Using a guided inquiry and modeling instructional framework (EIMA) to support preservice K-8 science teaching

Science Education

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 158-186

  Schwarz, Christina V ^a   Gwekwerere, Yovita N ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847640572     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: 1098237X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.20177     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abraham, M. R. (1998). The learning cycle approach as a strategy for instruction in science. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education. London: Kluwer.
2. Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8(4), 269-282.
3. Atkin, J. M., & Karplus, R. (1962). Discovery or invention? The Science Teacher, 29(5), 45-51.
4. Bright, P., & Yore, L. (2002, April). Preservice teachers' beliefs about the nature of science and their influence on classroom practice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
5. Bruer, J. T. (1993). Schools for thought: A science of learning in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
7. Carey, S., & Smith, C. (1993). On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 28(3), 235-251.
8. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Crawford, B. A. (1999). Is it realistic to expect a preservice teacher to create an inquiry-based classroom? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(3), 175-194.
10. Driver, R. (1989). Students' conceptions and the learning of science: Introduction. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 481-490.
11. Edelson, D. C. (2001). Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 355-385.
12. Feurzeig, W., & Roberts, N. (Eds.). (1999). Computer modeling and simulation in science education. New York: Springer-Verlag.
13. Friedrichsen, P. M., & Dana, T. M. (2003). Using a card-sorting task to elicit and clarify science-teaching orientations. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(4), 291-309.
14. Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science. New York: Teacher's College Press.
15. Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Secondary teachers' knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and their impact on instruction. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 51-94). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
16. Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C. L. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 799-822.
17. Grossman, P. L. (1991). What are we talking about anyway? Subject matter knowledge of secondary English teachers. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 245-264). Greenwich, CT: JA1.
18. Hayes, M. T. (2002). Elementary preservice teachers' struggles to define inquiry-based science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(2), 147-165.
19. Justi, R. S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). Science teachers' knowledge about and attitudes towards the use of models and modelling in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(12), 1273-1292.
20. Lawson, A. E. (1995). Science teaching and the development of thinking. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
21. Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Bell, R. (2004). Instructing science in elementary classrooms. Boston: Pearson.
22. Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2000). Modeling in mathematics and science, In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology: Volume 5: Educational design and cognitive science (pp. 101-159). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., Strom, D., & Pligge, M. (2001). Similarity of form and substance: Modeling material kind. In S. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Lynch, S. (1997). Novice teachers' encounter with national science education reforms: Entanglement of intelligent interconnections? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(1) 3-17.
25. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95-13). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
26. Magnusson, S. J., Palinscar, A. S., Cutter, J., & Vincent, M. (2002). Supporting guided-inquiry instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(3), 88-91.
27. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
28. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
29. Reddy, M., Jacobs, P., McCrohon, C., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (1998). Creating scientific communities in the elementary classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
30. Roth, K. J. (1991). Learning to be comfortable in the neighborhood of science: An analysis of three approaches to elementary science teaching. In W. Saul & S. A. Jagusch (Eds.), Vital connections: Children, science, and books. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
31. Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Duschl, R., Schulze, S., & John, J. (1995). Students' understanding of the objectives and procedures of experimentation in the science classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 131-166.
32. Schwarz, C., Meyer, J., & Sharma, A. (in press). Technology, pedagogy, and epistemology: Opportunities and challenges of using computer modeling and simulation tools in elementary science methods. Journal of Science Teacher Education.
33. Schwarz, C., & White, B. (2005). Meta-modeling knowledge: Developing students' understanding of scientific modeling. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 165-205.
34. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
35. Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (1999). Teachers' knowledge of models and modeling in science. International Journal for Science Education, 21(11), 1141-1153.
36. Windschitl, M. (2004). Folk theories of "inquiry": How preservice teachers reproduce the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific method. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 481-512.