A reliability and validity study of the dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills-modified

School Psychology Review

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 33-49

  Elliott, Jacquelyn ^a,b   Lee, Steven W ^a,c,d   Tollefson, Nona ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b Shawnee Heights Schools   (United States)

^c School Psychology Training Program   (United States)

^d Sch Equity/Excellence Model Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035632333     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Bagnato, S. J., Neisworth, J.T., & Munson, S. M. (1989). Linking developmental assessment and early intervention: Curriculum-based prescriptions (2nd ed.). Rockville, MD: Aspen.
2. Ball, E. W., & Blachman, B. A. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 49-66.
3. Blachman, B. A. (1984). Relationship of rapid naming ability and language analysis skills to kindergarten and first-grade reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 610-622.
4. Blachman, B.A. (1989). Phonological awareness and word recognition: Assessment and intervention. In A. B. Kamhi & H. W. Catts (Eds.), Reading disabilities: A developmental language perspective (pp. 133-158). Boston: College-Hill.
5. Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. (1985). Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
6. Burns, J. M., Collins, M. D., & Pausell, J. C. (1991). A comparison of intellectually superior preschool accelerated readers and nonreaders: Four years later. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 118-124.
7. Burstein, L. (1994). Performance-based assessment for accountability purposes: Taking the plunge and assessing the consequences. National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing. Los Angeles, CA. ED 3826760.
8. Clark, E. (1995). [Review of the Developing Skills Checklist.] In J. C. Conoley & J. C. Impara (Eds.), The twelfth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 278-281). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
9. CTB Macmillan/McGraw-Hill. (1990). Developing Skills Checklist. Riverside, CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill.
10. Cummings, J. A. (1994). [Review of the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised.] In J. C. Conoley & J. C. Impara (Eds.), The twelfth mental measurementsn yearbook(pp.1113-1116). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
11. Daly, E. J., Wright, J. A., Kelly, S. Q., & Martens, B. K. (1997). Measures of early academic skills: Reliability and validity with a first grade sample. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 268-280.
12. Deno, S. (1985). Curriculum-based measures: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
13. Deno, S., & Fuchs, L. (1987). Developing curriculum-based measurement systems for data-based special education problem solving. Focus on Exceptional Children, 19, 1-16.
14. Drieling, L., & Copeland, E. (1988, August). A model for the evaluation of kindergarten screening tests. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Atlanta.
15. Dunn, C. (1992). A validation study of the Detroit Tests of Learning Aptitude-Primary (2nd ed.). Diagnostique, 17, 266-272.
16. Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1985). Movement into reading: Is the first stage of printed word learning visual or phonetic? Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 163-179.
17. Felton, R. H., & Wood, F.B. (1989). Cognitive deficits in reading disability and attention deficit disorder. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 3-13.
18. Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Shankweiler, D. P., Katz, L., Liberman, I. Y., Stuebing, K. K., Francis, D. J., Fowler, A. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 6-23.
19. Fuchs, L. S. (1994). Integrating curriculum-based measures with instructional planning for students with learning disabilities. In N. C. Jordan & J. Goldsmith-Phillips (Eds.), Learning disabilities: New directions for assessment and intervention (pp. 166-196). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
20. Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1994). Must instructionally useful performance assessment be based in the curriculum? Exceptional Children, 61, 15-24.
21. Fuchs, L. S., Deno, S., & Mirkin, P. (1984). Effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Education Research Journal, 21, 449-460.
22. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1997). Use of curriculum-based measurement in identifying students with disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 30, 1-16.
23. Germann, G., & Tindal, G. (1985). An application of curriculum-based assessment: The use of direct and repeated measurement. Exceptional Children, 52, 244-265.
24. Good, R. H. (1994, April). New developments and extensions of CBM: Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills. Paper presented at the Council for Exceptional Children Annual Convention, Denver.
25. Good, R., Kaminski, R., Laimon, D., & Johnson, D. (1992). Advances in assessment for the primary prevention of early academic problems (Summary). The Oregon Conference Monograph, Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.
26. Herman, J. L., Aschbacher, P. R., & Winters, L. (1992). A practical guide to alternative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
27. Jackson, N. E., Donaldson, G. W., & Mills, J. R. (1993). Components of reading skills in post kindergarten precocious readers and level-matched second graders. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 181-206.
28. Kaminski, R. A., & Good, R. H. (1996). Toward a technology for assessing basic early literacy skills. School Psychology Review, 25, 215-227.
29. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1990). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, Inc.
30. Koretz, D., Stecher, B., Klein, S., & McCaffrey, D. (1994). The Vermont portfolio assessment program: Findings and implications. Educational Measurement: Issues & Practices 13, 5-16.
31. Lane, S., Stone, C. A., Ankenmann, R. D., & Liu, M. (1992, April). Empirical evidence for the reliability and validity of performance assessments. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
32. Linn, R. L., & Baker, E. L. (1996). Can performance-based student assessments be psychometrically sound? In J. B. Baron & D. P. Wolf (Eds.), Performance-based student assessment: Challenges and possibilities (pp. 84-103). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
33. Marston, D., & Magnusson, D. (1985). Implementing curriculum-based measurement in special and regular education settings. Exceptional Children, 52, 266-276.
34. Marston, D., & Magnusson, D. (1988). Curriculum-based measurement: District level implementation. In J. L. Graden, J. E. Zins, & M. J. Curtis (Eds.), Alternative educational delivery systems: Enhancing instructional options for all students (pp. 137-172). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
35. Mortelle, Y., & Smith, D. (1994,March). Relationship of the WIAT and WJ-R tests of achievement in a sample of students referred for learning disabilities. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists, Seattle, WA.
36. McGrew, K. S., Werder, J. K., & Woodcock, R. W. (1991). WJ-R technical manual. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.
37. Meisels, S. J., Wiske, M. S., & Tivnan, T. (1984). Predicting school performance with the early screening inventory. Psychology in the Schools, 21, 25-33.
38. Miller, W.H. (1995). Alternative assessment techniques for reading and writing. West Nyack, NY: The Center for Applied Research in Education.
39. Moss, P. A. (1992). Shifting conceptions of validity in educational measurement: Implications for performance assessment Review of Educational Research, 62, 229-258.
40. Prewett, P. N. (1992). The relationship between the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) and the WISC-R with referred students. Psychology in the Schools, 29, 25-27.
41. Prewett, P. N., & McCaffery, L. K. (1993). A comparison of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) with the Stanford-Binet, a two-subtest short form, and the Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement (K-TEA) brief form. Psychology in the Schools, 30, 299-304.
42. Share, D. L., Jorm, A. F., MacLean, R., & Matthews, R. (1984). Sources of individual differences in reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1309-1324.
43. Shavelson, R. J., Baxter, G. P., & Pine, J. (1992). Performance assessments: Political rhetoric and measurement reality. Educational Researcher, 21, 22-27.
44. Shinn, M. R. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement. New York: Guilford.
45. Shinn, M. R. (1995). Best practices in curriculum-based measurement and its use in a problem-solving model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology-III (pp. 547-567). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
46. Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., Knutson, N., & Tilly, D. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 459-479.
47. Shinn, M. R., & Hubbard, D. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement and problem-solving assessment: Basic procedures and outcomes. Focus on Exceptional Children, 24(5), 1-20.
48. Shull-Senn, S., Weatherly, M., Morgan, S. K., & Bradley-Johnson, S. (1995). Stability reliability for elementary-age students on the Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery-Revised (Achievement Section) and the Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 32, 86-92.
49. Smith, D. K. (1992, August). Relationship of the K-BIT and STT-R in a gifted sample. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. Washington, DC.
50. Stahl, S. A., & Murray, B. A. (1994). Defining phonological awareness and its relationship to early reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 221-234.
51. Stevenson, H. W., Parker, T., Wilkinson, A., Region, A., & Fish, E. (1976): Longitudinal study of individual differences in cognitive development and scholastic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 377-400.
52. Stipek, D., Feiler, R., Daniels, D., & Milburn, S. (1995). Effects of different instructional approaches on young children's achievement and motivation. Child Development, 86, 209-223.
53. Stoner, G. (1992). Validating curriculum-based measurement: Essential concerns from a behavioral perspective. School Psychology Quarterly, 7, 17-21.
54. Tindal, G. (1993). A review of curriculum-based procedures on nine assessment components. In J. J. Kramer (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement (pp. 25-64). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
55. Torgesen, J. K., & Bryant, B.R. (1994). Test of Phonological Awareness. Burlingame, CA: Psychological and Educational Publications, Inc.
56. Torgesen, J. K., Morgan, S. T., & Davis, C. (1992). Effects of two types of phonological awareness training on word learning in kindergarten children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 364-370.
57. Tramontana, M. G., Hooper, S. R., & Selzer, S. C. (1988). Research on the preschool prediction of later academic achievement: A review. Developmental Review, 8, 89-146.
58. Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. (1987). Phonological coding, phonological awareness, and reading ability: Evidence from longitudinal and experimental study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 321-363.
59. Wenner, G. (1995). Kindergarten screens as tools for the early identification of children at-risk for remediation or grade retention. Psychology in the Schools, 32, 249-254.
60. Wilson, M. S., & Reschly, D. J. (1996). Assessment in school psychology training and practice. School Psychology Review, 25, 9-23.
61. Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1990). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.