Different Visions, Different Visuals: A Social Semiotic Analysis of Field-Specific Visual Composition in Scientific Conference Presentations

Visual Communication

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 145-175

  Rowley Jolivet, Elizabeth ^a  

^a Polytech Orl ans   (France)

Author keywords

clause relations; geology visuals; medical visuals; multimodality; physics visuals; scientific conferences; social semiotics; textual metafunction; visual communication in science

Indexed keywords

EID: 84998146125     PISSN: 14703572     EISSN: 17413214     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/147035704043038     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Bastide, F. (1990) ‘The Iconography of Scientific Texts: Principles of Analysis’, in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds) Representation in Scientific Practice, pp. 187-229. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Bell, P. (2001) ‘Content Analysis of Visual Images’, in T. van Leeuwen and C. Jewitt (eds) Handbook of Visual Analysis, pp. 10-34. London: Sage.
3. Bertin, J. (1973) Sèmiologie graphique. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.
4. Cambrosio, A. Jacobi, D. and Keating, P. (1993) ‘ Ehrlich's “Beautiful Pictures” and the Controversial Beginnings of Immunological Imagery ’, Isis. 84: 662-699.
5. Claverie, J-M. (1993) ‘ La Communication scientifique en image ’, Alliage. 15: 12-19.
6. Coghill, B.M. and Wilson, A.H. (1993) ‘ Platinum Group Minerals in the Selukwe Subchamber, Great Dyke, Zimbabwe: Magmatic and Postmagmatic Influences on the Mineralization ’, paper delivered at the International Symposium on Mineralization related to Mafic and Ultramafic Rocks, Orlèans, France, 1–3 September.
7. Dagognet, F. (1969) Tableaux et langages de la chimie. Paris: Le Seuil.
8. Dressen, D. (2002) ‘Accounting for Fieldwork in Three Areas of Modern Geology: A Situated Analysis of Textual Silence and Salience’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.
9. Dressen, D. and Swales, J.M. (2000) ‘“Geological setting/cadre gèologique” in English and French Petrology Articles: Muted Indications of Explored Places’, in A.H. Jucker (ed.) Analysing Professional Genres, pp. 57-76. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
10. Firbas, J. (1992) Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Fyfe, G. and Law, J. (eds) (1988) Picturing Power. London: Routledge.
12. Goodwin, C. (1994) ‘ Professional Vision ’, American Anthropologist. 96(3): 606-633.
13. Hawkins, C. (1985) ‘Speaking at Meetings’, in C. Hawkins and M. Sorgi (eds) Research: How to Plan, Speak and Write about It, pp. 60-84. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
14. Hirschauer, S. (1991) ‘ The Manufacture of Bodies in Surgery ’, Social Studies of Science. 21: 279-319.
15. Hoey, M. (1983) ‘ The Place of Clause-Relational Analysis in Linguistic Description ’, ELR Journal. 4: 1-32.
16. Hoey, M. (1991) Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Hoey, M. (1994) ‘Signalling in Discourse: A Functional Analysis of a Common Discourse Pattern in Written and Spoken English’, in M. Coulthard (ed.) Advances in Written Text Analysis, pp. 26-45. London: Routledge.
18. Jacobi, D. (1985) ‘ La visualisation des concepts dans la vulgarisation scientifique ’, Culture technique. 14: 153-163.
19. Jewitt, C. and Oyama, R. (2001) ‘Visual Meaning: A Social Semiotic Approach’, in T. van Leeuwen and C. Jewitt (eds) Handbook of Visual Analysis, pp. 134-156. London: Sage.
20. Kostelnick, C. (1993) ‘Viewing Functional Pictures in Context’, in N. Roundy Blyler and C. Thralls (eds) Professional Communication: The Social Perspective, pp. 243-256. London: Sage.
21. Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. (1996) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
22. Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. (1998) ‘Front Pages: (The Critical) Analysis of Newspaper Layout’, in A. Bell and P. Garrett (eds) Approaches to Media Discourse, pp. 186-219. Oxford Blackwell.
23. Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. (2001) Multimodal Discourse. London: Arnold.
24. Krohn, R. (1991) ‘ Why Are Graphs So Central in Science? ’, Biology and Philosophy. 6: 181-203.
25. Kuhn, T. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Larkin, J.H. and Simon, H.A. (1987) ‘ Why a Diagram Is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words ’, Cognitive Science. 11: 65-99.
27. Lemke, J. (1998) ‘Multiplying Meaning: Visual and Verbal Semiotics in Scientific Text’, in J.R. Martin and R. Veel (eds) Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science, pp. 87-113. London: Routledge.
28. Lèvy-Leblond, J-M. (1984) L'Esprit de sel. Paris: Fayard.
29. Lynch, M. (1985) ‘ Discipline and the Material Form of Images: An Analysis of Scientific Visibility ’, Social Studies of Science. 15: 37-66.
30. Lynch, M. (1990) ‘The Externalized Retina: Selection and Mathematization in the Visual Documentation of Objects in the Life Sciences’, in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds) Representation in Scientific Practice, pp. 156-186. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Lynch, M. (1991) ‘ Science in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction: Moral and Epistemic Relations between Diagrams and Photographs ’, Biology and Philosophy. 6: 205-226.
32. Myers, G. (1995) ‘ Words and Pictures in a Biology Textbook ’, The Journal of Tesol France. 2(2): 113-126.
33. Ochs, E. and Jacoby, S. (1997) ‘ Down to the Wire: The Cultural Clock of Physicists and the Discourse of Consensus ’, Language in Society. 26: 479-505.
34. O'Halloran, K.L. (2000) ‘ Classroom Discourse in Mathematics: A Multisemiotic Analysis ’, Linguistics and Education. 10(3): 359-388.
35. O'Toole, M. (1994) The Language of Displayed Art. London: Leicester University Press.
36. Pinch, T. (1985) ‘ Towards an Analysis of Scientific Observation: The Externality and Evidential Significance of Observational Reports in Physics ’, Social Studies of Science. 15: 3-36.
37. Roth, W-M. and Bowen, G.M. (2000) ‘ Dècalages in Talk and Gesture: Visual and Verbal Semiotics of Ecology Lectures ’, Linguistics and Education. 10(3): 335-358.
38. Rowley-Jolivet, E. (1994) ‘ The Structural Role of Visuals in Oral Scientific Communication ’, paper presented at the Congrès de la SAES, Velenciennes, May.
39. Rowley-Jolivet, E. (1998) ‘La Communication scientifique orale: Etude des caractèristiques linguistiques et discursives d'un genre’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Bordeaux 2.
40. Rowley-Jolivet, E. (2000) ‘ Image as Text: Aspects of the Shared Visual Language of Scientific Conference Participants ’, ASp. 27–30: 133-154.
41. Rowley-Jolivet, E. (2002) ‘ Visual Discourse in Scientific Conference Papers. A Genre-Based Study ’, English for Specific Purposes. 21(1): 19-40.
42. Rowley-Jolivet, E. (forthcoming) ‘Visual Textual Patterns in Scientific Conference Presentations’, in D. Banks (ed.) Text as Texture. Paris: L'Harmattan.
43. Rudwick, M. (1976) ‘ The Emergence of a Visual Language for Geological Science 1760–1840 ’, History of Science. XIV: 149-195.
44. Schiess, R. (forthcoming) ‘Reading the Television Screen: Text, Texture, Screen Design’, in D. Banks (ed.) Text as Texture. Paris: L'Harmattan.
45. Shalom, C. (1993) ‘ Established and Evolving Spoken Research Process Genres: Plenary Lecture and Poster Session Discussions at Academic Conferences ’, English for Specific Purposes. 12: 37-50.
46. Smith, L.D. Best, L.A. Stubbs, D.A. Johnston, J. and Archibald, A.B. (2000) ‘ Scientific Graphs and the Hierarchy of the Sciences: A Latourian Survey of Inscription Practices ’, Social Studies of Science. 30(1): 73-94.
47. Van Leeuwen, T. (1991) ‘ Conjunctive Structure in Documentary Film and Television ’, Continuum. 5(1): 76-114.
48. Van Leeuwen, T. (1996) ‘Moving English: The Visual Language of Film’, in S. Goodman and D. Graddol (eds) Redesigning English: New Texts, New Identities, pp. 81-105. London: Routledge.
49. Ventola, E. Thompson, S. and Shalom, C. (eds) (2002) The Language of Conferencing. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
50. Winter, E.O. (1977) ‘ A Clause-Relational Approach to English Texts: A Study of Some Predictive Lexical Items in Written Discourse ’, Instructional Science. 6(1): 1-92.
51. Winter, E.O. (1994) ‘Clause Relations as Information Structure: Two Basic Text Structures in English’, in M. Coulthard (ed.) Advances in Written Text Analysis, pp. 46-68. London: Routledge.