The relation between DIBELS, reading comprehension, and vocabulary in urban first-grade students

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 546-567

  Riedel, Brant W ^a  

^a and Assessment ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35548929404     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RRQ.42.4.5     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. BARGER, J. (2003). Comparing the DIBELSOral Reading Fluency indicatorandthe North Carolina end of grade reading assessment (Tech. Rep.). Asheville: North Carolina Teacher Academy.
2. BUCK, J., & TORGESEN, J. (2003). The relationship between performance on a measure of oral reading fluency and performance on the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCRR Tech. Rep. No. 1), Tallahassee: Florida Center for Reading Research. Available: www.fcrr.nrg/TechnicalReports/ TechnicalReport1.pdf
3. COOK, R.G. (2003). The utility of DIBELS as a curriculum based measurement in relation to reading proficiency on high-stakes tests. Unpublished master's thesis, Marshall University Graduate College, Huntington, WV.
4. CTB/MCGRAW-HILL. (2003). TerraNova secondedition: California Achievement Tests technical report. Monterey, CA: Author.
5. DAANE, M.C., CAMPBELL, J.R., GRIGG, W.S., GOODMAN, M.J., & ORANJE, A. (2005, October). Fourth-grade students reading aloud: NAEP 2002 special study of oral reading. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Available: nces.ed.gov/nationsreport card/pdf/studies/2006469.pdf
6. FUCHS, L.S., FUCHS, D., & COMPTON, D.L. (2004). Monitoring early reading development in first grade: Word identification fluency versus nonsense word fluency. Exceptional Children, 71, 7-21.
7. FUCHS, L.S., FUCHS, D., HOSP, M.K., & JENKINS, J.R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239-256.
8. FUCHS, L.S., FUCHS, D., & MAXWELL, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9(2), 20-28.
9. GOOD, RH., & KAMINSKI, R.A. (2002). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Available: http://dibels.uore gon.edu.
10. GOOD, R.H., KAMINSKI, R.A., SHINN, M., BRATTEN, J., SHINN, M., LAIMON, D., SMITH, S., & FLINDT, N. (2004). Technical adequacy of DIBELS: Results of the Early Childhood Research Institute on measuring growth and development (Tech. Rep. No. 7). Eugene: University of Oregon.
11. GOOD, R.H., SIMMONS, D.C., & KAME'ENUI, E.J. (2001). The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 257-288.
12. GOOD, R.H., SIMMONS, D.C., KAME'ENUI, E.J., KAMINSKI, R.A., & WALLIN, J. (2002). Summary of decision rules for intensive, strategic, and benchmark instructional recommendations in kindergarten through third grade (Tech. Rep. No. 11). Eugene: University of Oregon.
13. GOODMAN, K.S. (2006). A critical review of DIBELS. In K.S. Goodman (Ed.), The truth about DIBELS: What it is, what it does (pp. 1-39). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
14. JOHNSON, D.S. (1996). Assessment for the prevention of early reading problems: Utility of Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills for predicting future reading performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
15. KAME'ENUI, E.J. (2002). An analysis of reading assessment instrumentsfor K-3- Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.
16. KAMINSKI, R.A., & GOOD, R.H. (1996). Toward a technology for assessing basic early literacy skills. School Psychology Review, 25, 215-227.
17. MANZO, K.K. (2005, September 28). National clout of DIBELS test draws scrutiny: Critics say reading tool's scope fails to justify its broad use. Education Week, 25, 1, 12.
18. MCKENNA, M.K., & GOOD, R.H. (2003). Assessing reading comprehension: The relation between DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency, DIBELS Retell Fluency, and Oregon State Assessment scores (Tech. Rep.). Eugene: University of Oregon.
19. MENARD, S. (1995). Applied logistic regression analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
21. PEARSON, P.D. (2006). Foreword. In K.S. Goodman (Ed.), The truth about DIBELS: What it is, what it does (pp. v-xix). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
22. PRESSLEY, M., HILDEN, K., & SHANKLAND, R. (2005). An evaluation of end-grade-5 Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS): Speed reading without comprehension, predicting little (Tech. Rep.). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Literacy Achievement Research Center.
23. ROBERTS, G., GOOD, R., & CORCORAN, S. (2005). Story retell: A fluency-based indicator of reading comprehension. School Psychology Quarterly, 20, 304-317.
24. SAMUELS, S.J. (2006, May). Introduction to reading fluency. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Reading Association, Chicago.
25. SHAW, R., & SHAW, D. (2002). DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency-based indicators of third grade reading skills for Colorado State Assessment Program (CSAP) (Tech. Rep.). Eugene: University of Oregon.
26. SWETS, J.A., DAWES, R.M., & MONAHAN, J. (2000). Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 1-26.
27. WILLIAMS, K.T. (2001). Technical manual: Group Reading Assessment and Diagnostic Evaluation. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
28. WILSON, J. (2005). The relationship of Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) Oral Reading Fluency to performance on Arizona Instrument to Measure Standards (AIMS) (Tech. Rep.). Tempe, AZ: Tempe School District No. 3.