Identifying children in middle childhood who are at risk for reading problems

School Psychology Review

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 258-276

  Speece, Deborah L ^a   Ritchey, Kristen D ^b   Silverman, Rebecca ^a   Schatschneider, Christopher ^c,d   Walker, Caroline Y ^a   Andrusik, Katryna N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^c FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955694863     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Aizen, R., & Budescu, D. V. (2003). The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Methods, 5(2), 129148.
2. Budescu, D. V. (1993). Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 542-551.
3. Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K. (2004). Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: The influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and memory capacity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 671-681.
4. Catts, H. W., Adolf, S. M., & Weismer, S. E. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 278-293.
5. Corapton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Bryant, J. D. (2006). Selecting at-risk readers in first grade for early intervention: A two-year longitudinal study of decision rules and procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 394-409.
6. Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Elleman, A. M., & Gilbert, J. K. (2008). Tracking children who fly below the radar screen: Latent transition modeling of students with late-emerging reading disability. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 329-337.
7. Cutting, L. E., & Scarborough, H. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 277-299.
8. DiPerna, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (1999). Development and validation of the academic competence evaluation scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 17, 207-225.
9. DuPaul, G. J., Power, T., Anastopoulos, A., & Reid, R. (1998). ADHD Rating Scale-IV. New York: Guilford Press.
10. DuPaul, G. J., Volpe, R. J., Jitendra, A. K., Lutz, J. G., Lorah, K. S., & Gruber, R. (2004). Elementary school students with AD/HD: Predictors of academic achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 42(2), 285-301.
11. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299.
12. Fowler, A. E., & Swainson, B. (2004). Relationships of naming skills to reading, memory, and receptive vocabulary: Evidence for imprecise phonological representations of words by poor readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 54(2), 247-280.
13. Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Catts, H. W., & Tomblin, J. B. (2005). Dimensions affecting the assessment of reading comprehension. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 369-394). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Stuebing, K. K., Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, B. A., & Shaywitz, S. E. (2005). Psychometric approaches to the identification of LD: IQ and achievement scores are not sufficient. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 98-108.
15. Fuchs, L. S. (n.d.). Project PROACTMaze Reading Passages. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
16. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1992). Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review, 21, 45-58.
17. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptuaUzing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13(4), 204-219.
18. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Allinder, R. M. (1991). Effects of expert system advice wimin curriculum-based measurement on teacher planning and student achievement in spelling. School Psychology Review, 20, 49-66.
19. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239-256.
20. Fuchs, L. S., Hamlett, C. L., & Fuchs, D. (1990). Monitoring basic skills progress: Basic reading. Austin, TX: ProEd.
21. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6-10.
22. Gresham, F., & Elliott, S. (1990). Social Skills Rating System. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
23. Hoge, R. D., & Caladarci, T. (1989). Teacher-based judgments of academic achievement: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 59, 297-313.
24. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, 601, Stat. 2647 (2004).
25. Jenkins, J. R., Hudson, R. F., & Johnson, E. S. (2007). Screening for at-risk readers in a response to intervention framework. School Psychology Review, 36, 582600.
26. Leach, J. M., Scarborough, H. S., & Rescorla, L. (2003). Late emerging reading disabihties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 211-224.
27. MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L. G. (2000). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests, Fourth Edition, Forms S and T. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
28. Marston, D. B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculumbased measurement (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford Press.
29. Mather, N., Hammill, D. D., Allen, E. A., & Roberts, R. (2004). Test of Silent Word Reading Fluency: Examiner's manual. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
30. Miller, A. J. (2002). Subset selection in regression. (2nd ed.). New York: Chapman & Hall.
31. Mutilen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2007). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen.
32. National Assessment of Educational Progress, National Center for Educational Statistics, & Institute of Education Sciences. (2007). Fourth grade: The nation's report card. Retrieved on August 1, 2008, from http.// nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2007/20074962.pdf
33. National Center for Response to Intervention Technical Review Committee, (n.d.) Classification accuracy. Retrieved October 13, 2009, from http://www.rti4success. org/chart/screeningTools/scoringRubrics/accuracy.html
34. National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence- based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading inst. Report of the subgroups. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development.
35. Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 443-468.
36. Olson, R., Forsberg, H., Wise, B., & Rack, J. (1994). Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 243-277). Baltimore: Brookes.
37. Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Scarborough, H. S., Cutting, L. E., Speece, D. L., Sabatini, J. P., Olson, R. K., & Denckla, M. B. (2008, April). Can taking a cheap and easy route get the job done? Using quick group tasks to screen for reading disability. Paper presented at the IES/ETS conference on Assessing Reading in the 21st Century, Philadelphia, PA.
39. Semel, E., Wiig, E., & Secord, W. (2003). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: PsychCorp.
40. Shankweiler, D., Lundquist, E., Katz, L., Stuebing, K. K., Fletcher, J. M., Brady, S., et al. (1999). Comprehension and decoding: Patterns of association in children with reading difficulties. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 69-94.
41. Speece, D. L. (2005). Hitting the moving target known as reading development: Some thoughts on screening children for secondary interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 487-493.
42. Speece, D. L., & Case, L. P. (2001). Classification in context: An alternative approach to identifying early reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(4), 735-749.
43. Speece, D. L., & Cooper, D. H. (2004). Methodological issues in research on language and early literacy from the perspective of early identification and instruction. In C. A. Stone, E. R. Silliman, B. Ehren, & K. Apel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy disorders. (pp. 82-94). New York: Guilford Press.
44. Speece, D. L., & Ritchey, K. D. (2005). A longitudinal study of the development of oral reading fluency in young children at risk for reading failure. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 387-399.
45. Stage, S. A., Abbott, R. D., Jenkins, J. R., & Berninger, V. W. (2003). Predicting response to early reading intervention from verbal IQ, reading-related language abilities, attention ratings, and verbal IQ-word reading discrepancy: Failure to validate discrepancy method. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 24-33.
46. Stuebing, K. K., Fletcher, J. M., LeDoux, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2002). Validity of IQ-discrepancy classifications of reading disabilities: A meta-analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 59(2), 469-518.
47. Stothard, S. E., & Hulme, C. (1996). A comparison of reading comprehension and decoding difficulties in children. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 93-112). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Swets, J. A. (1986). indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: Their ROCs and implied models. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 100-117.
49. Taylor, H., Anselmo, M., Foreman, A. L., Schatschneider, C., & Angelopoulos, J. (2000). Utility of kindergarten teacher judgments in identifying early learning problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 200-210.
50. Thompson, B. (1995). Stepwise regression and stepwise discriminant function analysis need not apply here: A guideline editorial. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 525-534.
51. Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K., Conway, T., & Rose, E. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33-58.
52. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of Word Reading Efficiency: Examiner's manual. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
53. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E. R., Small, S. G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., et al. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601-637.
54. Vellutino, F. R., Tunmer, W. E., Jaccard, J. J., & Chen, R. (2007). Components of reading ability: Multivariate evidence for a convergent skills model of reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 3-32.
55. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., Hecht, S. A., Barker, T. A., Burgess, S. R., et al. (1997). Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33, 468-479.
56. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing: Examiner manual Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
57. Wolf, M., & Denckla, M. B. (2005). Rapid Automatized Naming and Rapid Alternating Stimulus tests, examiner's manual. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
58. Woodcock, R., McGrew, K., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities, Third Edition. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
59. Woodcock, R., McGrew, K., Mather, N., & Schrank, F. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement, Third Edition. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
60. Zeno, S. M., Ivens, S. H., Millard, R. T., & Duvuri, R. (1995). The educator's word frequency guide. Brewster, NY: Touchstone Applied Science Associates.