ^a   Oh, Sung Jin ^b  

^a Gyeongin National University of Education   (South Korea)

^b Dongducheon High School   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Model; Modelling; Science classroom; Science teachers; Scientific model

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957461578     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2010.502191     Document Type: Review

References (98)

1. Acher, A., Arca, M., & Sanmarti, N. (2007). Modeling as a teaching learning process for understanding materials: A case study in primary education. Science Education, 91, 398-418.
2. Adadan, E., Irving, K. E., & Trundle, K. C. (2009). Impacts of multi-representational instruction on high school students' conceptual understandings of the particulate nature of matter. International Journal of Science Education, 31(13), 1743-1775.
3. Ainsworth, S. (2008). The educational value of multiple-representations when learning complex scientific concepts. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner, & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education (pp. 191-208). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
4. Bailer-Jones, D. M. (2002). Scientists' thoughts on scientific models. Perspectives on Science, 10(3), 275-301.
5. Black, M. (1962). Models and metaphors: Studies in language and philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
6. Boulter, C. J., & Buckley, B. C. (2000). Constructing a typology of models for science education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 41-57). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
7. Buckley, B. C. (2000). Interactive multimedia and model-based learning in biology. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 895-935.
8. Buckley, B. C., & Boulter, C. J. (2000). Investigating the role of representations and expressed models in building mental models. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 119-135). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
9. Carmichael, P. (2000). Computers and the development of mental models. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 177-189). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
10. Chevallard, Y. (1988, August). On didactic transposition theory: Some introductory notes. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Research and Development in Mathematics Education, Bratislava, Czechoslovakia.
11. Clement, J. J. (1989). Learning via model construction and criticism: Protocol evidence on sources of creativity in science. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity: Assessment, theory and research (pp. 341-381). New York: Plenum Press.
12. Clement, J. J. (2000). Model based learning as a key research area for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1041-1053.
13. Clement, J. J. (2008). Creative model construction in scientists and students: The role of imagery, analogy, and mental simulation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
14. Clement, J. J., & Rea-Ramirez, M. A. (2008). Model-based learning and instruction in science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
15. Clement, J. J., Zietsman, A., & Monaghan, J. (2005). Imagery in science learning in students and experts. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education (pp. 169-184). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
16. Dunbar, K. (1999). How scientists build models in vivo science as a window on the scientific mind. In L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian, & P. Thagard (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 85-99). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
17. Erduran, S., & Duschl, R. A. (2004). Interdisciplinary characterizations of models and the nature of chemical knowledge in the classroom. Studies in Science Education, 40, 105-138.
18. Gentner, D. (2002). Analogy in scientific discovery: The case of Johannes Kepler. In L. Magnani & N. J. Nersessian (Eds.), Model-based reasoning: Science, technology, values (pp. 21-39). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
19. Giere, R. N. (1988). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Giere, R. N. (1999a). Science without laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Giere, R. N. (1999b). Using models to represent reality. In L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian, & P. Thagard (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 41-57). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
22. Giere, R. N., Bickle, J., & Mauldin, R. F. (Eds.) (2006). Understanding scientific reasoning (5th ed.). Toronto: Thomson Wadsworth.
23. Gilbert, J. K. (2005a). Visualization: A metacognitive skill in science and science education. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education (pp. 9-27). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
24. Gilbert, J. K. (Ed.) (2005b). Visualization in science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
25. Gilbert, J. K. (2008). Visualization: An emergent field of practice and enquiry in science education. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner, & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education (pp. 3-24). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
26. Gilbert, J. K., & Boulter, C. J. (Eds.) (2000). Developing models in science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
27. Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. J., & Elmer, R. (2000). Positioning models in science education and in design and technology education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 3-17). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
28. Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C., & Rutherford, M. (1998). Models in explanations. Part 1: Horses for courses? International Journal of Science Education, 20(1), 83-97.
29. Gilbert, J. K., Reiner, M., & Nakhleh, M. (Eds.) (2008). Visualization: Theory and practice in science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
30. Gilbert, S. W., & Ireton, S. W. (2003). Understanding models in earth and space science. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
31. Gobert, J. D. (2000). A typology of causal models for plate tectonics: Inferential power and barriers to understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 937-977.
32. Gobert, J. D., & Clement, J. J. (1999). Student-generated diagrams versus student-generated summaries on conceptual understanding of causal and dynamic knowledge in plate tectonics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 39-53.
33. Gobert, J. D., & Pallant, A. (2004). Fostering students' epistemologies of models via authentic model-based tasks. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 7-22.
34. Gobert, J., Snyder, J., & Houghton, C. (2002, April 1-15). The influence of students' understanding on model-based reasoning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LO, USA.
35. Grandy, R. (2003). What are models and why do we need them? Science & Education, 12, 773-777.
36. Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C. L. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 799-822.
37. Guthrie, R. D. (1984). Mosaics, allelochemics and nutrients: An ecological theory of late Pleistocene megafaunal extinctions. In P. S. Martin & R. G. Klein (Eds.), Quaternary extinctions: A prehistoric revolution (pp. 259-298). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
38. Halloun, I. A. (2004). Modeling theory in science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
39. Halloun, I. A. (2007). Mediated modeling in science education. Science & Education, 16, 653-697.
40. Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). A typology of school science models. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1011-1026.
41. Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York: Free Press.
42. Henze, I., van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2007). Science teachers' knowledge about teaching models and modelling in the context of a new syllabus on public understanding of science. Research in Science Education, 37, 99-122.
43. Izquierdo-Aymerich, M., & Aduriz-Bravo, A. (2003). Epistemological foundations of school science. Science & Education, 12, 27-43.
44. Johnson, S. K., & Stewart, J. (2002). Revising and assessing explanatory models in a high school genetics class: A comparison of unsuccessful and successful performance. Science Education, 86, 463-480.
45. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002a). Modelling, teachers' views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modellers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 369-387.
47. Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002b). Science teachers' knowledge about and attitudes towards the use of models and modelling in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(12), 1273-1292.
48. Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2003). Teachers' views on the nature of models. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1369-1386.
49. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
50. Khan, S. (2007). Model-based inquiries in chemistry. Science Education, 91, 877-905.
51. Koponen, I. T. (2007). Models and modelling in physics education: A critical re-analysis of philosophical underpinnings and suggestions for revisions. Science & Education, 16, 751-773.
52. Kozma, R., & Russell, J. (2005). Students becoming chemists: Developing representational competence. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education (pp. 121-146). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
53. Lemke, J. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourse of science (pp. 87-113). New York: Routledge.
54. Losee, J. (2001). A historical introduction to the philosophy of science (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Magnani, L., & Nersessian, N. J. (Eds.) (2002). Model-based reasoning: Science, technology, values. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
56. Magnani, L., Nersessian, N. J., & Thagard, P. (Eds.) (1999). Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
57. Maia, P. F., & Justi, R. (2009). Learning of chemical equilibrium through modelling-based teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5), 603-630.
58. Marquez, C., Izquierdo, M., & Espinet, M. (2006). Multimodal science teachers' discourse in modeling the water cycle. Science Education, 90, 202-226.
59. Martin, P. S. (1984). Prehistoric overkill: The global model. In P. S. Martin & R. G. Klein (Eds.), Quaternary extinctions: A prehistoric revolution (pp. 354-403). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
60. Michalchik, V., Rosenquist, A., Kozma, R., Kreikemeier, P., & Schank, P. (2008). Representational resources for constructing shared understanding in the high school chemistry classroom. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner, & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education (pp. 233-282). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
61. Miller, P. H. (2001). Developmental issues in model-based reasoning during childhood. Mind & Society, 4(2), 49-58.
62. Morgan, M. S. (2002). Model experiments and models in experiments. In L. Magnani & N. J. Nersessian (Eds.), Model-based reasoning: Science, technology, values (pp. 41-58). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
63. Morrison, M., & Morgan, M. S. (1999). Models as mediating instruments. In M. S. Morgan & M. Morrison (Eds.), Models as mediators: Perspectives on natural and social science (pp. 10-37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. Nakhleh, M. B., & Postek, B. (2008). Learning chemistry using multiple external representations. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner, & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education (pp. 209-231). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
65. National Research Council (NRC) (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
66. Nersessian, N. J. (1992). How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science (pp. 3-44). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
67. Nersessian, N. J. (1999). Model-based reasoning in conceptual change. In L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian, & P. Thagard (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 5-22). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
68. Nersessian, N. J. (2002). The cognitive basis of model-based reasoning in science. In P. Carruthers, S. Stich, & M. Siegal (Eds.), The cognitive basis of science (pp. 133-153). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. Oreskes, N. (2003). The role of quantitative models in science. In C. D. Canham, J. J. Cole, & W. K. Lauenroth (Eds.), Models in ecosystem science (pp. 13-31). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
70. Oversby, J. (2000). Models in explanations of chemistry: The case of acidity. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 227-251). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
71. Passmore, C., & Stewart, J. (2002). A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 185-204.
72. Ramadas, J. (2009). Visual and spatial modes in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 301-318.
73. Rapp, D. N., & Kurby, C. A. (2008). The 'ins' and 'outs' of learning: Internal representations and external visualization. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner, & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education (pp. 3-24). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
74. Reiner, M., & Gilbert, J. (2008). When an image turns into knowledge: The role of visualization in thought experimentation. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner, & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education (pp. 295-309). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
75. Reynolds, S. J., Johnson, J. K., Piburn, M. D., Leedy, D. E., Coyan, J. A., & Busch, M. M. (2005). Visualization in undergraduate geology courses. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education (pp. 253-266). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
76. Rogers, Y. (2008). Using external visualizations to extend and integrate learning in mobile and classroom settings. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner, & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education (pp. 89-102). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
77. Rotbain, Y., Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2006). Effect of bead and illustration models on high school students' achievement in molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 500-529.
78. Rowley-Jolivet, E. (2004). Different visions, different visuals: A social semiotic analysis of fieldspecific visual composition in scientific conference presentations. Visual Communication, 3, 145-175.
79. Russell, J., & Kozma, R. (2005). Assessing learning from the use of multimedia chemical visualization software. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education (pp. 299-332). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
80. Rutherford, M. (2000). Models in the experiments of physics: The case of light. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 253-269). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
81. Schwarz, C. V., & Gwekwerere, Y. N. (2007). Using a guided inquiry and modeling instructional framework (EIMA) to support preservice K-8 science teaching. Science Education, 91, 158-186.
82. Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D.,... Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632-654.
83. Schwarz, C. V., & White, B. Y. (2005). Metamodeling knowledge: Developing students' understanding of scientific modeling. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 165-205.
84. Shen, J., & Confrey, J. (2007). From conceptual change to transformative modeling: A case study of an elementary teacher in learning astronomy. Science Education, 91, 948-966.
85. Smit, J. J. A., & Finegold, M. (1995). Models in physics: Perceptions held by final-year prospective physical science teachers studying at South African universities. International Journal of Science Education, 17(5), 621-634.
86. Snyder, J. L. (2000). An investigation of the knowledge structures of experts, intermediates and novices in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 979-992.
87. Stewart, J., Hafner, R., Johnson, S., & Finkel, E. (1992). Science as model building: Computers and high-school genetics. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 317-336.
88. Suarez, M. (1999). Theories, models, and representations. In L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian, & P. Thagard (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 75-99). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
89. Suppe, F. (1972). What's wrong with the received view on the structure of scientific theories? Philosophy of Science, 39, 1-19.
90. Tsui, C.-Y., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Genetics reasoning with multiple external representations. Research in Science Education, 33(1), 111-135.
91. van der Valk, T., van Driel, J. H., & de Vos, W. (2007). Common characteristics of models in present-day scientific practice. Research in Science Education, 37, 469-488.
92. Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (1999). Teachers' knowledge of models and modelling in science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(11), 1141-1153.
93. Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2002). Experienced teachers' knowledge of teaching and learning of models and modelling in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 24(2), 1255-1272.
94. Van Joolingen, W. (2004, August 30-September 1). Roles of modeling in inquiry learning. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Joensuu, Finland.
95. Vosniadou, S. (2002). Mental models in conceptual development. In L. Magnani & N. J. Nersessian (Eds.), Model-based reasoning: Science, technology, values (pp. 353-368). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
96. Windschitl, M., & Thompson, J. (2006). Transcending simple forms of school science investigation: The impact of preservice instruction on teachers' understanding of model-based inquiry. American Educational Research Journal, 43(4), 783-835.
97. Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigation. Science Education, 92, 941-967.
98. Wynne, C. F., Stewart, J., & Passmore, C. (2001). High school students' use of meiosis when solving realistic genetics problems. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 501-515.